A did that have been done since the 24th of march again it just is not there what i think across some of the regions and particularly in london where the demand is probably higher it just hasnt been the case and i think you know a lot of people are still coming up without an appointment to get tested because the system is just not working properly well that you are being put in charge of it says it was never any Silver Bullet anyway the mantra they were mayor and the burnham is demanding exact evidence for the latest tier one tier 2 system of coronavirus that we have here in britain is there a problem generally of Scientific Evidence i do independent sage so theres no Scientific Evidence for some of the to system itself ive been fighting the dependent stage quite quite close to it i do think that some of the recommendations have been made for examples of you know emergency measures to try and tackle the virus you know over 2 to me co 4 week period. Really changed things around one of the problems i think has been that i dont think the government has been transparent enough with their data for independence age even to make recommendations for even city mayors as you mentioned to be able to you know make calls that are relevant to their region and that back of transparency that lack of openness has meant that the scrutiny can be the same as well so you know we have questions on the temp in confusion and why thats a measure they seem to be effective but we can also see all of the data and the reasoning behind the measures being shared with us and its also much more harder to actually challenge the government on on those measures ok well your leader didnt vote against it explicitly you you may have similarly while the grow virus stuff is going on there all sorts of important Foreign Policy issues that are being debated in the house what did you make it may not even be Foreign Policy what do you make of this its been called a method of immunizing historic war crimes by u. K. Troops in iraq and in afghanistan maybe an island just explain what these overseas operations bill is i mean the overseas operations bill which has been proposed by the government is essentially to allow for the prosecution of military brass that which you know relate to crimes abroad proceedings over from 5 years ago or anything before 5 years ago to not be able to be brought you know in front of the courts for prosecution for judgment and i think you know if we look at the last 20 years when we know how much of you know the world has changed after 911 how much the world changed after the iraq war we are living in a different and runs it is really really important and it was your party that was that led this country to the iraq war why in any way as a leader of your labor party saying actually what i want is the labor position on the immunizing of british ships of his. Graemes well i think i mean i voted against the bill absa greeting and i think its really important to get on a firm you know footing and position on a bill and to do so at 2nd reading and not to leave it of the door open for amendments to be made just at 3rd reading because i think that we did sends a weak signal in terms of our opposition to such a bill being passed and i couldnt possibly say you know what my leader believes in terms of the human rights impact of the bill which is immense you know we are looking at a bill which does in fact you know actually impact upon the human rights Civil Liberties of military personnel who should have at any point i think in time with us 10 years down the line all 20 of them not be able to bring you know cases to the ministry of justice because thats the only way in fact justice can actually be achieved we know there are numerous cases where human rights abuses have taken place in iraq which have still not been brought in from to any national or International Court as you know the governments position is that there are too many vexatious claims and your leader as a mean clearly opposing it up till this 3rd reading that you speak of but more worryingly arguably and this is made headlines all around the world the government has i mean it sounds unbelievable seems to be trying to immunize the Security Services in britain m i 5 and i 6 from being able to rape torture and murder people what war what made so many of you back benches in Parliament Vote against it and sick as adama refused to vote against it the me was actually the way in which the scope of crimes that could be committed are so wide and how you know thats thats called being so hard means that crimes can be incited so an agent estate agent you know a covert operative can actually go inside. To crime commit rape or murder or as a way of actually logically apparently being able to tackle a crime in the 1st place and the logic that you know in order to tackle crime in order to tackle terrorism we also need to may be allowed to stay operatives to commit maybe terrorism or murder or to china sea ice is actually you know on a moral point i think you know it should not be something that we should a tool support we know that we need kobo protests to stop Child Sexual Exploitation for example you know these are serious matters we in which the government needs to actually have covert operatives and to take out what but what we dont need i dont think is to have for example covert operatives being in relationships with women you know having children with them. And not that has ever really knowing that thats actually whats happening that theyre actually being spied on and i think they really do need to be safeguards and the argument that ive heard in the east in the last 2 weeks that the human rights act provides a safeguard and provides a limitation on this statute is a i think completely misguided the human rights act does not allow for prosecutions to be able to be brought against individuals or even public bodies for that matter nobody has been ever prosecuted on the human rights act because its not