russell brand's channel, what's happening there? well, in recent years russell brand has perhaps dropped out of the mainstream media a little bit, but that doesn't mean that he doesn't have a huge following on social media, in particular onjujube. he has 6.6 million followers for his channel where he posts videos almost every day, giving his opinion on all sorts of things. he is able to make quite a lot of money out of that because there are adverts at the beginning of those videos and at the end and he is also able to promote things as part of those videos and provide links in the comments and description section of the youtube page to various products. however, he is no longer going to be able to make money from that because google has come out with a statement this morning saying we have suspended monetisation of russell brand's channel for violating our greater responsibility policy. no response to this movie yet from russell brand, although i was looking at his site this morning and he has made quite a lot of his videos onto a rival but much less well—known platform called rambo. rival but much less well- known platform called rambo.- rival but much less well- known platform called rambo. since the alleaations platform called rambo. since the allegations were _ platform called rambo. since the allegations were broadcast - platform called rambo. since the allegations were broadcast and i platform called rambo. since the. allegations were broadcast and put in print, we know that the bbc, channel 4 and a production company have launched internal investigations into russell brand, but the police have got involved as well after an allegation was taken to them. can you explain what has happened there?— happened there? yes, so this investigation _ happened there? yes, so this investigation by _ happened there? yes, so this investigation by channel - happened there? yes, so this investigation by channel 4 - happened there? yes, so this - investigation by channel 4 news, the sunday times newspaper and the times newspaper was broadcast and published over the weekend. following that, the metropolitan police have now announced that yesterday a woman came forward to file a complaint saying that she had been assaulted in soho in central london in 2003. the police did not identify the person who allegedly did this assault and it is not thought that it is one of the woman included in that investigation by the channel 4 and the two newspapers, those allocations are between 2006 and 2013, this was allegedly in 2003. what the police have said as they would encourage anyone who believes they have been sexually assaulted to come forward. russell brand strenuously denies all the allegations.— some breaking news from the uk. a damning report on the mistreatment of detainees at an immigration removal centre has recommended a time limit on the length of their stay. the public inquiry found a toxic culture among staff at brook house near gatwick airport. it follows the bbc panorama investigation into thousand 17. the inquiry chair recommended that the government changed the law to limit detention at immigration removal centres to 28 days. live now to your home affairs correspondent, tom symons. just take us through the conclusions from this inquiry, please. it conclusions from this inquiry, lease. , ., conclusions from this inquiry, lease. ., , please. it is worth saying that this in . ui please. it is worth saying that this inquiry results _ please. it is worth saying that this inquiry results directly _ please. it is worth saying that this inquiry results directly from - please. it is worth saying that this inquiry results directly from an - inquiry results directly from an investigation from the bbc�*s panorama programme which employed callum tully, an 18—year—old custom officer, to go undercover with hidden cameras at brook house and what font is extremely distressing. this inquiry said that as a result it had taken a vast amount of evidence and concluded that brook house was a place of stress and distress, overcrowded, dirty, noisy from aircraft taking off and landing at nearby gatwick airport, riddled with drugs, the drug spice use prolifically. the chair concluded that this was a place entirely unsuitable for detaining people for anything other than a short period of time. that is an important intervention in the debates about detention centres because currently immigration detention is unlimited and the government is now facing a call from a public inquiry to introduce a limit, something the government voted against and 2020. has there been any reaction from the government? i know this reporter just recently been published. watch at the practicalities of putting a time on detention? ida. at the practicalities of putting a time on detention?