>> they're actions that i have the legal authority to take as president. >> instead of fixing our broken immigration system, the president says that he's acting on his own, and that's not how democracy works. >> certainly by the calendar year, you'll see a much more robust presence. >> this is a long-term challenge. >> a ceasefire was in september. >> they continue to be detained and tortured. >> too much displace many. >> no respect for the weary in new york state. >> parts of the area have snow on the ground and 4 feet before it's over. >> this is a major emergency. we have roofs collapsing. >> three students are injured. and a gunman is dead at florida state university. >> you hear about all of these shootings, and then it just happens. >> today, we're all ffu. >> we begin with president obama's controversial move. >> a common sense, middle ground approach. if you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. if you're a criminal, you'll be deported. if you plan to enter the u.s. illegally, your chances of getting caught has gone up. we will always be a nation of immigrants. we were strangers once too. >> the president's three-year plan allows roughly 5 million people to avoid deportation, and it includes for parents of children who are residents. it expands the dreamer's acts provisions, and calls for prioritizing deportations for recent arrivals for criminals, and beefs up security. the president insisted that his actions are lawful and challenged republicans who threatened to sue him, claiming that he's wildly exceeding his executive authority. >> to those members of congress who questioned my authority to make the immigration system better, i have one answer, pass a bill. >> republicans say they are ready to do whatever it takes to stop the president. >> they were going to go nut, because they're going to see it as a move outside of the authority of the president. hopefully not, but you can see stances of anarchy. >> we are joined at capitol hill with congressman steve king, and i know that you strongly oppose the president's unilateral action, but didn't something need to be done? immigration reform has been paralyzed. >> this didn't need to be done. the introduction of the rule of law with regard to immigration didn't need to be done, and that's what happened. the president has taken the constitution, stood before america and separated out article 1, and torn it out of the constitution, and folded it and said i'm going to run this part of the government too. he has taken that authority, and our founding fathers set up a separation of powers and they envisioned the executive and the jeweled i shall branches of government would jealously protect the power that's vested in them thumb the constitution. this congress has to step and up take back the legislative authority from the president, and if not, the republic has been torn apart. that's why i have a sick feeling in my stomach and he knows better. 22 times, as he gave the speech. >> the congress has refused to take a vote, including on the senate bill that passed more than a year and a half ago that had some republican support. and illegal immigration is a crisis that the republicans have called a lot of attention to, and wasn't there a pretty desperate need at some point to move on this if congress wouldn't? >> if congress doesn't pass a bill that the president wants, that doesn't validate his unconstitutional action. i would say if the president thought this was so important, he failed to convince congress that they should pass a bill that followed in his bidding. congress has passed legislation, and we passed border legislation august 1st this year, to tighten the loophole, with mexican kids coming into the country and being distributed to every state, to send money to the border state directors directly because the president is not enforcing the law. the president announced before the bill was drafted that he would veto it. that's the kind of cooperation we have from the president, and now he sticks his finger into the eye of the united states congress, tears the apart, and destroys the rule of law for a long time to come. we have to put the president back into the constitutional barreled rails, and that's going to take a series of steps of things to do. >> and certainly, the president.net move on this, when he had huge majorities in congress in the first two years, and we're seeing that the represent rick has gotten very heated on the republican side, calling him a lawless president and senator kob urn said that we could see anarchy and violence. how far are republicans prepared to go to oppose this executive order? >> well, i think that the first thing to do is to bring a resolution of disapproval to the floor of the house house, pass that, and it stipulates the things that he has done and our rejection to it. we did what when the supreme court went out of the board of the constitution, and we have theology to bring censure, and that has happened to presidents but it has been a long time since we utilized that. and the third thing, to shut off the funding to reinforce the law. i don't think that it's getting very heat when do you say that the president is acting in lawless fashion, he has done violence to the constitution tonight. and it's not the only time that he has violated the constitution. >> talk about the proposals and what you think you can do. what exactly can congress do to defund anything that really have an affect on