benjamin netanyahu are going to great lengths to look and sound like they're on the same page. today, there were handshakes, photo ops, a whole lot of cameras in that room. they wore blue ties. a two-hour meeting followed by a lunch and lots of friendly language. >> as i've said, the bond between our two countries is unbreakable. >> israeli prime minister echoed the sentiment saying rendezvoused the and israel as one and the same. >> for them, you are the great satan. we're the little satan. for them, we are you and you are us. and you know something, mr. president? at least on this last point, i think they're right. we are you and you are us. we're together. >> but if you listen closely, it's not so cut and dry. there is reason to think the two countries may not be standing together so closely when it comes to iran. >> we do believe there is still a window that allows for a diplomatic resolution to this issue. >> and here's the prime minister. >> israel must have the ability always to defend itself by itself against any threat. and when it comes to israel's security, israel has the right, the sovereign right to make its own decisions. >> now, we spoke to several u.s. diplomats and senior military advisers today to try to read between the lines. most agreed with colonel cedrick layton. he told us quote the talks in d.c. make a unilateral israeli attack less likely in the next few months, but stresses, quote, r today's discussions bought us a little time. nothing r more. the bottom line is neither israel or the united states say they will accept a nuclear armed iran, but they don't agree on who when to intervene. they those today to repeat warnings about possible quote activities including a containment chamber used for explosive tests at iran's site. inspectors have been denied access to the site in recent months. the head of the iaea says -- with worries about iran causing oil prices to rise, can president obama keep israel from military action? will sanctions work? that really is perhaps the most crucial question we are facinging right now when it comes to iran. netanyahu's former chief of staff wrote an op-ed this weekend, the iranian american journalist is also -- you are side by side. let me start with you, neftali. obviously, this has been much reported on, leon panetta saying iran could be prepared to strike this spring. >> i think the good news from this summit is that obama made very clear that iran is a mortal danger to america's national interest and the entire world and that he's now adopting the doctrine of prevention rather than accepting a nuclear iran. the bad news is that words said in washington don't stop the insulation of centerfuges. as these talks are going on, chief inspector reported that iran has -- that they're moving insulations under ground and shortly, the window of opportunity to take out these facilities is going to be closed for israel and tha the crux of the problem. >> how big that window is. in your view. >> exactly. and i think it's important to emphasize there's going to be a certain period where israel can no longer do the job and essentially, obama is telling israel you depend on us. trust us. but does it make sense for the israeli nation to sort of outsource or very existence to obama? that's a very tough request to ask. i don't think we can accept it. >> i'm going to ask you more about timing in a moment. obviously, president obama is relying on them and has put crippling sanctions. he's put europe on board, but you are very skeptical as to what those might achieve. >> if the sanctions have the goal to change iran's behavior, that's not going to happen. nobody inside iran believes the sanctions are going to make iran change to american demands. demands they stop their nuclear program, which they claim is for peaceful purposes. and if the sanctions have the side goal of changing the regime by forcing the people to suffer so much they rise up, that's not going to happen either, so what is the goal? we talk about diplomacy, but there really isn't any. there have only be sanctions, only sticks and no carrots. >> what carrot could president obama offer? >> it depends on what your goal i is. contrary to what the israeli government says and our own says is that iran has not made a decision to build a bomb. iran has not moved forward with the weapons program. >> then sanctions themselves if that's true, are not justifiable. >> no. >> you can't say you're putting sanctions, you won't have a bomb if they're trying to do that. >> there is. completely inconsistent. >> i think no one in the world anymore has a doubt of iran's intent. i mean, you don't build just over the past two months, you don't install 2,600 centerfuges under ground if you're not going to use it for weapons. you don't enrich uranium 20% for peaceful reasons. you don't develop weaponized warheads for peaceful uses. i think that's behind us. regarding the sanctions, i believe that the current sanction architectture is too soft. >> one question. is it possible that iran is doing all these things because they want it to look like they're trying to go down that way because it's pride. they want to show they can and isn't supposed to and they want to show that they can do that even though they're not really? that this is bluffing? >> that's unlikely. our history teaches us something very simple. when a foreign leader says he's going to annihilate you, believe him. we're listening to what ahminedjad says, what ko mae says. we take this threat seriously and so does president obama. president obama has none of the doubts that my friend here is talking about. >> we have to remember -- >> some of these deputies have been indicating as such. coming out with this whole question on a tent. can i ask each of you, this is something more and more people have been asking about. what if iran gets nuclear weapons capability. some say so what. what's wrong with containment? >> i think the notion that a maniacal islamic regime will be able to contain ed with the sam rules of rationality apply with ahminedjad as they did with the soviet union is insane. i think the soviet union or anyone accept iran has never talked about annihilating a different nation and that's what iran is doing day in and day out. there's no doubt that iran is the world's biggest export of terror. they're killing people all over the world. they're the lifeline of those butchering syrians. >> obama has accused the revolutionary guard -- >> russia's a far more powerful country. if russia took away its support, he would probably fall, so that's unfair to say. to talk about them as saying