the military assumed, i think, there was support from those states. so getting them involved behind the scenes to really prefer the military as critical after we have seen this amazing turnout today in khartoum and around sudan. itrailien khartoum and around sudan. when ou sa khartoum and around sudan. when you say more _ khartoum and around sudan. when you say more pressures _ khartoum and around sudan. when you say more pressures needed, what form it should take? there is a concern that withholding money doesn't affect the military, it affects real people on ground. that's correct. in that case of sadhana what was south sudan, there is truth to that but i think what needs to be told directly to the general of the military is that there are significant feelings of support that the military has, whether tacit or not. supporting the region, egypt, the uae, the saudis and potentially russia that they will be supported financially, diplomatically on the world stage. there needs to be language, publicly, that it isn't a valid assumption, that they overturned the