A Russian MilitaryIntelligence Unit secretly offered bounties to taliban linked militants for killing Coalition Forces in afghanistan listen to the certainty of those words right there see that american intelligence concluded secret bounties taliban linked those are important words theres no equivocation there which may be why as soon as the t. V. News networks here in america read that story in the New York Times they began reporting it breathlessly almost as if their hair was on fire they wanted to get this story out for them it was the perfect story and they ran with it every which way that they possibly could but most of all with pretty much this narrative you heard it putin is paying to kill american soldiers and trump is helping him do it. It sounds like a great story right yeah all of it based on the New York Times story that was on that front page ok since then the New York Times has written another story that interestingly enough was on page 10 there it is we checked and that story seems to tell a very different tale one that seems to cast a lot of doubt on the original story so here let me go back to what i was doing before let me share with you some language from this news story it details how u. S. Intelligence officials are quote emphasizing uncertainties and gaps in the evidence from the original report that the n. S. A. Quote does not have information to support b. Conclusion in the original story that quote they did not have surveillance that confirms what the captured detainees but originally told investigators about bounties. That quote the cia did intercept data of financial transfers but the agency does not have explicit evidence that the money was used for bounty payments and finally that quote. There is no information directly connecting the suspected operation to the kremlin. That story the one with all the cabbie outside i just read to you directly from the pages of the New York Times somehow did not set the news anchors hair on fire in fact it was reported with much less intensity if at all so. It makes us ask what do we have left what do we have left with this story comparing it to what was originally reported im going to break that down for you right here on the news with rick sanchez where we do believe its time to do news again. Here is the list of the questions we think youll be asking after watching this newscast today were why the rush and believe me to tell a journalistically thin story about socalled russian bounties why mexicos president visits President Trump while Many Americans ask why. And how important is beauty sleep actually. Lets go ahead and begin with the russian bounty story that dominated the headlines for almost what a full week but now were left to ask what is really left of this story it does appear that the u. S. Interrogators did capture drug dealers somewhere in afghanistan and were able to tie them to wire transfers of large amounts of cash which seems to still remain unclear though or as we like to say in journalism parlance not nailed down is who really gave it to them and why our correspondent is john hardy. The New York Times reporter july 3rd that a new Administration Memo seeks to fuster doubts about suspected russian bounties on m. American troops the memo is reportedly from the National Intelligence council and according to the times acknowledges the cia and top counterterrorism officials agree russia appears to have offered bounties to kill american and Coalition Troops in afghanistan the story goes on to report that the nic which reports to the director of National IntelligenceJohn Radcliffe produced the 2 and a half page document a socalled sense of the Community Memorandum and dated july 1st it appears to have been commissioned after the New York Times reported on june 26th that intelligence officials had assessed months ago that russia had offered mounties but the white house had yet to authorize a response well the times reported specifically last month that a Russian MilitaryIntelligence Unit secretly offered bounties to taliban linked militants for killing Coalition Forces in afghanistan including targeting american troops or President Trump tweeted this in response to the times story and many other media reports the russian bounty story is just another made up by fake news tale that is told only to damage me and the Republican Party the secret source probably does not even exist just like the story itself if the discredited New York Times has a source reveal it just another hoax all the time story from july 3rd goes on report that the memo said the cia and the National Counterterrorism center had assessed with medium confidence but falling short of near certainty that a unit of the Russian MilitaryIntelligence Service known as the g. R. U. Are for the bounties but heres the thing the story goes on to read that other parts of the Intelligence Community including the National Security agency n. S. A. Said they did not have information to support that conclusion at the same level and since the times initial story last month there have been dozens of other media reports about the allegations of russian bounties on u. S. Troops but nothing concrete. Reported today online that a top u. S. General overseeing operations in the middle east and afghanistan said the purported russian bounty intelligence wasnt prove not even enough to hold up in a court of law but was still worrisome all this as a new reuters poll released today shows that quote most americans believe russia targeted u. S. Soldiers and won sanctions in response russia writes that overall 60 percent of americans said they found reports of russian bounties on american soldiers to be very or somewhat believable while 21 percent said