> first of all, how much money is there to distribute? how quickl"> > first of all, how much money is there to distribute? how quickl" property="og:description"> > first of all, how much money is there to distribute? how quickl">
science, it's a judgment." how do you begin to make that judgment when it comes to this? >> first of all, how much money is there to distribute? how quickly do we want to get the money out the e a lot of money, but considering the magnitude of the deaths and the physical injuries, you have to dampen expectation exctation. i doubt that anybody will be made whole by these allocations. >> yeah. so let's delve into that a little bit more. considering the injuries you said and what happened. how are you going to determine compensation for the families of the people who died? can you assign the same value to the life of an 8-year-old boy as a 26-year-old police officer, for example? >> you most certainly can. all lives are equal in my mind. this is not a litigation or a tort case where the stockbroker or the banker should get more than the waiter of the bus boy