Fox, lay the, the ceo of will join us for an exclusive interview. He weighed in on the debate surrounding the San FranciscoTech Community and inequality. From sanhave buses francisco to silicon valley. He talks about how the buses are efficient and the real problem is not enough housing in San Francisco. That exclusive interview later in the show. Our lead story of the day amazon reportedly in talks with j. Crew, neiman marcus, and many more retailers to get them on the site. It thaner to talk about my special cohost for the hour, who may look a little familiar the author of the everything amazon,the book about and Senior Writer for Bloomberg Businessweek. What do you know about this . Amazon wants to be the everything store. The true retailers have always been hesitant to put their wares on amazon. It is renowned for its discounting. Ralph lauren does not want to have its 300 sweater next to a 30 sweater. I am a customer. I would love this. Does this impact the brands, make them seem less aspirational . They worry. Is pitchinged , let luxury retailers advertise on amazon, or other websites, to then send customers other retailers and allow them to sell their goods, and service it with amazon prime. 23 million members who spend a lot. We will see how that is executed, and whether the deal is sweet enough for luxury retailers to do a deal with the enemy. It would be awesome if i could just throw a para genes into my amazon prime card. Tomy prime membership going get more expensive . The amazon ceo, on the latest Earnings Call, brought up the likelihood that they would be raising prices for amazon prime. I do not think he would have done that, were they not seriously considering it was 40ped we talked about a price increase. The first rule of retail worn high and then surprise customers. The cost of the shipping would be paid by the retailers, right . The deal with the luxury retailers is separate from the fact that shipping is getting more expensive for amazon. Of otherlarding lots services. I do not think the two are related. I think we will see amazon get more sophisticated about different pricing for prime. Maybe three day delivery or sameday delivery. They are going to experiment. How do you think that would impact the business . Time has been a huge driver of growth and addition of customers. It raised sales i Something Like 22 last year. A big risk. What could this hurt, bottom line . It is a big risk. There is a pretty big example in cosco, which has raised prices of its Membership Club over the years. Customers have stayed loyal. I think what jeff bezos will try to do is give something to customers as he is raising prime prices. We might see more content in amazon video prime. We might see an improvement in shipping, like same day or next day delivery. We will see. I doubt it will be a price increase alone. You mention amazon video, on demand. A report that the amazon set top box we heard they have been soon, and is coming could be based on the android operating system. There has been talk of this for a long time. What do you know . We broke the story one year ago that amazon was working on a set top rocks. Pagenk they have taken a out of the jobs playbook, waiting until they can offer something different. We do not know for sure if the thing is ever going to come out . It is inevitable. I think they are expanding what it can do, bringing in video games. A videogamed studio. The other important point is, amazon private pilot season. Some of the new pilots are quite good. There is one called ansparent, w transparent, which is getting a lot of buzz. I want to bring in jon erlichman. As well as edmund lee, who covers media for Bloomberg News in new york. Let us talk a bit about the settop box wars. If amazon comes out with this, what does this mean for apple and apple tv . What does this mean for netflix . I think it means competition. Amazon has been serious, especially in this town, about the originals. They are paying top dollar to make these programs, the same way that netflix is willing to spend top dollar to do our original programs. Amazon has clearly learned a lot from the Amazon Prime Video offering that they have. That is available on all sorts of devices, like rogue who ro9ku. Maybe there is a discussion they make that a standalone service. You were talking about whether amazon prime prices go up. They could say, here is the standalone video offering. You pay a little bit more. You could ultimately get everything tied to prime. It is hard to know exactly how it will play out. Tom rutledge said today on the Earnings Call that if they did the deal with time warner, it would not have made a difference in negotiations with programmers. What do you make of that, at that scale is not a factor anymore . We do not see negotiations for programming. Scale is a factor and is important. I am not trying to contradict what tom rutledge is saying. He is trying to make a more subtle point. When they talk to hbo or viacom ,nd you see the programming guy this is the scale they get in terms of the fees they have to pay. That does not change until you hit a much bigger array of customers. Nu are hitting 25 million, you might get a slight discount. Comcast already gets that. And 10ion customers million customers, not a big difference. You still have to pay more you would have gotten in the Time Warner Cable deal. He was trying to downplay the fact that he did not get it. They were not going to get that much cost savings on programming. Some, but not much. He makes a valid point. The other point was, the settop box, they are trying to create their own cloudbased settop up that might rival or catch to what apple tv offers, or amazon. Working on a webtv box. The competition is, who is going to own the settop box . Will they lose subscribers to apple tv or some other digital type box . Amazon now, they have original comic content. With