heinous _ for newspapers on how to cover such heinous and — for newspapers on how to cover such heinous and discussing crimes like this _ heinous and discussing crimes like this i_ heinous and discussing crimes like this. i would heinous and discussing crimes like this. iwould much heinous and discussing crimes like this. i would much prefer that the papers _ this. i would much prefer that the papers but — this. i would much prefer that the papers but a much bigger photograph of sarah _ papers but a much bigger photograph of sarah on _ papers but a much bigger photograph of sarah on the front we actually didnt— of sarah on the front we actually didn't see — of sarah on the front we actually didn't see him all. you do have to be careful— didn't see him all. you do have to be careful as a newspaper to talk about, _ be careful as a newspaper to talk about, why is is photograph bigger than sarah's photograph was that i would _ than sarah's photograph was that i would much prefer it if editors right— would much prefer it if editors right across the board this evening had chosen some different ways of presenting the story. do had chosen some different ways of presenting the story.— had chosen some different ways of presenting the story. do you want to cive our presenting the story. do you want to give your thoughts _ presenting the story. do you want to give your thoughts on _ presenting the story. do you want to give your thoughts on that _ presenting the story. do you want to give your thoughts on that as - give your thoughts on that as well rachel? it's a real debate. i remember in new zealand the new zealand prime minister after the mosque bombings it made the decision that she would never referred again by name to the perpetrator. and certainly as a result of that seem to drive eight media can sense consensus not to show his picture. i wonder if a bit of an issue about the casualness which we use, love these big pictures of frightening people. the debate is about whether