Was just remarkable and we try to be the opposite of smug and we try to be heterodox we try to think outside the box not look at the orthodoxy with the status quo as soon as you have a status quo it behooves anybody out there who even if you agree or of the status quo to look outside and see what what other people are thinking thats why we went across america twice the Great American pell grant and then gonzo the smug Industrial Complex chose not to do that so the cable News Washington post New York Times told you that the only people who vote for tom are White Supremacists this male right so this is what he they who votes for trump according to the exit polls trump did better in 2020 with every race and gender except for white men so the change from 2016 white men down 5 points white women up 2 points black men up for. Points black women up 4 points latino men up 3 point lead tino women up 3 points and other races up 5 points this kind of tells us conclusively that what the cable news on the smug Industrial Complex like the New York Times or the Washington Post are doing for projecting just another words they are the white racists well they are supremacist supremacists they are the say it might not be anything to do with race but they are certain of their superiority and that they are the best people like from everything and every level their smartest theyre the most brilliant the kind theyre projecting their yeah notion of supremacy yes and as a result they got the whole demographic dead wrong trump has shattered that narrative for once in terms of the importance of a diversity of a media landscape remember had there been a blue wave today you and i might not be able to broadcast in america we might be diplomats formed already from twitter this is what the likes of Rachel Maddow c. N. N. And all those people they what they wanted was just what they wanted to impose on americans so the importance here is that theres a profound and deep misunderstanding of the american electorate by the very people who are paid 102030000000. 00 a year to provide you the analysis of what is happening in the economy what is happening in politics what is happening in culture but they genuinely dont care about deplorable people who have not one single friend who is an influencer they dont care if anybody is like you know their family members are dying of opioid overdose because they were making fun of those people before but with the latino vote this is the black vote of 2016 remember hillary lost because black people didnt turn out because putin manipulated them into not liking her today this time around theyre saying that lets. She knows and florida that they wore that they didnt show up for bite and there was a she knew just fling away from the democrats to the republicans mostly a lot to do with cuban americans there were white protestors at these black lives matters protest in miami Walking Around with che guevara posters and the cubans dont like shake what are the cubans in in that live in miami but also heres an Interesting Data point about because remember they didnt ran a lot on covert 19 that how his response would be different that she would lock down people and if youre very wealthy if youre in the Creative Class if you work in social media or at twitter or google or any of these High Tech Companies its easy to work from home right youre very well paid you could do your job easily there but you know a lot of latinos have to work outside the family and they have to go to work but latino americans have a huge dyess for a family in latin america i know personally one person from peru whose family is literally starving to death in peru starving to death because of lockdowns so the Latino Community is very against lockdowns and the democrats rely on their vote so for example in cart to hang on colombias caribbean coast only 41 percent of households are eating 3 meals a day down from 82 percent before kovan 1000 leftists Tourist Hotels deserted so this impacts a Huge Community of people and that they didnt understand this that they didnt know that this is how latinos are feeling its just remarkable that they just dont even care about anybody outside the beltway but i think. The virus is. Once in a 100 year phenomenon its a pandemic and the response can be lumped into 2 categories one would be there. A state driven state controlled response and the other one would be more entrepreneurial so on the side of a more entrepreneurial response would be a fall under the heading of common sense if youre in a group of people it might make sense to wear a mask and it might make sense to go to work in be a commonsense approach and wear a mask when appropriate a very heavy handed state approach would be a blanket shutdown of the economy. Enforced by enforced by by for violence drugs the state police state and thats what i think a lot of people in the states heard when they heard joe biden talk about how he is planning to respond were no longer allowed to have adult conversations every single position if the other side takes the position you have to take the other side so theyre not were not allowed to discuss as rational adults because we no longer are in an age of reason as an empire disintegrates so were not able to say ok this is whats happening this is what we have to do we have to wear this mass we have to lock down but these are the costs there will be people who will die of heart attacks and cancer that what when and have been treated poor children especially will be harmed by not socializing and having school and having parents that are working and essential Industries Like meat packing plants that werent allowed to close by law during this