Use authorization for demolition of existing Single Family home and construction of a new two family home in rh2. Demolition of two story Single Family home and construction of new 5355 gross square foot four story two family home. Unit one on the bottom with two bedrooms and total of 1925 square feet. Unit two four bedrooms and three full baths 2158 square feet. One vehicle and one bicycle space for each vehicle. There was an application meeting on mar2019. Three maybes voiced concerns of the height of the building. The department received 25 letters of support describing the dwelling unit to the neighborhood. Consistency of the project design with existing neighborhood character and the garage spaces will not impact street parking. The department received four letters of opposition to the project from neighbors voicing concerns over the fourth floor on light and privacy to add jay sent buildings and out of context to the the neighborhood and concerns of the conversion of three unit structure and effects of neighboring foundation. I believe there was one additional. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use authorization request as noted in executive summary. It does involve demolition of the structure, proposed will provide two family sized units. It is not Historic Resource. This is a point of clarification. The unit is not occupied it is vacant. No known evidence of eviction it is consistent with rh two zones. That is concluding my presentation. The sponsor is here with a quick presentation. Good evening, president melgar and members of the commission. I am going to edit this on the fly so bear with me. The reason we are asking for demolition is because the existing driveway goes up 4 feet 9 inches from the street. Any attempt to modify the building to add fourth floor. The existing building is seen from the street yesterday. Here is a closeup of the driveway. So again the building on the left has 17 grade in the driveway. Ours is 29 . On the right is 26 . This is what we are proposing. Four story building, 40 feet tall. It is only 15 inches taller than the building on the left, a three story Single Family building 38 feet above the roadway. The building on the right is three story Single Family. I can go into more detail. The long and short the building is not bigger front or front, a few inches here and there. Taller by 13 feet to add 7 bedrooms and additional Single Family housing dwelling unit rather. This is designed for the homeowners who have a few words to say. I am lydia. This project will provide housing for my family. I have lived in San Francisco for 15 years. I continue to work downtown. We have been looking for housing for a few years and unable to find anything with enough space for my family. We plan to have three generations me, my husband, two young kidses and inlaws and parents. My husband and i work from home. The Additional Office space is needed for us. Thank you. We will now take Public Comment on this item. One speak consider card, mr. Lee. Okay. Any other Public Comment . No. It is you . Come on up. I am the neighbor in the sun set area. I lived in sunset for 40 years. I think sunset Needs Housing now because the children are growing up and family is expanding, and we need more, you know, housing, actually. The kids are growing up, they have married and have children. We need places for children to sleep. I believe the project is really good for the new people coming, you know, for our children around grandchildren. I dont have grandchildren yet. My son is getting married. I think, you know, eventually i might need to expand my house for my grandchildren. Right now i dont. I am thinking about that in the future. Thank you. I support this project. Thank you. Okay. If there is no further Public Comment is now closed. Commissioner richards. Commissioner richards i have to say i respect you, and i want to thank you. Every time you come and it is tantamount for demolition you go through the process and after seeing the last one and the ones before it i may not agree with the designs you are a man of integrity for advising your client to go through the process correctly. I move to approve the project. Second. Nothing furthered there is a motion seconded to approve with conditions. roll call . So moved. That motion passes unanimously 40. This is discretionary review. 19 a and b were continued to november 14th. 20 both drs are withdrawn. That is 21 for case 2018 2018012718drp at 1980 eddy street. Discretionary review. We are on 21 now. Good evening, David Winslow staff architect. This is a request for discretionary review of Building Permit application 20180816 a three story rear addition and conversion of ground floor Storage Space to create 775 square feet of dwelling unit to create a twostory two family dwelling. The Historic Resource is category p. Dr requester the immediate neighbor to the west is concerned with the proposed project because of the size and proximity of the proposed additional reviews from the bedroom to significantly impact his property value. His suggested alternative is reduce mass of third floor. Public comment staff received no letters in opposition or support. Staff recommendation is based on Advisory Team this design complies with guidelines related to building massing at the rear and access to mid block open space because the proposed addition is set back 6. 