And made an arms race. The point of this up us push this the to get the maximum return on every rouble invested on defense. Indeed, the soviet union was not thrifty about military spending and unfortunate the nation efficiency was not the top priority. The defense spending officer was about 13 percent of the g d. I will not site ready to quote, stuck on International PeaceResearch Institute for last year, or defend a little bit. And i noticed 4 percent assessments, and this year im going to it is 6. 8 percent on us. So then we have gone up by twos point bites, percentage points, and principal. This is a noticeable increase, but that is absolutely not critical. Banksley, ive done the soviet union, it was 13 percent and were now at 6. 8 percent. Lets say its consecutive it was i must say that defense spending and reinvigorate to the economy. Not of course there are many schools and we are aware of that. And you dont get so this goes back to the guns versus beauty. Lemme, although i repeat that our modern, the Defense Industry is a boon for the use apart from an implicit impact on civilian industries. At honda seems to be innovations needed for defense to produce civilian products. This is so crucial. What 1st of all our spending of course, is just the drug compared to that of the United States that have bottle 800000000000. We can so to 900000000000. 00. Yes. Would be 900. 00 to 8. 00. 6870. Yeah. You know, yes, its absolutely not terrible to outside of the simplest that you most nation desk with him for me to kind of some of those. A lot of embezzlement and kickbacks going on there because they dont have Hypersonic Weapons or whatever they lift. Im feeling if this is or not out. They spend a huge amount of money on maintaining their military and not only on pay enough, but also 1. 00 of the maintenance of bases around the world. Its like a black hole, really. You cant account how much you spend, actually. Thats where the bulk of the money is, what siphoned off the criteria. Although the production of lethal weapons and arguments in general take so much money that is difficult to estimate social take, for example, their widely advertise Missile Defense and our inter Continental Missile oven garbage should. One of the main components that we may use to overcome their missile, defense of the costs are simply not comparable. And we have essentially neutralized their advantages and investment of feeling in the silent sense. So this is how we need to add this, but of course, without any doubt that the income nomics of our armed forces deficient must meet the requirements of industry. And we study skin a. Historically, its quite obvious the nazi regimes do not disappear on their own. It is, but as a result of military subsidy, this was the case in germany in italy in advance is the same way. Obviously it be true of depend there and not see machine and non crane your point and now were advancing all along the front line. Judging by the records from both the ministry of defense and not in our workforce fun, its still hasnt been possible to find the findings have particularly where we can sustain fewer losses on the offensive rather than in dfcs. I admitted this quite a non trivial task where the worst strategist but it always hold on back. Defensive shane. I mean spar in or her road soldiers. How can we advance or your minimum casualties . Is that so many my memory but my purse is a valid and legit the question is but the the answer is also simply we need to increase the destructive power of our weapons as well as which number and the efficiency of our personnel and assets. It also involves technical in army aviation, even our strategic areas. So certainly it shall apply to those components that are suitable for Armed Conflicts of this time. The companies are ground based weapons including High Precision weapons artillery and Armored Vehicles in the us. And we are enhancing our capabilities, seen by leaps and bounds with this area. If that is exactly what is happening, that is the onset, the question, the more powerful and the greater amount of weapons we have to few are the casualties. Its been entering it to mention style products dont bags the question of what price we are willing to pay for the whole project with well, maybe the word does not fit in here for this historic challenge that we have been forced to face up. So we have to remember every human life is priceless, every single one and the loss of a loved one for a family, for any family is a tremendous grief. Its a girl. But the question boils down to our mission and how we define it with my produce. What is our Mission System . During our meeting earlier, one of the participants talked about the surprise that they experienced when they learned that the standard stories at home to russians just like us. If we came to help these people should receive a schedule. Thats basically the answer to the question. If we abandon these people today, our losses, which would increase many times over tomorrow, and our children, youll have no future thoughts because we will feel insecure. We will be a 3rd or 4th class country, and no one will respect us if we cannot defend ourselves. And the consequences could be catastrophic for the russian state. Thats the language mr. Prudence, for the american seemed to talk about negotiations about strategic stability. But at the same time, they declared in the course of to inflict a strategic defeat. And right now, our position is that we are also due to negotiations, but at the same time, the time for good will gestures has passed to go with them. So will there be no negotiations with me because we have never refused to negotiate this without goodwill gestures, without compromise. What will it look like . Van motors previously to that, i will try to explain, and we have negotiations in istanbul, turkey, i have already said this many times. I have to repeat it again. I will do it to uh, whats more, we negotiate this from the other side, which means we came up with a sick volume to for you a document. Im actually a 3 to a draft and figure out where to go and the extract from this treaty it is available. We just initial by the head of the negotiating group from the ukranian side. Mr. Or him . Yeah, i see the one that he did it took