what he's doing. because citizenship and immigration services are funded by fees, not by congress, and i'm sure that you don't want to defund ice, because in a of course -- border security depends on those agents. >> well, you see me smiling a little bit because i've seen this argument emerge from the white house in the last few days, saying that it's a fee for services. it takes an appropriations bill. that's a red herring by people that want to do an anonymous bill, wow imagine that the president of the united states can violate the constitution, and take the authority unto himself and the congress is powerless to veto that? i brought the legislation that cut off the funding for obamacare, and we went through this, but it's an internal ruling in the house that isn't written. so does want house have a tradition that prevents us from defending the constitution when the president violates it? that's not going to hold, i have the language in my jacket pocket. >> you said that impeachment is a last resort. but a lot of republicans have made noises about impeachment and is anyone considering that? >> i think that it's seriously considered. and i think most, and i'm speaking of the conservatives that i know the best, most want to start out with the minimal and ramp it up to we must defend the constitution. so i say incrementally, the resolutions for cutting funding next. and the american people have to rise up. we need to hear from the american people, and if not, there won't be energy in the congress to get that done. we have to make a decision on this by december 11th, and from where i now stand, i won't be able to vote for any appropriations bill by a lawless act by the president. >> i'm talking about the funding used to implement this. this is not an emergency. this is the president deciding to legislate by executive edict. he has violated his october to care that the laws are faithfully executed. and now the 35 of us in the house and senate are obligated to follow our oath and put the president back in the constitutional guard rails. >> let's talk about the family and the president's executive action is greatly aimed at keeping it together for people who work and don't have criminal histories, who pay for work permits and all of these things that are required enter order to be able to work in this country. shouldn't that be something that philosophically the republicans should support? >> of course we support families, and we support a man and woman joined together joined together hopefully in holy matrimony and blessed by children, but all of us are victims of our parents, and bad decisions my our parents. we don't put somebody in prison for a serious crime because they have children at home. and if the family is separated, it's because of the decisions made by the children and the families themselves. we didn't put up a sign that says come to america, and you get to live in per opportunity. but instead, we put up a sign that says, if you cross the border, you're going to commit a crime and we'll punish you. >> wanted president doesn't have to worry about the latino vote. and you don't have to worry about it, and it could be decisive in national elections, and there's clear history that latinos have turned against candidates who have taken up tough positions on people who, d would that damage the republican's chance to win the white house? >> i have counties in my district that are very high in numbers and percentages, and it's not that i'm not sensitive to this, but i recognize that we have latino families, and their moms and dads and grandparents, and they love their children, and they work hard, and i encourage them to work smart and hard. but we should not be doing identity politics and bending and twisting the constitutionas underbecause we're worried about the vulnerabilities. when you take an oath to the constitution, you don't have a caveat in there that says unless it's advantage to me, you must defend the constitution come what may. >> congressman steve king, thank you for your perspective. let's bring in michael shore from los angeles, and joining us here from new york, republican strategist, tom dougherty, and he's a political adviser. and it's good to have you with us. despite what we heard the congressman say, guys, the represent rick on both sides, you have the democrats comparing this to the new emancemation proclamation and the republicans talking impeachment and anarchy and violence in the street. and even tom coburn is not normally a sober guy. >> coburn has a good relationship with the president, and he's talking about rioting in the streets. no one is going to look apartment facts of this situation. it's just going to be the rhetoric of how dare he do this? and it's sad that as an american, americans lost tonight. and i'm talking about americans who, i believe illegally came into this country many many years ago and have american kids in this country, who shouldn't have to live in fear that they're going to be shipped home, away from this were children. they did wrong, and we're not granting them citizenship. so a lot of republicans like myself the immigration reform. all we saw tonight is the president thumb his nose into a system that he hasn't put a lot of time and effort into negotiating a deal. >> mike, your opinion on that, the democrats making a scene where it's a grand moment, comparing the president to abraham lincoln. >> i don't know if we could go that far, i wouldn't