we're going to bring you have the final installment of dr. sanjay gupta's look at the disease detectives and how -- and show you how two of their toughest cases including a little girl named kylie have turned out. tonight the sexual abuse allegations against one of most influential ministers in the country. bishop eddie long of the new birth missionary baptist church in atlanta. three men are suing bishop long accusing him of enticing them with cars, clothes, expensive jewelry in exchange for sexual favors. these are just allegations at this point but what makes them so startling is bishop long is leader of a mega church with 25,000 members but a major opponent of same-sex marriage and homosexuality. here's some of what he's preached in the past about gays and lesbians. >> and the problem today and the reason why society is like it is is because men are being feminized and women are becoming masculine. >> and everybody knows it's dangerous to enter an exit. you cannot say i was born this way. i don't care what scientists say. you can be converted. you were not born that way. let me pray with you. let me tell you, don't you be conformed to this world but be ye transformed, i don't know what i am, take your clothes down and i'll show you who you are. >> that's video from the southern poverty law center. these are photographs provided by the lawyer involved in this lawsuit, maurice robinson and anthony flagg, a third man, not shown, has also filed suit. these men were reportedly referred to by bishop long as spiritual sons. according to the flagg and robinson lawsuit, the they were 17 and 18 years old at the time. this is what his lawyer says happened. >> on that 18th birthday, bishop long engaged in oral sodomy with this young man. >> he says the bishop would discuss holy scripture to just five the sexual activity. bishop long denies all of the allegations. these photos of bishop long in tight gym clothes which appear to have been taken by the bishop himself were reportedly sent to another so-called spiritual son and released by the attorney involved in the lawsuit who you saw moments ago. bishop long's lawyer says the photos do not cooperate the charges and in a radio interview the attorney says he's a health advocate and weight lifter. earlier i spoke about the allegations with two ministers with deep experience in the intersection of religious, sexuality and in the case of one of the ministers, sexual scan dal. this summer ted haggard launched a smaller church with his wife, gail, author of "why i stayed." i also spoke with another minister in 2008 part of soul force which met with bishop long. >> obviously bishop long should be presumed innocent until proven guilty, but does it seem explainable to you that he would send out pictures of himself in skin-tight outfits to young men in his congregation? >> we know the pictures are there. we're not sure where they came from. but there was a movement several years ago where people were concerned about the direction of the church. and there was kind of a ma masculine movement. that doesn't mean he's guilty. >> professor troy, how closely do you follow what bishop long's church is doing? he was called, quote, one of the most homophobic black leaders in the anti-gay movement. is that an accurate description? >> i think there are a number of church leaders that come down rather hard on the lgbt community. i was part of the soul force american family outing that took lesbian and gay family members into new birth. >> you met with bishop long back in 2008. >> yes. >> what was your impression? >> the first impression i had was he was very hospitable to us but it was very clear there was a difference in theology. there was a very clear difference between what we believed and the oppressive theology that the church is known for. >> pastor ted, do you -- has there been a -- do you think this pastor was particularly homophobic? >> well, the times i met him i didn't get that indication. but i do think it's important that churches be able to embrace the type of theology that they believe in and be able to communicate it with clarity. when a church embraces a certain theological slant, people join with that, that's why we have freedom of religion. >> pastor troy? >> anderson, with all due respect, i agree we have the right to believe what we believe but it is absolutely hypocritical if you're going to stand in any pulpit across this country and preach against homosexuality when you have homosexual tendencies. the gospel of jesus christ hinges on truth. i'm a preacher and a same-gender loving man and as a requirement i cannot preach and not walk in truth around my sexuality. cannot do it. >> what about that? you weren't one of the leading figures among evangelicals that preach anti-gay rhetoric but you made comments about it being a sin, you came in support of the defense of marriage act saying it would be devastating for the children, did you feel like a hypocrite? >> i think every bible teacher struggles with some issues in the scripture. we're responsible to teach the bible. every one of us are growing in our prayer lives. we haven't achieved that. we teach sexual fidelity in marriage and the bible teaches that, we encourage people in that, but there are some times when adultery and different things come into the pulpit and come into the church. it's just like any ideal. we have police officers that get speeding tickets. we have -- we have people in congress that write our tax legislation that don't pay their taxes. >> but, pastor ted, there is a difference between, you know, somebody saying you should obey the law and you get a speeding ticket and somebody preaching something which is completely anthet cal to a deeply-held -- something -- >> i understand the point you're making. i understand the point you're making and i'm sympathetic to it, i just think it's important to understand the human condition. and this is why christ died for all of us. it's because we have people all over the country that have said i'm going to be married to you until death to us part, good times, bad times, et cetera. they end up divorced. people have ideals that they violate themselves because of things that go on in the human condition. and so i think all of us need to be aware of that before we start name-calling too quickly. >> i'm certainly not name-calling but i think there has to be a place in our religious discourse to critique scripture. because the same bible now, the premise i cannot stand for is that homosexuality is sin or wrong because the same scriptures used to lift up that said women could not preach, that