comparemela.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For BBCNEWS Nuclear 20240705 : comparemela.com
Transcripts For BBCNEWS Nuclear 20240705 : comparemela.com
Transcripts For BBCNEWS Nuclear 20240705
This is a very dangerous time. Leaders are not acting responsibly. I want to find out whats brought us from oppenheimers invention to this point. Now i am become death, the destroyer of worlds. Nuclear weapons, nuclear terrorism, nuclear proliferation. Right now, itsjust going in the wrong direction. Translation im ordering the
Strategic Nuclear
forces on special alert. Explosion. In britain, our own weapons are on high alert. Theres always one out at 15 minutes� notice to fire. Somewhere out there . Somewhere out there. And american nukes could soon be back on british soil. If we get trump in there next time, and he may press the button, because hes got a bigger button than putin, then we are a target. On computer this is one unseasonably bleak scene which has profoundly moved many people during 1982. Well, heres the greenham peace camp. A0 years ago now. Their peaceful protest against the siting of
Cruise Missiles
here is into its second winter. When i was a young reporter in the � 80s, then the
Nuclear Threat
was ever present. People talked about the threat of nuclear war between russia, then the soviet union, and america all the time. And then it went away and it really receded into the background, except i kept on. I kept on investigating. Is the
Islamic Republic
actively seeking to get the means to make a nuclear bomb . Its often rogue nations, rogue actors, as they were called, trying to get weapons. North korea has tested a nuclear bomb believed to be ten times more destructive than hiroshima. Its huge. So, what, the whole village comes in here . Thats the idea . In the last few years, weve had a whole host of global uncertainties. And now it seems that the
Nuclear Threat
is really back on the agenda again. The story of the
Atomic Threat
begins almost 80 years ago, in 1916. Archive we have seen that before. L film showing the bursting of the first atom bomb, the experimental one in new mexico. It was dropped from a steel tower and filmed from about six miles away. Afterwards, cameramen and reporters put on special canvas boots as a precaution against picking up dangerous particles left in the circle of devastation. And as for the steel tower from which the bomb had been dropped, this is all that was left of it. Ive come to new mexico, in america. Its all pretty barren and empty out here. I can see why it would be an area to test weapons. The small town of los alamos was the birthplace of the atomic bomb. It feels so peaceful here. Its extraordinary to think that this is where it all started. This is where the first atomic bomb was built and developed by
Robert Oppenheimer
and his team, the so called father of the atomic bomb. We had a moment where it looked like the
Chain Reaction
from an
Atomic Device
might never stop. Are we saying theres a. Chance that when we push that button, we destroy the world . Chances are near zero. Near zero . What do you want from theory alone . Zero would be nice. The recent
Hollywood Blockbuster Oppenheimer
told the story of the
Manhattan Project
and the development of the first atomic bomb. This modest little log cabin right on the end is the house where oppenheimer himself lived during those months he was working on the
Manhattan Project
. Ive been given
Privileged Access
to the house by curator cheri trottier. This is the room, why the oppenheimers chose this house. So have you had more interest in oppenheimer and the house since the movie came out . Definitely. Theres people, as you saw, peeking through the windows. Theres a great curiosity about where did this man live . This was oppenheimer� s study. The typewriter. Yes. Yeah. Opened by the censor as well. Because it was all so secret. Yes. Everybody� s mail, coming and going, was censored. Oppenheimer would have meetings in here with other scientists . This would be a room in which a huge amount went on . People were invited here for dinner, and oppie served his very strong martinis. There are stories where people literally had a very interesting time trying to leave and walk upright. The basics of
Nuclear Weapons
hasnt really changed since the first bombs were developed in the 1940s. They are still based either on fission, which is the splitting of atoms to release power, or they are based on fusion, which is the fusing together of atoms to create power. What we think of as a
Nuclear Weapon
