Rental unit and dont otherwise meet the income requirements for affordable unit, we cannot construct those units using affordable tax credits and some specifics for Affordable Housing, which means we need to come up with roughly an additional 300,000 in local resources to come up with that. But the units are deed restricted and come up upon turnover. The cost to replace the original unit considered the original the bedroom size to replace the original unit considered the original household and bedroom size and affordable income and program requirements. So the what were proposing now for post d. D. A. Residents who have moved to the island since 2011, the resolution you have before you today urges us to expand the relocation and transition benefits available for post d. D. A. Households. Again, just as background, under the transitional housing rules and regulations, currently, theyre provided only with advisory services, and leases have disclosed that the housing is interim and without relocation benefits. And at this time, we dont anticipate any of the existing housing needing to be vacated for the purposes of development within the next five years, and it being ten or more years before we need to ask people to permanently vacate units within the villages inventory without offering them replacement units. And the image in the lower right hand of the screen right now illustrates our existing residential neighborhood overlaid with the future Street Network of the development. So you can see on what is the eastern side of the existing residential neighborhood, that doesnt underlie future development site, but it underlies future open spaces. So as development requires the properties on the western or Southern Side of the diagram to be vacated, we should have vacancies on the north or eastern side of the neighborhood that we can relocate people into, and its not until the last phases of the Development Program that we would need to finish the process of vacating the Historical Navy housing. So in consultation with the City Attorneys Office and the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development and as proposed any resolution, any new benefit would be provided to a datedefined population. For example, residency established after 2011 but prior to january 2020. And this would mean inevitably, even if we dont do any future leasing of future units, that in the process of roommates moving out and roommates moving in, we will have people whose residency is established after that defined window and wont be established in the procedures we implement and propose to implement in the coming weeks. So what we are currently proposing is including all post d. D. A. Residents in the premarketing opportunities for market rate housing. This requires developer concurrence under the d. D. A. , but thats a concurrence that theyve indicated they would give. And it would prioritize income qualifying post d. D. A. Income residents in newly constructed units. So as each unit of Affordable Housing becomes available, we would go through the process of filling those, and any income qualifying pred. D. A. Hows holds could be placed into them followed by income qualifying post d. D. A. Residents before going to the to the mohcds larger preference framework for the filling of new affordable units. Were proposing that these benefits extended to post d. D. A. Residents be suborted to post d. D. A. Residents, meaning we would seek to place all income qualifying post d. D. A. Residents and then all post d. D. A. Residents. These could be made with tida board approval. Unlike the transitional housing rules and regulations, these changes would not extend the offer of in lieu payment benefits to post d. D. A. Residents and would not offer replacement units to post d. D. A. Residents unless they meet the income qualification requirements for Affordable Housing. And it also would not extend to commercial laeaseholders. We do have a small number of residential leases that are with entities for commercial housing and under the original thr rs, we would propose to leave that the same. So going forward, we plan our november meeting of the Treasure IslandDevelopment Authority board will be held on the island in the evening. We plan to have a discussion of those proposed changes at that meeting. Also as directed by the resolution, we will be developing an outreach plan. Weve been engaged with the predisposition and Development Agreement residents for the last 1. 5 years, preparing them for upcoming housing opportunities, and then bring these proposed changes for consideration to the tida board in december and then also expand our work with the developer in preparation for the initial premarketing windows which we expect to occur in 2020, and with that, ill take any questions you may have. Chair peskin supervisor haney . Supervisor haney i dont know if theres Public Comment do you want me to ask my questions now . Chair peskin let me see. Are there any members of the public who would like to testify on item number 10 . Seeing number, Public Comment is closed. [gavel]. Supervisor haney okay. I have a number of questions, and i appreciate your willingness to make sure we support these residents. So the first is about how we define this population. I see that residency established after 2011 but prior to january 2020, i have some concern about that because we are still potentially you know, somebody moves in i guess, are folks still moving in after january 2020, and would we get to a point where if somebody was still living there for seven or eight years and has no benefits . We we dont have any plans for the villages to continue entering into new leases. However, theres no restriction on someone adding a roommate, and so through the process of roommates moving in and out of units, we anticipate that there will be some future population that, through the process of being added to