I got there, they started littering even in space, a project to assemble on their own, what a Technology International consortium. The militarypolitical fire in the middle east is flaring up more and more brightly, capturing, fortunately, not new countries, but new areas. An unprecedented scandal has erupted around the un secretary general. Antonio. Judging the brutality of the militants , noted that the hamas attack did not happen out of nowhere, the reason is that the palestinian lands have been occupied for decades. Israel called it an unheard of justification for terrorism and demanded his resignation. Un representatives are threatened to no longer issue israeli visas. Threat this one is not symbolic. Blocking un work in the region will affect hundreds of thousands of people. Bapor is the un agency in the middle east to help Palestinian Refugees. The agency was created in december of fortynine after the first arabisraeli war of fortyeight. Its structures operate on the west bank of the jordan river, in the gas sector, as well as in jordan, lebanon and syria. It is the Largest International humanitarian project in history and currently employs more than 26,000 staff, most of them palestinians. After the socalled sixday war of sixtyseven, with the consent of israel , all humanitarian aid came through bapor. In addition, the agency is engaged in organizing education, healthcare, and providing other free social assistance to Palestinian Refugees, both in palestine and in neighboring arab countries. The agencys main donors are the United States, the european union, Great Britain, norway, sweden from arab countries, kuwait and saudi arabia. According to un documents, bapors mandate extends to a person whose residence palestine was for at least two years immediately before the outbreak of the conflict in 48, and which lost its livelihood as a result of the conflict. Not only persons falling under this definition, but also their children. Grandchildren, of the 2. 5 million residents of the gaza strip, a third consider themselves refugees of the first two arabisraeli wars, are entitled to receive assistance. They all live in eight camps, the main ones being jabaleya, rafah, ashati and khan yunis. Many are unemployed and exist with a subsidy from bapor. On the western bank of the artan there are 19 camps housing more than 800,000 refugees. In total , there are about 60 Palestinian Refugee camps in the arab world. Israel has repeatedly demanded that beaupor be abolished, accusing it of ineffective and misused funds, as well as supporting hamas militants. However, in december 2017, the Un General Assembly adopted a resolution in support of the agencys activities. Then 162 states voted for this document, only six voted against. At the same time, the un was attacked from the other side, turkish president erdogan accused the organization of worthlessness, how can a structure that ignores the brutal murders of children be taken seriously, and once again demanded its radical reform. Tom stiglich makes fun of queer people. This is a collective term for the designation. People whose sexuality or gender identity is different from the majority. In the us they often speak out in defense of palestine, with hamas militants on top. Another american, Michael Ramirez , portrays palestinians as hamas militants in a tshirt, death to israel, and the palestinian himself asks why cant we live in peace . Metamorphoses a drawing by the spaniard pedripol, this is not a mistake, a play on words. In spanish, motar is the verb to kill. Halit chiradi from morocco, the drawing is called biased social networks. Instagram and facebook users blame the company. Meta in censorship. Emad hajaj about the tragedy of an aljazeera reporter in the gaza strip. The family of weil addahduh, who headed the television companys bureau, was killed in an airstrike by the israeli air force. Rodrigo dematos from portugal. The palestinianisraeli conflict is in the form of a rubiks cube that can no longer be solved. i give up, says the man. In israel, the nightmare of october 7 continues to be compared with the american september 11, 2001. The parallel is unfortunately not unfounded, not only in terms of the number of victims and shock , but in terms of the consequences, when the reaction to an attack is more devastating than the attack itself, as was the us response that shook the entire middle east. Having been subjected to violence, the country falls into a frenzy, driving itself into a vicious circle. The definitions we now hear from israel, this is a new holocaust, these are new nazis, worse than isis, lets think about it, a rather poorly Armed Paramilitary group locked in gas, israel is the military superpower of the region, possessing nuclear weapons, what is the truth such a terrible existential threat, maybe its something else, there is a blanket of uncritical love in which the us and most europeans wrap the israelis, and that is. Encourages their type of thinking, an echo chamber emerges in which israeli theses are reproduced. By themselves, they are natural at the moment when there is there is an urgent need to demonstrate the power to instill confidence after a fantastic systemic failure, but if others repeat this, you yourself begin to believe in it all, and this is the worst thing that can happen, because such ideas are selfdestructive. The humanitarian consequences of the gas operation. Are beginning to unnerve many, but the western government firmly supports israel, but society, especially in european countries, is, to put it mildly, much less clearminded. There is a growing gap between leaders who are all the whole is on the side of israel and public opinion, we see this almost everywhere in europe, and this is already an internal problem of many western societies. They are not homogeneous. There are different groups that support different sides. After russias withdrawal from the first world war, the arab possessions of the former