is actually a number of different components. So there is a warhead, which is essentially the bit that goes bang. That contains the fissile material, whether its uranium or plutonium. The warhead has to be transported in a certain way, and its what we call a delivery system. So it may be this warhead may be in a bomb thats dropped from an aircraft. It may be on top of a missile of all sorts of different ranges or, indeed, it could be in a whole host of different ways as well. Archive thats the atomic bomb exploding at nagasaki. All of you who see this picture can judge for yourselves the extent of the menace to civilisation of this new weapon. In 1945, the
United States
dropped their new weapon on the japanese cities of
Hiroshima And Nagasaki
. Hundreds of thousands were killed. It changed the face of warfare. Scramble america had ignited a nuclear arms race. Four years later, russia began testing atomic weapons. Followed by the uk in 1952. Archive after the first | blinding flash, dr penney turns round with a smile of satisfaction to view the colossal spectacle. In the � 60s, france tested. The film record has been heavily censored by the french authorities. But this picture is impressive evidence of the bomb. Followed by china. Those who now possessed
Nuclear Weapons
had the ultimate means to deter an attack, giving them enormous power. Soon, the nuclear club grew. India detonated its first weapon in 197a. Then pakistan developed the bomb in the � 90s. Its widely believed israel has
Nuclear Weapons
, though its never confirmed this. In 2006, north korea carried out its
First Nuclear
test. The story of
Nuclear Warhead
proliferation is numbers went up exponentially. The total number of warheads that have been built is probably well over 100,000. But what weve seen over the last three decades is a gradual slowing down, a gradual reduction. However, there are probably in the region of 13,000
Nuclear Weapons
in the world today, in the eight, brackets, nine states most of these in the us and russia. The two bombs that were dropped in august 1945 killed somewhere in the realm of 200,000 people. Most modern
Nuclear Weapons
today are more powerful, have more explosive yield. In the uk case, probably somewhere in the region of six to seven times as powerful. And many of the other states have warheads that are more powerful still. So even just a handful of those could probably destroy the uk. The explosions at
Hiroshima And Nagasaki
, and the
Radiation Sickness
that followed, showed the true horrors of
Nuclear Weapons
. Oppenheimer was haunted by his creation. The world would not be the same. I remembered the line from the hindu scripture of the bhagavad gita. Now i am become death, the destroyer of worlds. I suppose we all thought that, one way or another. The
Manhattan Project
scientists who created the bomb felt compelled to warn the public. They came up with the idea of the
Doomsday Clock
. To visualise how close we are to destroying our world. The mushroom was becoming an acceptable fungus in mans garden. A group of scientists tried to waken the general public from this apathy and founded a periodical in which they tried to explain the social and political consequences of atomic power. Its cover design became a clock approaching midnight. As the time for atomic scientists and the world ran out, its hands neared the end of time. When it was first set in 1947, the hands stood at seven minutes to midnight. Theyve moved 25 times back and forth since then. In the 1990s to the furthest point, 17 minutes away, when the soviet union broke up. By 2017, with putin and trump in power and north
Koreas Kim Jong
un, the hands went forward again to two and a half minutes. Today, on top of the nuclear concerns,
Climate Change
and threats from new technologies like ai are part of the assessment. In 2023, the hands moved the closest theyd ever been to midnight. Just 90 seconds away. Ive come to chicago, where the
Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists
is based. Reporter north korea has threatened to detonate a
Hydrogen Bomb
over the pacific. President putin has ordered russias
Strategic Nuclear
forces to be placed on. The president warning the risk of
Nuclear Armageddon
has not been this high since the cuban missile crisis. The bulletin� s president is rachel bronson. Nice to meet you. Very nice to meet you. So this is the bulletin . This is the bulletin. Bulletin of atomic scientists covers. Yeah. They go back 75 plus years. This is the original
Doomsday Clock
. So that was the very first iteration of the clock. Thats it, right there. It was created by an artist. And its a metaphor about how close we are to destroying humanity with our own technologies, with our own making. This was the late � 40s. Countdowns, clocks, rockets, missiles. This was very much. This was a dangerous time. Yeah. They saw the potential of a global arms race. They really believed that if you could educate the public, the public would put pressure on leaders, and leaders would have to keep us safe. Why did you make the decision in 2023 to move that clock to 90 seconds to midnight . It was largely around the russian invasion of ukraine, which our science and security board deemed as one of the most dangerous times in history. Why . First of all, the us and russia control 90 of the
