Lives. May you rest in peace. Supervisor cohen thank you [roll call] madam president . That includes the introduction of new business. Supervisor cohen thank you very much. Madam clerk, i think that brings us to item 44. Public comments. The public may address the entire board of supervisors for up to two minutes on items within the subject matter of the board. Supervisor cohen thank you supervisors, i mentioned earlier i was here at the six hour meeting. I have a leg brace and a back brace and i stayed throughout today. I want to tell you that the years and years of my environmental work are not going to be in vain. I have thousands of articles that i have written. I go before the bay area air Quality Management district and you have some representatives. They dont Pay Attention when you go to the board. The bay area air Quality Management district has employees who want to work very hard and they are told destroy the documents and we have not heard anything from our supervisors and we have not heard anything from our board. So on another level, an important level, you all know that at Hunters Point, equipment was put so that they could register the very, very high levels of asbestos structures. What did they do . Which some of you supervisors have taken money from, they removed the batteries. I know. In any project, and more of dubious projects, that supervisors, including mayors take a lot of money. Illegal money. They think they can use a mechanism of this money or whatever, but that is blood on your hands. So i dont mind suffering, but i dont like to take painkillers. I will suffer. But i will speak up. I make statements, but there are supervisors that have their hearts in the right place and those who get my blogs, they know they have to do what is right. Thank you, very much. Supervisor cohen thank you , for your comments. Mr wright . On the 19th of this month, you heard from 90 black skinned coloured people, both male and females pertaining to discrimination based on race. By all of the departments here in the city, i submit to you that you are running a correct and organize enterprise in the city and county of San Francisco you originate by ethnic cleansing in the fillmore area by justin herman. Any further compound the problem years before them in the forties , with chemical warfare, by using hazardous chemical materials, and the Hunters Point area which kills thousands , probably millions of black people. It just flows. As a result of your employment discrimination against blacks, and every department within the city, and numerous testimony took place, i find it odd that the two black females in the authoritative position failed to appear. And they have the audacity to tell us about employment and about how you dont appreciate us talking about employment and people who are making 184,000 for sweeping up shipped off the street. And you say it was 80,000 and i was being disrespectful. It is not 80,000 a year they are making. They are making a hundred and 84,000. I appreciate you talking to me like that. It just flows. S. F. Glove , gov, please. The bay area has an increase in modern rent. Given the neighborhood sponsors with more than 30 of the decrease in the number of low income africanamericans, latinos and asians living there. Researchers found that the statement supervisor cohen thank you mr daltrey . Do we have two minutes or three minutes . Supervisor cohen you have two minutes. Thank you. It says in the agenda we have three. Ok. My name is anubis. Good evening to madam president and the fellow board of supervisors. I am a San Francisco native and i was homeless for six years on the streets of San Francisco in the city that i grew up in. I have come here today for the general Public Comment to talk about homelessness and the attitude that the city seems to have taken towards the Homeless Population. More than ever, we see that the city is trying to house Homeless People but on the same token, it punishes and it criminalizes the Homeless Population for simply sleeping on the street. I am a person of reason. I understand that people and your constituents have fear of people who commit crimes or perceived to have committed crimes. I understand action seem to be taken when true crimes are committed such as robbery or violent crimes, et cetera. The people should not be criminalized for the simple act of sleeping. And it has become very common in the city for d. P. W. To cave into businesses and even to put barricades on public property, but not only dampers, it dampers the ability to survive on the street but the ability for the general public to use public spaces. One example of this would be the u. N. Plaza. In summary, i just want what im asking for is i want this board to send a message to the entire City Government and the current mayor, that you will not stand for decriminalized of the criminalization of homelessness. Supervisor cohen thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. Tom gilbert d. I mentioned earlier about gavin newsom running for governor. He is the man that pressed court against the washington vote. He was saying we need a new formula. So the people of San Francisco said to1 margin, we dont want eight washington. I am wondering, where is he coming from and what his new formula is going to be . Again, financial profits. From what i understand, the world dash the word is fire, now. Financial, insurance, real estate runs the world. We have a situation here that we are going to leave behind 25 or 30 Affordable