5 feet from the requesters Property Line and extends to the adjacent neighbor to the east. Sits over the existing footprint of the building such that it retains visual access to the medblock open space from the add adjacent properties. Property views are not protected by the guidelines. Staff recommends not taking dr and approving. There are no extraordinary conditions. This concludes my presentation. I am here to answer questions. Thank you. Good evening. I see am renee hole. Are you the d. R. Requester . You have to wait. I see am sorry. I didnt realize that. The d. R. Requester will present first. Then if you are a sponsor you can come up after. Good evening. I live in the house for seven or eight years with my wife and baby. This is one of the rooms where we it is with our baby. It is going to impact our pleasure of the house as well as parents come to live with us often enough. That is why we requested to the height and subsequent i spoke to my neighbor and she is going to present her case as well. Your neighbor is going to present your case . You are done with your presentation . We will before you come up we need to take Public Comment from anyone who agrees with the d. R. Requester. Okay. Since there is none. You can go. Please forgive me for not knowing the appropriate procedure. Is she the project sponsor . No, i dont believe she is. I am sorry. I dont understand who is who. Let me explain. I am the one who is most impacted by the proposed remodeling. I live in the middle of the block around the corner from 1100 broad rick to 11201122 broad rick. It is a two unit building. My coowner had a stroke. She is in her early 80s. In two months i shall be 90. I have here a picture of the existing building from my kitchen window. This is a drawing which we were able to get from the designers, and in a letter on the 30th of april i said i had no objection except that i wanted to see that the extension were not on so deep. Apparently this letter of the 30th of april never got to anybody, even though i addressed it to the planning commission. If you take a look at this drawing, you can see that it comes up to about here and it cuts off daylight from my windows considerably, and is the sun goes at an angle, i will get very little sunlight except maybe once each day. I have here a picture of my existing thing and a photograph with black lines what i would consider for me a healthy adjustment which would mean the line of the roof in the proposed building would not be so high. What can i say . I am nearly 90. My friend had a stroke. She is in her early 80s. We have had no communications with the owner or with the architect to try to let us know what they were planning to do. If it hadnt been for reuben i wouldnt have had a clue. I did give a condition approval. Gentlemen and lady, that is what i have to say. Do you want to take this letter . I can accept that. Just leave it there. Would you take these pictures, please . Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Since we have no Public Comment in support of the dr requester we will hear from the project sponsors. Good evening. I am the architect for 1980 eddy street. What we are proposing is a rear addition. This is the existing deck area, three story deck. The proposed design does not go past the line of the deck or adjacent house to the east. We have held back our building 6 6 be inches in the Property Line the d. R. Requesters window is here. 35 feet to where our bathroom begins. This is approximately 30 feet here. The distance there. There are no windows on this wall right here. All of the windows are back here. This drawing north is up on the drawing. It shows light coming through. There is plenty of light from the south coming this way. In fact these two buildings cast more shadow to the mid block than we actually would. The third floor addition is expansion for the growing family there and for the addition of the unit below is for to add a unit to the housing stock. Also, i have here with me the owner of the home to speak now. Evening, commissioners. I am a fifth generation bay yore z area i have been in San Francisco 25 years. I am a schoolteacher, my husband is a chef. We have two children in the public schools. We love the schools and neighborhood. We need more space. We have decided not to move outside of the city and hopefully to do expansion of our property. Thank you. Thank you. You still have a couple minutes. Do we have any Public Comment in support of the project sponsor . Case is submitted. D. R. Requester you get two minute rebuttal. If you would like. So my case i stated i lived in the city for almost 20 years. I came from a different country, this is my home and i have been living there with my family and kids. I believe that this expansion is going to significantly impact my home value. I requested merely [ inaudible ] okay. Thank you. Project sponsor you have two minute rebuttal as well, if you want to add anything else. I think we started this process knowing that we were sensitive to the house being victorian and the mid block light and air. We made choices. Our planning input to pull the house away from the west neighbors and Higher Elevation than we are. I feel like we have done a lot to already address the light and air access for the whole neighborhood. That is what we did. Thank you. Okay. That is it. Commissioner fong. This is probably not as much as what the neighbors would like to see, the addition in the rear has a shed roof and a higher ceiling than the rest of the spaces. There could be if that was a flat roof that was say 9foot