— at the practicalities of putting a time on detention? no, no direct resonse time on detention? no, no direct resnonse yet _ time on detention? no, no direct response yet from _ time on detention? no, no direct response yet from the _ time on detention? no, no direct response yet from the home - time on detention? no, no direct l response yet from the home office but in the past officers told me that it has implemented previous inquiry recommendations, inspection recommendations which needed to be brought in at brook house. the problem for the government is it is just change the law to make the treatment of people who come across the english channel in small boats much more harsh, if you like, a tougher approach. the government says that if you come across in a small boat or if you pass up the offer of life in a safe country before britain, then you could be immediately detained and removed from the uk. the effect of that is detention centres are expected to get fuller, not less full, as the years go on in future. but here an inquiry is saying that people have to be housed in detention centres for less than 28 days. 0ften to be housed in detention centres for less than 28 days. often they can be there for months and i spoke to a guy yesterday who had been in detention for 2.5 years. you can say that this is effectively a direct challenge to the government's policy of increasing detention and making it tougher to get into the uk using detention as a sanction. i it tougher to get into the uk using detention as a sanction.— detention as a sanction. i want to listen into — detention as a sanction. i want to listen into the _ detention as a sanction. i want to listen into the inquiry _ detention as a sanction. i want to listen into the inquiry chair, - detention as a sanction. i want to listen into the inquiry chair, she i listen into the inquiry chair, she is talking after the publication of this inquiry. is talking after the publication of this inquiry-— is talking after the publication of this inquiry. humiliating remarks were made _ this inquiry. humiliating remarks were made towards _ this inquiry. humiliating remarks were made towards men - this inquiry. humiliating remarks were made towards men who - this inquiry. humiliating remarks i were made towards men who were this inquiry. humiliating remarks - were made towards men who were self harming _ were made towards men who were self harming or— were made towards men who were self harming or being treated for a medicai— harming or being treated for a medical emergency. segregation was used inappropriately and there were occasions _ used inappropriately and there were occasions where threatening or derogatory language reduced towards men who— derogatory language reduced towards men who were extremely vulnerable. in men who were extremely vulnerable. in one _ men who were extremely vulnerable. in one incident there was a failure to adequately respond to a detained man he _ to adequately respond to a detained man he had been found with a ligature — man he had been found with a ligature around his neck. i also saw evidence _ ligature around his neck. i also saw evidence of— ligature around his neck. i also saw evidence of physical violence by staff against detained people. that i staff against detained people. that i found _ staff against detained people. that i found this number of incidents took— i found this number of incidents took place within such a limited time _ took place within such a limited time of— took place within such a limited time of five months is of significant concern. in my view these — significant concern. in my view these incidents were able to have a because _ these incidents were able to have a because of— these incidents were able to have a because of a combination of factors. under— because of a combination of factors. under the _ because of a combination of factors. under the home office at this contracture brook house was not sufficiently decent, secure or caring — sufficiently decent, secure or caring for— sufficiently decent, secure or caring for detaining people or its staff at— caring for detaining people or its staff at the time these events took place _ staff at the time these events took place an— staff at the time these events took place. an environment flourished in which _ place. an environment flourished in which unacceptable treatment became more likely. the physical environment itself was entirely unsuitable for detaining people for anything _ unsuitable for detaining people for anything other than a short period of time _ anything other than a short period of time. some men were held there for more _ of time. some men were held there for more than a year. the building was designed to a specification of a category— was designed to a specification of a category b— was designed to a specification of a category b prison, that is wrong with physical security suitable for managing offenders. the environment was harsh _ managing offenders. the environment was harsh. men primarily slept in shared _ was harsh. men primarily slept in shared cells with poor ventilation. there _ shared cells with poor ventilation. there are — shared cells with poor ventilation. there are issues with overcrowding. it there are issues with overcrowding. it was _ there are issues with overcrowding. it was extremely difficult to deliver— it was extremely difficult to deliver a decent and humane regime for the _ deliver a decent and humane regime for the men — deliver a decent and humane regime for the men detained. the deliver a decent and humane regime forthe men detained. the impact deliver a decent and humane regime for the men detained. the impact of the prison— for the men detained. the impact of the prison —like environment was particularly — the prison —like environment was particularly detrimental for those with mental ill health or other vulnerabilities. indeed, one home office— vulnerabilities. indeed, one home office manager told the inquiry that if someone spent more than 24 hours at brook— if someone spent more than 