possible under the human rights act to prosecute anyone and therefore the government sort of outlining that i think is really misguiding the public the edo and and the human rights act in fact is actually under review by this government even if the repetitions it wouldnt look possible in the future anyway but that suggest amo built himself as a human rights lawyer punished front benches with that i think they had to resign over this why why is he so confident that abstaining is the best route i mean i dont know disappointed either he is he opposed to it i dont even know how many think there were a lot or whether there were lots of conversations about this and and you know certainly i think. A number of good amendments were tabled by the front bench of the Neighbor Party to this bill you know looking at the ways in which young people for example shouldnt be you know made part of the cove operate open a covert operations so you know putting certain amendments through is a positive thing by my party why do you still think that the main issue here is is the scope is is there a wide range of crimes that could be committed them in the Food Standards Agency for example a minimum it may be so make you think why would the Food Standards Agency need to be given power as the government is talking about you know this happening all in terms of the economic well being if you look at for example whats happened in the last 2 decades we we no way we are faced with a Climate Emergency and you know do we need Food Standards Agency to be given powers to buy an activist for example that you know oral history very very you know keen to actually scrutinize the work of the government in terms of agriculture and food and you know we know that you know we definitely i think many of us to feel that this is a direct attack by the government on you know organized labor organized. On trade Union Activity which is so vital for our democracy is the right to strike the right to protest Extinction Rebellion you know that their work in terms of holding the government to account on the climate is so important for that to be able to flourish in a democracy but this bill actually puts all of that risk and just finally i mean is to validate your leader has been keen to have his eyes the flag patriotism black eyes madisons a fizzle that arguably in this country after all the stature debate how important do you think in terms of education we need to know about britains historical imperial record how many there are and certainly lots of petitions are currently being put forward the government and im sitting on a committee soon. In a jointly with Education Committee of which were a member to actually for example consider the publics demands around the black history curriculum and you start to actually address a colonial history and this is one step in way in which to do that i dont think it goes far enough and as you say you know there is a bit of fizzling out i think from from what happened earlier in the year with the black gloves much of protests is also not good enough i think to to talk about patriotism without actually you know i can origin how damaging those messages are for you know black and minority ethnic communities you know we dont need to prove our loyalty to britain when we need party unity government to actually you know put number one of the on the agenda for example the pandemic and how its you know leading to so many black lives. Being lost i havent yet managed me g. s us often as a result of the pan pandemic we still have the highest number of excess deaths being experienced in one or 2 regions and those things are really really vital when you try to you know this is this is an earthquake in a lot of ways you know that this in terms of whats happened in the last few months the pandemic is really brought to light how you know racism is so imbedded in our institutions and and in our policies and thats thats what needs to happen its not good enough just to talk about the curriculum and diversify we need to actually seriously address the fact that people are dying in this country as a result of policies that are embedded in racist narratives. Thank you. Thank you after the right after alleged washington failure to destroy democracy in bolivia why is trump secretary of state pompei ono calling for elections in haiti on trafalgar day when slavery linked to raise your nelson was killed off the coast of spain we investigate the legacy of one of the leaders of the worlds 1st successful slave revolt haitis Toussaint Louverture or the socalled jacobin black spartacus all this more coming up but through of going underground. And im going to be out there so i dont think about that i dont mean i dont mean not new dorp are. I kind of but i wonder. If and i think now i think its higher than our. Members of the african mafias safe. To europe but once they. Leave they count speech europe. Will not some of the libya my home and i couldnt you know. This you know get it out i mean. They sold the. Concord of the united. With the persona. Secret prisons and usually what comes to mind when thinking about europe however he even the most prosperous can be deceived. There were too few houses. Were. Prison was located and the only people had access to the story investigators l. Z. Uncovered the darkest dealings of the secret services but i mean. The great of no. Full. Justice on. Welcome back well even while the usa looks to joe morris tennessee president ial debate donald trump secretary of state might bump aoe has been busy calling on the caribbean nation of haiti to hold elections critics accuse him of falling into line with washingtons repeated attempts under george w. Bush and barack obama to destabilize the once richest country in the western hemisphere if true then trump is simply following the example set by us president Woodrow Wilson who imposed racist laws in haiti to raise the victory set by tucson of a tour when he inspired the 1st successful slave rebellion