clear space in there, that would reduce the addition probably several feet. Do you agree . I do. Which is probably not as much as what the d. R. Request errands neighbor would like to see but it does reduce it a little bit. Otherwise, the addition and Everything Else is pretty minimal in terms of the length of the lot. I am supportive of the expansion but perhaps with a minor tweak. Commissioner richards. Can you put that in the form of a motion please. Move to grant and to approve the project with modification of the rear from a shed roof to a flat roof allowing the interior to have a 9foot clear. Is that sufficient . Second. If i understand correctly take dr and approof the project as proposed with following modification for the rear shed roof alter the shed roof to flat providing interior 9foot clearance floor to ceiling height. roll call . So moved that passes unanimously 40. We are adjourned. His voice o momentarily. This is a regular meeting of the commission on Community Investment and infrastructure. The Successor Agency commission to the for tuesday, september 17, 2019. Welcome to members of the public. Madam secretary, please call the first item. The first item of business is roll call. Please respond when i call your name. [role call] the next order of business is item two, announcements. The next regularly scheduled Commission Meeting will be held on tuesday, october 1, 2019 at 1 00 pm city hall, room 416 . Announcement of prohibition of sound producing Electronic Devices during the meeting. Please be advised that the ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person s responsible for the ringing of or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar soundproducing electronic device. A member of the public has three minutes to make pertinent Public Comments on each item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter time frame on any item. Strongly recommended that members of the public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit a card to the commission secretary. No reportable actions. The next order of business is item four, matters of unfinished business. There are no matters of unfinished business. The next order of business is item five, matters of new business consisting of consent and regular agenda. Approval of minutes from the regular meeting of july 16, and august 6, 2019. Do we have any speaker cards . No for this item. Closed Public Comment. Hello commissioners, do we have any comments or edits to the minutes . No. Of july 16, and august 6 . No. May i have a motion . Yes, i move that the minutes be accepted. The motion has been made by commissioner scott seconded by president bustos. [role call] the Consent Agenda is adopted. Madam secretary can you call the next item. The next order of business is regular agenda item 5b. Authorizing a fourth grant disbursement agreement with the Mexican Museum, a california nonprofit corporation, and 706 Mission Street co llc, a Delaware Limited Liability company, in an amount not to exceed 1,000,000, for tenant improvements for a new Museum Facility at the 706 Mission Street project, pursuant to a december 14, 2010 Grant Agreement between the museum and the Successor Agency; former Yerba Buena Center project area discussion and action resolution no. 242019 madam director . Thank you. This item before you is a request for disbursement, since the approval of the Grant Agreement, we have had three disbursements, and this will be the fourth. The crest the request before you for a Million Dollars to assist with the partial funding for the museum. With that, we have representatives here. Thank you. Good afternoon. I am develop services manager, i am here before you today to present a Grant Funding request. With me, are representatives from both the Mexican Museum and 706 Mission Street company. The developer for the 706 mission project. Andrew kluger who is the chair of the board of directors of the Mexican Museum and market for our from 706 Mission Street, he is a project manager. I will provide a brief overview of the project, and the current grant disbursement request and then turn it over for discussion. As you know there we go, the project is located in in Yerba Buena Center. Which the agency helped assemble and develop over the years into a the cultural district that you know today. The last remaining undeveloped parcel is the Mexican Museum site. That is shown here on Central Block one. Here is an an aerial view. And reggie 706 Mission Street site, which combines it with a building that was purchased by millennium partners. There is a long trajectory to the history of this project. In 2013, ocii entered into a purchase and Sale Agreement with millennium for a mixed use project on that combined site. The project started construction in 2016. In overview, the develop a program for this project includes 190 units of condominiums, and a 480foot tower. The build out of the korn shell of about a 48,000 squarefoot museum space and the four floors. The developer is responsible for building that shell and transferring it to the city. Also, part of the project is Historical Preservation of the aaronson building on the ownership and operation of the garage. You see renderings of the project. As i mentioned, this is the last project and fulfillment of the yerba buena cultural district. We contributed the land and the garage. The developer provide Significant Community benefits, including the construction of the shell of this museum sp