compare it to slavery with coming over here in many cases illegally and having citizenship. that's going a bit fash, but however, i think tommy is not right when he talks about this being, thumbing the nose at the american people. the president, to his -- as is in the record, had a senate bill that went to the house of representatives. and i think in some sense, if the president has thumbed his nose at the country, so too has john boehner over the last year and a half when they had a bill sitting in the house of representatives. but than doesn't manner. this is not about the micro. this is not only about the legislation. this is about the macro, the political reality of a pretty coming in and taking sort of political ownership of a group of people, while at the same time -- >> let's bring in tom on that. is this all about politics? the democrats making sure that they solidify their gains? >> of course it is. if that weren't the case, they have bad political calculations going back before the election. why didn't they do this before the election? they clearly, it's going to motive. factually on one side, people agree with the policy, and they nationally disagree with the manner in which he's doing t. which goes back to the way that the president has run the country. >> you have 57% of americans saying that they want immigration reform. but they didn't want the president to do this by himself. so michael, could this hurt the democrats? could it alienate white voters who have already been trending away from them? >> democrats have already found a way to alien ain't white voters as a group over time, but they're making it up with voters. could they have done this before the election? i thought so. i thought that analyzing it that night, it was not a good move on the part of the president, but now, wait a second, now he's going to hamstring this congress. >> it's about people who are living in fear, and living inent shadows, as the president put it, so it's about people, and not just about politics. >> all right, this will affect a lot of people, here's what he said in the presidential campaign. >> i talked constitutional haw for ten years, and i take it very seriously. the biggest problems are george bush trying to bring more and more power through the executive branch, and not go through congress at all. and that's what i tend to reverse when i'm president of the united states. >> so the president sounded like congressman king, who we just had on, and is this more than a standard politician flip flop? >> i would say that it's a longer conversation, antonio, when you talk about what the presidential power is. there was a lot of democrat in the president when he was running, as a senator then, and talked a little bit about how there was overreach from the bush administration. and this is not something that has gone rampant with the executive action, and also, he's the president now, and things always do change when you become the republicans. >> you have a hard time. and there are at least 40 video clips that i've seen in the last 24 hours, where he has said time and time again, i don't run a monarchy and i can't do this by myself. >> tommy, if he people are saying that he's being emimperial. >> he is saying, that i don't want to be part of that. they're looking for their own political gains, and we need to solve the immigration problem in america. we shouldn't have the president of the united states for the last three years going on speech after speech, saying i don't have the power to do this, and turning it around and saying i do have the power. >> there was a bill sitting in congress, at a certain point, there was exasperation, and this is a stop gap, this is a three-year measure, a new president can come in and throw this out. >> i hope that this motives the congress to sit down with the president now, and go over his proposal and get a piece of legislation done. that's my hope. >> is that realistic? >> no, but can you imagine in two years, a republican president who overturns the executive order? that would be horrible. >> then you'll realize the political power of what happened tonight. because you will lose a swath of americans who you had, and that would be unfortunate for both parties. >> what about the argument that presidents reg began and bush 41 used the executive order? >> there's a difference that they don't talk about. in those two instances, they were fixing loopholes, and it was a technicality by executive order that went into fix, and in this case, you have a whole legislature that hasn't acted on this, wrongly so, so it's a of different situation. >> michael, how does this play out? you have republican governors saying that they're going to sue to invalidate this. >> governors have more power, because governors can take parcels of education, and they can play with this law level than congress can. and one of the things, the funding for it. they're going to hold this hostage by not putting the spending bill in. and this would be enacted by the immigration services that doesn't get any money for it. >> they could do something about it. >> he would have to attach that to a spending bill, and congressman king knows a little bit more about how the legislature works than i do, but everything i have read and the people that i talked to over the last few days said that it would be difficult and almost impossible to get any spending bill passed if they attach those riders onto it. >> what about