Yet again in a london courtroom what do you make of the United States trying to have a new indictments against Julian Assange to wiki link isnt states is trying to crush Julian Assange in order to do damage. Whistleblowers the future talking to journalists so thats the uk doing to some extent quite well they want him in prison for 175 years the chargers they breach or we can we can tell how many years hell get because his. Source so c. Many got 35 or he was our by president obama so i think if he does get extradited well get 50 years and he wont buy trucks. But why would have jumped in say. A lovely healing spell why would they suddenly at this late stage and we have meals melter here on rio and special rapporteur on things being tortured here in britain why this late stage would wait maybe trying to change the indictments against a sanch maybe even stopping the old ones are trying to cane it theyre trying to add to it over a broad conspiracy charge going back to his days as a juvenile hacker in australia all the people literally persons unknown is the phrase theyre using to me encourage to send him secret set weekly sort of course in those days weekly kes was rather good because it exposed the courage of scientology to be exposed corruption it did a lot of good things were back in his early days which now the americans are trying to turn into a past conspiracy this may be because they feel the case isnt Strong Enough to be evidence of persecution is pretty strong because its been shown that hes and his his hideaway in the ecuadorian d embassy was bugged by the americans that they had intercepted content while her subject in a spanish case because of course he felt cia has not admitted to bugging conversations with you i understand jeffrey having been following that case so it was a case of its a breach of european law its the sort of being that caused the pentagon papers case to be derailed because they bugged and stole stuff from the Sources Office so it is the kind of evidence coming out that. They may not like there was a suggestion that the white house wanted it to be postponed until after the elections because some evidence was going to come out about how overtures were made on behalf of the Republican Campaign to weaken he said there was evidence by his fiance who said that one of the guards on behalf of the ins tried to get her babys nappy so they could analyze the pool in order to see whether a sound was a power but theres a lot of clue in the courts of britain that the moment and more importantly as far as the press were concerned was to lets get on johnny depps bed. Im afraid that was what the media was interested in but yeah exactly you success winning even though youve successfully overturned so many wrongful convictions here you presumably are not going to be called a witness to the Spanish Court were bound to the laws on is trying to complain or at least sort out whether the cia link company you see global were bugging you yourself in the Ecuadorian Embassy can you remember any of your cases where a cia link company was abusing client all the lawyer privileges none that i know of that i wouldnt necessarily know but there is julian a sour 100 journalists letters and publisher who is locked up in coakley dangerous in belmarsh and he can only talk to his lawyers now after 10 minutes telephone calls for 10 minutes and its difficult to prepare a case he could have been let out on bail under a kind of house arrest or mansion arrest in the country where alec chronic shackles would prevent him from leaving but at least. Be able to prepare his case with concentration that did not appeal so hes looking at the barrel of a gun which will provide him with life imprisonment to die in an american supermax it might come when the americans have their way and i think it is as american as american journalists are now realizing it is correct to freedom of speech because the argument from white house is putting forward is that he doesnt deserve the 1st amendment because hes not an american in australia and that it doesnt apply to any journalist working for american papers you you were retained by Julian Assange and youve defended him so is Jennifer Robinson amber heard lawyer thats why she says she was in the news so is amal clooney and the Guardian Newspaper which partnered up with wiki leaks printed an article in the past few days as this hearing was being discussed in london and then earlier printed an article saying hes basically a russian asset. He has a russian asset and defacto as a man you yourself were defending a russian as a not a journalist at all i didnt see that article that stands i suppose from the American News about wiki leaks publishing stuff that they may have obtained from russian sources from Russian Hackers but youve got to remember wiki leaks had the idea or publishing anything of Public Interest and that what they published about the Democratic National committee to show that there was a lot of jiggery poker a carrying on to stop Bernie Sanders getting. The nomination and 5 members of that committee had to resign but people are realizing that perhaps if the cia had secretly slipped him some information about mr putin and his wealth or his involvement in assassination in britain then he would have had the integrity to publish clashes well but when we hear and we dont know of course he published collateral murder which was evidence of certainly in wrights crime the killing of journalists it was really a case of burial manslaughter i suppose so so that nothing ever been tried in that way in the d. N. C. Meanwhile joe biden the president ial contender said and then when he nixon as almost an enemy combatant seemed to reflect