pandemic so that their children will be underserved. Latino families across latin america their their families will starve these are the things that will happen lets discuss what should we do as as adults like how should we respond to this if these people will die over here but were going to save these people over here should we do this like we were able to everything has to be hyper emotional you know to support their unique Conspiracy Theory whether its on m. S. N. B. C. Or fox news they have to support like they have to deny so much reality and that is that becomes a problem during situations like this in particular for a while south responsible. That goes with the entrepreneurial approach is difficult for most to wrap their head around because they would prefer a state driven collectivist approach and remove the need to have to apply their common sense or to think intelligently about the matter at hand and thats the laziness of the general population who ideologically is susceptible to demagogues and collectivism that prevents a reasonable entrepreneurial approach the hispanic voters in america sussed this out and understood that trump is more of an entrepreneurial guy and they dont want to give in to what they have the experience of in latin america in particular of collectivist ideologues brutish left wing folks people are very unique individuals and complex nobody is lumped into one group you know they try to create these identity politics that like in 2016 im a woman i should vote for hillary and if i didnt on the sexes so they reduce it to that when we have a very complex society we have a huge amount of different cultures all here its not its a hamas culture so you know the fact that they are no longer able to deal with that means they can know theyre no longer fit to rule and i want to bring back to one you know the huge cost financially so there were these like fake news being spread all over the place before the election that Mitch Mcconnell the leader of the santa ana Senate Majority leader from kentucky and that Lindsey Graham the senator the republican senator from South Carolina were somehow vulnerable and they were going to lose then and like oh come on you resistance source give us your money were going to run somebody against them well both want to know landslide but even mcgrath and Jaime Harrison reese the combined 199000000. 00 and lost to Mitch Mcconnell and Lindsey Graham by a combined 35 points so people. 200000000. 00 at a time by the way when they need it like these were probably people giving like the 10. 00 of their 3040. 00 in the bank in order to like have this victory improve you know the you know one of their conspiracy theories right but you know this this false it was fake news that wab these people for 200000000. 00 by some what we can say so far in this drama is that on the left with the smug class of the blue checks of the New York TimesWashington Post types they are projecting their supremacy series and hatred yes and propaganda. The thing that they accuse the other side of doing is this theyre projecting oh weve got to take a break there we come back much more coming your way. Sputnik 5 has the world. Just like its namesake the original sputnik. The force craft of a to leave. Orbit the worlds. Many questions remain. The authorities are confident enough to go forward with mass production. And the family states please when you feel well enough. To receive. Interest preliminary requests. Billions. For see. This is happening. Or go and the reaction has been exactly the same as it was way back. The world reaction is made of green cheese. Anybody who thinks that because i dislike the election we are problems are over that thats simply not true the problems were there before President Trump theyre not going away you have problems with the economy in the long run youre going to have huge debt pay for the things youre going to do there we still have a problem in the United States with racism we have too many young africanamerican and hispanic men and jails are growing possessions etc so those problems are there. And simply allowed in and dont produce not does not solve them. Welcome back to the kaiser report imax kaiser time now to go to Preston Byrne hes a lawyer at andersen kill law preston luckily thank you right through to be here great to have ya now lets get into it one of the biggest issues during the election was section 230 tell us what is section 230 how does it relate to what we saw happen in terms of socalled censorship on social media during the election preston shares a section to 30 has been call 26 words they created the internet and what it essentially does it allows Internet Companies to host on enter its User Generated Content without necessarily being liable so if your dish and really underscore example defamation law newspaper printed an article that you wrote lets say you wrote an article saying you know i think george bush is no good scoundrel and your newspaper the newspaper is liable as a secondary party to that location so you publish it and if its the best story they can be sued as well as you or at least not in the United States thats a other question that anywhere we certainly are from that 2nd you there he is designed to allow Online Public publication platforms to host user in serial and let people speak very freely on the internet. And they wont theyre they cant be sued for concert. So theyre just very limited exceptions the other provision says sections you dirty see one section to the receipt to the 2nd half the provision allows these content these platforms that has User Generated Content to moderate or remove objectionable material and again it says theyre not