impeachment and government shutdown? do you think? >> no, if they do they're crazy. let's stay focused here. we just had a huge election win in november, and let's not think that somehow this was solely on immigration. there were a lot of reasons that republicans came out and elected a new united states senate and that's why the governors won. when you start playing an open hand in politics, that's when you get beat back, and we haven't done very well in national elections recently. they have a lot of work to do. >> thanks. coming up, did the u.s. government offer to pay ransom to secure bo bird's return. and the loss of mike nichols. >> did the u.s. try to pay money for the release of sorting bo bird al? the elite counter terrorism delta force joined with the fbi to exchange money on the afghan bored this year, but the deal was apparently a scam. an afghan, who claimed to represent the acani network, disappeared with the money. joining us is rear admiral, john kirby, the press secretary, and always good to see you, admiral. the military was in the business of paying ransom for bo this year, and was a ransom paid. >> no, a ransom was not teamed. >> so there was no attempt for his release involving the fbi and supposedly going to the border of pakistan and afghanistan? >> well, i certainly can't speak for other agencies in the government, but speaking for the defense department, no ransom bags wade for bowe bergdahl or an it attempt for release through a ransom. >> and you talked about how the military has at times paid significant ransom for information, and was there money paid respect to bergdahl, and ransom in. >> well, i don't have any indication as i said earlier that that was the case in the bergdahl situation, and it is a fact that in the past, we have used money as an incentive to get information to help our operators in the field. and that's a practice that has occurred. but again, i don't have any indication that that was done in this case. >> turning to iraq, the reports that the iraq governor of mosul was killed in an airstrike on wednesday, and where are we in the attacks on isil's leadership? >> i can't confirm those reports. we're still assessing the strikes to see what the results were, to the degree which any leaders may or may not have been hit. and theist teffort to degrade il is on a pace, and we continue to destroy hundreds of vehicles, and several hundreds of their fighters taken off the battlefield. we know that. and we know we have hurt their finances, especially in the realm of oil refinery and sales, to the tune of probably hundreds of thousands of dollars a day now that they don't have access to. we have hit their command control facilities, and some of their financing centers, and we know we have hit and destroyed training camps that we have used and staging areas where they have placed vehicles. this group is very much feeling the effect of the coalition's power, and i don't just mean from the air, also from the ground. iraqi security forces in the middle of the country, and certainly peshmerga forces to the north and northwest are taking the fight to isil, and doing so effectively. that doesn't mean that there's not still room to grow and there's still challenge, but they're making games. >> talking about the local forces, we need to have that fight on the ground. the kurds, the pesh miles per gallon a. keep saying that they're not getting the weapons they need from the west, and in fact, the president of iraqi kurdistan, has officially requested on wednesday more heavy weapons from the coalition, saying that they can't go on the defensive if they aren't getting the support. and are they not getting what they need? >> well, i would let mr. barsani speak for himself. but we are certainly aware that the kurdish forces are requiring and we would like to have more arms and ammunition weapons at their disposal and that's given the fight that they have undertaken up in the north. and i can tell you that the iraqi government continues to resupply the kurdish forces as best they can, and we have coalition partners that continue to supply and resupply the kurdish forces. that's an ongoing consideration that we have. >> where are we on the increasing amount of u.s. troops going to iraq? >> we announced another 1500 that would be going to both help with training and expanded advise and assist task. specifically around northwest baghdad, and anbar. and so those efforts continue, and i expect that we'll continue to see the troops flow? in wanted coming weeks and months to fulfill those missions, and flurry coalition members that have also agreed to sign up as trainers for the four sites in the country for building partner to help to train iraqi and pesh brigades to improve their combat capability. i know of no additional outside of the 1500 that we were going to send, or impending decisions to send more. >> but i have to ask you the question as i often have, the nsc's tony blan tony, and the gd troops under certain circumstances, are they being discussed? >> there's no active discussion right now about changing the fundamental missions that the troops are performing inside of iraq. there's no change in policy to not have troops in a combat role on the ground inside of iraq. we're advising and assisting and doing training and we're certainly flying and supporting iraqi security forces from the air. all of that will continue, and general dempsey himself has said that his job is to provide