within its range. the family of a 20—year—old man who died after being restrained by police a week ago appeal for peace after angry clashes in east london. are very personal tale of love in the romantic comedy the big six. find out what james the romantic comedy the big six. find out whatjames king mate of this and the other releases this week in the film review. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are nigel nelson, political editor of the sunday mirror, and political commentatorjo phillips. al polite tourists reviewers, so twitter tells us! you may disagree. i left my knuckle duster that home. to be polished! let's take a look at tomorrow's front pages. the observer leads with donald trump's decision to sack his chief of staff. the telegraph leads with an ally of borisjohnson attacking philip hammond's approach to brexit. the sunday times has a report on the lives of teenage british girls who run away to join so—called islamic state. the mail says that princess diana's brother has called on channel 4 not to broadcast her video diaries, which are due to air next week. the express also focuses on princess diana, claiming the princess asked the queen for help about her marriage. that story also makes the daily sta r‘s that story also makes the daily star's frontpage. that's where we'll begin as reported in the mail on sunday, don't show diana love tapes on tv pleads the earl, asking more demanding that channel 4 acts what are called bombshell videos. why are they so sensitive? diana in fact gave them toa sensitive? diana in fact gave them to a voice coach and the idea was these were never meant to appear. they seem to go through a peculiar route after that where they end up ina number of route after that where they end up in a number of places, the bbc seemed to get the. and decided not to broadcast. and decided it would not upset the royal family by broadcasting them. they then go through a circuitous route and end up through a circuitous route and end up with channel 4, who plan to come out with diana in her own words next sunday, that's the idea, and what they say is she apparently was terribly candid with her voice coach, where although this wasn't meant to be broadcast, she did talk about prince charles, talked about camilla being his mistress at the time, talks about a lot of private matters. quite clearly earl spencer would be hugely upset for these to be made public, and of course so would william and harry. that doesn't mean they shouldn't be made public. should they, 10? iwould say... we know there is nothing new in the clips here that we don't already know, she was desperately unhappy, three of them in the marriage. there is an insinuation that this boy coach session was before she did the explosive panorama interview, but as far as we can tell this was a private session with a voice coach. therefore it is private and like nigel lamb curious to know how they ended up at channel 4if to know how they ended up at channel 4 if the bbc bought them, but i have read here but apparently they were broadcast on the american network nbc in 2004 and described them as a ghoulish striptease and that the people involved were no better than grave—robbers. but there is an odd question about who owns them. you said she gave them to him, you don't know that. i don't. not that i'm casting aspersions! i don't know that but he got them. the issue, really, is going to be a real battle during the week. i don't think it's public interest? isn't it? i think ata public interest? isn't it? i think at a certain level your private life is always public interest. private citizen and public person don't have the same levels of privacy. would you broadcast interviews with a doctor or therapist?” you broadcast interviews with a doctor or therapist? i wouldn't do that? why? because medical information has to be confidential. i wouldn't broadcast staff overheard where she was talking to a pre—cyber, for instance. something like this is not privileged the same way. but she and he would assume it to bea way. but she and he would assume it to be a private session. we don't know what he thought. he's bought... she didn't want to broadcast at the time. it seems an odd thing to talk about her private life in the way she did. except when she was doing it for the panorama interview. she was doing it with a voice coach, but ido was doing it with a voice coach, but i do think this is part of history. she was the person we have been hugely interested in, and overall, i think there is a genuine public interest for showing what she was like. we had a programme during the week where william and harry, a fantastic programme, talking about their mum, and what a fantastic person she was. i do think we ought to see a more rounded, picture, though, and so both sides. we know this, there is nothing new in this. we don't know until we see the tapes. and also given that princes william and harry have done so much to raise awareness of mental health issues. they have done a great job. she was clearly in a great state of mental trauma. you can't she was clearly in a great state of mentaltrauma. you can'tjust present one side of diana, the mother in their case, and in a sense a sanitised version of her. once you put that out and say that is public interest, surely the dark side of diana is public interest as well. we will have to disagree on that! that, folks, is how you disagree! laughter . the sunday telegraph, policy ally attacks hammond brexit plan, transition must be no more than two yea rs transition must be no more than two years says foreign secretary's economic guru. who worked with boris when he was mayor of london, and it is interesting if you are interested in these things, which of course we are fascinated by, various misses me oi'i are fascinated by, various misses me on her walking holiday, gone away to lie down in a darkened room. —— there is misses me on holiday. chancellor appearing to speak some sense to a lot of quarters about a slower transition phase so we don't have the cliff edge brexit, and now we have