going to be liable for the removal of that cereal so t. L. C. Are in a long story short is sessions you there he says youre not liable for what other people post and if youre a platform and you move someones content youre not liable for that. So broadly speaking republicans i think we know so far about these elections is that they have maintained control of the senate. And but we can say broadly speaking that the democrats appear to want more of a corporate sponsorship of social media the republicans generally speaking you could say one last is that a fair characterization and who do you think wins this fight thats a good question i think the republicans actually want more state control of certain media which kind of goes against what they usually stand for because most of the proposals that involve federal commissions are many of the proposals that involve the creation of federal commissions like the f. C. C. To go in and force contest standards on these websites and force them to be neutral whatever that means that itself is a constant basis traction on stage and as such it is presumptively unconstitutional and subject to strict scrutiny so so the republicans really have said we want more state fair thats the democrats of course are quite happy for the corporations to do it they want given that this election cycle all of big tax shows that theyre very much in the tank for the democrat agenda and the left wing generally so i think best theyre not going to be too keen to change especially to 30 anytime soon because their tax these companies from you know from any liability for engaging in politically biased activity which i think frankly it should i mean i think thats the way things should telling him to use case lets say on twitter if i tweet something and then somebody quotes my tweet and theyre tweet and they Say Something libelous i could be responsible no so the 2nd to 30 basically says that no user or provider of an Interactive Computer Service will be liable for the content that is posted by another user so if you posted it tweet lets say that said you know i dont trust and hes a really good guy and then my safety pose reach we did it and said i know president i think hes a scoundrel and i was greatly offended by this and i decided that i was going to sue stacey i couldnt turn around and sue you if you had said anything improper there i could. To safety but i couldnt sue twitter because of session 230 because you didnt say it twittered say so you can only go after the person who actually said the defect major damage source so heres another kind of example or so the Network Effect and social media creates monopoly power for the winners the vast majority of ad revenue accrues to just 2 or 3 of these social Media Outlets causing huge barrier to entry. Now question is if alex jones can be cut off from all social media why should the private corporations owning the internet and telephone also be allowed to come off from those services so in other words our sounds its cut off from social media what stops them from cutting off from having the means of telephone right its the same thing like whats different about social media in your mind is this a good question even it is a good question and its something where i think weve seen a number of companies have had different experiences in this regard bish you just yesterday lost a critical is this is a shes a huge new competitor and they lost an unspecified very important business critical piece never going for structure and as such the website is no doubt nobody knows quite well now there was the d. S. Was there i was saying nobody sure gaz another company which has had a huge problem theyve been banned from practically every payment processor under the sun theyve been blacklisted by visa joint as your go daddy you name it and then from it alex jones is a similar issues as well so its telephones are a little bit different theyre common carriers theyre subject to particular. Regulations which prohibit the doing that but in terms of banks terms of web infrastructure in terms of social media and Interactive Computer Services there is no such regulation that requires its suits you provide people you know you get discriminate against someone for you know a protected characteristics you know you cant say that you cant use this because youre asian or because youre white that would be. Unlawful but you can do it on the basis of political viewpoints largely because the companies have 1st amendment rights which allow them to do so but also session to 30 acts as a further layers which immunizes them from liability for those actions now the issue seems to be a creeping in face of death by corporations you know remember when they passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that gave them the ability to order takedown measures for material that appeared on social media and elsewhere under what many would claim are spurious claims you know going all the way back to Lawrence Lessig chris say it against what they call perpetual copyright you know the copyright own by corporations gives them an ability to create a Walled Garden where only speech that they approve of is allowed on the most dominant forms of communications we have how dangerous is that is extraordinary dangerous and what we actually see in other countries that are in the United States is that they have noticed the take down procedures for political content so the United Kingdom has a notice and take down procedure for defamatory comments so if you post a defamatory content on the Financial Times comments section which is one of the few websites news websites which still has a Comment Section there. Defamatory someone