Nuclear Weapons
on this planet. Now, a
Nuclear Power
state using
Nuclear Weapons
as a tactic, as a terrorism, psychological terrorism, but also potentially as a tactic. They were threatening to use
Nuclear Weapons
. Youre talking
President Putin
, russia. Thats right. And so that was the first time in a very long time that we could remember such threats, and them being bandied about so casually. And so it was a very, very scary time. And the likelihood of misperceptions and accidents were so high that, largely for that reason, they moved the hands of the
Doomsday Clock
closer to midnight. Explosion. Shouting. The russian invasion of ukraine was a war
President Putin
expected to win quickly. That didnt happen. Ukraine fought back with
Weapons Supplied
by britain and other nato allies. Just days into the conflict,
President Putin
made a threat that shocked the world. Translation top officials of leading nato countries i are making aggressive statements about our country. Therefore, im ordering the
Minister Of Defence
and the
Chief Of The General
staff to put the
Strategic Nuclear
forces on special alert. Putins warning to the world not to join the fight alongside ukraine revived fears of nuclear war not seen since the 1960s. Ive come to geneva in switzerland, a city associated for many decades with efforts to bring peace. And now home to one of the main
United Nations
offices. Pavel podvig is a russian expert on
Weapons Of Mass Destruction
and russias nuclear forces. Nice to meet you. For a decade, he was involved in setting the
Doomsday Clock
. The russian president made it very clear that
Nuclear Weapons
are on the table. He said very specifically that if someone would intervene, then they will see the consequences theyve never seen in their lives, which was a direct reference to
Nuclear Weapons
. How shocked were you that
President Putin
would say that at that time . Oh. That was pretty shocking, i would say. At that point, we didnt know what that would look like. I wouldnt say weve never seen before, because if we go back to, like, � 62 and the cuban crisis, we may have seen things of that order, of magnitude, but imagine this happening in the 21st century. That was definitely a shock. And
President Putin
why did he do this . And what does it tell us about him and how far he might be prepared to go . Well, this is. Exactly what
Nuclear Weapons
are there for, to make sure that you have a certain freedom of action. And at that time, apparently, the russian president believed that by making these statements, he could deter the west from intervening on the side of ukraine, which was a correct calculation. This is how deterrence works. But do you think theres a danger that if he was backed into a corner, if there was an existential threat to russia, that putin could use
Nuclear Weapons
. Well. Technically, yes, the weapons are there. Merci beaucoup. So the only way russia can use
Nuclear Weapons
in this conflict is to use it in what i would call a strategic sense, or in
Hiroshima And Nagasaki
sense, to shock the opponent into surrender. Ukraine, in this case. The reaction of the internal community to just the idea of
Nuclear Threat
s was very strong, very negative. People didnt like it, and they did force russia to lower the rhetoric. And it was clear that bringing
Nuclear Weapons
again, even as a threat, will definitely not. Bring russia any friends. This isnt the first time the world has held its breath over the prospect of nuclear war between russia and america. A sea of planes that on a moments notice can be in the air to avenge any communist strike. In 1962, russian missiles in cuba raised tensions to boiling point. It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any
Nuclear Missile
launched from cuba against any nation in the
Western Hemisphere
as an attack by the soviet union on the
United States
. At the 11th hour, the crisis was averted. But that close call sparked the need for better
Global Cooperation
on
Nuclear Weapons
. In london, representatives of three nations signed an agreement to halt the spread of
Nuclear Weapons
, taking out an insurance policy, so to speak, against a worldwide nuclear holocaust. In 1968, the
Non Proliferation Treaty
was signed. Its still enforced today. It was meant to restrict the
Nuclear Weapons
club to just five the us, russia, britain, france and china. Other countries agreed to only develop civilian programmes like
