rights legally to put this vaccination requirement in place? what does the law say here? >> i do. the law says osha must -- must do it if there's grave workplace dangers. the majority said, well, the dangers here are workplace and everywhere. the dissent said so what, there are workplace dangers, and they're accentuated in the workplace. that's enough, and i think they were right. >> the liberal dissent says this decision undercuts the capacity of the responsible federal officials acting well within the scope of their authority to protect american workers from grave danger. why didn't that argument win, harry? >> that's the broader theme, right? having administrative agencies with expertise and uniformity, it didn't win because the new majority doesn't like the administrative state very much, doesn't trust it and wants to scale it back. >> i want to see if you understand this, all right, because these are comments from