Supervisor fewer thank you very much for your early support. I wanted to say that, these amendments before you today were developed by really on the ground experts. That build 100 Affordable Housing. They know that Affordable Housing at 3000 square feet will not be built. This is a practical experience for people who built Affordable Housing. Thats why were changing in the legislation today from 10,000 square feet to 8000 square feet. I wanted to add that with this other amendment is making the threshold at 50 feet, that they can also add three stories of density or height to their development on top of the 50foot baseline height. I think i was very remiss in not thanking my outstanding legislative aid and your outstanding aid. Kudos for all their help on this. I think it is something that the west side supervisors are looking at the lack of Affordable Housing in our district and looking for ways to build. There are 100 Affordable Housing. Some people said its the thing of the past. We have proven its not true. Thank you chair and thank you colleagues. I hope you will support this legislation today. Supervisor peskin thank you supervisor fewer. Before i call on supervisor preston, i have to not to get in congratulatory nonsense, really shot out supervisor katie chang who was one of the first west side supervisors who was going to go down that road at their own political peril. Supervisor preston thank you chair peskin. Thank you supervisor fewer for your leadership on this. Proud to support prop e and like to see added as a cosponsor to this legislation. I find legislation like this refreshing. I think so much of our discussion around housing, often intentionally by those that profit for market rate housing. Intentionally try to conflate the discussion around market rate housing, which is one discussion with a discussion around housing that is affordable to working class in San Francisco. What you saw in prop e, what you see in this legislation is a clear signal that were serious about housing for the working class in San Francisco. That were serious about housing our educators and were not going to buy into this frame which decides who is prohousing, who is antihousing all that based on what one thinks of multimillion dollar luxury housing. Which does not allow a discussion of Affordable Housing to be held hostage to discussion of highend housing. Im happy to talk about market rate housing and happy to talk about Affordable Housing. I appreciate the legislation for being clear on the issue right now that is one of the greatest challenges of the city. Which is Affordable Housing. Well talk about the housing balance later in the agenda. We are absolutely failing as a city to build Affordable Housing. The way that we get there is through 100 affordable projects. That will be expanded based on this legislation. I want to recognize and really associate myself with the comments that chair peskin made about my colleagues in district one in district four in neighborhoods that historically have not always welcomed greater Affordable Housing and high density Affordable Housing. Supervisor fewer, supervisor mar, i want to express my appreciation for your ongoing leadership in making sure that we are creating Affordable Housing opportunities for working class here in San Francisco, all over the city including on the west side. Supervisor peskin thank you. Supervisor safai. Supervisor safai thank you mr. Chair. Thank you supervisor fewer for all your wonderful work on this. Thanks to the united educator, preview mar, everyone. District 11 is one that falls little bit on the east side. Weve been a good example in the last three and a half years, weve been able to push forward 375 units of Affordable Housing. Two of those projects are 100 affordable. I can tell you that accelerating the process saved significant cost to the project. Quicker things can move, the easier things are able to be built and the overall financing of the project changes. With the help of yourself, supervisor fewer and the work we did with the mayor to get the additional matching funds, that then ultimately able to accelerate state financing process. When people say, whats the point of doing this. Why do we need to streamline. That is one of the biggest reasons. We want to get people housed quickly as we can. Educators and others that are being forced out of the city because they are no longer able to afford to live here. Two, the quicker we move, the quicker were able to finance the project and keep the cost down. I want to appreciate all the hard work. I want to point out that it definitely can be done with the right Community Process and what weve experienced in our district over the last four years, moving these projects forward is that if you do the right outreach, if you talk about the project in the right way and you express not only that theres an ability for those in the neighborhood and the application process to benefit from it. They see theres a stake in the process for them. I wanted to thank you all for your hard work and proud to support prop. Supervisor peskin thank you supervisor safai. If there are no other comments from the author, Committee Members or supervisor mar, colleagues who would like to make a motion on behalf of supervisor fewer to send this item with recommendation to the full board without objection . So moved. Supervisor peskin roll call plaza. Clerk [roll call vote]. You have three ayes. Supervisor peskin thank