Nuclear Power
plants. Under the npt, most countries agree not to develop or seek
Nuclear Weapons
, and they accept safeguards by the
International Atomic
Energy Agency
to verify that all of their
Nuclear Activities
are strictly peaceful, that no
Nuclear Facilities
or
Nuclear Materials
are being used for weapons purposes. It basically provides stability in the international system, in the
Global Nuclear
order. The treaty limited the number of countries that developed
Nuclear Weapons
. But the � 70s and early � 80s saw a massive arms race between the two major players, america and russia. During the cold war, they ramped up the number of
Nuclear Warhead
s to over 70,000 between them. The fear was they could set off an all out nuclear war with devastating consequences. The enemy realises that an attack on the
United States
would likely mean committing national suicide. Nobody wins in nuclear war because both sides are sure to suffer terrible damage. During the cold war years, we were constantly at loggerheads. We had a lot going on to try to get our hands around the threat of
Strategic Nuclear<\/a> forces on special alert. Explosion. In britain, our own weapons are on high alert. Theres always one out at 15 minutes\ufffd notice to fire. Somewhere out there . Somewhere out there. And american nukes could soon be back on british soil. If we get trump in there next time, and he may press the button, because hes got a bigger button than putin, then we are a target. On computer this is one unseasonably bleak scene which has profoundly moved many people during 1982. Well, heres the greenham peace camp. A0 years ago now. Their peaceful protest against the siting of
Cruise Missiles<\/a> here is into its second winter. When i was a young reporter in the \ufffd 80s, then the
Nuclear Threat<\/a> was ever present. People talked about the threat of nuclear war between russia, then the soviet union, and america all the time. And then it went away and it really receded into the background, except i kept on. I kept on investigating. Is the
Islamic Republic<\/a> actively seeking to get the means to make a nuclear bomb . Its often rogue nations, rogue actors, as they were called, trying to get weapons. North korea has tested a nuclear bomb believed to be ten times more destructive than hiroshima. Its huge. So, what, the whole village comes in here . Thats the idea . In the last few years, weve had a whole host of global uncertainties. And now it seems that the
Nuclear Threat<\/a> is really back on the agenda again. The story of the
Atomic Threat<\/a> begins almost 80 years ago, in 1916. Archive we have seen that before. L film showing the bursting of the first atom bomb, the experimental one in new mexico. It was dropped from a steel tower and filmed from about six miles away. Afterwards, cameramen and reporters put on special canvas boots as a precaution against picking up dangerous particles left in the circle of devastation. And as for the steel tower from which the bomb had been dropped, this is all that was left of it. Ive come to new mexico, in america. Its all pretty barren and empty out here. I can see why it would be an area to test weapons. The small town of los alamos was the birthplace of the atomic bomb. It feels so peaceful here. Its extraordinary to think that this is where it all started. This is where the first atomic bomb was built and developed by
Robert Oppenheimer<\/a> and his team, the so called father of the atomic bomb. We had a moment where it looked like the
Chain Reaction<\/a> from an
Atomic Device<\/a> might never stop. Are we saying theres a. Chance that when we push that button, we destroy the world . Chances are near zero. Near zero . What do you want from theory alone . Zero would be nice. The recent
Hollywood Blockbuster Oppenheimer<\/a> told the story of the
Manhattan Project<\/a> and the development of the first atomic bomb. This modest little log cabin right on the end is the house where oppenheimer himself lived during those months he was working on the
Manhattan Project<\/a>. Ive been given
Privileged Access<\/a> to the house by curator cheri trottier. This is the room, why the oppenheimers chose this house. So have you had more interest in oppenheimer and the house since the movie came out . Definitely. Theres people, as you saw, peeking through the windows. Theres a great curiosity about where did this man live . This was oppenheimer\ufffd s study. The typewriter. Yes. Yeah. Opened by the censor as well. Because it was all so secret. Yes. Everybody\ufffd s mail, coming and going, was censored. Oppenheimer would have meetings in here with other scientists . This would be a room in which a huge amount went on . People were invited here for dinner, and oppie served his very strong martinis. There are stories where people literally had a very interesting time trying to leave and walk upright. The basics of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> hasnt really changed since the first bombs were developed in the 1940s. They are still based either on fission, which is the splitting of atoms to release power, or they are based on fusion, which is the fusing together of atoms to create power. What we think of as a
