imagine? let me go to robert from shy town, chicago. robert, what's your question hi, laura. >> thanks for taking my call. so i know it's very unusual for there to be two attorneys on the jury why do you think this happened? and which side will benefit more? >> well, you know, it's interesting because as most people have this assumption that a lawyer should not be or cannot sit on a jury. but more often than you think they really do, the risk of having lawyers, though on the jury if you're the prosecution, is that people might differ to the lawyers in that deliberation room, as opposed to the evidence presented, the statements of the attorneys they don't want that deferens. they don't want somebody else to be the expert when they have presented a full case. on the flip side, there might be deadly for the defense they may want a lawyer on that particular jury who can say, you know, they didn't meet these elements are in my experience, you know, i'm a lawyer that might be the cause of all of it, but you're right. it does give people pause. but there are different types of lawyers, right? there are those