they want to wipe another country off the map, they want to annihilate israel, that's not actually true. they've never said they want to, or they are going to build a bomb and destroy israel. that's just -- >> last week, one of their senior military officials said if israel threatens them, they're going to wipe them off. >> ahminedjad said israel might be must be wiped off the map. the shout of the iranian nation is forever deaf to israel. i've got 20 quotes of this maniacal leader of iran saying we're going to kill you. i take him seriously. >> final word to you. if it goes in that direction, could containment be a policy we should consider? >> absolutely. i think it should be if it goes in that direction. i think we still have a lot of time to get to the point to even goes there to begin with, but if it were to happen, i don't think iran is anymore dangerous as a country. it's not going to protect the regime and in terms of maniacal, stahlen was maniacal. how many millions of his own people did he kill? i don't think iran is ever going to use a nuclear weapon if they decide to build one. >> appreciate you coming on side by side. we're just hours away from super tuesday. one question, can mitt romney clinch the nomination tomorrow? and then the woman known as dr. feelgood is in custody. she wrote 25 prescriptions per day for these painkillers and the break in the case of a woman found murdered in her mercedes. will her husband be taken into custody? to keep big winter jobs on track, at&t provided a mobile solution that lets everyone from field workers to accounting, initiate, bill, and track work in real time. you can't live under a dome in minnesota, that's why there's guys like me. [ male announcer ] it's a network of possibilities -- helping you do what you do... even better. ♪ [♪...] >> announcer: with nothing but his computer, an identity thief is able to use your information to open a bank account in order to make your money his money. [whoosh, clang] you need lifelock, the only identity theft protection company that now monitors bank accounts for takeover fraud. lifelock: relentlessly protecting your identity. call 1-800-lifelock or go to lifelock.com today. [ male announcer ] this is lois. the day starts with arthritis pain... a load of new listings... and two pills. after a morning of walk-ups, it's back to more pain, back to more pills. the evening showings bring more pain and more pills. sealing the deal... when, hang on... her doctor recommended aleve. it can relieve pain all day with fewer pills than tylenol. this is lois... who chose two aleve and fewer pills for a day free of pain. [ female announcer ] and try aleve for relief from tough headaches. for a day free of pain. are you still sleeping? just wanted to check and make sure that we were on schedule. the first technology of its kind... mom and dad, i have great news. is now providing answers families need. siemens. answers. any way you want it. that's the way i need it. any way you want it. that's the way i need it. we just had ourselves a little "journey" moment there. yup. ♪ any way you want it ♪ that's the way you need it ♪ any way you want it we're just hours away from the biggest day in the republican presidential campaign. >> i guess president obama is going to be about the economy. and jobs and government being too big that i'm the guy you need to nominate. >> look into the eyes of the candidate, what they overcome and offer to this country. not just what money they have. but where's their soul, their conviction. >> ten states vote tomorrow. over 400 delegate at stake. which is more than all of the primary days so far combined. now, a lot of these states are up for grabs. just take a look at this one cnn poll from ohio, which everyone knows is a crucial state. dead heat. not even statistical. literal. between santorum and romney. historically, super tuesday is when the nomination the clinched. bush, clinton, mccain all e mernled after the big day, but tomorrow, nobody will walk away with the actual nomination. not as many states as last time and this whole proportional allocation thing, that's a real problem. some of those guys probably regret it now, unfortunately for the gop, they have caused this to drag out. this has been going on and destroying the party's image. four in ten americans say the process has left them with a less favorable impression of the republican party. okay, so great to have you with us. i appreciate it. let's talk first of all about what everybody needs to do tomorrow to win this thing. mitt romney is the guy people are looking at to see if he can do it. he's got to win a majority of delegates. >> yeah, i think the bar's pretty high, but he's won five states in a row. the big moe seems to be behind mitt romney. the key is to get out from behind his strength. ron paul alone with him. but can he win ohio? that would be a major momentum changer because santorum had double dig leads. >> kevin, can he win ohio? >> i do believe he can. i think john's right. this is a campaign that has been organizationally to win delegates. we're in a position to consolidate a lot of the different elements that have been competing across the party for who would make the best nominee and because governor romney has spent the last few contests focusing on the economy, he has done very well and helped serve his argument about electability. we'll sit here after these contests tomorrow and wake up wednesday morning. we'll have a candidate that is best positioned to bring the party together and that will be another big selling point. >> so rick santorum, what does he have to do tomorrow? ohio, tennessee and oklahoma. first of all, john, is he out if he doesn't win? >> i don't think anybody's out. the math means this will go on. nobody will clinch the nomination tomorrow. that's just the facts. it's a momentum test. but if rick santorum after that sweep he had, if he can't put some wins on the board, that's a major negative. now, this is neck and neck, but he should have a solid strength in oklahoma and tennessee, but he's got to put some real wins on the board to show he's going to be the last man standing against mitt romney. >> jamal, this is got to be for the guys you're advising, some good news. the long battle has hurt mitt romney significantly when it comes to approval rating. 