pompei own no reflection of the resignation of you mentioned high tech terrorists who were in finance or going to the russia report because even though no evidence was found by the russian or border by the intelligence and Security Committee here the recommendations were that we may need american style espionage act which is under which sound has been crossed canada penitentiaries unary freeze the treason government out of the prevent fraud is the object now but of course we havent had much luck with treason prosecutions we allowed him philby it to escape we allowed blunt to continue selecting the queens lose so theres been a reluctance to use the earth in 81 treason act ad i think it would be a great mistake to update it it should be abolished because its one of these vague laws about and compassing leo go through. The monarch and i think to use it against people who have. Assisted particular russians would be wrong a much better idea frankly is to have a register foreign interests so that those who act for foreign governments must come clean about it and tend to see what will that mean for me say because i think the state mandated by the russian duma the b. B. C. Obviously likewise mandated by the British Parliament to broadcast overseas does that mean the registering of found foreign journalists in one of them even bankers actually bankers who work say for h. S. B. C. Or a company in the city of london well i think this is reasonable but of course the problem with reduced ration of as a foreign interest is shown in russia or in singapore where theyve forced Amnesty International and other human Rights Groups to register and then create all kinds of bureaucratic problems so youve got a box the law and there is a good law thats been suggested incredibly you can donate more than 10000 pounds to a British Political Party without any Money Laundering scrutiny so this is quite serious people are upset because Russian Oligarchs and their wives donate hundreds of thousands in return for a tennis match with power strong soon and its clear that money that comes to any Political Party from abroad should be able to over 10000 pounds should be subject to Money Laundering rules and at the moment its not so i think thats one valuable law that will come from the russia report which didnt find any russian. Interference in brake usage but said that was because m i 5 wasnt looking well obviously the toys say all that Russian Oligarch money the entirely innocent donation to the tory party ive just got a quickly just ask here we have seen case because we had someone on he said that. Jeffrey epstein was working for the israelis the Israeli Government denied it and now Galle Maxwell finds herself on remand in a brooklyn prison how safe is shane heaven that her friend that scene died in a new york prison well is interesting because it may seem quixotic givens theres so much injustice in the world to care about injustice delayed max but you know you judge a system of law by how it treats its most unprepossessing people and the complement with american law or in these high profile cases is that theres no contempt of court or as we have in britain so theres massive judgment its as if shes pretty you guilty and the judge herself and said is wrong ever so good and allowed and i find this astonishing allowed 3 prosecution witness list to oppose bail and just say shes almost shes a sociopath and this of course is all reported and this is because america has no contempt of court lose designed to protect a fair trial and as a result there is a massive and now it appears again and of course we have seen in a number of high profile american trials that privilege has taken to sting the jury can produce a wrong word it or she denies all the charges all wrongdoing every rotten casey thank you very much after. Break does u. K. Prime minister Boris Johnson stand a chance when he enters negotiations into the dragons den of the Worlds Largest trading globe you we asked t. V. Star and business mogul deborah mead its time for u. K. Business to be the country. To im going underground. L. Look forward to talking to you all. That technology should work for people. Must obey the orders given it like human beings except when such orders to conflict with the 1st law. Should be very careful about Artificial Intelligence and the point is to make. Them shia. Areas with Artificial Intelligence will something to. Protect its own existence. Back skies or financial survival they say money to develop. Closer to these it is a central plank support diatomic other problem right now so stop the. Welcome back to the slow down addition of going underground joining me now from somerset in england is dragons den business mogul deborah and the reason deborah you on the show is really to explain there was what is in store for Small Businesses now were hearing from britains e. U. Negotiator david frost that basically the e. U. Has to accept the deal on the table what will it mean. For resume businesses in this country well its not enough that weve been living in sort of limbo land where they understand what the dance steps and the like and of course was also as if you know and done it which is a pretty rocky anyway. But i think it is very worrying indeed that businesses that probably dont have a huge safety net you know in the u. S. And the world you know theres a lot of just in time stuff. Probably going to like cash employed in their businesses and not sitting with this great lump of money at the 1st hour that theyre looking for and thinking i dont know what ive got to do ive got a government telling me prepare but i dont know how to parent for the frasers actually to prepare for all possible outcomes