Instead of Playing Politics with the future of our country, the Scottish Government should focus on delivering Good Government and Public Services for the people of scotland. Politics is not a game. The other main headlines this hour as famine looms for 20 Million People across africa and the middle east, we report from somalia. Rail services on some of the busiest lines in england have been disrupted because of a 24 hour strike. And the queen launches the baton relay for next Commonwealth Games, which are being held on australias gold coast next spring. Good evening and welcome to bbc news. The legislation to begin the process of the uk leaving the European Union, the so called brexit bill, has been approved by both Houses Of Parliament. Amendments earlier proposed by the House Of Lords, which would have protected the rights of eu citizens living here and Given Parliament a final say on the outcome of the exit talks, were dismissed. The way is now clear for theresa may to trigger article 50, which will allow those talks to begin. It comes on the day that scotlands First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, announced she would seek permission to hold a second Independence Referendum, which she said was necessary to protect scottish interests because of the governments approach to brexit. We will have the latest from westminster in a moment, but first this report from our scotland editor sarah smith. This was a big and bold move from Nicola Sturgeon, a dramatic political moment, one that is a huge gamble for her. But it is a risk she says she is ready to take. What scotla nd says she is ready to take. What scotland deserves, in the light of the Material Change of circumstances brought about by the brexit vote, is the chance to decide our future in a fair, free and democratic way. Democratic decision she says must happen before the uk leaves the eu. It could have been avoided, she claims, if the uk government had been prepared to negotiate a separate Brexit Dealfor been prepared to negotiate a separate brexit deal for scotland. We have worked hard, really hard, to try to find agreement. The Prime Minister and her government have been given every opportunity to compromise. Our efforts have instead been met with a brick wall of intransigence. Opinion polls still dont suggest more than 50 of the country would want to vote for independence. The economic circumstances are much harder for you than they were in 2014. Do you really believe you could win another referendum on independence . Yes, i do. Absolutely i believe that. I believe it would be wrong for scotland to be taken down a path that it has no control over, regardless of the consequences for our economy, our society, our sense of who we are as a country. That would be wrong. And therefore myjudgement is that we should have that choice. Outside, people came to share a significant moment. But this decision cant be made here alone. The Scottish Government will need the Prime Ministers permission for another referendum. Instead of Playing Politics with the future of our country, the Scottish Government should focus on delivering Good Government and Public Services for the people of scotland. Politics is not a game. In the scottish parliament, a majority do support another Independence Referendum, even though the tories, the lib dems and labour will oppose it. Nicola sturgeon tells us shes forcing this debate on us because of brexit, and the uncertainty that causes. So how on earth can creating more uncertainty to be a good thing . Nicola sturgeon has seized the initiative today and taken theresa may by surprise. She did not know this announcement was coming. But Nicola Sturgeon will need the agreement of the uk government before she can have another Independence Referendum. Theresa may could refuse to allow it, or she could insist any vote takes place after brexit is complete, after the whole of the uk has already left the eu. When the Prime Minister met the First Minister here injuly, she said they would reach a uk wide agreement on brexit. That failed. Now, they must try and agree the terms of a scottish referendum. Their predecessor signed a deal to allow the last Independence Vote, one they said was a once in a generation event. And dont forget, both these men then Lost Theirjobs after losing referendums. Tonight, voters in scotland will have to start thinking all over again about whether they want to stay in the United Kingdom, a decision recent polls suggest is very finely balanced. What weve seen over the last few weeks, actually, support for independence actually going up in the last few polls. What this tells us is that if you thought this was a foregone conclusion for either side, to take this for granted, would be absolutely wrong, this is going to be a really, really tight race, whenever the next referendum happens. Clearly, a second Independence Referendum is going to be high stakes for all concerned, with the result currently impossible to predict. The Prime Minister is set to trigger article 50 and open negotiations to bring the uk out of the European Union by the end of the month. It follows a series of votes in both Houses Of Parliament which allowed the