that he intends to testify. do you think that could change once the judge actually rules and which of his past legal run-ins can be introduced as evidenced are or do you think it's him just talking that no defense attorney would allow his client in this case to testify well, here's a scenario, anderson, i think could happen, and ellie mae agree with me on this that you know, he's saying he's going to testify. >> and then judge merchan and i agree fully with the la that although the prosecution has luck what are the wagon with a number of things that they'd like to introduce a go-to his credibility so they'll merge. john will give them some things and you could imagine that former president trump would say, well, you know, i was gonna testify, but this corrupt judge is letting all this evidence in that's irrelevant cases that i have on appeal and so forth and unfortunately, i can testify because he he's done me wrong, so to speak that's an out for him. i would think if he wants to take it.