Language is a [beep] show. Its hard to not think about what is happening on the other side of sixth street. The school is in crisis. We have one school in our district and talking about a new school is ridiculous to me. We had to get pinterest to pay for a second social worker because we have the highest number of homeless kids. 85 of middle schoolers were reading below grade levels. We know that means they will drop out and become incarcerated. For us, its a huger issue, instead of just what is happening in the footprint of this plan area, but we hope that some of this can reach over to the other side of 6th street. Park and rec in this plan, i frankly have more faith elsewhere than the soma plan. The rec center has not had hand towels since may. So there are issues when we talk about renovating the rec center and creating parks, what it means for now . How can we creep eight new when we dont take care of what we have . And i feel theres disproportionate investment in structures, not people. There are people in crisis that need the support and putting it into a building or a set of activities doesnt meet the need where it is. I dont want my kids to have to see that on the way to school. Its a huge issue that we hope can be taken as a whole and not just within that footprint. Thank you. Seeing no further comments on item number 3, i request that we close Public Comment. Public comment is closed. I want to thank all of the staff and members of the public and supervisor kim and her staff for the long road its taken to get to here. In the first hearing i raised some questions about whether or not there are studies that could allow for more housing and we discussed that offline, and also talked a little bit supervisor kim, havent talked to you about it, but the initial propk notion of metering and to see if there were ways that we can meter the amount of housing as offices being developed. I think thats a conversation we should be having. Before i got back on the board, supervisor kim attempted to do that and ran into some opposition from the other side of this building. But to get the plan forward, it has to get out of this board. It may be an opportunity to insert metering in, so we dont end up with office and then housing way later. You guys can take a crack at that as you would like, but also a way to communicate with my colleague as were supposed to do. Noted. Well come back to you. And i know that weve had conversations and i know first of all, i know through watching some of the Planning Commission meetings, theres been a lot of Public Comment about the balance of housing and office and theres been requests to examine where we can adore add or convert within central soma. Can you go into that a little bit . Yes. The plan has 7,000 Housing Units rebuilt. I. E. R. Assumed 8,000 or so Housing Units in the area. So there is margin to move that around. That said, since we started the conversation, we identified a few locations where we have additional housing. The Planning Department was not considering use of the state density bonus in this area. Supervisor kim, we looked at that, so its resulted in about 600 more Housing Development units. And weve identified a few office sites proposing to carve out space for Affordable Housing, so that adds to the total. There are not many more moves up our sleeves to add units altogether, unless some of the sites that are slated to be office somehow switch over to be residential and that moves the needle, recognizing you want to move that within the bandwidth of i. E. R. Or else we have to start that over. So we discussed this previously and the 30,000, 40,000. Right. Its abstract, but to make it a jobsoriented district, were requiring large parcels to be jobsoriented and the threshold is 30,000 square feet. If it moves to 40,000, it will be several hundred other units built in the neighborhood. Thank you. A number of things i want to know one additional question for mr. Wartheim. One member of the public talked about height and shadows. Yes. We would not allow any building to move forward with a shadow on south park. That is built in and thats why heights around south park are around 45 feet. And well make sure any building would not. So none of the heights being contemplated in the central soma plan right now would add additional shadow to south park . No. Thank you. I just want to acknowledge the members of the community that came out today. And for talking about the priorities that the community would like to see in terms of how we distribute the benefits of the central soma plan. And, first of all, to acknowledge that we have a community thats accepting of density and growth and height and i think that says a lot about the neighborhood that the south market is. But ensuring that as we accept growth and we understand that it is a role to build more housing in San Francisco and the bay area that we want to ensure that the benefits or the value that private developers are building upon, that it be shared with the community and how we would like to see that value shared. And to reiterate to be sure that were supporting our Small Businesses and our legacy businesses and those communities with the leather lgbtq community, as well as filipino, and making sure its more than historic districts, that were able to support them to live and continuing elements of south of market community. I also heard a need to ensure that we are supporting our tenants and allowing them to continue to live there with support services and Legal Support in languageappropriate services and that we are ensuring preservation of Affordable