governments brexit bill to pass without alteration. Our Political EditorLaura Kuenssberg has more. Not once. The ayes to the right, 335. The noes to the left, 287. But twice. The ayes to the right, 331, the noes to the left, 286. The Prime Minister never wanted them to have a say. But tonight, mps voted for her to get brexit started. Ceremoniously, the bill went along the corridor of power, back to the House Of Lords, who had tried to change it. But resistance has been fading. Only the lib dems left in theresa mays way. They have voted. Contents, 135, not contents, 274. So the not contents have it. A comfortable win for the government. Westminster is different these days. The uk as we know it could soon be very different, too. The question is whether or not scotland is going to be taken into the abyss, with this tory government. Im glad that we on this side of the house have an alternative. There might not be a real, meaningful vote in this chamber, but there shall be a meaningful vote in scotland about protecting a millennium long history as a european nation. Whether on rights for eu citizens to stay in the uk, or parliament having the final say, the government has not budged much. But it won the day. Over the past five weeks, we have seen parliament at its best. Right honourable members and peers have spoken with passion, sincerity and conviction. So, with the uk tonight now firmly on the path to exit, the Scottish Government wants to give voters a chance to leave the union, with all its complex history. Can the Prime Minister, attending a Commonwealth Service today, really deny that . Technically, it is down to westminster. But politically, is it really possible . Nicola sturgeon is talking about independence, three hours after the brexit result was declared on 24june, and actually has been banging on about independence every day since. Im afraid todays irresponsible actions just demonstrate that Nicola Sturgeon has a constitutional obsession. You could rule this out right now. You could just say, the uk government will not allow another Scottish Independence referendum to take place. There could be another referendum. Theres a process for doing that. But we are absolutely focused on the argument that there should not be another Independence Referendum. Youre saying, not yet, but youre not saying no. Theres a process issue. We dont want to be in the process argument, because thats not a real argument. Behind closed doors, ministers used to say they said they would not allow another Independence Vote to go ahead. But the eu referendum, and how scotland voted, has changed that whole dynamic. Even before today, there was a growing sense it wasnt if, but when. It is only 263 days since the eu referendum. Yet, just as one fight for the tories comes to an end, another, perhaps more profound, begins. Lets speak to our Political Correspondent chris mason. Is itfairto is it fair to say that it has been a slightly easier night the government than perhaps they were expecting . M has been. And what is interesting as politics has been very noisy but quite awhile. The Decibels Levels last night cranked up a few notches, but the government has got its way. In the House Of Lords and in the House Of Commons, it didnt face any trouble whatsoever. Barely any rebels at all in the House Of Commons early in the evening, and the House Of Lords basically got the hintand the House Of Lords basically got the hint and recognised that there was a limit to its powers to intervene, given that it is an appointed chamber rather than an elected one. What they had made their point. They had attempted to persuade the commons to amend the bill on the rights of eu nationals, and that meaningful vote, so called, at the end of process. What they acknowledge the commons wasnt going to wear that, and so they said, look, this is the End Of The Road. Liberal democrats continue to make the point that they have a real problem with brexit, but labour and a good number of the independent crossbench peers recognise that the End Of The Road had been reached. So the bill now will get royal assent, it will become an act of parliament, and so theresa may will have on her back pocket the very thing that the Supreme Court said a couple of months ago she had to have in order to start the whole racks at process, triggering article 50. But she isnt going to do it tomorrow. She could have done, but she isnt going to brexit process. As she has promised for sometime now, towards the end of the month, so a couple of weeks yet. Why are they going to wait another two weeks. There were some suggestions it would happen more quickly. There were, there was a lot of headlines over the weekend using the word could, hearing a lot of the word could, because she could do it tomorrow but it doesnt necessarily mean that she will. And now we know that she wont. Why not . I think she wouldnt want to be seen to be rushed, it is not really in her nature. We have got the elections coming up in holland. There was of course the intervention from Nicola Sturgeon, which might have made it think she should just leave it a little while longer. Made her thing. There is a big day in her diary she has to avoid later this month