do so food in the corridors of whitehall they respect to or with the people so what who think they do that anyway on a regular basis therefore they dont have a problem with the uncertainty of. The earlier the issue for me with all possible ask how much is that takes money you know actually its madness you know its crazy you look at a business you think about whats the most likely outcome and you prepare for its the most likely outcome you look around you take account of all of the factors if you think my justin says this is probably the things that happen there is such scant information there is such a muddled horizon that i dont know from this is me who spends my lunch trotting through issues assent that doesnt matter but doesnt it doesnt matter if i dont know how we were kants what is the most likely scenario as sussan we dont have a lot of trust sitting around you know what chappell owed money then that its yes interesting the government themselves and the reason that they didnt have enough and slices is that it would have been a wrong decision to put a load of cash into a load event than todays is just in case theyre asking businesses to put a lot of cash into them into what will probably be socially relevant projects that is just not joined up. Oil more disturbing arguably if you believe the sources that are talking to the Financial Times was this report that the people in white always saying they could use code to mask the economic negative consequences of a no deal at the end of the year presumably the government would say that definitely is not the case do you think that could be the case and there are people thinking like her well if it is the case its a pretty ugly mindset you know. That really isnt what we should be spending our time Walking Around the halls of whitehall talking we should be talk about how we get ourselves asked its dont be very difficult to distinguish whats happened and the edge of what has happened because rex it and it might be helpful to the government that would probably have struggled with a with a very difficult scenario. And i did think it will let people off the hook you know and i dont like letting the i think people make decisions but there i i agree with them i dont agree with my help they get them right it get them right well done if they dont get it right then they they should be held responsible for it and i think they could be an element of why were. Well theyre saying theyre trying their best i dont know how many requests you are getting for Venture Capital how many Business Plans are being sent at the moment but i mean how do you think people are saying when the bank of england bails out Ryanair Easyjet 600000000 b. A. 600000000 john lewis 300000000 who are concerned the 260000000 greggs 1c5xw6cw i know has very money for a semi is life support but what do you think theyre thinking when the Biggest Companies in the country seem to have got so much money from the bank of england in tow the loan facilities well im. Just a facet of the sun so its less unease but the truth of matter is that there is. That Big Companies that pay to have jobs and theyre begging at an betting that tax revenues theyre betting our economic stability even if were not adding anything at price so i dont have an issue with looking at a business that would fundamentally survive beyond this as opposed to it for i say that whether its a big business or whether its a Small Business we should not support industries that are fundamentally a problem because you know thats just the money how to manage and we should be spending that money looking at new industries in the new shape so so you know i dont say worry about the fact that were saving jobs for people and were trying to stabilize an on the i dont think i think thats a good way to spend our money and i think in the early days i was pretty comments about whether sportiness unease because they had to move quickly they made promises quite quickly and they actually delivered the casket as weve gone they felt clunky they havent looked at individual industries in a i think a particularly indepth way in what they should be doing is working the trade associations and dealing not just the industries as a whole you cant talk about the Hospitality Industry money in the halls or all is a part you know look at each step of that industry and understand what it needs to support and ive been a bit disappointed about the targeted support now that theyve had the time to understand you know the different effects on the different parts of the Different IndustriesGoldman Sachs needed money from the u. S. Taxpayer back in 2008 which is an act emanates from Goldman Sachs ive kind of ethos is the is the 1st the 1st straw to be clutched at by some of that kind of inheritance going to be this soviet style bailout i mean when you think about it for a time i dont know whether for case right now the government oversees the figures most people are being in effect most people are. In fact employed by the government here to here at all is not a company saying you know they need to be bailed out weve turned into the u. S. S. R. Is a good point and its a really good question because we didnt with the support issue how do we get people through this what were not really to make thats how we shape the thing that theyve got to get through so so you know new industries encouraging people to behave and i encourage people rewarding people im actually full going into the emergent you know this is a billet industry is the i. T. Industries that and its pretty well Software Companies so so so along with you know theres pieces that they need to get everybody through this and then that is a thesis says we need to die