Nuclear Weapon<\/a> is actually a number of different components. So there is a warhead, which is essentially the bit that goes bang. That contains the fissile material, whether its uranium or plutonium. The warhead has to be transported in a certain way, and its what we call a delivery system. So it may be this warhead may be in a bomb thats dropped from an aircraft. It may be on top of a missile of all sorts of different ranges or, indeed, it could be in a whole host of different ways as well. Archive thats the atomic bomb exploding at nagasaki. All of you who see this picture can judge for yourselves the extent of the menace to civilisation of this new weapon. In 1945, the
United States<\/a> dropped their new weapon on the japanese cities of
Hiroshima And Nagasaki<\/a>. Hundreds of thousands were killed. It changed the face of warfare. Scramble america had ignited a nuclear arms race. Four years later, russia began testing atomic weapons. Followed by the uk in 1952. Archive after the first | blinding flash, dr penney turns round with a smile of satisfaction to view the colossal spectacle. In the \ufffd 60s, france tested. The film record has been heavily censored by the french authorities. But this picture is impressive evidence of the bomb. Followed by china. Those who now possessed
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> had the ultimate means to deter an attack, giving them enormous power. Soon, the nuclear club grew. India detonated its first weapon in 197a. Then pakistan developed the bomb in the \ufffd 90s. Its widely believed israel has
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>, though its never confirmed this. In 2006, north korea carried out its
First Nuclear<\/a> test. The story of
Nuclear Warhead<\/a> proliferation is numbers went up exponentially. The total number of warheads that have been built is probably well over 100,000. But what weve seen over the last three decades is a gradual slowing down, a gradual reduction. However, there are probably in the region of 13,000
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> in the world today, in the eight, brackets, nine states most of these in the us and russia. The two bombs that were dropped in august 1945 killed somewhere in the realm of 200,000 people. Most modern
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> today are more powerful, have more explosive yield. In the uk case, probably somewhere in the region of six to seven times as powerful. And many of the other states have warheads that are more powerful still. So even just a handful of those could probably destroy the uk. The explosions at
Hiroshima And Nagasaki<\/a>, and the
Radiation Sickness<\/a> that followed, showed the true horrors of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. Oppenheimer was haunted by his creation. The world would not be the same. I remembered the line from the hindu scripture of the bhagavad gita. Now i am become death, the destroyer of worlds. I suppose we all thought that, one way or another. The
Manhattan Project<\/a> scientists who created the bomb felt compelled to warn the public. They came up with the idea of the
Doomsday Clock<\/a>. To visualise how close we are to destroying our world. The mushroom was becoming an acceptable fungus in mans garden. A group of scientists tried to waken the general public from this apathy and founded a periodical in which they tried to explain the social and political consequences of atomic power. Its cover design became a clock approaching midnight. As the time for atomic scientists and the world ran out, its hands neared the end of time. When it was first set in 1947, the hands stood at seven minutes to midnight. Theyve moved 25 times back and forth since then. In the 1990s to the furthest point, 17 minutes away, when the soviet union broke up. By 2017, with putin and trump in power and north
Koreas Kim Jong<\/a> un, the hands went forward again to two and a half minutes. Today, on top of the nuclear concerns,
Climate Change<\/a> and threats from new technologies like ai are part of the assessment. In 2023, the hands moved the closest theyd ever been to midnight. Just 90 seconds away. Ive come to chicago, where the
Bulletin Of Atomic Scientists<\/a> is based. Reporter north korea has threatened to detonate a
