Otherwords, charged, election interference. In other words, that he did it to influence other words, that he did it to influence the results of the 2016 Election Influence the results of the 2016 election. 50 influence the results of the 2016 election. , , election. So the former president sa s it is election. So the former president says it is a election. So the former president says it is a bookkeeping election. So the former president says it is a bookkeeping case,. Election. So the former President J says it is a bookkeeping case, in says it is a Book Keeping case, in fact it is. Says it is a bookkeeping case, in fact it is. , says it is a bookkeeping case, in factitis. , , fact it is. Exactly, but i suspect that what fact it is. Exactly, but i suspect that what the fact it is. Exactly, but i suspect that what the Prosecution Fact it is. Exactly, but i suspect that what the prosecution has, | fact it is. Exactly, but i suspect. That what the prosecution has, if the jury that what the prosecution has, if the jury believes them, is witnesses that will the jury believes them, is witnesses that will say that they heard or they that will say that they heard or they have that will say that they heard or they have got Documentary Evidence that proves that the former president said, for example, you have president said, for example, you have got president said, for example, you have got to president said, for example, you have got to pay this money, it is close have got to pay this money, it is close to have got to pay this money, it is close to the have got to pay this money, it is close to the election and if you do not pay close to the election and if you do not pay the close to the election and if you do not pay the money she is going to out me not pay the money she is going to out me i not pay the money she is going to out me. I could lose the election over out me. I could lose the election Over It out me. I could lose the election Over It they out me. I could lose the election Over It. They have not typed that p Over It. They have not typed that up obviously because they are on their up obviously because they are on their first up obviously because they are on their first witness. Their first witness. They have put David Packer their first witness. They have put David Packer on their first witness. They have put David Packer on these their first witness. They have put David Packer on these stand their first witness. They have put| David Packer on these stand first. He is from the Parent Company that owns the national inquiry. He was instrumental to this catch and kill programme that the prosecution allege was in play. Why him first . How good a witness is he . Allege was in play. Why him first . How good a witness is he . Well, we are auoin how good a witness is he . Well, we are going to how good a witness is he . Well, we are going to see. How good a witness is he . Well, we