40% unfavorable rating. which i believe is worse than any other recent candidate in american history who has gone on to win the nomination. according to the nbc "wall street journal" poll. you're i'm sure hoping the ground battle continues, yeah? >> yeah. this is good not just for democrats, but because it's helping america to get a real eye in. the one thing that's true about presidential campaigns is they start to reveal who these people are as people. a couple of weeks ago when rick santorum said that going to college made barack obama, wanting kids to go to college made mitt romney a snob. he didn't have much to say. he used that bad word about the gorge town law student. mitt romney still didn't have a lot of say. that's the kind of thing that americans look for you to stand up and corral your people and say we've got too far. let's get back to the center of the debate. and that's what i think mitt romney -- >> he did give the you know, the least shutdown kind of comment about rush limbaugh. certainly rick santorum was much stronger in saying it was absurd. there's also been a backlash to the rush limbaugh situation. a hawaii station has dropped him as well. armed forces did not. he apologized again today saying he had dropped to the level of the left. here he is. >> i descended to their level. when i used those two words to describe sandra. that was my error. i became like them and i again, sincerely apologize for using those two words. >> at the -- when this first happened, what do you think went through mitt romney's head? he said that wasn't appropriate or words i would have used or something like that, but didn't say that was absurd or ridiculous. >> look, i don't think anybody is out there running for president tryinging to be the leader of the free world based on an arguments about that take place on talk radio and talk radio controversies. i think most people that run for president are running because they want to care care of very big things. the economy, national security. >> kevin, you're right, but the problem -- >> because they're looking at reasons why they can talk about the big issues that are affecting people in their lives, that's why they run for president. i think getting drawn into a lot of the cable talk is not one of those things that becomes a priority. >> the reality is of course that talk radio has been determining the talking points for far too many folks. that is a real problem of the party and the role of a real leader is to stand up and say stop, enough. to police their own. >> when bill clinton -- >> hold on, guys. >> what happened was -- >> let john finish. >> but as bill clinton did with sister, this has a real dynamic for the republican party, it alienates women. independent women. not just from talk radio, but from the conservative cause. that's the reason this resognating deeper. >> i think that's right and i think there's a lot of other issues where candidates can go out and address the real big concerns women have. whether it's education, health care, the overall economy whether than having it all into one incident with a radio talk show host. i think this was a discussion that a lot of people had in the country. took up a lot of space on cable news. when your question is how did the candidates handle this, candidates have to go out and talk about what they believe are the big issues. the bigger issues that are driving the american electorate's decision when chooses a president. >> thanks very much to all three. we simply hit pause. now to california where an l.a. county doctor has been arrested for murder after three of her patients died from prescription drug overdoses. the allegation was that three otherwise healthy men were murdered by a deadly cocktail of prescription drugs. lisa sing was arrested last week after a lengthy undercover investigation into a case of a doctor turning out pill prescriptions by the thousands. investigators say she wrote as many as 27,000 prescriptions in three years. that's 25 prescriptions a day, 365 days a year. it seems to be an extraordinary amount of prescription drugs moving out of a strip mall out of a california freeway. the murder charge itself. that has never happened in california and is rare nationwide. >> as you know, we have prosecuted cases charging involuntary manslaughter, most recently, conrad murray in the michael jackson case, but this was a little l different. this involves multiple victims and a large amount of undercover work by both the dea and state medical board. >> the sting operation went on for years. miguel marquez is working the e story for us. obviously, usually in l.a., but wonderful to have you here tonight. how was she doing this? >> it was so unbelievably simple. you'd walk into our office with a back problem. you'd tell her about it. and she would prescribe anything you wanted, anything she could at several different pharmacies to cover her tracks. i pulled some of the names. everything from ox con tin, xanax, hydromorphone, morphine, the list goes on and on. >> it was very clear that people who had problems or addictions would go to her and she knew what she is doing. >> they were coming from other parts of the country. from seizure seizu >> 27,000 prescriptions over three years is the alleged amount. how much money would chef made from that? >> she made millions. there was one indication that she charged $110 per visit. if you look at that over the number of prescriptions she made, also an indication that she and her husband paid $5 million cash for an office building two years ago if that gives you an idea of how much money she was making. >> wow, this we were talking about this, this has not happened before. conrad murray was charged with involuntary manslaughter. she's charged with three counts of second degree murder. are they considering other charges? >> they are. it is possible there are more out there. some reporting done a couple of years ago on as many as six to eight people directly or indirectly related to prescriptions. >> it seems sort of like in this day and age, all these people are flocking to one person that would give you drugs, there would be a very blatant trail on social media. >> a variety of reasons. the people seeking the drugs for the most part wanted them and weren't out there advertising the fact they were looking for these drugs. also, she was very smart. she would make the prescriptions and smartest thing she did was to make the prescriptions at different pharmacies. you'd go in, she'd give you three different drugs from three different pharmacies. it was difficult r for them to see that this was happening. >> appreciate it. are nfl coaches paying players to ininjury star players? and canada's making moves on the international stage. a number of things they're doing to become a next superpower. i've had surgery and yes, i have occasional constipation. that's