you. This entire conversation has been a perfect segway into the next two items. Please read items four and five together. Clerk [agenda item read]. Supervisor peskin thank you. Before i call on the requester for these hearings, supervisor mar as ive been going down trip down memory lane and in booking my former colleague, supervisor tang. With regard to both these items and underlying policy that surrounds them want to invoke the name of supervisor jane kim. Whos the author of the housing balance report concept and a different proposition. I want to state that for the record. With that,ly turn it over to supervisor mar. Commissioner mar thank you so much chair peskin and members of the Land Use Committee for your time to discuss the importance timely topic of Housing Affordability and housing stability needs. The Global Pandemic and our shelterinplace responses has revealed the importance of stable and secure housing and the Public Health of the growth inequality weve accepted in San Francisco. The housing policy decision made here in San Francisco have allowed a segment of the population to work remotely. Some of them quickly migrated to other cities after coming to San Francisco during the recent techdriven job and economic boom. It also forced working class essential workers who are highly dependent on public transportation, travel from suburbs risking their lives to work in a period of high unemployment. Renters cannot pay rent, homeowners cannot pay their mortgages and we anticipate eviction or foreclosure in the coming months ahead without government intervention. The future of jobs and work is uncertain. We dont have projection data on the scale of the impact. This is the context of today within which we should be looking at housing policy. With where we are and what we need to do to focus whats ahead. In addition to responding to new challenges caused by covid19, we must reflect on our citys housing policies to date and the path forward to solve Housing Affordability in a more strategic and impactful way. The Planning Department has been working on report and strategies before the pandemic. Its right now initiating the process for the state mandated updated element. The Housing Element is our road map for housing policies. The timing of this update is important as we see what the pandemic and Economic Crises is revealing about current housing policies. Planning staff will be presenting on these today. My goal is to discuss how they fit with in our Housing Needs of low to moderate income workers, resident and communities. Last year, i commissioned a job report from the budget and legislative analyst office. The board of supervisors unanimously passed an ordinance they sponsored requiring an annual report from the Planning Department which was due this past april. Im disappointed that the report is still not complete. But today we will hear from planning staff about the scope of that report. Well get precise completion time line. The budget legislative analyst revealed that job growth over the past decade has been uneven with high wage jobs growing by 14 but lower wage jobs by 11 . The b. L. A. Said Housing Production has been exceeding the needs of high wage workers, we fail to build housing for low and moderate income house holds. Low income households have declined by 23 despite growth in low wage jobs in San Francisco. Now, during covid19 health crises, this disparity has become a matter of life and death, depending on who can afford to shelterinplace and who cannot, who can live close to their job here in San Francisco and who must commute great distance. This pandemic as well as the Racial Justice movements are quite a tragic killing of george floyd highlights what we known. We need a new framework for housing policy its centred on having affordability and stability and centred on racial and social equity. We should not be led by the whims of private Market Development and real estate speculation and housing dictated by profit motive. We need to be guided by our citys actual Housing Needs for its residents and workers. The status quo does not work for the majority of san franciscans. Even with one of the biggest developments in city history. The status quo ignoring the role of Economic Development policies on housing and we are meeting the need of our residents and communities. We need to ask the right questions and get the data to tackle the problem. This includes data on racial demographic, resident affordability, homelessness, commute patterns pattern and hg trends. In the mist of a pandemic and Economic Crises, we need to rethink our existing frame work and focus on facilitating more and more market rate housing. I look forward to our discussion on how San Francisco can refocus our priorities to meet the actual Housing Needs of our residents and communities including families, seniors and low to middle income workers. We have Planning Department who will lead the presentation. Supervisor peskin, i want to make a request if youre okay with it. If we can hear Public Comment after the presentation from the Planning Department . Supervisor peskin yes, supervisor mar. As we discussed for you and i, not form of the committee. Well turn it over to planning then well have Public Comment. They will bring it back for the members of the committee and supervisor mar and any other supervisors that want to join to discuss the subject of these two hearings. With that, well open up to the Planning