recommendations, and if he gets to the point where he provides that kind of recommendation, he's free, he's expected to make that, and he doesn't see a case right now, and he doesn't see a case where he's making that kind of recommendation in the future. >> as always, general, it's good to have you with us. >> my pleasure, thank you for having me. >> and now to more stories from around the world. we begin in tallahassee, florida, where a former student opened fire outside of the library at florida state university, then reloaded and walked inside of the library where 450 students were studying and opened fire again. >> somebody yelled, guy with a gun! and i happened to be 30 feet from the guy, and i turned around and grabbed all of my stuff and ran out with everybody else. >> you hear about the shootings on the news, and then it happens. >> three people were injured. one critically, before the police arrived. the shooter fired one shot at the police, and the police responded, killing him. next, we head to buffalo, new york, where another 3 feet of snow fell thursday. that follows a storm that dumped 6 feet of snow earlier. three people have died. and governor cuomo begged, pretty, pretty please, stay in their homes. with such accumulation, the snow's weight is an issue. a nursing home was evacuated after a staff member noticed a depression in the ceiling, and a roof collapse. despite all of that, the buffalo bills initially offered $10 an hour and tickets to the game if they would help to remove tons of snow from the ralph wilson stadium. officials were not happy about the offer. >> we have roofs collapsing and we just toured a facility where there were patients in a nursing home with 7 feet of snow. if the nfl is pushing the game to be held, shame on the nfl. >> but later thursday, the nfl changed it's mind and announced that it's host ponking the game until monday and it will be played elsewhere. we held to new york city, where legendary film director, mike nichols has massed away. he made some of our most popular movies. who is afraid of virginia wolf, the working girl, and the graduate, to name just a few. the latter won him 1968's best directing oscar. his wide ranging talent made him only a handful of people who win an oscar, grammy and tony awards. his family fled nazi germany and they fled to new york city. he's part of a comedy duo, but his greatest success came behind the scenes, winning his first tony in 1964's bare foot in the park. in the 1980s, he met diane sawyer. in his own words, she wanted to interview me for it. and we had 14 lunches. the two were married 16 years. i had the pleasure of working with mike and diane, and my deepest condolences go out to mike and diane's family. straight ahead, vladimir putin claims the u.s. is trying to push him into a new cold war. and also, chances are you have a bad boss, and now we have the numbers to prove it. and later, the queen of sweden joins us in the middle of her trip to the u.n. on behalf of the world's most vulnerable children. >> an arranging of 13 people a day are being killed in the ongoing conflict in ukraine, despite a ceasefire in september. 4300 people have died in eastern ukraine since the fighting breakout between the ukrainians and the pro russian separatists in april. vice president biden is expected to announce an increase in non-lethal help for ukraine. foruke rain. >for -- youring us, courtney, the senior adviser for russia and iris you'reand it's a cease. are things getting worse. >> the ceasefire has reduced the level of killing but it has continued, and russia has continued to put new arms into the rebel-controlled areas of eastern ukraine. >> and thaws one of the things that the report says. that the military is going back and forth across the border, and there's ample evidence of russian servicemen in eastern ukraine >> so the report is saying that putin is wrong when he says that russia doesn't have military equipment in ukraine and they're there, and the people are dying, but the russians haven't done very well in eastern ukraine. they don't control a single region. they have donetsk and the capital cities around them. >> it's an enormous mess. there are almost half a million people displaced. and that doesn't count the people who have left the area. thousands of people have left altogether, we have thousands of people who have died. >> but the ukrainian army, which started out, mustered strength, and then the rebels brought in their own forces, so now in the eastern ukraine, it's a bask case. the coal mines are flooded because the power stations were cut and they couldn't keep the water out of the coal mines, and just lik like crimea, this a burden for russia. >> there's talk of everything from killings to torture, and what's up in that part of the world? >> yes, out of a pre-pond rance of violences is what's coming from the rebels and the people who disappear, torture, other things happening inside of the rebel-controlled area. >> thousands have disappeared, according to this report, and the argument from the rebels, that the ukrainians were going to discriminate against ethnic russians, and ironically, the report brings up the fact that the schools are teaching only in russian, violating. >> according to the campaign, claiming discrimination, it was not an issue. russian was widely used in eastern ukraine, and there was a lot of power. >> let's talk about vladimir putin and some of what he's saying. in an interview