the settop box, they have something apple does not have. Amazon could be a big player there. Apple hadrded that been talking with Time Warner Cable before the comcast thing happened. Do we know any update . Are the talks still happening now that Time Warner Cable could eventually be part of comcast . The talks have slowed down. They have been put on hold because of the merger. That is not to say that comcast is saying anything to time warner, like, you cannot talk to netflix about putting the system on your settop box. I think the executives at time warner are thinking, a lot of this could change. How should we think about this . They have definitely at least slowed down, and that could be an issue for these guys, wanting to get on Cable Systems to legitimize what they are trying to do with streaming. This network reported results. Subscriber growth is slowing. Can they compete in this new environment . We are going to talk a lot about satellite players, dish and direct tv. Do they have to come together . Broadband, the ability to say, we are losing video subscribers, but people still need their highspeed internet. There has been a lot of hints from both dish and directv about wanting to offer webbased television offerings, which the Cable Companies are not going to like. That helps to explain why directv wanted to buy hulu. Dislikes to be disruptive. You will see more action. Thanks for weighing in. Ofing up on the next part the show, we are going to be talking about the wireless carriers. They appear to be paying the price for more users signed up for social messaging apps. Click here with our special guest host, a busy week for us, covering this whole Facebook Whats up acquisition. Have you used it at all . I downloaded it yesterday. When you are a Technology Reporter and download the app after it was acquired, you have failed. I did have it on my phone, but none of my friends are on it, so i deleted it. A lot of people in the United States are not used to using it. It is more widely used by people who live abroad to communicate with evil in different countries. One of the things i want to talk about today is where the cost of this is going. Who is shouldering it . Maybe, the carriers. Social messaging apps have already cost the carriers 32. 5 billion, and will cost them 54 billion by 2016. I am joined by the principal a Consumer Services company. How do you come up with these numbers . The messaging figures we produce are a function of several different drivers and variables. Weof which we do not do not tell people about. They are confidential to us. But we talked to a lot of operators all over the world. We have many of the tier one customers, telcos, as clients. And ourork with them model we have on this subject to work out the numbers. How much sympathy deal have for the mobile operators, who are seeing sms revenues dried up as customers turn to apps . The operators are in a quandary with this particular problem. N inod example of this is kp holland, who had a particularly whats appnce with in particular, because there is some as revenues were unprotected their sms revenues were unprotected by being in a bubble a bundle. If you bundle to subscribers, the revenues are protected. That, ito does not do is very easy for users to make the decision between something that is completely free and something they have to pay for. A user perspective, obviously these services are completely free or almost free. Aside from the carriers, is anybody else is the cost being passed on to anybody else . Sapp, itrms of what isnt. Apart from a small charge to subscribers in some countries, something around one dollar a year, the cost is taken pretty much by whatsapp itself. You make in the difference around advertising between the app and facebook . Two different set of principles here. The founders have basically vowed never to introduce advertisements into whatsapp. Indeed. I do not think Mark Zuckerberg is going to make the same mistake as he did with instagram , where he meddled early on in the terms and conditions, which upset the users. I think he has learned by that mistake. Koon is goingan to stick to his guns on the no advertising front. To maintain trust with users, i am fairly sure facebook and whatsapp will not be putting advertising on the application anytime soon. But that is not the only way of potentially monetizing the service. What i think is more in zuckerbergs style is to drive sharing activity on facebook and user connections on facebook using whatsapp. Right. Carryon. This whole idea of integrating facebook into whatsapp instead of whatsapp into facebook i can it will exist with a business it hates . Thanks so much for giving us that update. Beyonces surprised selftitled album came out in december 2013. Box may have helped. Box is reportedly on the road to an ipo. Jon erlichman caught up with the colorful ceo for an exclusive interview at the Digital Entertainment world conference in l. A. He always wears colorful shoes. He talked about how big names like beyonce might be using box to keep content under wraps before it is released. There was a somewhat popular release of a new album that happened by surprise recently. One of the reasons why it was kept in secret so well was was the platform used for managing that content. They were able to decide to at thethe information time they wanted to. They could keep all the controls in one place in the meantime. This is allowing content owners to do more with their information and have more security around it than if they had not gone to the cloud. Box and beyonce . Maybe. Maybe not. It has been reported you guys are planning to go public. . F you can shed on that subject probably not. That is to subjects in a row we cannot talk about. We are trying to build an independent longterm company. That is the path we are on, is staying very independent. Twice you are focused on