Hydrogen Bomb<\/a> over the pacific. President putin has ordered russias
Strategic Nuclear<\/a> forces to be placed on. The president warning the risk of
Nuclear Armageddon<\/a> has not been this high since the cuban missile crisis. The bulletin\ufffd s president is rachel bronson. Nice to meet you. Very nice to meet you. So this is the bulletin . This is the bulletin. Bulletin of atomic scientists covers. Yeah. They go back 75 plus years. This is the original
Doomsday Clock<\/a>. So that was the very first iteration of the clock. Thats it, right there. It was created by an artist. And its a metaphor about how close we are to destroying humanity with our own technologies, with our own making. This was the late \ufffd 40s. Countdowns, clocks, rockets, missiles. This was very much. This was a dangerous time. Yeah. They saw the potential of a global arms race. They really believed that if you could educate the public, the public would put pressure on leaders, and leaders would have to keep us safe. Why did you make the decision in 2023 to move that clock to 90 seconds to midnight . It was largely around the russian invasion of ukraine, which our science and security board deemed as one of the most dangerous times in history. Why . First of all, the us and russia control 90 of the
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> on this planet. Now, a
Nuclear Power<\/a> state using
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> as a tactic, as a terrorism, psychological terrorism, but also potentially as a tactic. They were threatening to use
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. Youre talking
President Putin<\/a>, russia. Thats right. And so that was the first time in a very long time that we could remember such threats, and them being bandied about so casually. And so it was a very, very scary time. And the likelihood of misperceptions and accidents were so high that, largely for that reason, they moved the hands of the
Doomsday Clock<\/a> closer to midnight. Explosion. Shouting. The russian invasion of ukraine was a war
President Putin<\/a> expected to win quickly. That didnt happen. Ukraine fought back with
Weapons Supplied<\/a> by britain and other nato allies. Just days into the conflict,
President Putin<\/a> made a threat that shocked the world. Translation top officials of leading nato countries i are making aggressive statements about our country. Therefore, im ordering the
Minister Of Defence<\/a> and the
Chief Of The General<\/a> staff to put the
Strategic Nuclear<\/a> forces on special alert. Putins warning to the world not to join the fight alongside ukraine revived fears of nuclear war not seen since the 1960s. Ive come to geneva in switzerland, a city associated for many decades with efforts to bring peace. And now home to one of the main
United Nations<\/a> offices. Pavel podvig is a russian expert on
Weapons Of Mass Destruction<\/a> and russias nuclear forces. Nice to meet you. For a decade, he was involved in setting the
Doomsday Clock<\/a>. The russian president made it very clear that
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> are on the table. He said very specifically that if someone would intervene, then they will see the consequences theyve never seen in their lives, which was a direct reference to
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. How shocked were you that
President Putin<\/a> would say that at that time . Oh. That was pretty shocking, i would say. At that point, we didnt know what that would look like. I wouldnt say weve never seen before, because if we go back to, like, \ufffd 62 and the cuban crisis, we may have seen things of that order, of magnitude, but imagine this happening in the 21st century. That was definitely a shock. And
President Putin<\/a> why did he do this . And what does it tell us about him and how far he might be prepared to go . Well, this is. Exactly what
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> are there for, to make sure that you have a certain freedom of action. And at that time, apparently, the russian president believed that by making these statements, he could deter the west from intervening on the side of ukraine, which was a correct calculation. This is how deterrence works. But do you think theres a danger that if he was backed into a corner, if there was an existential threat to russia, that putin could use
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> . Well. Technically, yes, the weapons are there. Merci beaucoup. So the only way russia can use
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> in this conflict is to use it in what i would call a strategic sense, or in