recently, he said that the west is to blame for what he called a cold war, and he said that nato expansion is to blame, and we have troops on russian borders and that kind of represent rick probably wet well in russia. >> people in the west know that the west didn't start this fight. the west didn't start the cold war, bub the russian government is trying to create a false narrative about what's happening in ukraine and the russian controls, the russians themselves are seeing something that's different than the rest of the world. >> and putin is certainly saber rattling. we have these flights that he has been putting out all over the world, including sending bombers into the gulf of mexico, something that the soviets didn't do in the cold war, and he has trains and submarines that have crossed the european borders, so none of the sanctions seem to have inhibited his behavior. are they working? >> the sanctions have a direct and indirect impact. a massive capital flight from russia is because of him, creating sanctions, and president putin had one of the top business people deignedded andetained.so because of the oi. >> oil prices crashed and inflation it up. oil is their biggest earner of foreign kur surrency. so could we be seeing history repeat itself? it didn't have the economic wherewithal to duct it's adventurism. and could we be seeing that happen with putin? >> that's right. the soviet union went bankrupt in 1991 when the economy went bankrupt. and of course the oil prices are lower now, making them wonder if this is going to replay. most ordinary russians don't feel the full effects of what's going to hit them coming down the pipeline in the next couple of months, so we begin to wonder, is president putin too hard on many fronts? we don't see cracks in the leadership at this point, but the strains are there with the economy, and the fighting in the ukraine, and the kremlin has tried to hide the burpials of the ukrainian soldiers, showing that ukrainians are not keen that war. >> always good to have your insights. coming up, millions of children around the world are displaced. she talks about her global efforts to help them. and first, the huge majority of bosses that are just plain awful. we have your numbers to back up your suspicions about the person that you work finish. >> horrible bosses, the odds are that you have one. 70% of bosses make their teams worse, and only 30% of american employees were found to be engaged in their work, and in the world, it's worse, 13%. prime examples of bad management, bad leaders don't encourage their workers or development and employees don't feel that their work matters, they're not given the materials or equipment to properly to do their jobs, and there are no goals for the team: researchers say the problem is not everyone is cut out to be a supervisor. companies failed to pick the right leaders more than four out of five times. gallop settled hundreds of organizes and measured the engage. 27 million employees over the past decades. the managers from hell cost the u.s. $553 billion every year. solutions t. let the employees work from home occasionally. they log more hours in a week than on site. and managers so identify employee's instructs and dwell on those. when companies increase the number of talented managers and double their rate of engaged employees, they have on average 147% higher earnings-per-share than their competition. coming up, the queen of sweden and her efforts to help at risk kids around the world. >> i'm john seigenthaler in new york. coming up after this, the president announces his plan to save millions from deportation, and republicans are not pleased. who will benefit from immigration reform and who won't. cleaning up after 7 feet of snow and preparing for the next dangers. flooding and a roof collapse. and a legend, mike nicole's most memorable films. >> while some queens are content to stay in their castles, my next guest, the queen of sweden, has chosen a different path. in 19199, she was starting a foundation for at-risk children, and she has projects arranged the world, including some in the u.s. she has traveled the globe for kids. last week, she was in dubai for the global child forum. and this week, she's speaking at the united nations, for the unicef convention on the rights of children. joining me is her majesty, queen sylvia of sweden and thank you for being here. >> thank you very much. i'm happy to be here to celebrate the 25th year of the convention on rights of the child. >> and you'r you speak six lang, you must feel at home in the united nations. >> that was por portuguese. and you founded the world child organization 15 years ago, and what inspired you to go down this path for abused children? >> when sweden had the first world congress on sexual exploited taking of children, and so i asked myself, what can i personally do to help? drawing attention to these very difficult issues, which at that time were quite taboo. and that's why i tried to draw the attention. it's not the easiest, but as a mother and a queen to talk about these issues, but if we don't, who is doing it? and who is going to help the children? you have to talk about it. and that's why i'm so happy that for 25 years, it's really on the issue. we saw all of the members here now in the u.n. talking about sexual abuse, protect the children, about trafficking and all of these difficult issues. >> and the numbers are dramatic. it's estimated that one in