Item number 6, Consent Agenda, all matters listed here are considered to be routine by the Authority Board and acted upon by a single vote the Authority Board. There will be no separate action in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. 6a, approving the minutes of the september 11th, 2019 meeting and authorization the execution to lease nur 1183 with Life Learning Academy incorporated a California Nonprofit Corporation to provide additional charges credit for sewer repairs at building 229 Treasure IslandSan Francisco and 6c resolution the execution of a Fourth Amendment to the recommend dumb of agreement between the Treasure Island authority and the San Francisco county Transportation Authority to com ben sate the cost relating to your vista point operations, maintenance, traffic security and Shuttle Services for the period from november 1st, 2019 through june 30th, 2021. Resolution approving the execution of a fivemonth lease with apartments llc and california limited liable for 77,000 square feet of unimproved land and located between avenues i and m and fourth and fifth streets, Treasure Island modular units of its nonprofit vertical development on Treasure Island. Are there any questions on the Consent Agenda . So moved. Is there a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. All those opposed. The ayes have it. Next item. Item number 7, Treasure Island market Rate Housing Development update. Daniel butler will be presenting on this item for ticd. But before turning it over to her, i wanted to provide some context for people that may be watchingaing at home and some or newer members of the board. The planning documents that were adopted in 2011 layout the framework for the development of Treasure Island. In particular, there were special use district legislation that were adopted and amended to the planning code. Sending out specific zoning requirements for Treasure Island establishing high limits, et cetera. There was also a design for Development Document that was prepared which is an interpretive implementation manual of the Requirements Incorporated into the special use district provisions of the planning code. Those code amendments and the d for d layout the basic land use and Development Standards for the island and also establish the approval process where the Planning Department and tida for future development work. The d for d, document and design for Development Document was approved by the title board and adopted by the board of supervisors in conjunction with the other project entitlements that were prepared in 2011 and then the Planning Department also adopted the special use district provisions to the planning code and those were subsequently approved by the board of supervisors. In the d for d and the special use district, title retains planning and Development Projects on lands subject to the title ends trust and the image on the screen shows both the land use on the island between open space civic use, civic institutional use, mixed use and residential and the hashed area indicates which areas are subject to the trust and which are not. Primarily, those areas that are subject to the trust encloud our historic buildings, building one hangars 2 and 3 but they also include the hotel sites on both Treasure Island. The Planning Department has jurisdiction over all vertical developments. For the Planning Department, and for the other trust lands, as long as proposed projects can form to the requirements of the d for d and the special use district provisions, the review is an administrative function of Planning Department staff rather than matter for the Planning Commission and these projects will have been presented to the Planning Commission as an informational presentation but theyre being reviewed at the staff level at the Planning Department but we also wanted to bring them here to the title board and to our audience and so they can get an update on the progress of formulation so ill turn it over to danielle. Good afternoon. Im Danielle Butler and i have to help answer any questions. Thank you. Were excited to bring these projects to you and be it a point where were ready to share them as bob mentioned we have gone to planning with them and we hope to submit for site permit this year. We have the full build out this is looking southeast towards the eastern span of the bridge. Everything in the forefront is stage one. We have at least conceptual drawings for everything except for the icon tower. And what is showing the massing. This is just stage one and so you can see that the ferry would be complete and the city side park and all of the 10 stage one buildings. And then this is the buildings that wore bringing to you is the c2 block its the four buildings clustered there in the middle and theres the swords affordable building that we had a design for and there would be one more affordable building just next to that. At full build out there are 8,000 new homes and 2200 affordable. Stage one will have 1,770 with 320 affordable and then the first residents, which includes that c2 block and the two affordable projects will have 1,045 new homes. Here is a bar sell view of stage one and we are looking at the c2 block there in the middle. Well have two for sale and two rental. C2. 1 in the top left will have 26265 units its a tower. And we have 175 rental units and c2. 