it has his signature going on the group here. We have it in the executive office, but then it is known as mr. How many of himself told the world publicly. Also at a meeting with journalists, including foreign journalists, trucks of the former british Prime Minister, mister johnson. He came and dissuaded them to finally simon, respectively execute disagreement and raised a topic that you have just mentioned. That the russian needs to be defi, it on the battlefield. States and we really think negotiations. Yes, we are ready, but only ready for negotiation. Thats not all based on some of the desires, after the use of psycho tropic drugs. But based on the realities that have evolved, as they say, in such cases on the ground, i see that as a 1st, i think secondly, we have been promised many times that nato will not expand to the east and then we see them. I dont know what else they promised at all if we do not go too deep into history, that the internal conflict in ukraine would be resolved peacefully, national elliptical, not to. As we remember, 3 Foreign Ministers came to key east of from poland, germany, and france. You know, they promised that they would be guarantors of these agreements consultants against of the day later there was included on them. They promised to fulfill the minsk agreements different and then publicly announced that they were not going to fulfill these promises, but only took a pause to arm the band, right regime we were promised a lot of things. So promises alone are not enough. And between associate, not only because they are running out of ammunition is somehow ridiculous on our part. Nevertheless, we are ready for a serious conversation and we want to resolve all conflicts and particularly this conflict by peaceful nation. But we must clearly and distinctly understand that this is not a cause, especially enemy wants you to take for rearmament, but a serious conversation with guarantees for the security of the russian federation. And we are aware of the various options that are being discussed. We know the carrots that are going to be shown to us in order to convince us that the right moment has come. We want these, i repeat once again to resolve all disputes. And this dispute is a conflict in particular of life peaceful means. And we are ready for that. Just be sure you want to do that. But it should be a serious conversation with security assurances for the warring party. In this case, we are primarily interested in the security of the russian federation. We will proceed from this promise until age mister prudence, and i think we are looking a little too noble good. Will it turn out that they will once again to see of us and we will console ourselves with a factor we are on is from the perceived us. That is our destiny to remain fools all the time. What she has been ever since the americans mentioned metals in the ninetys for winning the cold war. All these decades have been decades of fig lives. How can we even hope that they will go and finally, make an honest deal with us that they will honor and with guarantees for us . How do you even deal with them . Do you really believe that this is possible . Yeah, i hate to say who else are the once, but we need veterans. These are the guarantees must be spells. That would be good us. They must be guarantees that would suit us and that they wouldnt believe in. This is what we are talking about. But now it is probably pretty much or doesnt have to be talk publicly about what a key for the absolutely, were not buying any kind of just the embry message. Yeah. But you still have, im afraid youre going to be quoted in an expansive way when you, when you do you trust . No one at all. But where are you referring to western partners in this case, when you say you trust . No one more. Yeah. I prefer to be guided by fact so rather than by well meaning statements and talk about trusting everyone like an official lassie when you make a decision at this level. The degree of responsibility for the consequence of the decision is very high in show a deal with that is why we will not do anything that is not in the interest of our country. Is by the way, what is wrong with pressing them across. But what i see completely lost his mind, he said hes going to send the french troops to fight us whatever. And now we looks like a gaelic rooster getting ready for our locks by scaring the daylights out of europeans. How do we even respond to . So the thing is in the western military, so i havent been present in ukraine for years now. Going back as early as a free go ukraine, and that below, after the cool, the numbers have grown exponentially. Each of these days, westerners get involved in the conflict, both openly as military advisors, and as for an mercenary, see, they are suffering lots of things. But if we talk about foreign troops being sent there officially by foreign countries, i am convinced that it will not change the reality on the battlefield. And that is what matters. Just like arms deliveries and we use nations that age by your form. My 2nd point is that science can lead to major geo political consequences. Say polish troops enter the territory of ukraine, use the stated so these over into the were currently on the roof and border or take positions and other areas to give you credit in 2 months. And the reason for this to engage in combat operations on the line as content, and you should that happy. And i dont think that totally strips whatever want to leave do seem to get that actually, i guess this way because they will want to recover their october. And thats their dream of something. I dont know if you see us to recover the land that they consider historically povich lands that were once taken from the matter of nation. Divide with joseph style interest and hand it over the ukraine talking about of course they want them back and then im homeless military units enter these areas. They are never going to leave. But then other countries could follow safety to those that lost some of their territories as a result of world war 2. And i think that ukraine would have to face very serious geo political consequences of, excuse me, including some that could threaten its state within its current generation. The going back to emmanuel, im a chrome, its could