a an existing lease, could not qualify for these benefits in the future. Supervisor haney and so again, my concern would be there that somebody may be living there for you said ten years from now until theyre even asked to leave from the villages. So if someone moved in because of a roommate situation in january 2020 and then, they could be there for ten years and have no still no access to any sort of benefits at all. Potentially, yes. Supervisor haney okay. Well, thats something i haddy like to talk further about. You know, maybe some way of in the future setting a certain because i feel like like there will be a board i dont want to have to come back in 2020 for this new set of people that are there. For anyone whos whos living there for some amount of time, having some level of priority so that theyre not when the development actually starts so that theyre not left kind of hanging out to dry there is a lot of what my intention is here. The other the other couple pieces of this, so prioritize income qualifying. Can you qualify what income qualifying means and also what the prioritize means . We have a you know, it says explicitly that they wouldnt have a certificate of preference. Ive read that in one of the reports. So what exactly is the priority that they have, and over and above whom, and do we have a sense that theyll be actually able to access the housing . Yeah. So im trying to supervisor haney so the first is what does income qualifying mean . So it will depend upon the individual development. So this would also give people the opportunity to pursue inclusionary affordable unit does. So the typical affordable units is 80 to 120 of area Median Income. Most of the city developed units will be 40 to 60 of area Median Income although the Funding Sources utilized, could be as high as 80 of area Median Income. So i dont have the presize numbers, but i believe the precise numbers, but i believe the current numbers for a family of four, area Median Income is on the order of 120,000 a year. So a family earning 50 of area Median Income would be 60,000 roughly for a family of four. But again, family earning 120 of area Median Income, pursuing a unit, that could be as high as 140,000. Supervisor haney got it. Im just wondering, for example, in the villages, based on what the rent is now do we have a sense of kind of what percentage of the post d. D. A. Households would income qualify . We as i mentioned for the last 1. 5 years, weve been engaged in a lot of dialogue with our residents that have been there since prior to 201, and we have good information on population of their household incomes. I think theres reason to believe that our post d. D. A. Residents are from a similar demographic. If thats correct, then as much as 40 or more of current households would qualify for Affordable Housing. Supervisor haney got it. The other thing is around this so because of this, then, wed also have wed have to have a process to collect information from our part of our outreach process would be to engage people in the dialogue, educate them on what the requirements are and see if they potentially fit in the income brackets that could pursue these opportunities. Supervisor haney got it. So i have some questions about the no extension to in lieu benefits of post d. D. A. Residents. My understanding and im sort of thinking about what it would be like, you know, for a family or for a person or whoever whos been living on the island for potentially up to this. 18 yeapoint, 18 years maybe because they dont income qualify or arent able to get into one of the Housing Units because they dont win the lottery or what, that they would be asked to leave with no benefit given to them at all, that seems to be complete out of place in how we deal with people that are evicted through no fault of their own. If you are evicted because of an owner move in, in the city and county of San Francisco, you have some relocation benefits that are given to you. And essentially what we are doing here is an owner move in. Were saying theres some sort of other owner redevelopment use for this, and through no fault of their own, they are being evicted. Now i recognize that they signed leases at some point saying that they werent necessarily entitled to the benefits, but i do think that its worth considering that if somebodys post d. D. A. , and they still live where they are when their unit is being demolished and redeveloped, and they cant access housing on the island, that there should be some benefits provided to that household. So it may be some very small number. I recognize that pred. D. A. Households can take the inlieu benefit at any time. They sort of own that benefit. They dont have to wait for the and i understand why thats kind of a different benefit than you might provide post d. D. A. But if were evicting someone and theyre not able to access housing, and were demolishing their unit, generally, in best practices, and what weve extended to most everyone we can here in San Francisco and to have some relocation benefits for that person or family. Just on the subject of the inlieu benefit as it applies to the pred. D. A. Households, it was anticipated at the time that the transitional housing rules and regulations and actually incorporated into the transitional housing rules and regulations based on comment from existing residents that if it got to be in the range of seven to eight years post entitlement and households had not been offered a replacement unit yet, that we would originally, the inlieu payment was to be offered at the time households were asked to move and not available otherwise. But in the discussion and the preparation of the transitional housing rules and regulations, based on resident concerns that Development Might take some time to develop to occur, provisions were made to offer an early inlieu payment to households after some seven to eight years if they had