Housing starting at hundred 20,000. And yet we have social needs in our community. The weave is wearing apart. Where are we going to get Senior Housing . Where are we going to get foster kid housing . Disabled housing . Section eight housing . People that are on the margin that cant afford their own homes anymore. People in the margin who cant afford their rents anymore. We need dignity homes. They dont have to be large, but they can be they should be placed in every format. Especially what we are talking about today in this 15 15,000 or 1500 homes, again. We think 25 is great but how can a teacher make a hundred 20,000 and afford a home here . We need to reweave our society. We need to bring the Government Back home. Times are changing. If we can do this and set this model up here, it can be multiplied into every other community. We need a new direction. Thank you. Supervisor cohen thank you for your comments. Next speaker. Yesterday Michael Savage made a very interesting statement about christine forward and how she works at some christine forward and how she recruits ford people for the c. I. A. Everything that the American Public believes is a lie. What is his name . He was there talking about that. Do you remember that guys name . What ever. This is big. I dont know why Rush Limbaugh did not say anything about it or sean hannity. I cannot listen to 12 hours a day talk radio. This is big. It makes perfect sense. Christine forward ford is lying about sean kavanaugh. You cant have one big mouth lady bringing down one guy. Where are the four people who were in the room. They all said it didnt happen. Jesus is unique. He can do that. He said if i bear witness of myself, my witness is true. He said in the law of moses that it is commanded that two or three witnesses, everything will be established. Not just one lone witness legacy to. Jesus said, i am want to bear witness of myself and my father bears witness of me. Do you realize what he is saying there . Jesus stands alone. There is no one remotely close to the man, the god to man. He said his father bore witness of him. He said i have greater witness than john the baptist. John is much more than a prophet because isaiah spoke of him. Malachi spoke of him, but all of the prophets profits bear bore witness of him. Supervisor cohen thank you next speaker, please. Thank you. Good evening ladies and gentlemen of the board. I am going to try for the third time to talk about 911. You will recall back in 2001, involuntary outpatient psychiatric treatment was a huge issue in california. It was hotly debated in the state legislature and in the past. And then 911 happened. What is the connection . The patriarch act was passed. It modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 in order to get rid of the requirement that electronic surveillance be conducted for foreign intelligence purposes. Also, there is still a requirement that the target of intelligence be an agent of a foreign power. However, that is a low bar to meet. All a person has to do is meet the requirement for civil conspiracy, which can mean encouragement. Someone who encourages terrorism i could make that. I could meet that by. I am not saying that i ever encourage terrorism but it is such a low bar to meet. There is a lot of grey area. One somebody once somebody is under electronic surveillance, what can be done . They can be entrapped into the commission of crime. Once they are entrapped, then they can be subject to incompetency to stand trial. They can be designated as incompetent to stand trial. This is a backdoor commitment to root for involuntary outpatient treatment. These people can then be committed and here is the proof. San francisco t. V. , please focus on the laptop. An error message. No. Ok. Fifteen seconds. I dont think i will pull this off. There has been 1900 increase in Mental Health filings. I will never get this. I think i will just run out of time. Supervisor cohen perhaps in two weeks. [laughter] supervisor cohen next speaker, please. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you. I believe the next item for us to deal with our adoption without Committee Reference . Clerk 12 yes items 45 and items 46. A unanimous vote is required for resolutions on First Reading today. Alternatively, and a supervisor may require a resolution to go to committee. Supervisor cohen any members that would like to sever an item . Seeing none, can we take this same house, same colloquy without objection, these items are adopted unanimously. Same house, same colloquy what is next . Clerk in memoriam. Supervisor cohen ok. In memoriam. We had a couple of them. As we get the in memoriam together, i want to announce one thing. October 16th is the next scheduled mayoral appearance. Districts one, two, three, and four will be able to submit a topic to ask the mayor a question on. The deadline to submit your topic is noon on october 10th. This is for districts 14 to ask and submit a question to the Clerks Office for mayoral appearance at the board of supervisors scheduled for october 16th. Clerk by noon . Supervisor cohen yes, by noon. Are we ready . Clerk todays meeting will be adjourned in memory of the following beloved individuals. For the late virginia ramos. For the late bob roper and cyrus shake. Supervisor cohen all right i believe that brings us to the end of our agenda. I want to thank our friends at San Francisco television. Thank you for assisting us with the broadcast today. Is there any other business . Clerk that