Housing and building new housing. I had just heard about a site grand aurenti, singleroom occupancy hotel units that have housed philippifilipino Members Community and the city is working to acquire the 22 units, but i had a heart attack when i heard about the 10 million in deferred maintenance that is coming with that site. And so theres a lot of work to do to preserve units and not build new ones. Finally, i think its important to note that were able to articulate the list of priorities that we have under the different buckets of benefits. And i did want to just, again, support some members of our public that spoke about air quality. I think its incredibly sad when we hear about, you know, all the particulate matter that people see on the leaves and our trees in the other open space areas. I see that in my unit where i live when i open my windows, but we want to be sure as we grow this neighborhood its safe neighborhoods for children, families and seniors to live in. So im very excited about the plan of the portion of the plan that will be dedicated funding to improve air quality and greening the district. I think thats just vital. We need to make sure that people are living, thriving, and were doing what we can to mitigate for the negative environmental impacts in the neighborhood finally and most importantly, what i walk away from, we need to think about how the governing structure of the fees as they come out through the multiple buckets, Affordable Housing, residential, environmental, pdr, open space, schools, childcare and cultural preservation, that as much as we can that we set our priorities with the soma plan and we have a longterm governing structure that can ensure that fees 5, 10 years down the road still reflect our community priorities. We heard mention of the cac through the former Redevelopment Area plans. I should note we have the Soma Stabilization Fund that looked at how to distribute infrastructure and community service, looking at it as an option for some of the fees as well as the eastern Neighborhoods Advisory Committee as well. So michael is to work with the community as well as planning to set up a governing structure for how we disperse fees in the future. I think theres a lot of work to do and i ask the community to help us to develop our list of priorities as well, as we think about what the Priority Services are, im struck by, you know, hearing the staff at betsy carmichael, in terms of the readi reading level scores, its hard it hear, but sacramento does project spending needs for prison based on 3rd grade test scores. There is a nexus between when children succeed in Elementary School and the likelihood of ending up in our prison system. So whatever we can to do strengthen our communities in the long term, i think we should certainly be focused on that. Finally, i mentioned this in the beginning, but really thinking about our cultural districts and how we support that through the central soma plan as well. So this is the second of three hearings that ive called on the central soma plan. I want to thank all the departments for being here. Weve didnt ask all of you to come up and speak today, but think its important for the departments to hear from the board and members of the community. So, chair peskin, i have no further comment. I make a motion to file this item. Councillor peskin happy to file the item and look forward to the third hearing and hearing both from members of the public as well as continuing to work with supervisor kim and Planning Department staff on the notion of metering. With that, well file the item and adjourn the hearing. Thank you, good afternoon, everyone, this meeting will come to order, welcome to the december 11th, 2017 special meeting of the rules committee. My name is supervisor chair of the committee and to my left is Rule Committee members norman ye e our clerk today is john carole. And id like to thank jesse larson and nona mallconian for staff north meeting. Do you have any announcements. Silence cellphones and Electronic Devices and copys of documented should be submitted to the clerk and items acted upon will appear on the january 92,018th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you mr. Clerk. Please call item number 1. An ordinance with the code to establish the Tenant Assistance Fund for hazardous housing and to allow eligible tenants to vacate issued bit department of building inspection or Fire Department to receive Financial Assistance for the fund for up to two years. Great. Unless theres im just going to make a few opening comments and call up members from the Mayors Office and department of building inspection, Fire Department and our Human Services agency and City Attorneys Office all who have worked on this fund. Back in the beginning part of this year as many of you know but this is also just for the general publics knowledge we discovered a hazardous situation and we had 30 individuals leave in dungeonlike conditions. They were in an old converted garage with no windows and no light and one way in and one way out exposing electrical wires and pluming and essentially little coupe cal cubicals built underground that were very small, tiny Living Spaces for almost 30 individuals and the reason this was brought tour. Tonimarie our attention we got a call from a tenant that said they were in dispute with the Master Tenant and many of you know a Master Tenant would be in one persons name with many people under one person and the Master Tenant dispute resulted in pg and e being shut off and there was an individual with breatheing support or ventilateer