ottoman empire, london and paris were divided into two. At the conference in san rma, in april 2020, they were given mandates to govern the territories. Great britain received a mandate for palestine and iraq, and france for syria. Modern lebanon. Wherein the geographical concept of palestine then included the modern territories of israel, jordan, the west bank of the jordan river, the gaza strip and northwestern saudi arabia. At the same time, the balfour declaration, a letter from British Foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to the representative of the British Jewish Community alter rothschild, in which the British Government agreed to the creation, was also recognized in san remo. National home in palestine. In july of the twentysecond year, the league of nations approved the mandates of england and france for the former arab possessions of the ottoman empire. Great britain was responsible for implementing the balfour declaration, at which time there was a massive immigration of jews to palestine. From 24 to 28 alone , 82,000 jews fled to palestine from poland and hungary to escape pogroms, but the peak. Came in the thirties after the nazis came to power in germany, and the arab population opposed the massive influx of migrants. In 37, armed clashes began between jews and arabs. Organized detachments operated on both sides selfdefense. Then the british authorities decided to restore order by force. 2,000 british soldiers were sent against the rebels. During the fighting, 5,000 arabs, 400 and 200 british were killed. In 39, the uprising gradually faded away. The british authorities have set a quota for accepting migrants 75,000 people over 5 years. In the immediate aftermath of world war ii, british authorities intercepted ships carrying jewish migrants bound for palestine and sent them back to where they came from or to third countries. But at the beginning of the british mandate, the population of palestine more than doubled. If earlier the share of jews was 11 of the regions population, then by the end of the war it was 33 . The standard of living in palestine also grew, but this is not. The year Great Britain announced its desire to abandon the mandate for palestine. On may 14, 1948, its effect was terminated; the United Nations declared the need to divide palestine into two states, jewish and arab. Same day in tel aviv, David Bengurion proclaimed the creation of a jewish state, israel. A paradoxical contradiction arises, a tangle of problems that states and peoples face are increasingly tighter, more confusing and complex, and the proposed recipes for solving them are becoming simpler, if not more primitive. Ethnic nationalism raises its head, raises its head in many countries, in israel it has never lowered its head , so israel is a leader in this sense, in general, and israel is also a leader in another sense, that political legitimation is based on, well, lets say on bible, which is not a rational argument today, demodernization , of course, is observed in many countries, the desire to change history, the desire. To ethnically cleanse not only the country itself, but to cleanse the memory, this is happening in many countries, to unite the people and so that the people do not Pay Attention to what in a Democratic Society pays attention to, namely economic inequality, discrimination, everything else. Supporting the slogan scheme is sometimes effective. An example of this is easy found in the history of the cold war, however, it was an ideological confrontation, now everything is different. President bidens last speech that we are fighting evil, this whole idea that good and evil arose, in my opinion, reigen started with this, because even Stalins Soviet Union was not called empire of evil, that is, the evil empire , this emotionality, it is also a sign of demodernization in my opinion, and as for the rollback, well, of course, it is completely clear to your audience that many remember the nineties of the last century, where doctors of science sold beer on the corner, well, this is also a sign of demodernization, well, what is sometimes called essentialism, probably in russian there is also. Such a term, uh, that is, that there is peoples who have such a being, but this does not fit into the framework of modernization at all, because someone has some kind of being, this being makes them behave this way and it is impossible to change it, this is a kind of racism, generally speaking , because in the 20th century, well in the 21st century too, it was very popular a teaching that was not only perceived by germany positively. Biden, immediately after returning from israel, proposed a new confrontation scheme to the americans. We will not allow terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin to win. The next day, the same indestructible bloc of tyrants and terrorists was branded by the head of the european commission, ursula vonlein. Well, has the basis for the consolidation of the free world been found . On march 12 , 1947, in a message to congress, harry truman outlined a new Foreign Policy program. The president stated that the United States has an obligation to assist free peoples in their struggle against totalitarian regimes, and called on congress to provide economic and military assistance to greece and turkey to prevent the spread of soviet influence in southeastern europe. In a situation where almost all countries are forced to choose between two mutually exclusive ways of life, the policy of the United States will be to help free peoples defend free institutions and National Integrity against aggressors who are trying to impose a totalitarian regime on them, so the term free world arose, aka the first world, this is the usa, western europe, as well as canada and australia, the countries of the socialist camp opposing them, led by the ussr , were called the second world, all the remaining countries of asia, africa and latin america were called the