say we could not eat pork or that two twains of fabric could not be twain and oppressive text. at some point we have to re-evaluate what we believe. we cannot couch it in we're all sinners and all have our shortcomings. no, there's things we have to give off, we have to let go of around oppressive theology. and homosexuality and homosexual oppression, homophobia in the church is one of those thing. >> you're promoting one biblical interpretation and respect the churches enough to promote a different one. >> that's what we do as theologians period. that's what we do as preachers of the gospel. we stand up and present a gospel that is either inclusive or exclusive. we make that choice. >> well, but that's what you're saying and that will work for your church and your congregation. but there may be a congregation down the street that wants to apply some different verses. >> if we're going to apply differences let's walk in truth, though. we have to walk in truth. >> everybody says -- >> we cannot preach a gospel that we do not live. if we know -- we shouldn't get up in pulpits and preach against it. >> pastor ted. >> -- >> everybody -- everybody thinks -- your claim, you're calling other people flanames, you're claiming to have the understanding, and you're inclusive yourself. >> i'm not claiming to have perfect understanding but what i am claiming to say is when we get up we make a choice as to whether we preach inclusion or exclusion, whether we're devi divisive with our theology and whether we walk in truth. >> if this is true, what do you think it says about this bishop? >> i think every person that loves the scriptures and loves god wants to be a better man than they are. and every one is growing from glory to glory to glory, every one is in a process under the word of god, and with one another and with the holy spirit and that we need to let that process continue. >> pastor troy, let me ask you the same question. >> if this is true there are internal contradictions playing out in the public eye. >> pastor ted haggard? >> i think there are internal contradictions in everyone about a variety of things. >> i agree with you but this gospel of liberation calls us all on the carpet. i'm not exclused, you weren't excluded and bishop long is not excluded either. >> but here's what i'm saying those who independently chose to call me on the carpet were not helpful. it was those who loved me, helped me, comforted me, and this type of broad based generalized analysis of people outside your group is not what's helpful to him or to the process. >> and what i'm saying is it didn't take a scandal for me to come out and walk in truth. i called myself -- >> that's your choice. >> there are other options besides waiting until we get into scandal to be called on the carpet around walking in truth. >> but that's every human being's choice. this is america. you can't use your religion to tierenize others. >> interesting discussion. pastor ted haggard, troy sanders, thank you. join the live chat right now. keeping them honest, the republicans' pledge to america. and later, sanjay gupta on the men and women racing to save little kylie. disease detectives with the pressure patient. >> for me it's easier to live day by day enjoying what i have in front of me as opposed to what it could, you know, what it might be down the road. because if we don't get there, then it's just going to be that much harder. seemed like a great day to save. oh, it's not just today. with our free loyalty program, you earn great stuff like accident forgiveness and bigger discounts just by staying with us. oh! ooh! so, what you're saying is, it gets even better with age. oh! tell me we're still talking about insurance. rewarding loyalty. now, that's progressive. call or click today. everyday i eat your soups, i save a lot of money. that's great. so, your rich and hearty soups have made me, rich and hearty. that's funny. i'm hearty because of your juicy steak, your potatoes... you're really, rich and happy. [ male announcer ] progresso. you gotta taste this soup. (announcer) everything you need to stay balanced on long trips. residence inn. with the best decongestant. my choice is clear. claritin-d. nothing works stronger, faster or longer for allergy congestion relief without drowsiness. get claritin-d at the pharmacy counter. live claritin clear. you hear a lot about republican chances of winning the house in november. today party leaders put out the blueprint, calling it a pledge to america. >> our government is out of control in washington and we need to rein it in and begin a new drive for a smaller, left costly and more accountable government in our nation's capital. >> at the white house they're calling it nothing new. >> you know, i think -- i think john boehner said and i think most of the american people will see that this is very much in line with what the republican party has proposed for the past many years. >> well, this is it, about 21 pages, repeal health care reform, the t.a.r.p. bailout, limiting support of fannie mae and freddie mac, spend more on missile defense. the proposal for cutting government spending and closing the budget deficit that have drawn the most fire from democrats and some conservatives saying the specifics aren't there and the numbers don't add up. let's talk about it now with paul begala, erick erickson and j.d. hayworth. erick, i read what you wrote about this. i think you said it was the worst thing to come out of washington since george mcclellan. you called it dreck. >> pretty much. >> what's the problem with it? >> it's ridiculous. for starters, the very first page, it decries the self-appointed elite, the ruling class imposing mandates on american citizens and businesses. flip over a few pages and it imposes mandates on businesses related to health care. in 2008 all the conservatives were upset about republican spending and democratic spending. guess what? the compromise on this plan is we're going to go back to that spending, that two years ago the conservatives were complaining about. it's very disappointing. i kind of prefer to be the party of no than the party of pretty much anything goes as long as we don't give you specific. >> mr. hayworth, what about that? >> i don't believe that erick's criticisms are without merit. obviously more can be done, let's not forget that the start of this country, the constitutional convention, patrick henry, a great patriot, was very suspicious of the constitutional convention saying, i smell a rat. so when you take a look at what is transpiring here, i think more appropriately it's what mark twain said, history doesn't repeat itself but it rhymes. 