support that could not get it along with all the other tenants that needed electricity and it was a Master Tenant situation and we were extremely perplexed by the call for that particular address because we couldnt imagine where anyone would be living and Building Inspections along with the fire marshal were called and went out immediately inspected the space and discovered what i described in the beginning of the remarks and individuals living in dungeonlike conditions. For the first time in our citys history there was an order to vacate by the Fire Department but with that vacation, the City Attorneys Office was able to negotiate a relocation money two months rent and utilities for the tenants that were documented at that space over 4,000 per tenant and then working with the City Attorneys Office and h. S. A. And my staff and ben ames along with the department of homelessness and the support of housing we were able to negotiate some space in the existing building upstairs while an unauthorized church vacated individuals stayed there for a short amount of time and we got these individuals in to salvation army, light house, for a few months temporary temporarily again h. S. A. Stepped up to support those tenants and in the meantime we had this conversation that there was a warehouse working group that was then evolved in to this hazardous Housing Working Group and that is what is before us today and weve create aid new piece of legislation and we have a new program that will essentially treat individuals that are living . These conditions that are essentially asked to move or evicted at no fault of their own very similar to a fire and so we looked at the Fire Victims Assistance Program and essentially made a sub section under that program that would be dealing with individuals living in a hazardous housing situation and so this is designed to be transitional subsidy for those individuals six months primarily at discretion of the director of h. S. A. To extend more no more than two years to find more permanent housing so we again appreciate my colleagues sitting in a special rules committee meeting, we want to have this sent to the full board of the Committee Report because we want to take the first vote before the holidays and also to finalize this program when we return from our wintery sets so that we can begin to set this up and some of the things id like folks presenting today to think about is i know we did some initial thinking about how this money would be utilized and how much people might be able to avail themselves for this program but we might think about properly funding this if theres going to be more individuals identified as well as based on the discovery of more individual s living in substandard housing that might be asked to leave and the difficulty with this versus our fire victims Assistance Fund is in a situation of a fire, very often tenants have a place to move back to when the work is completed or theyre giving that option in this situation, its not as clear cut in terms of the ability to move back for five mesh a there was no option there was no way to make that livable space, if it were a above ground theres windows and air and light and maybe the upgrades could be made to make the housing more permanent and again thats why we put the discretion at the director and working with h. S. A. And Supportive Housing to make that final determination but in the situation of five persia theres not the option of making that permanent livable space so those are some of the things were going to think about today. So for unless you would like to make an initial comments ill call up jeff buckly from the Mayors Office who worked with our office hand and hand on createing this program. Interview thank you, i appreciate the opportunity to speak and so the legislation that you have before you as you mentioned i think the goal is to help relocate tenants who are displaced from their homes bit administrative orders to vacate by d. B. I. Or the Fire Department and this was created as a result of the five persia case just to kind of crystalize what supervisor said earlier, it was very clear from those of us who responded to the five persia situation we were dealing with a gap in the way that the city would respond to residents who are faced and living in this type of situation and we lacked the resources in really the system support to be able to work with those residents and find them habit able, suitable housing in particular i want to point out the heroic work of your staff because she jumped in to that situation and on the ground and really helped make what could have been a much more chaotic situation far more manageable but the reality was is that we needed to have a much better Response Network in spaces like this when and if they consider the city has the ability to step in there and have a more manageable process and i think a big driver of that concern for having this more managed process was the concern we would have people either evaporate in to a difficult Housing Market or find themselves homeless or on the street as a result of having, not having the necessary response. So a couple things that went in to it when we were looking at the legislation was, what i think is somewhat different than the citys fire response is in these situations what appears to be the clear culpability of the Property Owners and so what i think this legislation besides deploying the funds necessary to help rapidly rehouse people in safe Living Conditions, it also allows and puts on the hook the Property Owners who the city you know, knowingly contends