concludes our business for today. Supervisor cohen thank you , ladies and gentlemen. We are adjourned. [ ] order. Good afternoon, welcome to the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission Regular hearing for wednesday, october 3rd, 2018. I would like to remind members of the public to please silence your mobile devices that may sound off during these proceedings. When speaking before the commission, if you care to state your name for the record. Id like to take roll. [ roll call ] first on your agenda is general Public Comment. I have no speaker cards. Does any member of the public we are to speawish to speak. Seeing and hearing none, well close general comments. Good afternoon, commissioners. Ill do announcements this week. Item 2 review of past events of the planning staff report and announcements. Can you see if my mic is going . Good afternoon, commissioners, tim fry. Two quick updates to share with you. As you are aware, the joint arts commission, our civic Design Review committee, of the arts commission, and the h. P. C. Joint hearing, regarding the Civic Center Plan wonting occurring on the 15. However, i still have an outstanding meeting with them to get a better understanding of what sort of topics the committee would like to discuss with the commission. Ill meet with the officers and with you in preparing an agenda to have a much more general discussion at a joint hearing at a future date. If theres anything that comes to the top of your mind now, im happy to relay that to their staff, when we have that meeting later this week. Also, at the last hearing, the commission asked for more information on the number of entitlements and permits associated with h. P. C. Activities that mayor breeds legislation. I have connected with kate conner and carlie grobe from our staff and they will have a report in your packets for your october 17th hearing. That concludes my comments. Unless you have any questions. Thank you. Any questions for staff . No. We can move on to commission matters. Item 3, president s report and announcements. I have no report on announcement. Item 4, considering of draft minutes for august 15th, 2018 and the minutes for the regular hearing of september 19th, 2018. I have no speaker cards. Any comments on the minutes . Does any member of the public wish to comment on the minutes of september 19th, 2018 or august 15th, 2018. Seeing and hearing no Public Comment. Do i have a motion to adopt the minutes. I so move. Second. On that motion to adopt the minutes for august 15th and september 19th, commissioner black,. Yes. Johns. Yes. Matsuda. Yes. Proman. Yes. Hyland. Yes. Wolfra. Yes. So, the morning paper carried an article about the demise of the elbow room, one of our legacy businesses. For anyone who hasnt been there or hasnt been there recently, caithink the date is early janu. Go in december or before. Commissioner hyland. I wanted to let you all know that i was invited and director ram joined us, the San Francisco moma and the San Francisco Public Library are doing a project. Theres an artist and residents at the Headlands Center for the arts. They have put their hands on a w. P. A. Model of the city. Its 30 feet by 30 feet. Eveevery city block down to brisbane. It was on display at city hall from 1939 to 1941. It went into storage. A professor at b. C. Berkley was storing it at uc berkley. Its currently at a Storage Facility for the library. They intend to distribute it across the city in all the Branch Libraries and have that section of the model displayed for three months. Starting on january, february and march. Theyre looking, they have not located a space yet, but theyre look to go assemble the model for another three months. The goal is to talk about it and toen spire conversations around the development of the city. So stay tuned. Well keep you posted on that. Its really a phenomenal. It was fantastic. One of the things i found extraordinary about it, its not just the downtown, its the city. Every block. Every block is designed to be removable. Its an ex extraordinary piece of work. I was blown away by the detail. They painted the buildings the appropriate color. The actual colors they existed at the time. Some parts of the downtown, as i understand it, which we didnt fully see, were updated overtime. Most of the city is as it was in the w. P. A. Era. So 30s i guess. And we are all looking at where we can put it. It could be on display. Its like 30 by 30 feet as commissioner hyland said. Its a big space to find. Our new building doesnt necessarily have a space that big. Although were looking to see if we can do it vertically. Thats where it was at one point. Because the light cars are used by events and such, i dont think that would work. Obviously the space is there. It would be really wonderful to find a place to put this on permanent public display, if we can find it. Stay tuned. Thats great. Thank you, any other comments . We can move on. Seeing none. Commissioners, your consent calender. The matter listed here is considered to be routine by Historic Preservation commission and acted by a single roll call vote. Theres no separate discussion of this item unless the public or staff requests which it will be removed from the consent calender and considered at a separate item. Item 6, administrative certificate of appropriateness and minor purpose. This is a renewal. Anyone wants to take this off consent . Does any member of the public wish to remove this from the consent calender . Seeing none. Do i have a motion to approve the consent calender . Move to approve. Second. Thank you. On that motion to approve the renewal delegation, commission black. Yes. Johns. Yes. Matsuda. Yes. Hyland night yes. And wolfram. It places under your regular item for calender. 