not yet been offered a replacement unit. And so this last may, we opened that opportunity up to the the existing population. And i believe at this point, seven households have taken advantage of that opportunity. As far as the postd. D. A. Households, its something we could take under evaluation. The i think that wouldg id need to consult with the city, but i think it would be more of an amendment of the housing rules and regulations through the board because were extending a financial benefit, but we can continue that dialogue. Supervisor haney okay. Yeah, because i think in the same sense, whether whether an inlieu benefit payment makes sense for postd. D. A. Is one part of the question which may be a more extensive allocation, but for the postd. D. A. Folks who are actually qualified for our priority here, however we define it, at the point through which they are no fault evicted, the city should do just as we ask in an owner evict or anything else, provide some relocation to any person or household, regardless of their income. Now we have a little time to figure that out, ten years or something, but it does seem like something we have a responsibility to do. Did you answer the question about the priority . Yeah. Our transitional housing rules and regulations as they exist today create a contractual obligation for the Treasure IslandDevelopment Authority to offer replacement housing to the pred. D. A. Residents. So that obligation creates a priority. Its a priority that moves those pred. D. A. Units to the top of the list of those constructed on Treasure Island. So this proposal to the thr rs would apply to the contractual references supervisor haney the regular references that mohcd has. Great. Got it. Thank you. Chair peskin supervisor safai . Supervisor safai yeah. Just to follow up on a couple of questions that supervisor haney had. This does somewhat i dont want to overstate it, but it does somewhat trouble me, as well. If what im reading, supply transition benefits to households before the d. D. A. Was adopted in 2011. Were in 2019. Thats eight years. So how many residents and how many households are post 2011 . We have a total of 650 households on the island actually, its around 630. 250 of those are lowincome households. So of the remaining 350, 110 are exclusively pred. D. A. Supervisor safai of the 380. Of the 380. Supervisor safai so the 250 theyre all taken care of. Supervisor safai so of the 380, were talking about the remain remainder 380, its almost half. There are another 40 that are commercial leases, so theres about 140 that are currently postd. D. A. , 100 postd. D. A. Chair peskin and whats the time . Some of them could be yesterday . Well, some roommates i know that people have moved to the island as roommates within the past three months. Others could date to 2011, 2012. Supervisor safai and i think supervisor haney asked this. What income category do these folks fall into. You asked that, right, supervisor . Yeah. We havent done extensive engagement with these households yet, but if we assume they fall into the same relative graphics as our other d. D. A. Households, we expect roughly 40 would qualify for lowincome housing. Supervisor safai it seems you should make this a priority of this development. Yeah. And we would begin the same engagement supervisor safai is that what you asked for, supervisor haney . [inaudible] supervisor safai on the mic. Repeat what youre saying. So out of the 380 that are not affordable, 140, those are set. 40, take out 40t for commercia. And out of the remaining, 40 would income qualify. So my question was wouldnt we try to focus on helping those 40 . Supervisor haney yeah, and thats what the proposal is giving them a priority right under the d. D. A. So they would get access to housing. And we would begin we have a consultant thats supporting us in engaging with existing households, and we would propose to, upon adoption of these benefits, launch the same engagement efforts with that supervisor safai you used the word roommates is. Id be interested to see what the make is of these 140. Some of these might be family, extended family that moved in due to our housing crisis, so that might be good to know. Yes. We have all of those circumstances. Multigenerational housing, college units. Supervisor safai yeah. But if we can breakdown the 140, that would be good to know. Thank you, chair. Thank you, supervisor haney. Chair peskin would you like to send this forward to the full board . Supervisor haney please. Chair peskin so moved and we will do that with a full recommendation without objection, and we are adjourned. Hi, everybody. Good morning and thank you for being here. Thank you to the foundation for hosting us and i am pleased to be joined here with a number of our leaders including my partner in these initiatives, supervisor mandelman as well as our new district attorney. And members of the task force. I just want to thank all the members of the task force who participated in this process. I think supervisor mandelman and i had a conversation when he and i talked about this task force and what he wanted to do with it , and he said specifically to me, i dont want to do a task force that does a report that just sits on the shelf and that is really what i am excited about. And implementing the task force this force this year, we have recommendations that we are not only working to implement, but we are going to see hopefully real results as a result of the amazing work that the task force has done. We know that in San Francisco we have a serious problem with meth use. In 2018, over 126 people died of a meth overdose and the number of Overdose Deaths from meth rose over 500 in the last 10 years. Meth use is a Public Health and a Public Safety issue in our city. We know that meth is not only providing Substance Use challenges in San Francisco, but we need to make sure that we have a citywide ap