Hiroshima And Nagasaki<\/a> sense, to shock the opponent into surrender. Ukraine, in this case. The reaction of the internal community to just the idea of
Nuclear Threat<\/a>s was very strong, very negative. People didnt like it, and they did force russia to lower the rhetoric. And it was clear that bringing
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> again, even as a threat, will definitely not. Bring russia any friends. This isnt the first time the world has held its breath over the prospect of nuclear war between russia and america. A sea of planes that on a moments notice can be in the air to avenge any communist strike. In 1962, russian missiles in cuba raised tensions to boiling point. It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any
Nuclear Missile<\/a> launched from cuba against any nation in the
Western Hemisphere<\/a> as an attack by the soviet union on the
United States<\/a>. At the 11th hour, the crisis was averted. But that close call sparked the need for better
Global Cooperation<\/a> on
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. In london, representatives of three nations signed an agreement to halt the spread of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>, taking out an insurance policy, so to speak, against a worldwide nuclear holocaust. In 1968, the
Non Proliferation Treaty<\/a> was signed. Its still enforced today. It was meant to restrict the
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> club to just five the us, russia, britain, france and china. Other countries agreed to only develop civilian programmes like
Nuclear Power<\/a> plants. Under the npt, most countries agree not to develop or seek
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>, and they accept safeguards by the
International Atomic<\/a>
Energy Agency<\/a> to verify that all of their
Nuclear Activities<\/a> are strictly peaceful, that no
Nuclear Facilities<\/a> or
Nuclear Materials<\/a> are being used for weapons purposes. It basically provides stability in the international system, in the
Global Nuclear<\/a> order. The treaty limited the number of countries that developed
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. But the \ufffd 70s and early \ufffd 80s saw a massive arms race between the two major players, america and russia. During the cold war, they ramped up the number of
Nuclear Warhead<\/a>s to over 70,000 between them. The fear was they could set off an all out nuclear war with devastating consequences. The enemy realises that an attack on the
United States<\/a> would likely mean committing national suicide. Nobody wins in nuclear war because both sides are sure to suffer terrible damage. During the cold war years, we were constantly at loggerheads. We had a lot going on to try to get our hands around the threat of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> and the threat of nuclear holocaust, because it is an existential threat to humanity. It was something both the soviets and we, later the russians, felt we just had to keep working on. Then the world changed. A new russian leader, mikhail gorbachev, came to power. Reporter the world had waited six years for this moment, and yet mr gorbachev\ufffd s first words were easy going and natural. Dobriy den, he says. Good morning. Gorbachev and president
Ronald Reagan<\/a> met at a historic summit. Shortly after, the two superpowers signed the start treaty, a commitment to reduce the number of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a>. The cold war was over and a new era of arms control began. That was really an incredibly promising time because the cold war had ended and we had this opportunity to rethink the role of
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> in us policy, and to greatly reduce. And
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> were greatly reduced over that time by a total of about 80 . In 2010, us president obama signed a second start treaty with russian president medvedev to reduce their stockpiles still further. I was responsible for negotiating the new start treaty. It causes us to limit our deployments of
Nuclear Warhead<\/a>s to 1,550 warheads each. Was a bit of a golden moment, i would say, in the us russian relationship, and we were lucky to be able to get the new start treaty negotiated during that period. Medvedev was president , but the real power in the kremlin was the then prime minister,
Vladimir Putin<\/a>. I know for a fact that behind the scenes,
Vladimir Putin<\/a> was trying to throw a wrench in the works. It was, i think, difficult sometimes to get things across the finish line in moscow. But in that way, it was a typical arms control negotiation, each side pushing for its own national interests. We got it finished, and it did enter into force. Today,