five women and one in ten men are sexually abused as children, and child abuse crosses all boundaries. wealthy families, and low-income families, all ethnic backgrounds and all religions, and those abused are more likely to abuse others, so your mission is to break that cycle? >> well, it's a very difficult issue of course, and we have to reach hands. and that's why last week, i went to dubai to talk about child protection and the children's rights, and i must say that princess hia was there, and she was with me, and she made a wonderful speech, very strong, and so there were many different countries from that region present, and i'm happy that perhaps it's opening doors and windows that we really can work together to save thoemmes children. i mean, it's such an awful mother. and of course won wonder, how can that happen. >> and the project has contributed $80 million all over the world. and what do you see as the biggest challenges that children now face? >> i think its children in conflict and trafficking, but also, there are not many who really know about their rights. so that's something that i really think it's so important to applicate and to talk about children's rights. and you know, in brazil, we're in brazil as well. so there are truck drivers, driving from the northern part of brazil to the southern part of brazil. and over 1 million truck drivers. and so we started a cooperation with the transport companies, and there are over 500. and so together, we're having seminars and workshops, and i must say, from the over 1 million truck drivers, 83% know about children's rights, and they are protecting these children. they're our best ambassadors, and they're really having an eye on their colleagues. so all of those cases have reduced 2/3 of those cases have been able to be reduced. and this is really a success story. >> a topic that we have covered extensively on the show is the plight of the hundreds of thousands of displaced children from the on going conflicts in syria and iraq, and i know there are an estimated 100,000 iraqis in sweden, and i know that sweden has provided humanitarian aid to iraq, and how much of a focus will children in that part of the world be for your efforts? >> i must say, i really admire that he this receive so many refugees, millions, and over half of them are children. and of course we have to do everything that we can to help these children in the conflict areas. they're the first to suffer. and i'm proud and happy that sweden has been soience and so , and still is to receive so many refugees, and give them a home. and that's very important. >> a final question about sweden. your new prime minister is here, at a time when your new geographical neighborhood has gotten so dangerous with the fighting in the ukraine, and last week, evidence that likely a russian suck marine violated your sovereignty and your waters, and i know that sweden is nodg aligned. but how concerned with the swedes, the people at home by the developments there? >> of course ukraine, they are quite close to sweden, and of course the swedish government is watching it very very carefully. and of course there are signs of stronger actions from certain governments. and so of course we're worried. >> your majesty, it's an honor to have you with us, and i wish you the best efforts on behalf of the world's children. i know that you have a daughter in new york, and come by and say hello. >> thank you very much. and wonderful to talk to you. all the best. >> that's all for now, but the conversation continues on the website. facebook and twitter@aj "consider this." we'll see you next time. >> small, medium, large... cluster oysters and white tablecloth half shell oysters. for nearly a century, oysters have been harvested here in drakes estero. seven years ago kevin lunny bought the floundering farm here and turned it into a 1.5 million dollar annual business, but some environmentalists say he has outstayed his welcome and it is time for the farm to stop production. >> but it is fundamentally incompatible with a national park wilderness area to have a commercial, private oyster operation... it just doesn't fit. >> lunny insists he is a responsible steward of the land and exemplifies sustainability. lunny says if the lower court ruling against him stands, the community may gain a quiet estuary, but some of their cultural history will be lost. >> the president's plan, up to $5 million undocumented immigrants allowed to stay and work. >> if you meet the criterion, you can come out of the shadows. >> 6 million more facing life in the shadows. tonight president obama acts alone on immigration reforms, as republicans vow to strike back. >> that's not how a democracy works. >> our

Related Keywords

New York , United States , Ralph Wilson Stadium , Dubai , Dubayy , United Arab Emirates , Germany , Afghanistan , Brazil , Florida , Portugal , Virginia , Syria , Russia , Kremlin , Moskva , Pakistan , Ukraine , Mexico , Iraq , Baghdad , Florida State University , Sweden , Ireland , Anbar , Balkh , South Korea , Americans , Swedish , Chosen , Ukrainians , Mexican , Soviets , Russian , Iraqis , Swedes , Afghan , Portuguese , Ukrainian , Iraqi , Soviet , Russians , Irish , American , Steve King , Tom Coburn , Queen Sylvia , Abraham Lincoln , Al Jazeera America , Mike Nichols , John Boehner , Drakes Estero , Los Angeles , George Bush , Vladimir Putin , John Kirby , Diane Sawyer , Tom Dougherty , Antonio Mora , Mike Nicole ,