they were not credible and the rest were unsure and further 39 percent said they thought she did know about russias targeting of the u. S. Military before reports surfaced in the news media last month while 26 percent said the president did not know well moscow continues to deny allegations of any russian bounty plot against u. S. Or Coalition Forces in afghanistan on july 4th President Trumpery tweeted comments from representative jim banks of indiana saying that the New York Times had actually endangered u. S. Troops with its reporting about the russian bounty allegations says the white house is now reportedly conducting an internal investigation and to who may have leaked the alleged russian bounty intelligence info for the news with rick sanchez john how to hide so did this really happen as originally reported was the story exaggerated somehow to fit the trump russia narrative once again and whats the context of countries whether its rush hour or any other country using its military or its money to influence the affairs of other countries for example would we ever do Something Like that joining us now to tackle these thorny questions are about from journalist. And former u. S. Official Michael Maloof to perfect guest to have on this so michael let me start with you what do you think what do you think really happened here whats the real story on how this story big. As massive as it did. Some information as you pointed out. There was Money Exchange and thats not. Unexpected because its been known for quite some time that russia has been talking to itself but for what reason and that is to monitor jihadi going into next door russia and they want to be they want information and the taliban doesnt do it out of the goodness of their heart they want to be paid so and who is better to conduct than an Intelligence Unit and that would be g. R. U. Military intelligence. But the fact that there was no credible evidence to support the initial allegation is not unusual and the fact that you had the head of centcom in so saying that he could not find it credible so it raises the political question of why now and i think it was once again democrats trying to. As the bad guy and try to link it to trump has been supportive of him and its coming just at the election its its just a cascade of what we saw in the 1st 3 years. Of collusion between clinton and and trump and exists its a great story they want to get out there ben you and i have been doing this business for a long time i think if you were at up all our years people would say we should retire but. When you. Get in newsrooms where someones pitched a story and you knew it was thin journalistically but you also knew that it fit a certain narrative this smell like that to you oh it absolutely smells like that rick but i think it goes even further than that 1st of all the New York Times when that should be the headline on the story because of the poll the john what he cited at the end of his piece there where he talked about the majority of. People who are hearing about this or even a large portion of them are saying they believe its true whether theres evidence or not so the New York Times accomplished what it tempted to accomplish push a narrative whether it was true or not because truth did not seem to matter here and instead they got really what they wanted which was to continue the narrative about trump and putin collusion this time in afghanistan but whats really interesting to me about this about the way i actually released a podcast about this issue yesterday citing the evidence or lack thereof about this it wasnt just that the n. S. A. Said that well we dont necessarily agree with his assessment the n. S. A. Said we found no credible evidence and the latest story that the times has done on this essentially says well look this additional document was created in response to our story in response to your story because your story was wrong the story includes no evidence whatsoever and you and i both know where the editors of the New York Times who say you guys are bringing this information but you have no evidence whatsoever that is called bad journalism it goes beyond that though and heres the conversation i want to have with you guys one of the things that bothers me about this type of story is the lack of context and i think both of you know michael you know. If were going to do stories on the fact that theres a country out there that from time to time uses its money or its military or its influence to handicap a war or whats going on in another country im sorry but we have to look in the mirror we do this all the time so im not saying russia did and i dont know if russia didnt but i do know the thing that we criticize were also guilty of am i wrong. No no youre not and if we actually are in the mujahideen to kill russians when they when the soviet union theyre not to. Afghanistan this is what we just have a whole lived. But were going to hold out im going to help you here michael didnt we just have a whole impeachment hearing about how we as americans need to get more money to the ukrainians so they could kill more russians thats what i heard every day from iraq arse. No youre not wrong and its not what happened in ukraine was not im president as i said we were doing it back in 79 and 80 we were supplying stoners to them which we were actively doing that so what human that was a secret program and i was and i was literally a program go ahead with doubt about 10 seconds lastly its just to know that the times use the word bounties that is a trigger word that they use that there is no evidence of that taking place on any level and they use that word as a buzz word to put it in peoples minds of this was