not boris, he is maintaining his tight lipped nature, but mr lyons, one his tight lipped nature, but mr lyoi'is, one assumes his tight lipped nature, but mr lyons, one assumes speaking with his boss's blessing. we can't assume that! i think in politics you can, actually. he is basically saying this is ridiculous, what philip hammond says is crazy, and the warnings of the cliff edge are nonsense and he is comparing it to warnings about the millennium bug that would bring all our computers into disrepair. is this code for, we are worried that if it takes that long brexit will crash and burn? partly i am sure that is true. first of all i am not convinced boris thinks these things. he has been the other side of the world this week with wonderful pictures of shaking hands with robots injapan and so on and reports have come back which seem contradictory, this is not unusual with boris, but i don't quite know what he thinks and which is why it would go too far to say that mr lyons speaks on his behalf. what seems to be happening this week is that philip hammond is getting his way, and itjust feels like plain common sense. we will not get this complex negotiation completed by march 29 2019, so transition period is going to happen. thank you. laughter. so polite, we could do songs of praise, couldn't we? where is the tea set an extant?! we are going back to the 50s! after you, may i say! the sunday times, life of teenage girls in isis britain, and stripped passports for jihadists, let's deal with the passports first, this is because of concerns that the so—called caliphate is imploding. exactly. we now know the 150 so—called jihadists have been stripped of their passports. some of this has been known but not publicised, but i think because there is a concern that nothing is happening, so these are people who have gone, they are banned from returning to britain so in effect are stateless without british citizenship. where they go and what happens afterwards remains to be seen. but at the same time the home office i think is under pressure because last week it confirmed only six terrorist suspects in britain are subject to the terrorist prevention measures, sol the terrorist prevention measures, so i think there is genuine public concern that on the one hand we hear the police and security services thwarting a certain number of attacks or incidents, but then you say, are you using these powers? they are trying to get the word out. they are trying to get the word out. they are trying to get the word out. they are not stateless, to humbly disagree with you. that would be illegal. they had dual nationals so they have somewhere to go in the sense of their other nationality, but the more passports we take away, the better it is for this country they don't come back. at the moment we are talking about 23,000 jihadists in britain, we don't want another 850 from syria and iraq. another picture of a woman, a young woman who escaped from raqqa, where she had been living with her husband was fighting for isis and talks about meeting the other girls who left britain tojoin about meeting the other girls who left britain to join isis. indeed. she met some muslim schoolgirls who vanished from their homes to marry isis fighters and claims to have the notorious white widow over there, and says this enclave in raqqa is known as little britain because there are so many british brides who have gone there. a fascinating piece, maybe we'll will talk about it later. acid laws in the independent, government relaxes laws against advice and campaigners saying this may have made acid attacks more likely. it could well have done. it is perfectly true that they did make the regulations easier, and amber rudd is now trying to correct the balance to make regulations more difficult again, so broadly what was happening was a lot of acids were covered under the poison acts and you couldn't get them without either a licence, so if you wanted a strong acid, the shop needed a licence and you needed a licence to buy it, for something wea ker licence to buy it, for something weaker there was a reporting contingent on it, which meant... is this selling rather than buying? the retailer would have to tell the police if there was any suspicion about what was going on. amber rudd is tightening this up again. as a result of the acid attacks. exactly, but as we have seen with weapons available on the internet and often seized by the police, i imagine those doing these atrocious attacks will easily find another way to buy it. you could be right. but it is worth tightening it up in shops. and also it was hugely opposed by doctors and the authorities at the time. back page of the mail on sunday, five years ago we were...” know! having a lovely time in london 2012, but london's shocking drug date, how many people used banned substances. it is appalling, the mail on sunday reveals that out of 156 track and field finalists 87 had previously committed a doping violation or have since done so, about 13%. that is really appalling to all the people who were clean who competed through their own sweat and effort and hard work and perhaps who lost out on a medal to a cheat. there is no doubt that the doping scandal throughout sport is awful, and of course this comes just a week before we get the world championships, the athletics world championships, the athletics world championships here. and spectators as well, you wonder who you are watching, who is genuinely... that is right. as you both know i know nothing about sport, but however it seems to me we are coming to the point where everybody should be tested, and it seems you need a screening system to stop people doping before they start competing. back to the sunday times, let them eat pheasants says beefy botham. you know who this man is even though you can't stand sport. don't you two gang up! famous cricketer. well done, you see? famous for what? cricket! we'll let that one path. he has the new idea to help food banks out. this might upset hunters, but to put pheasants, because he shoots a lot of them,