Well and what is happening now in other words the collapse of the International System which he feels was unsustainable before the 2nd well and hes very unsustainable so. Thats really extremely well said you know george the the article is its a very long extremely detailed and my 1st reaction is this is a historical document all by itself it was only published a few days ago the parallels of the the 1930 s. And what we have right now in the International Order is is following apart fragmenting and this is one of the it is the primary reason other than nazi aggression started the 2nd world war in europe and i think the parallels are really quite me have the United States using sanctions as a political weapon we have we have constant pressure being brought against iran against and israel but has no basis in International Law and this and this is a very appropriate one and id like to point out to you that the United States is walking away from the entire. Spectrum of arms control agreements i think this is very dangerous as well go ahead jump and. Yes youre absolutely right peter. And the sanctions regime that the United States has in particular are imposed against russia which is a very very Serious Business and that both the democrats and republicans want to tighten every you know you know as a as moving forward so whoever wins this election will want to impose some kind of sanctions some kind of penalties is russia the obsession obsessive hatred of russia and now that prevails in london and in washington is a very Serious Business and i think that. This is one of the issues that in a certain point thing out that this this really it does get into a very dangerous situation so what hes saying is that. This dangerous situation is part and parcel and that as alexander pointed out with this revisionist view of world war 2. According to which the nazis and the soviets jointly launched it and this was a European Parliament resolution this isnt something he story the story in quite just the pontificating way this is a recent resolution of the European Parliament joint aggression by the soviet and he was pointing out you know important facts to keep in mind and said no that wasnt right was in september like in 39 no one no one stopped england and france from invading joe met me my job was preoccupied with paul and it was a nonaggression pact no one stopped you didnt do anything so you still are blaming the soviet union for that so hes pointing this out and saying this is bottom ponselle of this. Or this most of the worlds this over you know and then he moves on into the 2nd part of the article which is. Like this is restore the. Post world war 2 or the. Hes used as the basis of it the permanent 5 members of the Security Council so you know those were those are the days when there was the ability in the world and they went to see this is where we need to be moving now you know alex and also i mean if we can just look at present day politics we see the fragmentation in the weakening and the lack of mission of nato and im not i think this is one of the reasons why theyre changing this narrative because nato needs to have an enemy to justify its own existence and you know and we have poll after poll deeply in germany where the german public wants americans to leave 75 years after the fact they want them to start rebuilding but of course this is a switching major we have the neo cons and entire political bipartisan consensus in Washington Well lets move them to poland which would be in violation of riemanns ending the cold war but again they just want International Law and that is really the basis of the article that hu jintao accompt about is the foundations of International Law it fell apart it fell apart before the 2nd world war and that is a wave of the footsteps of france and britain ok not the soviet union absolutely can i just point out that this idea of the city union and nazi germany being allergists to start the 2nd will get east a fringe theory in Academic Circles it is a fringe theory some people in the police it or wells are adults it amongst academics it remains a fringe there it. Is expressing what is still very much overwhelmingly the academic consensus but the parallels here is julie also and then very interesting is that after the 1st woman in the lead up to the eventual start of the 2nd world you see a extremely unfair. Stoutish invests is very interesting and hes attacking for the 1st start as far as i know from a Russian Point youve the entire this is when johnny being essentially constantly bullied by the allies leading to very very common consequences now hes not saying i think you know that russia has been put in exactly the same way but what hes pointing to is the fragility of a system in which theyre all green is self appointed when it see it as then mission to constantly be telkom lose and at such a system becomes deeply on balance and it becomes increasingly fragile and that way get things like nate continuing to this you a calling to all this you can say of an ending expansion of focusing all russia as aggressive states shes not by the way and. Make tensions in europe and in the worlds which really have substantially cools because as correctly points out all the great powers would to come together through Security CouncilUnited Nations system it would be perfectly possible to result problems. You know towards one of the things i took away from the article again and i suggest our viewers and i have a read through because its absolutely fascinating is that be the