happening you know and by the way i just want our viewers to know nobody here is saying we know this is how it happened or this is not how it happened or its good or its bad were just saying get make sure the information is clear make sure your story is not then and provide context when youre sharing these types of stories with what is essentially the entire world thats all right next guys appreciate it. I had the news with rick sanchez when we come back the president of mexico visits the white house of meet with donald trump and none other than larry king visits with me all that stay there. And then. Tara reid outbreed i turn on the t. V. On the about the world of whats happening around me i see shows on the screens but in last every day because the fake news near it says sadie state. Who may be cooling his flock build enough business with farm f. The barbara fabric globalism a kid my house plenty off there in the store but i found a network that will question science breakthroughs that space civil strife Climate Change stop it will be cool to simplify lists all that mainstream wants to do was keep us quiet you watch the right you cant keep a silence critical poissy is told to spake few question inside direct we dont take sides we walk the dog artsy america of means well talk. You cannot be bold with yeah youre right. Im holland cook i invite you to climb with me above the main stream media empire and from that higher fan to glimpse the big picture question more. What about government said here there is a law growing up Justin Trudeau decided not to show up but in a move that has certainly stirred some controversy at home in mexico and confused a lot of people over here on this side of the border the president of mexico andress Manuel Lopez Obrador met with President Donald Trump at the white house today many have asked why he would do that why the leader of a people that mr trump has labeled as criminals and rapists meet with him well he answered that question heres what he had to say. But what i mainly appreciate it is that you. Have never heard of. My state i saw it i need something to envisage the pain of the moroder as he that you have followed. By. George. Who said last night she only is not giving up or we need not to new take it as pleasure as the importunate can be shamed by their people but it can be looked at i have found. Treat us as a colony. On the contrary you have most of our. Condition in us young us an independent nation where you have obrador the president of mexico by the way there is something else. What happens this is a lifestyle story we want to bring in today because a lot of people lately have not been getting a lot of sleep what happens when you dont get enough sleep what happens to your face what happens to you physically we decided that we would look into this today so heres our correspondent natasha. A lack of sleep can have a profound impact on your mood and concentration levels the next day my sleep expert a live you are result though says its also shocking to your skin to prove her point a result. Reveals the difference sleep has on the skin after only 6 hours of sleep she says thats when your 1st notice dark circles are bags under the eyes a result loss i think so the thin blood vessels around your eyes everything shows up here including having dilated the vessels are she says it also helps to stay hydrated as puffy bags under the eyes are a result of tired skin retaining water livia says the 2nd thing that happens to your skin when sleep deprived is that it produces less college and which can lead to premature wrinkles according to research sleeping less than 5 hours a night gives one a 30 percent reduction in college and Growth Research also indicates youre a whopping 45 percent more likely to get fine lines if you sleep 6 hours as opposed to 8 hours and 70 percent of growth hormone which essentially drives college and is produced during deep sleep and if youre suddenly seen more breakouts on your face it could be from not getting adequate shut eye this is a sign of a lack of sleep impact in your immune system a result of points out that 70 percent of natural killer cells which detect and destroy invading pathogens are produced in deep sleep so as we all try to stay healthy during this pandemic getting 8 hours of sleep is an easy way to start reporting for the news with Rick Sanchez Natasha sweet. Time for our conversation bi weekly conversation with larry king. Today were talk about masks because it appears america is going like mask crazy right now so people are really angry because other people are Wearing Masks other people are angry because they have to wear masks in fact weve got a montage here of show to show you just a cursory search on you tube of all people are acting as a result of their mask i or. You cannot escape god im say that again you cannot escape god not even with the mask or 6 feet arresting him and. Youre going to hurt youre coming closer. And im going to you know will many if any more this is over you know. Why do you want me asking anything he cant you come up one morning. The last one was a woman who went to target to get a broader sense of what harry did call them bad as throw him down on the ground saying this man thing is not a good draw what the hecks course. Its all the a c. Obviously the man has for obviously that mass dont hurt right they dont hurt obviously its preventing bad things and when they say you cant make a comment say were a national or about masks i think mass should be sorry they say we can make things mandatory. You remember one scene. I wouldnt know how to proceed program but im going to make me a sheep until you told me i have to. So i think i think all is is a crazy argumen