495 gary street. Is a major permit to alter. Good afternoon, commissioners. Rebeca, planning staff. Before you is a request for a major permit to alter for exterior alterations for 495 gary street. On the is the east corner of gary and Taylor Street. The property is within the article 11 market mason conservation district. 495 gary street, known as the cliff hotel was constructed in 1913 and received major addition and renovations in 1926. The proposed scope of work is the construction of a new onestorey rooftop addition on the lower roof of the subject property. In the footprint of an existing non historic temporary tent structure on the roof. The addition will be adjacent to the historic cliff residents rooftop at the subject property. The additional has stucco, plum multi lie window and a pvc roofing. Staff finds the proposed work condition is recommended. Will be in conformance of article 11 and secretary of the interior standards for rehabilitation. The proposed rooftop will only be visible from a distance at the south elevation of the building. It will not be visible from the hotels primary gary and Taylor Street spots. Staff finds although the proposed rooftop addiction will be the cliff residents, the facade has been altered and has non historic window and door openings where the doors and windows used to be. It will have a roof line that parallels the gable roof of the cliff residents. Lower than that roof to avoid obscuring from the cliff residents. The rooftop will have stucco. But will have a simple contemporary design top distinguish the edition from the property. The new multilight aluminum windows will be compatible with existing historic steel windows found in the upper floors of the hotel. They will be differentiated from the Historic Windows through their different window opening sizes and configuration. Staffs preliminary recommend for this project is for approval with conditions. Staff recommending one condition of approval to stipulate late the project sponsor provide the proposed stucco cladding to ensure its compatible with the finishes of the subject property. No Public Comments have been received since packets were submitted. This concludes my presentation. Unless there are questions and the architect has a brief presentation of the project. Thank you. Would the architect like to come forward . Will five minutes be adequate . I believe so, yeah. Thank you. Sfgovtv should pick it up. You see it on the screen . Yes. You can speak in that mic as well. Good afternoon, i am representing on behalf of the owner of the cliff hotel. We are preparing a renovation of this temporary tentbased. Well show you a little bit further how this renovation will be in keeping with the existing property. I wanted to provide you a few drawings of the hotel. This area of the hotel is built in 1924. It was built for the owner of the hotel at the time. It was a residents up in the space. It is no longer used as such. Its currently meeting space for the hotel. They hold hospitalitytype functions and meetings. Its got an adjacent terrace, that overtime, the property has added temporary to semi permanent tent structures. The property would like to turn those temporary tent structures into a permanent exterior facade. At the same time, we want to make sure that we are improving the life safety of the facility and this floor. You can see, in this small photograph here, the existing tent structure on the building as well as a 1926 historical photo of that same facade where these three arched windows are currently. It no longer looks like this. And just some other existing windows. And these are some other photos of the interior of this terrace area. You can see theres nothing quite historic about this at this point in time. Theyve just built on top of the exterior terrace. The tent structure from above. This is a view from Taylor Street. Taylor and ellis, which is about as much as you can see of the existing tent structure. The closer you get to the property, the less you can see of this area because of its nature of being inside the u of the hotel. Our design proposes keeping within existing finishes. We are trying to be compatible with the existing windows. Weve worked with rebeca on staff, in terms of the window shapes and sizes. It will be a very simple structure. Its basically just closing the exterior facade. Im sorry. Somehow this got moved and i dont know how to move it back. I dont how to move it become. These are just some details. We are proposing to put our exterior facade walls along the parapit. This is just an over all plan here that you can see to have some information on where this particular terrace, that is within the property. As you can see, its really just one large, open space. Were just adding the facade and trying to deal with the exiting requirements of that area. I think that concludes our information. Great, thank you. Should i close this down . You can leave it. Just leave it up. Thank you. Commissioners, any questions for the project . Well take Public Comment on this item. Does any member of the public wish to speak. If so, please come forward. Seeing and hearing none, well close Public Comment. Any discussion . Do i have a motion . I move to approve with conditions. Thank you. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to approve this matter with conditions. Commissioner black. Yes. John. Yes. Pearlman. Yes. Hyland. And president wolfram. It passed 60. Item 8. At 1800 Mission Street this is a certificate of of appropriateness i need a motion to be recused. Move to recuse. Thank you. Motion to recuse president wolfram. So moved that passes unanimously 60. Good afternoon, again, commissioners. Planning staff. Before you is a request for a ser tive at of appropriateness to make exterior and interior alterations known as the state arm reand arsenal on mission and 14th street. The property is landmark number 108. The proposed scope of work includes the creation of a new accessible entrance to the building at the south part of the Mission Street facade. Modifications to enter stairs and ramping at the existing main Mission Street and 14th street entrances. Installation of rooftop equipment that will be visible from multiple vantage points, repairs to exterior masonry facade. Structural enhancement to the rooftop and interior repairs. Staff finds the work condition as recommended. Will be in conformance with the requirements for article 10 and the secretary of the interior standards for rehabilitation. Staff finds that although the creation of the proposed new accessible entrance at the south enter of the Mission Street facade will remove the facade cladding. The brick to be removed will be limited to the minimum amount necessary for the creation of the entrance and the removed brick will be salvaged and stored on site. The new entrance will be located on the same facade as the main historic entrance to the building. It will be set within one of the corners to allow the historic entrance to remain unmodified. With a design similar to the exiting entrance doors at the main Mission Street entrance and simplified in detailing and provide to the historic main entrance. The proposed modifications to stairs and ramping at the existing main entrances at Mission Street and 14th street, including installing railings at the gran et steps of the main Mission Street entrance and resloping extending a portion of the existing concrete ramp leading to the main 14th street entrance. Well enhance the accessibility of these event trances. Have minimal attachment points and well be simple in design to avoid detracting from the historic features of the building. Staff finds the proposed new rooftop will only be visible from certain view points and are completely hidden from view from most vantage points. As demonstrated by the provided site line studies. The cleaning and repair of the masonry cladding will aid in the preservation of the landmark property. The proposed stabilization of portions of the drill hall roof parapit will not be visible from a public rightofway. Staffs preliminary recommendation for this project is for approval with conditions. Staff recommends four conditions of approval regarding review of specifications and mock ups for the proposed cleaning and repair work at the facade. As well as the completion of the parapit repair work approved under h. P. C. Motion number 310. With these details all to be reviewed by preservation staff. No Public Comments have been received since the packets were submitted. This concludes my presentation unless there are questions. The project team has a brief presentation of the project. Project team. Do you think you need more than five minutes . Five should be fine. Good afternoon, commissioners. My name is Alex Stanford and on behalf of a. J. Capital partners, im excited to introduce our Rehabilitation Plans for the iconic San Francisco arm room over the past year, our design team has worked to develop accessibility and life safety upgrades, seismic retro that compliment and enhance the Buildings Architectural features. They will conducted to insure the alterations meet landmark expectations. We take pride in Historic Restoration projects and one of the cities most culturally significant neighborhoods. Samantha rose will provide more detail on key design elements. Thank you. Ill be happy to take any questions later. Thank you. Im samantha with t. F. I wanted to review some of our major design goals with our interventions at the mission arm re. These include improving access. Bringing the building up to current standards. Providing new m. E. P. Systems. Repairing and extending the life of the buildings landmark facade. And increasing seismic resilience as well as repairing existing structural issues. So, from the First Floor Plan you can see these interventions, hopefully i can get it all on screen. We have a stair at the north. A slight extension to the ramp at 14 street. Going into the drill court for accessibility. And then another new stair at the southeast tourette. You can see our new accessible entry that rebeca mentioned. You will notice the existing historic main entry has a number of steps leading up to the recessed entry doors. This provided in order to maintain the charter defining features of this historic entry, we therefore, came up with the idea of a new accessible entry at the southeast portion. So, from the image, you can see the existing southeast and our proposed new entry. We also consulted with the Mayors Office on disability, in order to discuss equitable design strategies. So, by having the entry on the southeast tourette, it maintains Mission Street as the primary entry. Its 200 feet away from the existing historic entry. Its recessed in order to respect the