President Putin<\/a>s invasion of ukraine, and his
Nuclear Threat<\/a>s, have brought cooperation with america to a halt. Translation military chiefs told russias leader the task. Of delivering a
Massive Nuclear<\/a> strike by
Strategic Offensive<\/a> forces had been rehearsed. The new start treaty runs out in 2026. At present, there are no negotiations to extend it. That could spell the end of over 30 years of agreement between the two
Major Nuclear<\/a> players on limiting their weapons. We are no longer conducting onsite inspections or really exchanging information that provides both sides a great deal of predictability about
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> systems on the other side. So to me, its a tragic moment for nuclear arms control. This is a very dangerous time. We have moved from a period where
Nuclear Weapons<\/a> were considered unusable and a nuclear war unwinnable. Were seeming to move into a period of time where were not so sure. Every major country is investing in their nuclear arsenal. Hello. Cloudy, windy and mild pretty much covers sundays
Weather Forecast<\/a> in most parts of the uk. We do have this wriggling
Weather Front<\/a> which will bring rainforsome, particularly in the western side of scotland. But with that front edging a little bit further northwards, it will introduce milder air for more of us. But with that extensive cloud cover, it will be quite misty and murky for some coasts and hills. A bit of rain across north west england, parts of northern ireland, but more especially, this western side of scotland,
The Rain Becoming Heavy<\/a> and persistent. Eastern scotland with a bit of shelter from the winds, while here, we mayjust see a little bit of sunshine. But it is going to be a windy day for many of us. Very windy in the far north. Gusts of 60 miles per hour, for example, in shetland, where temperatures will only climb to four degrees. But elsewhere, further south, highs of 13 or 14 degrees well above the average for early february. And then during sunday night, the rain keeps on coming in western scotland, hence this met
Office Yellow<\/a> weather warning. The wettest locations over
Higher Ground<\/a> could see 170 millimetres of rain. Some snow mixing into the north of our
Weather Front<\/a>, where it engages some cold air. Very mild, though, further south, as we start monday morning. Through monday, well continue to see these outbreaks of heavy rain just waxing and waning across the north west of scotland, with some snow across the far north. But to the south of that, it stays mild, it stays quite windy, it stays very cloudy, with some mist and murk and some spots of drizzle. Temperatures up to around 13, maybe 14 degrees once again, but always colder to the north of our
Weather Front<\/a>. Just two degrees there, in lerwick. And by tuesday, well, that
Frontal System<\/a> looks set to push a little bit further southwards. So rain for northern ireland, northern england, perhaps into north wales. To the south of that, still cloudy, a bit murky, very mild. To the north of our
Weather Front<\/a>, well, some sunny spells, a few wintry showers in the far north and something just a little bit chillier. Now, this
Weather Front<\/a> just wriggles around through the middle part of the week. It will bring further outbreaks of rain. Later in the week, it does look like these various
Frontal System<\/a>s will eventually push southwards and that will allow some colder air to dig its way across more parts of the uk. It is going to take a while for that colder air to spread southwards, but it does look like, as we get through the end of the week and into the weekend, it will turn colder for all of us. Yes, therell be some rain, but for some, there may also be some snow. Live from washington. This is bbc news. The us and uk lead
International Airstrikes<\/a> on iran backed houthi positions in yemen in the latest response to attacks on red sea ships. It comes a day after the us hit iraq and syria with airstrikes in retaliation for last weekends deadly drone strike on us troops injordan. President joe biden saunters to victory in south carolina, where democrats held their first primary election of the year. Hello, im sumi somaskanda. We start in the middle east, where the us and uk have led more
Coalition Strikes<\/a> against the iran backed houthis in yemen. This video from
Us Central Command<\/a>
Shows American<\/a> aircraft taking off for the raids. According to centcom","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia801309.us.archive.org\/16\/items\/BBCNEWS_20240204_003000_Nuclear_Armageddon\/BBCNEWS_20240204_003000_Nuclear_Armageddon.thumbs\/BBCNEWS_20240204_003000_Nuclear_Armageddon_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240707T12:35:10+00:00"}