24 hours at brook house you are going to develop — at brook house you are going to develop mental health issues, it is not a _ develop mental health issues, it is not a nice — develop mental health issues, it is not a nice place to be. i also heard evidence _ not a nice place to be. i also heard evidence that the indefinite nature of immigration detention caused uncertainty and anxiety for detaining people and had a detrimental effect on their well—being. there was no maximum period _ well—being. there was no maximum period for— well—being. there was no maximum period for which someone could be detained _ period for which someone could be detained at brook house or any other immigration removal centre and this remains _ immigration removal centre and this remains the — immigration removal centre and this remains the case today. people should — remains the case today. people should not be held indefinitely for immigration purposes in an environment designed to the specifications of the prison. immigration detainees are not prisoners. in light of what i found i'm recommending that the government introduce _ i'm recommending that the government introduce a _ i'm recommending that the government introduce a time limit whereby those detained _ introduce a time limit whereby those detained at immigration removal centres. — detained at immigration removal centres, including brighouse, should only he_ centres, including brighouse, should only be kept there for a maximum 28 days _ only be kept there for a maximum 28 days this— only be kept there for a maximum 28 days. this inquiry found that too often _ days. this inquiry found that too often there was a failure to follow safeguarding rules and procedures that are _ safeguarding rules and procedures that are in — safeguarding rules and procedures that are in place to protect the most _ that are in place to protect the most vulnerable. for example, i found— most vulnerable. for example, i found serious failings in the application of safeguarding rules relating — application of safeguarding rules relating to individuals whose health may he _ relating to individuals whose health may be detrimentally impacted by detention, notably around rules 34 and 35— detention, notably around rules 34 and 35 of— detention, notably around rules 34 and 35 of the detention centre rules — and 35 of the detention centre rules the _ and 35 of the detention centre rules. the rules and went to ten people — rules. the rules and went to ten people can _ rules. the rules and went to ten people can be segregated were also misunderstood and implemented incorrectly. these failures left detained _ incorrectly. these failures left detained people exposed to the risk of harm _ detained people exposed to the risk of harm and in some cases caused actual— of harm and in some cases caused actual harm — of harm and in some cases caused actual harm to be suffered. i am clear— actual harm to be suffered. i am clear that — actual harm to be suffered. i am clear that this was not because the safeguards themselves are poor, rather— safeguards themselves are poor, rather there was too often a widespread disregard or a lack of understanding of how to implement them in_ understanding of how to implement them in the way they were designed, concerning _ them in the way they were designed, concerning the i have also heard evidence — concerning the i have also heard evidence that this confusion and flawed _ evidence that this confusion and flawed implementation may persist. this inquiry receive detailed evidence about how health care was delivered _ evidence about how health care was delivered in brighouse. there are hi-h delivered in brighouse. there are high levels of mental ill health of the detained population and a significant proportion are likely to be acutely vulnerable having been victims _ be acutely vulnerable having been victims of — be acutely vulnerable having been victims of torture or exposed to trauma — victims of torture or exposed to trauma. there can be a heightened risk of— trauma. there can be a heightened risk of self—harm or suicidal ideatioh _ risk of self—harm or suicidal ideation. while i do not underestimate the challenges of delivering health care in such an environment i was concerned by the evidence _ environment i was concerned by the evidence i_ environment i was concerned by the evidence i saw and heard. i find that health care staff did not sufficiently understand their safeguarding responsibilities towards detained people, particularly in relation to the use of force — particularly in relation to the use of force and were too quick to dismiss — of force and were too quick to dismiss difficult or challenging behaviour as disobedience rather than an— behaviour as disobedience rather than an indication of mental ill health — than an indication of mental ill health. ., , ., , health. so, that is kate ives, the chair of the _ health. so, that is kate ives, the chair of the inquiry _ health. so, that is kate ives, the chair of the inquiry into - health. so, that is kate ives, the chair of the inquiry into brook . chair of the inquiry into brook house immigration centre. i want to go back to tom symons, who has been listening across. give us a sense of how serious the incidents where uncovered which have led to this damning report. uncovered which have led to this damning report-— uncovered which have led to this damning report. well, they