when there is a big celebration of euery, for want of a better word, with the anniversary of the treaty of rome, the first act which started the business of eu integration. So a diplomatic and political act, the date on which article 50 is triggered, and every date after it will be deeply political as well. There must be a better word than eu ery. Political as well. There must be a better word than eu erylj political as well. There must be a better word than euery. I am working on it. I have two years. Lets return now to the passage through parliament of the brexit bill. Joining me now is professor richard whitman, head of the school of politics and International Relations at kent university, and Senior Research fellow at chatham house. Good evening to you. Good evening. What is your assessment of this evenings events in parliament, and where this takes us . I think what it has done is to really strengthen theresa mays position. This was a process she didnt want to go through, taking article 52 parliament. She was forced by the Supreme Court, though, and i think she has ended up now as we have seen with the parliamentary arithmetic, much, much stronger than might have otherwise been expected, and it clearly demonstrates, i think that gives her a very strong hand for going into the negotiations with the eu. One of the issues that is difficult with this debate is the level of parliamentary scrutiny there is going to be through this process. How much do you think there commons and the lords now is taking a look at some aspect. Going through every aspect with a fine tooth comb, picking up some issues which can get explored at length in the referendum and i think what we are going to discover between now and the summer is the complexity of the negotiations, but also as far as parliament is concerned, i think it is really going to want to. It is really going to want to give the government things to think about in terms of the different aspects of the relationship. And so i think parliament is really going to come into its own. And that could mean, looking at tomorrow mornings times newspaper, separate bills on separate issues, say on agriculture, for the sake of argument, on immigration. And if we get to that point then of course there could be debates and amendments. The lords gets involved. It is potentially quite convex, isnt it . Absolutely. We have two things going on. On the one hand we have the disentangling of the uks relationship with the eu, which was a two year Negotiation Process , eu, which was a two year Negotiation Process, triggered when article 50 is invoked. What we also have is the uk needing to put in place the arrangements to replace what we have with the eu. We know we have a great repeal bill coming, but we also have to think about areas such as the environmental policy, energy policy, competition policy, agricultural policy, fisheries policy, and so on. And all of those are clearly areas that parliament will have a view on. Well want to investigate, explore through committees and a vis the report to the government in terms of the directions they think the uks policy should start taking in these areas. Does that mean two years is long enough, or not . Well, i think it depends on what you are looking at. Two years in terms of negotiations with the eu is probably enough to look at how you disentangle the uk from the eu. It is not enough, really, to work out a new sort of trade deal with the eu, and it is certainly not long enough, i think, to work through most of the areas of Public Policy that the uk either has to do decide on, what principles they want to be based on. And the European Union has been part of our Public Policy making since the early 1970s. In a sense we have to look at where we find our national policy, a whole series of things. Lets return to the prospect of a second Independence Referendum in scotland. In september 2014, the people of scotland voted by 55 to 45 to reject independence. Our scotland correspondent lorna gordon has been to fife to see if the mood has changed and to test the appetite for a second referendum on independence. Across the first from scotlands of the city of edinburgh light of these streets. They are typical of many scottish towns. What do people here think of the possibility of a second Independence Referendum . Its too early for a referendum. People are tired. The fight that Nicola Sturgeon wants to take us into the key you. Going out, want to go back in. The last Independence Referendum a little over two years ago, a majority of the people here in The Kingdom Of Fife voted to remain as Pa Rt Kingdom Of Fife voted to remain as part of the uk. In fact, the results here mirrored exactly the result across scotland as a whole. Families and couples were divided in their opinions of what was best for scotlands future. I want more independence. My personnel at 10 opinion, i would go back to another vote. Hopefully this time it would go to independence. Her partner originally voted no to independence but has not changed his mind. Originally voted no to independence but has not changed his mindm originally voted no to independence but has not changed his mind. In the la st but has not change