3 has 114 for sale and the other is 248 rental units with 20 live work units. Here is is another view of stage one in the context of the island. At this point, its not the focus of today but there will be buildings on yerba buena island. A year ago, we ran an rfp process and we had a lot of architects respond and we put together an amazing team of the best architects in the bay area. Weve had a series of workshops with those architects to all work together. S. O. M. Was a master architect who helped give us guidance and cmg helps make sure those designs were coordinated and they attended all those workshops. You will see the two affordable and gonzales and som with edmunds lee those will be in the next block, the second half of stage one. On the right, you see stanley behind the admin building and the block were focusing on today we have handdel architects and perk inson and david baker architects. Here is another view of stage one. Our methodology was to build out one entire block. So well have the ferry complete, the waterfront plaza or an area just in front of the ferry complete in front of the admin building. The cultural park and then the entire block so it feels like one finished area so if construction going on on either side at least that whole area will feel finished. This ised garage entry off the 7 seas and the Main Building entry is off of kervas which is this street. The Main Building entry will be at the corner of the shared public way. The tower is 31storeys. Theres a podium level on the seven seaside that is seven levels and theres four levels on the other side that you will see a better image of. Theres 265 units and the reason for the stepping and the height is to conform with the design for Development Document that bob just mentioned. Here is a view of the main entry. Thats looking at the shared public way and tower in the background. You can see that from the seventh level to the fourth level. On the seventh level, theres the amenity deck so theres a pool, awe lounge, Fitness Center and kitchen. Another view on the right. And a building on the left. Were look at it from the mid lot easement side with the power otoweron the back. Here is a closer view of the shared public way unit. You can see the brick around the podium and the use of wood to warm it up a little. All of the architects have and have seating to engage the public and then some sort of wall or fencing to. Here is a view from the cultural park looking back towards the building and this is 1750 rental units. You can see the step in height so its 70 feet along seven seas and 40 feet along the shared public way. We are proposing retail at the corner about 1500 square feet of retail and the resident lobby would be on the eastern side of that lobby. This is the shared public way and you get a better view of the stoop. This is the take on the stoop with concrete steps to allow for seating and landscaping for privacy. A closer view of those stoops. You can see the sahtu metal panels, balcony on the fourth floor for the residents on that units. This is a view from seven seas so we would be standing looking back. Although theres not a main entry on this side of the building, we didnt want it to feel like the back of a building because this is a main thorough fair so we think they did a nice job in respond to go that request. On the top floor, we are we think theyll be amazing and unobstructed views looking back to the easter span of the bay bridge. Next we have c. 23. Here the garage entry is off of the mid block easement between their building and david bakers and the Main Building entry off of kervas. And the view from city side park looking back towards the building. This is 114 for sale units. They have the step in height as well so we have 60 feet on this side along city sides parks and with flats in between and it reads like a 2003storey building as you come across the water. Here is a view at the intersection of david Baker Building looking at the garage entry for 2. 3 and here is a view of the main entry. To the left would be the resident lobby and to the right is the mail room. And a view of the shared public way. The units they have there are 4. This is what theyve done with the stoops. Theyve done a nice job with landscaping and steps. Again privacy for the residents and a way to engage with the public. Finally we have c2. 4. We are proposing to seek a change in our horizontal approval to extend avenue of the promise so it goes all the way to brew ten. Right now it stops ated mid block easement but were proposing to extend that street so we can have the garage entry off of that street and across from the future hotel that wont be built out for a little while. Instead of having it across from the cultural park. Main building entry is across from the cultural park. This is a view looking at the building from that park. The tower is 19storeys and its fourstoreys along the shared public way and six on the city side on the western side. Theres a Fitness Center on the fourth flor on the corner of the shared public way and amenity deck on the sixth floor with an amazing roof deck with views back to the city. Here is a view from that extension of avenue of the palms and brewten looking at the building thats the resident lobby on the bottom floor and a double height space on the sixth flor for the amenities. Closer view of the shared public wake these are the live work units so we do have to confirm with the stoop requirement. They did have landscapeing and seating again privacy for the residents and engaging with the public. This would be across the street from the retail space. And an areaal view so you can see the pop out