were re damning report. well, they were pretty disturbing. _ damning report. well, they were pretty disturbing. some - damning report. well, they were pretty disturbing. some of- damning report. well, they were pretty disturbing. some of the i pretty disturbing. some of the footage gathered as part of that investigation was deeply disturbing. inquiry focused on 19 incidents that it said amounted to inhumane or mistreatment of people, potentially in breach of their human rights. just to give you some idea, of them involved a man known by the cipher t - 1527, involved a man known by the cipher t — 1527, an involved a man known by the cipher t —1527, an egyptian man claiming asylum, who had been tortured, he said, and had mental health issues. at one point he was held down by the neck by a custody officer and you can hear him in the footage screaming and gurgling as this detention centre offers holds him down. we havejust had a response from g4s, which ranted centre back in those days, saying it had improved its performance and that there had been a review in 2019 that found no evidence after the documentary that those behaviours still present. let's look at some other stories making news. new government figures show the number of schools in england affected by crumbling concrete has increased to 174 — an increase of 27 since the end of last month. officials said surveyors have been checking hundreds of schools every week for the concrete known as raac. the government said it will update the list every two weeks. the department for transport has awarded the train operator avanti west coast a long—term contract to run services on the west coast main line for up to nine years. the company had previously been ordered to develop a plan to address poor performance. the transport secretary said avanti was "back on track" and the contract will ensure improvements continue. unesco, the united nations�* cultural body, has urged the government to amend a controversial plan to construct a road tunnel near stonehenge. highways england says it wanted to build the tunnel to reduce traffic on the a303, but there is concern among activists and unesco that stonehenge could lose its world heritage status if the plan goes ahead. you're live with bbc news. world leaders are in new york for the united nations general assembly, with debate beginning shortly. the annual meeting is an opportunity for the leaders to have their say on current events. brazilian president luiz inacio lula da silva will open the first session, followed by us presidentjoe biden. this year, the focus is on ukraine, climate change and sustainable development. cbs news correspondent jarred hill is in new york. president biden is expected to focus heavily on ukraine, the situation there between ukraine and russia and in particular trying to galvanise as much of this body as possible around this effort notjust for ukraine itself but as we have heard from president biden and other allies, this idea of broader efforts to maintain democracy in that part of the world. that is expected to be a big focus. we are expecting to hear from president zelensky around the same themes and ideas, as well. this same themes and ideas, as well. as well as what is happening in public, there will be lots of bilateral meetings. this is a meeting of world leaders, representatives all getting together to talk shop, effectively. not just getting together to talk shop, effectively. notjust getting together, but getting together individually. i have spoken to former un official to have spoken to former un official to have said that this is what this type of event is for, for these world leaders to have these one—on—one conversations and potentially sway them in the direction that person wants them to go. president biden is the only world leader out of five world leaders here that have veto power. president putin will not be here, xi jinping will not be here. president biden will have the opportunity to have conversations with the leaders of some of these countries that may be surrounding russia and ukraine and trying to get them on their side. ~ ., and trying to get them on their side. , ,, , side. more surprisingly, the president — side. more surprisingly, the president of _ side. more surprisingly, the president of france - side. more surprisingly, the president of france is - side. more surprisingly, the president of france is not . side. more surprisingly, the - president of france is not there, and for the first time in a decade, the uk prime minister is not going to be there. the uk prime minister is not going to be there-— to be there. yes, that's right. we know that — to be there. yes, that's right. we know that the _ to be there. yes, that's right. we know that the president - to be there. yes, that's right. we know that the president of - to be there. yes, that's right. we know that the president of france are saying that he is staying behind to prepare for a visit from king charles, and the uk prime minister says that his schedule is busy. all of that is bringing up a question of the relevance of this type of event. it gives president biden a bit of a way to say that he is in essence the leader of these major leading nations and to potentially give some of the smaller countries, it gives them an opportunity to make some of their concerns known, make some of their concerns known, make some of their voices heard on a stage that