third world. The Marshall Plan and the bloc created in 1949 became a logical continuation of the truman doctrine. In 1950 , the Truman Administration already strictly adhered to the two worlds doctrine. It was outlined in a topsecret strategic document of the National Security council usa nsc68 , where the struggle between the free world and the soviet world was essentially declared, according to the principle of who will win. between 1950 and 1953, the United States tripled its defense spending from five to five. Gdp. Damage to free institutions, anywhere, amounted to a general defeat. And the United States was required to ensure a rapid and decisive increase in the political, economic and military power of the free world. With its decision to enter the korean war that same year, the administration put theory into practice by demonstrating its intent usa, protect the borders of the free world everywhere. In january 61, kennedy, in his inaugural address, emphasized the rivalry between the free world and the communist world. He promised that the American People would pay any price, bear any burden, face any difficulty, support any friend, oppose any enemy, to ensure the survival and success of freedom. However, Fidel Castros regime in cuba survived. The collapse of the berlin wall became a New Historical stage. Collapse of the socialist camp and the collapse of the ussr in 91. The new world order, a unipolar world under the leadership of the United States , was supposed to be the universal triumph of the free world, but it was shortlived. In the countries of asia and africa, which 40 years ago were called the third world, new, very influential centers of power have formed, which, in principle, are alien to the concept that reproduces the approaches of the cold war. The concept of the west as a free world played an Important Role in the confrontation at one time. Pyotr slyoskin has been researching this for several years now. Phenomenon. When did the idea of a free world even arise . The free world became a key concept of american Foreign Policy in 1950. After the socalled loss of china and before the start of the korean war. The main feature of the concept of the free world is its negative definition. American politicians identified the free world with a completely different world from the communist world. That is, they proceeded from the fact that the whole world should be harmoniously interconnected, but this was prevented by the communists, who had a different goal, namely global forgiveness. So we had to build to protect the entire territory that remained free from communist. So from this flowed, firstly, the policy of Global Military containment, well , containment was invented by george kenon back in 1946, wasnt it . George kenan did not mean this, for him there was a hierarchy of american interests, japan was important in this scheme, but korea, vietnam, not so much, many other politicians. Then global deterrence is an impossible Strategic Task that gives away the initiative communists, but for the leader of the free world it was impossible to act otherwise, any advancement of the unfree world reduced the space of the free world, and the free world was indivisible, the loss of freedom in one place meant the loss of freedom everywhere, well, in the end , the United States fought for a long time in vietnam and created military alliances along the entire perimeter of the communist bloc. Well, this doesnt even sound like ideology, it looks more like religious faith. The second consequence of the policy of the free world was the need and impossibility of creating a single, common for all ideology. American politicians believed that the communists had their own idea, wrong, destructive, but understandable. So the free world should too. There was something to offer , and there were constant attempts to come up with Something Like that, but it was impossible to come up with a positive ideology, because the free world was defined negatively. America did not consider itself the leader of western, christian, capitalist, democratic or any other countries, it considered itself the leader of the entire noncommunist world, and because of this american politicians were heavily dependent on the feeling of an existential communist threat; they reacted very painfully to soviet peace policy; in the absence of a communist threat, there was little connection between the free world, and when did the topic disappear . By the end of the sixties, american politicians for the most part stopped appealing to the free world ; on the one hand, no one was challenging the global scale of american interests; leadership was taken for granted, and leadership of which was no longer so important; on the other hand, everything the internal contradictions of the concept began to appear more clearly, after the end of acute crises in. In cuba in berlin, the cold war gradually became routinized, it became more difficult to perceive the communist threat as existential, and in the meantime both worlds split, the confrontation between the ussr and china destroyed the picture of the communist monolith, in as a result of decolonization , the socalled third world was finally separated from the free world, and after the sixties, some elements of the politics. Of the free world were preserved, and firstly, this military alliances, which in many ways became an end in themselves, and secondly, the need for a single existential enemy, and after the collapse of the soviet union, it seemed that the entire globe would finally be reunited, but less than 10 years had passed before bush jr. Reaffirmed American Leadership of the free world, in the fight against global terrorism, the axis of evil. And as soon as the war with terron was more or less over, the time came for the confrontation between democracy and autocracy, the defense of the liberal order from the good old enemies, russia and china, now we often hear about an order based on