in Human History the historic flashpoint occurred during the time of nelson commemorated today in britain is trafalgar day dr Sudhir Hazara Singh author of black spot because the epic life of truth out of a tour joins me now from oxford in the u. K. So their welcome to going underground so it was the richest country in the western hemisphere the 1st successful slave revolt its been in the news because kanye west has been tweeting from chavez and ports in who was tucson luva tour. So to say it was the son of and slaved parents who were brought forcibly to haiti in the 1st half of the edge in century or rather brought to stand a man got the. Richest french colony he grew up on a plantation in the north of the colony and eventually his talents less such that he was brought to the attention of the plantation araki and he became effectively the assistant of the manager of the plant as and he lived for the 1st 50 years of his life until d the outbreak of the revolution and enslaved to 50 year olds watching this program can take heart that they can become revolutionaries of 50 its never too late exactly and then when the revolution broke out in 1791 he mediately became one of its leaders and rapidly established himself as the. Leader of the homa and slave peoples and then he has this meteoric rise becomes a general in the French Republic and on the fight the british the spaniards and later on even the french kicks them out of sodomizing how demanded the french revolution the 2nd but you know im going to ask you because the history textbooks i have at school said pitt the younger was a great reformer here in britain with wilberforce an antislavery you say to sell of a tour or basically. Commanded an army the kill 15000 british troops on haiti what were the british doing that well its a very good question and its one that is rather an understudy in britain but one thing that we know now is that a soon as slavery was abolished in sandman in 7093 and then by the french and 17 months before the british who. Adelanto. Interests in the caribbean region intervened militarily in sand in order to try and help restore slick so between 7094 and 79 and yet there is a British Occupation of odds of saddam and toussaint has to fight and he fights them and eventually serves them out of the house to another misinformation about bit the bit the younger then what about the american independence leaders as he said rob spear declares the end of slavery in paris and 7094 any help from the United States the americans are divided because that on the one hand they know that they have slavery in their own country and the American Revolution as you know does not take any Decisive Action against slavery at the same time some of the leaders of the American Revolution particularly john had is very sympathetic towards the republican experiment in hate but others like jefferson for example talked of the haitians as cannibals. And you have some leaders of the American Revolution particularly the ones who were particularly close to slave interests like jefferson were very hostile to whats underlying and towards hate will donald trump wont be pulling him down any statues of jefferson ill tell you that i made a joke about revolutionaries in their fiftys but given the brutality of slavery a half of 2 sons contemporaries may have died from the plantation he was it was born in prematurely and this you attribute to frances brutal code no war tell us a little bit about that. So the code no was supposed to be an attempt by the royal authorities and was promulgated in the late 17th. In the late 17th century an attempt to regulate slavery so that the most extreme forms of barbaric cruelty toward slaves were somehow codify according to the cardinal law slaves belong to the last of slaves had no civil law Political Rights and indeed a child born of the slaves became the property of his austin so the god no it is really a document which effectively. Codify. The system of slavery and do you think to size a tragic figure in that he failed to declare independence he may have led the worlds 1st slave revolt successful slave revolt but not declaring full independence for france was his downfall. Well thats how it actually played out but i think that his strategy was the right one of because his strategy was based on the hope that the french would understand what the best way for a place like saddam and to the iran led by french i mean even napoleon in the counter revolution against the revolution even napoleon because lets not forget and i mention this in the book napoleon when hes defeated and has time to think about his past actions that sent Helena Napoleon regrets the action that he took against him something that you and he says and i quote almost that i should have made end of i stroll and it was the french miscalculated that unfolds no we dont want we just send a few 1000 troops out and well conquer the albums again well that proved to be a very costly mistake for the french to aside from all this diplomatic pragmatism he was not militarily trained and yet you think maybe some commanders today use guerrilla tactics inspired by tucson of a tour in wars against imperialism yes well i think one of the many remarkable things about him and hes not even celebrated for that reason is that the haitian revolution reason to suck on really the pioneers of what we call in the modern age guerilla warfare we historians normally attribute of the term to the spanish insistence to not only him in the early 19th century in the war as you know it but actually all these tactics and you have to stop and the haitian revolutionaries during the seventys and. So other revolutionaries of that hemisphere che guevara killed by washington backed interest we know about the some of the the great revolutionaries of the 20th century i mean there is a part of it out as tucson to adore and his death and why. Well he was captured treacherously by the french in 82 basically the french and saved and. Theres a c