is usually dominated by some of these major key nations. ads, is usually dominated by some of these major key nations. these ma'or key nations. a nightmare there in these major key nations. a nightmare there in newark _ these major key nations. a nightmare there in newark at _ these major key nations. a nightmare there in newark at the _ these major key nations. a nightmare there in newark at the moment, - there in newark at the moment, or there in newark at the moment, or the streets full of limousines, has taken over the centre of new york? we just saw a motorcade passing taken over the centre of new york? wejust saw a motorcade passing by, and that has been one of the things that has been the case here over the past couple of days as you do have all of these world leaders. we also have all of the security to make sure that they stay safe. we know that there are about 10,000 or so officers, new york city police as well as federal officers, coming through this area, standing on the streets to make sure that everything is orderly. there are also people that we don't see that you are here to make sure these things go as safely as possible.— to make sure these things go as safely as possible. always good to talk to you- _ safely as possible. always good to talk to you. thank _ safely as possible. always good to talk to you. thank you. _ talk to you. thank you. president biden will be speaking in the next couple of hours. relations between canada and india have further deteriorated, with india expelling a senior canadian diplomat. it was in response to allegations that indian agents might have been involved in the murder of a canadian sikh activist. hardeep singh nijjar was shot dead outside a temple in british columbia less than three years after india designated him a terrorist. the indian foreign ministry described the allegations they were behind his death as absurd and motivated. earlier, the canadian prime minister, justin trudeau, told parliament he had raised the issue with his indian counterpart, narendra modi, at the g20 summit. over the past number of weeks, canadian security agencies have been actively pursuing credible allegations of a potential link between agents of the government of india and the killing of a canadian citizen, hardeep singh nijjar. canada is a rule—of—law country. the protection of our citizens and defence of our sovereignty are fundamental. our top priorities have therefore been, one, that our law enforcement and security agencies ensure the continued safety of all canadians, and, two, that all steps be taken to hold perpetrators of this murder to account. canada has declared its deep concerns to the top intelligence and security officials of the indian government. last week, at the g20, i brought them personally and directly to prime minister modi in no uncertain terms. live to delhi now with our correspondent zubair ahmed. give us the background to this, tell us a bit about the lead up to this, a real de—escalation of the relationship between canada and india. for relationship between canada and india. ., . , relationship between canada and india. ., ., , ., , ., , ., india. for a number of years india has been urging _ india. for a number of years india has been urging canada _ india. for a number of years india has been urging canada to - india. for a number of years india has been urging canada to help i india. for a number of years india . has been urging canada to help them find out the people who are according to india perpetuating terror in india, also they are foreigners and the main people behind the secessionists seek movement in india and it has always urged canada to root out such people from the canadian soil which india says they have been using for quite a number of years. justin trudeau came to india in 2018. india had protested against such elements and urge candidate to take action against such people. even last week when mr trudeau was at the g20 summit, there was a brief meeting with mahendra modi. it was no doubt very brief, it lasted five minutes but it was extremely tense. they did not hug each other theyjust shook hands and very briefly, so it was clear that things were not right between the two countries and after justin trudeau made that statement in the canadian parliament on monday, there was shock and even anger in india. india is feeling offended that a friendly country like canada has gone public with allegations which india has now said our unsubstantiated. there is a lot of surprise and india has urged canada that they take action against separatists who are using canadian soil to spread hatred in india. flan soilto spread hatred in india. can ou rive soilto spread hatred in india. can you give us— soilto spread hatred in india. can you give us a _ soil to spread hatred in india. can you give us a bit of background with regards to the murder of hardeep singh nijjar. orwas regards to the murder of hardeep singh nijjar. or was he and why has he become such a focus in both countries? he he become such a focus in both countries?