existing facade. And glazed for visual access as well as to enhance the experience when you are inside the lobby space and beyond. You can see from this perspective that the addition al exterior are quiet. The stair inclose youre is at the north speaking out. As well as the new mechanical units and key recovery units for the m. E. P. Systems in the building. And then finally our goals are, again, to help repair and restore the existing landmark facade through masonry repair, window repair, particularly at the existing gun windows in the basement, which you can see at street level. And then, at the drill court facades in the south and west and the 14th street, we were looking at doing repair of large cracks in the existing masonry as well as the repair work that was discussed under a previous c. O. A. So, thank you very much. Im here to answer questions as well as alex and coalman of w. J. E. And jim abrams. Thank you. Any questions . Open this item up for Public Comment. Any member of the public wish to speak on this agenda item . Seeing and hearing none. Closed Public Comment. Bring it back to the commission. Questions . Thoughts . Motion . Motion to approve with conditions. Second. This doesnt have conditions. This one is just an approval. Very good, commissioners on that motion to approve this matter commissioner black. Yes. Johns. Yes. Matsuda. Yes. Pearlman. Yes. And hyland. Yes. So moved. That motion passes unanimously 50. Item 9 for case number 2018001477coa at 903 minnesota street. This is a certificate of appropriateness. Good afternoon, commissioners. Natallia with Department Staff. The item is a why for certificate of appropriateness for 903 minnesota street which is con trib tory to the article 10 landmark district. The properties occupied by a twostorey singlefamily dwelling designed in the east lake and constructed between 1890 and 1891 as one of peltons cottages. The proposed project is to correct a violation pertaining to the removal of exterior finishes on the front and wear without the benefit of a permit. It was brought to the departments attention in november of 2016 that the approved scope of work was exceeded. The work is currently under suspension and pending the decision of this commission. The projecten tales the projectg building including wood cladding, wood [ please stand by ] prepared this short presentation. I am available for any questions and this concludes my presentation. Thank you. Commissioner, do you have a question . I have a question. Do you want to wait until i can wait. Does the sponsor want to come forward and do your presentation . Yeah, sorry. Good morning, commissioners. Good afternoon. Ryan paterson for the project sponsor. Were here because the contractors, i understand, did some removal beyond what was allowed by the permit. Without the owners authorization and we are here to restore the character to defining features of this property and a basic violation. And the architect were recently brought in for this purpose specifically and look forward to working with staff and the commission to achieve that. Well see a few key photos showing the conditions that the property was in. I understand that work was related to dry rot that was discovered. So what i understand is that those garage doors were roted to the core and had to be removed but they are going to find doors that are as close as possible to what was removed and well work closely with staff on that. Happy to answer any questions and the design team is here as well. Thank you. Thank you. There is no additional presentation, right . That was it . Ok. Lets do Public Comment. Does any member of the public wish to speak . If so, please come forward. I do have a question. The letter that came in from the dog Patch Neighborhood Association talked about that those doors are, i assume, they open out as carriage doors. That is correct. And that they were she was implying that thoses are available. Theyre findable or recreatable. And what i heard you say is that an overhead typical garage door that looks like it. Where is the department on finding replacements for those original doors rather than doing the overhead. Because i mean, the dog Patch Neighborhood Association was firmly against that direction. Im wondering if the departments had talked about that and what they think is ok. I believe weve approved a similar story of an operable garage door that looks like a carriage style. So it is consistent with our feedback on other projects. Is it an entire door or it leaves and they go up thats what would make a difference. If it is a sectional door, that looks quite different than the other kind where they go up. It is a onepiece door because the old doors were hinged on the sides. Yes. Yes. And they were paired. So i i believe so. Perhaps the project sponsor might have Additional Information on that. Right. Thank you. Does the sponsor know the answer to that question . Correct. It is a onepiece door that would open. Rather than sectional . Yeah. Great. Then im for that. Commissioners, any other discussion . Motion . Ill make the motion. We have a motion from commissioner matsuna. Very good, commissioners on that motion to approve this matter with conditions. [roll call] that motion passes unanimously 60. And places us on items 10a through f for case numbers 2018006629mls. 2018006796mls. 2018006629mls. And 2018oo77338mls for properties at 2253 webster, 353 kearney street. 