16 years ago house republicans signed a contract with america, but i think one thing that should be embraced by all conservative candidates, the folks that join the tea party u.s., people want to be hired, and how many times do job applicants tell those who will employ them exactly what they will be doing? no, the people need to be in charge. so my quick, easy and free advice to every conservative candidate is to sign the contract from america. >> paul, a lot of the language in this pledge, though, does sound like language from tea party protests. >> well, some of it. i -- some of the specifics were odd to me. first in a hardware store, the grassroots got screwed. they set up this thing called, what is it called, america speaking out, where they asked people to weigh in on a whole variety of issues. guess what? the number two issue on job creation coming into this from the american people, the grassroots mostly conservatives was stop subsidizing corporations that ship jobs overseas. that didn't make it into this. why? because the republicans support that. in fact, when it came up for a vote, it was 174-1 within the republicans in the house in favor of protecting tax breaks for corporations that ship jobs overseas. this looks much more like an elite washington lobbyist deal. in fact, the principal author of it is a lobbyist whose firm represented exxon, pfizer, aig, one of the great grassroots organizations of america. >> does paul from a point? >> this is exactly why the republicans didn't need to do this. put this in perspective. i agree with congressman hayworth the contract from america has much more substance to it than this dreck. look at the contract with america, it came out after 40 years of democratic rule in one page, 867 words. the republicans explained how they were going to be different from 40 years of democrats. we've now had a four-year gap between republican control of congress and democrats and now they've got to produce a document longer than the american constitution. >> mr. hayworth, i want to play a clip of an interview dana bash with john boehner. >> reporter: you talk about the rebellion out there. part of what those rebellious voters want to know is they want you to be specific because as you probably know, as you know, that maybe aren't enamored of the democrats but they don't trust you -- >> that's why we've outlined clearly in our pledge what we would and would not do. i think when it comes to spending we've been very specific about common sense steps we can do. >> reporter: give me one example. >> how about the unspent stimulus money? let's stop it. let's stop it and bring it back. >> erick, congressman hayworth, have they been really specific? >> what they've attempted to do here, and understand any time a proposal is offered in the hot house of american politics 40 days before a midterm election, it will be open to predictable criticism. but i think here, in washington terms, paul and his friends talk about the party of no, n-o, i think house republicans are trying to say we're the party of no, k-n-o-w. we know the american people want change. we're listening to what they're saying. no document will be perfect. i think it's an important start, but again, if there is unanimity among conservatives on this pn panel and how about it? we've got paul outnumbered 2-1 tonight, candidates would do well to sign the contract to america. >> i've done 24 local radio interviews across the country today, 24 in 20 states. one of the 24 radio hosts, all local conservative talk show hosts, liked this thing we says the republicans have a problem. but for perspective, the '94 contract wasn't what got the republicans to win, it was the democrats in '94 that did that. hopefully this will be the last night i ever have to consider this document again. but for are perspective, by 2000, the 98 programs the contract with america said would be eliminated had grown by 13%. >> paul are there specifics in this thing? >> not enough. i think dana did a good job of trying to pin boehner down. some specifics, this is one of the drums i've been banging, let's nom demonize the tea party, let's not patronize them. they're much more specific than boehner. privatizing social security, privatizing medicare and veterans benefits and ending unemployment compensation. they think it's good ideas but they're specific ideas. >> now you see, when you're taking a look at politics from paul begala, colored glasses, you get fear instead of hope. this is what paul is running with and is this is why you're going to see a change in november. >> clearly the -- >> the extreme overreach is the obama administration spending exponentially higher. >> are you saying there aren't tea party candidates that want that? you're saying paul is flat out wrong? >> what we're seeing from house republicans is an effort to achieve a consensus. it is always a work in progress. and just one final comment. as i heard the interview with john boehner, i thought back when jack kennedy announced the goal of bringing men to the moon, i don't believe reporters sat down and demanded that night that jack kennedy tell us specifically how that was going to be done. there are always broad concepts, and the challenge is to make it work. >> i've got to go -- >> that will be the challenge -- >> paul, respond and then we've got to go. >> joe miller in alaska has called social security and medicare and unemployment compensation unconstitutional. sharron angle has said social security violates the bible, much less the constitution. rand paul in kentucky, christine o'donnell in delaware, go all across the country and republicans are campaigning to end social security, medicare and veterans benefits. we should have a debate. >> got to leave it there. appreciate all of you on. thanks very much. still ahead, you've seen the surveillance video of a woman withdrawing money from a bank trying to save her family, short time later she, her two daughters were killed. tonight, new video from one of the suspects at a gas station where he allegedly bought the gasoline to set the house on fire and kill the two little girls. also new details of what happened that day. and sanjay gupta's special report, the final part, will 6-year-old kylie get a diagnosis that will save her life? no one knows what's wrong with her. she's getting sicker and her parents are desperate for answers. >> scared they might not find something in time, and the reality is they might not find anything, but if they're still looking and they haven't given up, that's someone on your