— countries? he was a separatist leader wanted _ countries? he was a separatist leader wanted in _ countries? he was a separatist leader wanted in india - countries? he was a separatist leader wanted in india by - countries? he was a separatist leader wanted in india by the l countries? he was a separatist - leader wanted in india by the indian authorities. he was based in british columbia, near vancouver. authorities. he was based in british columbia, nearvancouver. he was killed injune of this year and i would like to tell the viewers that there are similar murders in the uk in the month ofjune and another seeks gentleman was killed in lahore in pakistan, so between may and june this year three similar killings happened and all of them were wanted by the indian authorities and they were linked to what india says is this movement. the one that happened in canada, now the canadian government has come out to say that they have decided there was a link between the murder and the indian government. that is the background. thank you forjoining us and given us the background to this deterioration in relationships between canada and india. before we go, an x—ray of a rather unusual kind in mexico. doctors in mexico have carried out a series of tests on the remains of what is alleged to be a small alien body. two of the "non—human bodies" were presented to mexican congress last week by journalist and ufo enthusiast jaime maussan. he says the bodies were found in peru in 2017 and claims they are not related to life on earth. they have three fingers on each hand and elongated heads. there is no definitive answer yet on what they are, but doctors say today's tests show no sign of assembly or manipulation in the skeleton. stay with us here on bbc news, hello. it's already been a wet day so far for quite a few of you and more rain to come through the rest of today. it's all linked in to an area of low pressure, which is to the north of the country. 0n the southern edge of it strong winds and these weather fronts, which are just marching mainly across the central strip of the uk. the rain will ease off a little bit at times, although i suspect around the hills of northern england, south—west scotland, northern ireland, north—west wales it will remain pretty damp throughout. a few passing showers towards the south coast. a few glimpses of brightness here, but here, and across much of england and wales, where we see the strongest of the winds today, gusting 40, 50, maybe 60mph. winds a little bit lighter further north. the rain gets heavier again this afternoon in northern ireland and south—west scotland. some of the brightest weather to be found today will be in northern scotland, but, even here, a few passing heavy, thundery showers and fresher feel — 13 to 15 degrees, compared to 19 or 20 celsius further south and east. it will feel reasonably humid here, but that will, of course, be tempered by the strength of the wind. it will remain windy through tonight. the rain will become more extensive across scotland, northern ireland for a time and then heavier bursts of rain march back into the north of england and across parts of wales for tomorrow morning. with those winds still coming in from a south—westerly direction, it's not going to be cold night at all — 15 or 16 degrees for many. into wednesday, this weather front will bring something fresher gradually through the day, but it's going to be quite a potent feature. starting in the north of england, wales and the south—west there could be some rumbles of thunder. some pretty nasty downpours with that could cause some minorflooding. that will work its way eastwards, never quite reaching in the far south—east until late in the day. brighter skies in its wake. fresh feeling, the breeze, but frequent showers across western scotland, northern ireland and the wind strengthening across in the western isles, where, as we go into thursday, we could see winds gusting 50, 60mph again here, but elsewhere the winds will be lighter compared with the next couple of days. a sunny start, fresh start, but plenty of showers developing through the day. some of those could be heavy and thundery. for all, temperatures in the teens. in the breeze and the showers it will feel cooler. the change to the unsettled conditions is because we've got the jet stream really piling across the atlantic and in these dips we see areas of low pressure, one after another, but there will be a little bit of a gap between them, i suspect, through friday into saturday. so late on friday and early saturday there will be some drier and brighter moments with some sunshine, but there's more wet and windy weather to come later in the weekend. bye for now. this is bbc news. the headlines: world leaders are in new york for the united nations�* general assembly. president biden addresses the meeting today. hundreds of protesters rally in libya's disaster—hit derna, accusing the authorities of neglect over the devastating flash flood. military officials find the debris of an f—35 fighter jet that disappeared after the pilot ejected over south carolina. world leaders meeting at the united nations have warned that global attempts to end extreme poverty and tackle climate change are going in reverse. they said goals for sustainable development, agreed by un member states in 2015, were "in peril" and many were unlikely to be met. and as our diplomatic correspondent james landale reports from new york, the war in ukraine will again dominate events. september in new york. rain, security, and diplomats gathering at the united nations — all here for their annual meeting to try to put the world to rights. high on their agenda, of course, russia's invasion of ukraine, where the war is grinding on. earlier this year, the un secretary—general, antonio