456 through 467 oak street, 587 waller street, 354 through 356 san carlo street and 811 tree avenue, respectively. These are all mills act applications. We should hear from staff first, sir. Are you ok . Yes. Because we have identified sir. Sir. Were going to hear from staff first and then receive Public Comment and at that time you can testify. You will be invited back. Dont worry. Good afternoon, commissioners. Shannon ferguson, Planning Department staff. The items before you today are six historical property contracts. The legislation authorizes local governments to enter into contracts with private Property Owners of qualified Historic Properties. This agreement provides property tax reductions to owners of those Historic Properties who can then allocate the savings towards an appropriate maintenance and restoration plan. The departments currently holds 31 active contracts. The department receives six novak application by the may 1 filing deadline. Department staff reviewed each application for a completeness, conducted preapproval sections and worked with applicants to revise their rehabilitation and Maintenance Plans as necessary. All six Property Owners will enter into a contract with the city. The agreements are 10year revolving contracts that are renewed annually. Your commission packets contain a draft valuation for each property, outlining the potential property tax savings. These figures were compiled by the assessors recorders office. Each Property Owner has outlined with the assistance of Department Staff rehabilitation and Maintenance Plans that will ensure that work will be conducted in conformance of the secretary of the interior standards. Our First Supreme Court 2253 webster street. Its a twostorey plus basement wood frame Single Family dwelling designed in the italian age style. It was constructed circa 1900 and it is a contributor to the webster street historic district. The applicant has already completed some rehabilitation to the building. In 2017 including dry rot repair and painting at an estimated cost of 75,000. The proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes can flashing replacement, roof replacement, additional dry rot repair and are placing the front door and kind. The rehabilitation work is estimated to cost over 87,000. For over 10 years. Thes proposed Maintenance Plan includes any wood section of the siding, front porch and door. Maintenance work is estimated to cost 3500 annually. Any needed repairs will be made in kind and will avoid altering or removing character features. The Property Owner will receive an estimated property tax savesing of 13,000, 13,750. It is a reduction of 54. 73 from the based year value. The next property is 353 kearney street. A fivestory over mason ri commercial brick building designed in the renaissance revival style. A category four contributing building to the kearney conservation district. The building is currently valued by the Assessors Office at over 3 million. So a historic Structure Report was submitted to demonstrate that granting the exemption would result in the [inaudible] of the property. It includes brick repair and repointing at the facade and basement. Repair and in kind replacement of wood windows, plaster repair, sheet metal corners repair, sheet elevator and stair repair and store front repair and replacement. Rehabilitation work is estimated to cost over 1 million over 10 years. But the Maintenance Plan includes annual in . Dian sp ex of the roof, elevator wood basement, window, store fronts, sheet metal corners and fire escape with any in kind repair of deteriorated elements as necessary. Maintenance work is estimated to cost 23,000 annually. And it is intended to meet the secretarys standards. The property own her receive a tax savings of 26963. Thats a 32. 82 from their factor based year value. Property is 465467 oak street twostory plus wood frame building and built circa 1900. Its a contributor to the hayes valley Residential California registered historic district. The applicant complete rehabilitation work to the building in 2017 including wood window repair including exterior repair at a cost of over 6,000. Thes proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes seismic upgrade, roof replacement, exterior painting and is estimated to cost 369600 over 10 years. The proposed plan includes section of the roof, downspouts and porch and wood siding. Repairs will be made in kind and are intented to meet the secondtyerss standards and will cost approximately 2,000 annually. The Property Owner will receive an estimated property tax savings of 16250, which is a 52. 98 reduction from their factored based year value. The next one is a contributing building to the devos park historic district. The proposed Rehabilitation Plan includes seismic and foundation work, roof replacement, front facade restoration, window replacement and front steps and porch restoration. Rehabilitation work is estimated to cost over 337,000 over 10 years. The proposed Maintenance Plan includes annual inspection of gutters and downspouts, windows, front steps and front porch, front facade and roof and any needed repairs will be made in kind and will be will meet the secretarys standards. The property will receive an estimated tax savings of 16412. Its a 58. 3 reduction from their factored base year value. The next building is 354356 san carlos street. Its a threestory woodframed, twofamily residential building, originally designed in the italian style and built in 1977. 1877. The front facade was altered with stucco cladding. And the front steps were stuccoed