Department. Good afternoon chair peskin. Good afternoon supervisor preston and supervisors safai. As supervisor mar has noted, this is not normal times. These are critical times. We need to assess our work, to be able to identify what needed strategies and policy and plans to meet the needs of our community. Well start with a brief context of our challenges. This is our transdata report and share some key highlights. Some of those are the reports that supervisor mar has requested. They will follow with a presentation with some of the recent reports. I will provide overview [audio breaking up]. Today, supervisor mar has already discussed San Francisco and most of the work is battling with the pandemic like never before. This is impacting all of us at many levels. Many businesses and schools are closed. Many people are experiencing Mental Health challenges. In this context, it is very clear that communities of colour have been hit the hardest. If we look at the latinx community, they only represent 15 of the population. If you see the map, the neighborhoods where we have communities of colour or lower income communities are the ones that have been impacted the most. Clerk looks like were having trouble with the presenter. Merriam, may i suggest you turn off your camera . Is this better . Clerk i think so. I was indicating its a problem. Our housing challenges are not new to the city. Covid19 has highlighted some of our problems in the city. Even few months ago when San Francisco was experiencing growth for 10 years, we have severe homeless problems. Our black population was shrinking. The latinx workers couldnt find Affordable Housing. What covid19 has done, it helped us recognize our historic racial and social inequities. Planning was playing a role, if we look at the racial inequity we can go back to the 1400s for our indigenous people. We can go through some of the ordinance that we passed. Most recently, some of the predatory lending practices and exclusionary zoning for which government is responsible. We can see the cumulative impacts on american indian, black and other communities of colour today. Lack of Affordable Housing, homelessness, displacement is a major issue. This kind of crises, were also opening some new possibilities. We have the ability to imagine the possibilities. We are directed to centre our planning work on racial and social equities. In this context that were reframing our housing work, we can say that were not starting from zero. Since 2016, we started developing a racial and social equity plan. Much work remains. That work can only be accomplished through a process of collaboration with our community. Here is where we need to define or redefine our data reports. [indiscernible] this work also require collaboration with city partne partners. Its something that impacts our neighboring cities. Were going so start first reviewing update reports. Michelle . Thank you. Good afternoon supervisors. Im michelle littlefield. Im the data and analytics manager for the Planning Department. Before we dive in the specific report, i want to give a brief overview of the reports we do prepare for the department specifically within citywide. Then we can dive into the specifics of the housing data, Housing Inventory and the housing balance report. We do three major reporting that are released to the public. The first group of reports are with respect to areas planned monitoring. You can see here, we do variety of reports that are done varying frequencies throughout the year or over multiple years. Really focus of the area plan are to report on the Development Activity that is within each respective Community Area plan and also other metrics that have been identified including the status of transportation initiatives, fees that have been collected through impact fees and other economic information that is collected with respect to those specific target areas. These have different reporting requirements across the board. But the majority of them do hit on today major things with respect to housing, with respect to development and with respect to other major initiatives that are really targeted towards specifically targeting the issues that have been identified that each area plan has been identified to be monitored for that area plan. Supervisor peskin if i can interrupt you for a second. We like to look at colours. Is the reason that these places all the same colours because they are all part of the eastern neighborhoods rezoning . Yes, thats correct. These are actually grouped into a much larger report. Which is for the eastern neighborhoods. That explains the colour coordination for the respective reports. Supervisor peskin wasnt western zuma done separately . As far as i am concerned, they were done the timing when these reports were completed were at the same time. The date for this last report shows the time range between 2011 and 2015. Supervisor peskin this is your reporting, not when legislation was passed to create the area plans. Create. These reports are specifically related to the area plan monitoring following the adoption of the plan. Supervisor peskin got it. Thank you. Great question. Next slide please. The next set of reports, which is the subject of our presentation today are next group of housing reports that are related to housing projection within San Francisco. There are four reports that specifically focus on this area of development. One is the 2019 San FranciscoHousing I