of the unit on the fourth floor and the sixth floor deck were proposing. These are this is looking back towards the tower and it gives you an idea of the feel of the shared public way and what the pallet will be. And just another view of that shared public way. And then i dont know, lets see if i can get this to work. This is something that s. O. M. Put together so you can get a feel for what it would be like to be on the street. Thats the future con towe icon the right. And going down the shared public way. Just ahead would be s. O. M. s building thats conceptual not into planning. Thank you, very much, danielle. This is the first time that actually we as a commission have seen the vertical Development Plans and certainly i think that theres a lot of questions and a lot that we have to absorb. But mr. May be other sessions that we need to under the plans a little bit better. Lets open it up to the commission. Thank you. Thank you for that wonderful presentation. Even though were concentrating on the market rate we already won the elite and mission bay and ive had the opportunity to review Development Plan most recent the candlestick point. I can tell you, im getting really nervous. A lot of creativity right here in San Francisco. So Treasure Island is a point of destination. That point of destination. At some point, within the next few weeks, i would like the retail or whatever. I think it is time for us to revisit, look at the plan now, because if you look at the ambition of the chase stadium and all of them, listen, we could be at Treasure Island as a Bedroom Community and all the actions are here on the mainland and if you see what the five point is doing for candlestick point, the questio question is,t us to come back here and have it fullblown to show us here what are we when we went to new york, again, we have programs and given the fact we have 300 plus acres and the maintenance of the parks and all this stuff are inkum berdych oencumbered so wet that on the agenda right now. What kind of activities and how this will mean the primary objective of also being at the point of destination. This is really great. I think your plans are great and theyre going to be subsidize the Affordable Housing. We grief and were getting the retail plan. Its on the agenda coming up soon. Thank you. Thank you for the presentation. I will follow along as best i can. We didnt get this ahead of time. Its a lot of information to bring forward. It would be helpful if we can get it a little bit in advance so we can maybe be more prepared for the conversation. So, i just want to make sure i understand the shared public way extension that you are requesting through planning. Is that the avenue of the palms that you are proposing to extend all the way back . Yes, its the building to the west which would be lets see if i can can we put that back up on the screen . Thank you. Its this street just to the west of c2. 3. Right now our approvals have it ending right here. Theres a little bulb out. We need to process it but we think its possible and everyone is in favor of extending to brewton here at the corner. Do we have jurisdiction over that shared way extension or because its part of the Developers Land that falls within planning jurisdiction . It will be a multiagency discussion. This is also part of the conversation of removing the vehicle traffic off of the shared public way. There would be there wouldnt be a way for the traffic to circulate and we need to maintain and with this extension we can fully remove the vehicle traffic and its a good kevin and with public works and public utilities. One of the decisions that made this an opportunity was the decision not to co develop the hotel site with parcel 2. 4 and that was one of the reasons that happened with the palms ended at that site. Developers made the decision to move forward with 2. 4 as a Residential Development and hotel site which lies to the west of that forward at a later date and there doesnt need to be a physical decision and anymore. I understood that. Just to be completely clear, i think im hearing you say the decision around taking vehicles away from the shared public way, are you talking about the mid block public away in between 7cs and avenue of the palms . Originally that was going to be one of the back of house streets . They were a pedestrian and bike prioritized space and vehicle traffic was allowed. I believe it was around may we came to the board or the i. T. C. And forecast that we are evaluating removing all vehicle access from the shared public except for Emergency Vehicle access and as a means of enhancing competitive environment and this connection here was part of improving we wanted to take and traffic off of this block of the shared public. It sounds like this particular will come back to the i. T. C. Well have further updates. I think in the future when it comes back to the i. T. C. , i would be curious whether or not there are impacts to the end of the street and the cultural park being a pedestrianoriented experience. Its fine and i dont have initial objects just looking to better understand the trade off. A question about the livework unit, was that a requirement of the Development Agreement or that particular parcel. Is that something the developer decide today do . It was something we decided to do. We thought it was a good location for it and we have a different type of unit and feel. How can that function well and persist to function genuinely as livework units. As you know in San Fr