rules, this also turns out to be an ideologeme like the free world, i hear from various politicians in washington that in general they realize that this is a losing concept and want to find another one. Will improve more often now to the un charter, so that it is clear what exactly the rules are, so in my opinion, they themselves understood that it didnt work out very well, with the divisions of autocracy and democracy, they also understand, that is, on the one hand, there is a tendency return to the original logic of American Leadership, namely leadership free world versus unfree world. And both autocracies and democracies are the same essence, on the other hand, they understand perfectly well that the world has changed, in the fifties it was already difficult to divide the globe into two parts, and write india as a free world, regardless of what but niru himself wanted, and now even more so, and so he calls it. The third world, the former third world, but he received much more geopolitical autonomy and does not want to choose between blocs, and this is well understood in washington, and the solders are tyrantsterrorists, about whom spoke biden, does she have a chance of being picked up . Also, i think, not very much, because just yesterday an article came out highlighting jake sulloven, and its all about. The International Order, and the main enemies of this order, russia and china. Oh, and there the stake, after the publication of the printed version, about hamas, and the war on terror and radical islam, is not very well invested in the defense of the free world or the International Order, but because on the one hand, terror is not external. Geopolitical threat, internal problem in paris, brussels, even in the same israel, and the palestinian issue is considered internal, and so this is a bad marriage for the International Order for the free world, and opposition to the International Order of china and russia, and you can here. Add the northern korea iran, and in my opinion, works much better, this has been a Long Time Coming in washington, that is, the main term there is great power competition. The war against global terror is considered a failure, these are just these endless wars, so what do they want from this is to leave and return to the big rivalry, ah, geopolitical to the defense, but of the entire International Order, from existential threats, here china, russia more or less fulfill such a role, but hamas not so much, here i think that its a different concept is important, this is civilization, and this can be seen when some barel talks about the jungle isad, or the american nonconservative robert kagen also wrote about the jungle, and you cant name the barbarians, the chinese, hamas, the afghans, somehow you can imagine this, with on the other hand, it is considered a terrible maveton, you can no longer talk about civilization, this is the rhetoric of the 19th century, and even if this picture is in the minds of politicians, if they express it out loud, they must then take their words back, the axis of evil they added iran there, but in general this is was the former communist world. And now i think, after all, this is not an axis of evil, but what happened during the cold war, that is, everyone knows that there is no need to return to the cold war, the americans, the chinese, everyone says that we dont want a cold war, but the confrontation between america and china with russia, it still reminds me a lot, and north korea, of course, is part of the same picture, and its precisely here that iran and hamas are getting in the way. And if it is possible to improve relations with iran and generally calm down the middle east, it would be personal, and biden and the administration , in my opinion, really want this, and israel is a special issue in american politics, rather an exception than part of some general logic american speech, and even here it is changing, this is the meaning of israel, because the new young generation is more likely to sympathize with palestine. On campus, that is biden will stand with israel, but on university campuses, everything will no longer be as clear as you say , thank you, we talked with peter slyoskin, freedom, democracy, law, it all sounds beautiful, i just want to stand under the banner, really , our iranian interlocutor drew attention to the less inspiring side, the problem is that the United States is striving. The entire western camp for war. Israeli operation against gas, which supports the west, could become the impetus for a real civilizational confrontation west against the islamic world. This is a war of narratives, a war of information, a war of people. It all started with the ukrainian conflict. Consolidation in support of the war. And now the same thing is happening with this war. This is a new and completely vicious type of unification, fraught with danger for everyone. Symptoms in general. Very alarming, a clash of civilizations, the prospect could not be darker. Hope for the old maxim beauty will save the world. In iran, by the way, they know a lot about it. A report from tehran about true connoisseurs. At first glance, this is ordinary, nothing a remarkable old sedan, but pop the hood and oh my god, it has. A gold engine literally covered in pure gold. This car belongs to an iranian car enthusiast who is engaged in tuning cars. It took him a lot of time and a huge amount of money to create this work of art. It feels like opening an old treasure chest. Everything about this peugeots engine, from the cylinder head to the manifold, is plated with highcarat gold. Everywhere you look, there are sparkling decorations and precious stones, according to. Since my youth, i dreamed of becoming a famous car designer, so i decided to transform this engine. I started working on this car 9 years ago, in the design i used gold, sculptures with decorations and 800 swarovski stones, i also added precious stones, basanite opal with gold fasteners, etc