business. Dropbox, another company in this area. I have heard of it. Likes it focused on the consumer. You decided that is not your market. We like consumers, but not as a business model. Fastgrowing bay area dropbox. Box and the Trademark Company also gets confused. This competition between your if they areeven focused on the consumer and you are focused on business i will go back to the ipo question. We think about that race less than people watching the industry think about it. It is not huge priority for us to be in the Financial Market race. We think it is more important that we build out a robust business. The companies you are competing with or get labeled with, the big players in Technology People like to use the microsoft example. Read youro if i twitter feed, it looks as if you kind of have approval of him as a leader for the company. I am sure he cares. Did you reach out to Satya Nadella . He was one of the first executives at microsoft to reach out to us, a couple of years ago. We usually think of someone they have something behind their back. In this case, everything we interacted on felt like it was in an interest of becoming a more comfortable platform. He has been at microsoft a long time. People thought, is he going to bring enough change . Agent ine change microsoft. Peoplebust people bus to San Francisco. Do you think about the employee responsibility and what is becoming a touchy subject in San Francisco of less room for the all thelass because of Successful Technology companies that have given new opportunities to people who now live in San Francisco and bus down to the valley . It is efficient. The alternative is to have 75 extra cars on the road. We want to make it so people can get to work more easily. It is from a capitalist intent also. Cani on the buses means you work, so we get an extra two hours of work from people. How do we create the most productivity from our Employee Base . For society, i do not think buses are the real issue. It is not even a symptom. The issue is that you have not a lot of housing and frank in San Francisco. With scarce housing and an increased workforce, all you can do is have some shift in the population . That is super unfortunate. The solution is you build more houses and pay people more. Unfortunately, we are unrelated to either of those, so we are going to keep asking people. The box ceo. We will talk about your cover story today. Collects welcome back to bloomberg west. With us for the hour, our special guest, a Bloomberg BusinessweekSenior Writer. He wrote the cover story this the about the invasion of taxi snatchers. You profiled uber and other competitors like sidecar. All thecomes to uber, talk has been about surge pricing and the ceo has not seemed to budge when it comes to his philosophy that this is the best way to get drivers on the road to meet demand. Did you get the sense he is ever going to waiver . Absolutely not. They are pretty religious about it. Is it working . He said prices go up over the weekends, snowstorms, and holidays, because it gets more drivers on the road. A bunch of colleagues went out and started taking uber cars and surgears, because they do pricing as well. By and large, we found drivers do get off the sofa and out into the world when the prices go up. I have interviewed many uber drivers and find they prefer uber. With lift, the pink mustache thing is inconvenient, especially when it is raining, to get it in and out. Some people do not realize these drivers use multiple services at the same time. They might be looking at uber, sidecar, and the list at the same time, im going where and going where the rides are. Took even more advantage of the regulatory ambiguity in many cities then uber did, taking amber to her amateur drivers and saying, you can become a cab driver. Lift is about to raise over 80 million from investors to turbocharge that business model. I think it is something uber has worried about. It is a reason they are putting so much money behind uberx. We are looking at the pink mustache. Is that there thing . Can they keep it on every car . It does feel a little San Francisco. They are committed to it. They have a Conference Room in the back that is covered wall to wall with experimental think phelps to figure out how to make that thing work better in the rain. So they are looking into that. Ceo of uber, his background obviously very successful right now. A has been in the business long time. He had a business before that did not quite work out, and it trained him into the mindset that he is committed to this philosophy all the way. Tell me about that. He is a battle or, and it is because of that experience. He had a peer to peer filesharing service in the 1990s, video streaming that he sold. Many years of basically not even taking a salary. He has got the battle wounds. It makes him perfectly suited to this, a field where it is hand to hand combat with other companies and entrenched taxi commissions. Was thevorite detail blood sweat and rahman on his socks. Ramen on his socks. On new years eve, and uber driver killed a little girl as she was crossing the street. Now, they are in a court case about this. Are saying the driver was distracted by the app, which was shining in his face. Some of the challenges around the uber model are background checks, insurance, distracted driving. The tragic situation on new years eve in San Francisco gets all of that. The mom of this child says she saw the driver with the cell phone reflected on his face, looking down. Uber said he was not really driving for them because he did not have anybody in the car, even though he was clearly looking for a fair. Background checks she had a previous citation 10 years ago for speeding. You compare it to how the traditional cap industry would have handled this. Maybe not all that differently, but it does show that uber has work to do to prove to its cus