it be that he decided to take revenge on russia after we step on his toes in africa. So instead of just sitting there and taking it like good little boys, they probably didnt expect us to be so certain didnt come up with him. The stuff i think might well be some grudge on his part comes by the different when we were in direct contact with him. We spoke quite openly about this subject. Wait and it is. We didnt go to africa and we didnt try to drive friends out of the content and the problem lies elsewhere at home. And it has to do with the famous wagner. At 1st ive carried out a number of economic operations in syria and then it moved to other kind of close enough and it was when i, the Defense Ministry assisted them in some way. But only based on the fact that it was a russian group. Nothing more in the bottom, we never pushed anyone out of africa. I just thought it was simply the matter of African Leaders signing contracts with russian authorized economic operators. And you can, when you were wanting to do business with them and not wanting to do business with differentiate. In fact, it wasnt even our own initiative. And i said, was our african friends who brought it back to this thing . That why would anyone hold a grudge against us for that . I have no idea sunday for an independent state wants to develop relations with its foreign partners, including russia. If it wants to build ties with russia, we didnt touch any of the former french colonizers in these african countries. And im being completely serious here because in many former french colonies just now people dont really enjoy doing business with their, their former masters, which its, and it has nothing to do with us, nothing whatsoever but know it must be convenient to take offense that someone might also ignoring your own thoughts, perhaps this acute and rather emotional reaction on the part of the french president has to do with the ongoing developments and some of the african countries. Although i do know that some african states see the percent of the french as completely normal and say that yes, they are ready to work with the french. And while some countries dont want to check it, but it has nothing to do with russia, were not in sitting anything or fitting anyone against france. Thats never been a goal for us. Not going to be honest. We dont even have a specific state level policy to develop stronger ties with africa. Were just friends and thats all they want to build deeper relations with us. We welcome that and were always ready to meet them halfway. There is nothing to be upset about. Now they say in france that there are no more red lines left with regard to russia, that nothing is on the table with no reasoning as an altima, we hear how they want to speak with us in terms of, of balance of power. And we hear a lot of weird things coming from france from the west. In general, from lithuania, the voices are somewhat distant. But overall, of the course, sounds hostile or perhaps we too could go for an unconventional option and invite say, the 2000000. 00 strong north korean army and exchange for our new cars or umbrella, over half the korean peninsula. Why not . And what to look for one thing, the democratic peoples republic of korea has its own and if they are umbrella, they havent asked for our help in that respect. Secondly, as we see it today, based on the progress weve made on the battlefield, we are quite capable of accomplishing the tasks that we set for 76. As for the countries that claim, they have no red lines in dealing with russia. I suggest that they should realize that russia likewise will not have any red lines in dealing with my tests for the smaller states in europe. First, though, we treat them all with respect, no matter what. And secondly, when these smaller nations called for a tougher policies, awards, russia, and demand other take extreme measures against us, increasing the deployment of troops and so on. They only do that because they know so they wont have to face the consequences of that provocative rental purchase. As for the ones who do they behave in a much more restrained manner. And rightly so, whats and all that plastic. Germanys taurus missiles, the german chancellor little off shots so they wont supply much. There are forces that insist on supplying taurus to cream. The british came up with the initiative to supply tours missiles through the u. K. They are ready to arrange the transit. The target is the crime in britain next, and german generals are already planning operations. They are, as we for not only against the crime in bridge, but against military base is deeper inside the russian territory. Stories. Somebody already says that those missiles may be used to strike the kremlin. Are they getting the carried away in their dreams spun from the 1st its pipe dreams since the Wishful Thinking on their heart seconds. They are trying to intimidate us for so we test for germany way to get them to me. There are constitutional implications for them that are in this as well. They are asking quite right to the place, but what if those thoughts has just been up the part of the crime in bridge and that is uninterruptedly, even in their own books russians territory. That would be a violation of the constitution of the federal republic of germany. The thing is, the opposition of germany, even more aggressive. Lets see where their mouth gets. And they, we just to make sure we are keeping an eye on that. And then they already use those british and us made missiles. But that doesnt change the situation on the battlefield much. Im please. Yes, they inflict certain damage, obviously. And that doesnt change the course of the possibilities. And the consequences that inevitably befall the opposing part is what weve been hearing a lot on russian channels, International Channels in german channels as well, about how many assets in germany are out of order or require update, state repairs and so on. Let them know whats working. As you rightly said, there are things they must think he should stop and put them in person and think about smarter ones among them will stop and then start thinking i was know which came in. And what about the new natal members, finland sweden. What is their bargain here . To swedish for administer