issue of sovereignty and protecting ones own defined National Interests ok in the end and what i find really interesting is that because during the cold war it was it was an ideological conflict with the cold war is over and so you want to bludgeon russia. Like it was the soviet union the soviet union has no ruling idea im sorry russia today has no ruling ideology ok so the parallels dont work anymore and so what putin is saying is that like the soviet union russia of today will defend its National Interest as it defines it its about sovereignty sure. Yes and this is a very important point that the russians havent put in and love are often made over and over again which is the United Nations charter in shrines the principle of National Serenity and that there is an equality between all nations no matter how small that they are sovereign and that there is no right on any on anyones part to bully other smaller nations and to tell them what how they should run their own best and so you know yes he indeed hes pointing this out as this kind of western regime change operations that prevailed over the last few decades is a violations of United Nations charter and again it goes back to his point that. You know in 1045 there were sensible leaders who created a you know for want of a better way the new world order that respected National Serenity wrote the United Nations charter and created a balance of power system which was the United NationsSecurity Council that took into account the interests of the great powers which and their head hence the failure of the league of nations which didnt answer yes thats what hes insisting yeah we need to go back to that and at that time and he wants this out so that the leaders of the western powers always acknowledged a that the sacrifices that the soviet union made will do that they did the heavy lifting and that there was no symmetry between what the nazis did and what the u. S. s out it was if you had said its just to never accuse the u. S. S. R. Or be in aggressive rosell never to. And it had nothing to do with ideology if you look at the bound nations of of the United Nations it didnt point out that it didnt focus on ideology it looked at the existence of sovereign states and how they would be as actors on the International State alex let me go back to you and finish up on this point one of the things i think is also interesting about the article is the the rule of law in International Institutions and we get this route this route vision is theory that revisionist history thats coming out is it is sidestepping it wants to avoid these or even dissolve these institutions and and that is a political agenda and its a an agenda towards a gemini i would say what absolutely this what what the agenda me is that you say that certain western palace where the ones that seem to hand at fulton won the 2nd world war you gentle gust the soviet union smelt a full which is what mike baird and you say that the soviets and the germans would pass on possible the same evil a law against the gas so you dandle adze completely deconstruct the International System as it was creates it after the 2nd. And you know you cant pal morally vice sassing else through this get twisted version of history you morally impel a small number of states to dictate against the rest. All of. The millions of lives there and a statement by saying no birth to signaling its come to the history of the 2nd world war all right gentlemen im going to jump in here were going to go to a short break and after that short break well continue our discussion and a real mistake. International memorial awards has extended its deadline for submissions. All media professionals are eligible whether you are a freelance journalist work for alternative media part of a global News Platform you can submit to your published works in either video format go to award go to r. T. Dot com and it a no. So you need for a good. Other than. That on the but im going to do the book on the song that does this for me just. Instead of. Running t. Must do i feel story be stuck or your muscles from the media which. Go chill the church. That. We think he minds be soldier to piss off the boots hes wearing. Which to the soul looks like to move to oppose will appear more than with. The sure stuff in the summarizing police force send us all to. Join me every thursday on the alex salmond show and ill be speaking to us from the world of politics sports business im show business ill see you then. Welcome back to cross talk where all these are considered im peter about remind you were discussing some real. Ok let me go back to george and go to pesca well john bolton has put himself in the news actually but you very much liked and i really like an article that came kind of with the oh everybody in washington hates john bolton and this up that if i was a republican say hes disgruntled while democrats think hes just trying to sell books and trump calls him a sick puppy or he still laughing all the banco there is a bit of a trap be up there and its questionable right now hes going to be able to earn the guard of the profits from this book that why anyone would read is a mystery to me go ahead george. Yes there is a county yet it could be that bolton will be tied up in the courts because the judge suggested. That bolton did in fact review classified information and didnt really go through all the proper vetting procedures of the white house so there are there are grounds for. Ministrations lawsuit against bolton so that so thats a problem for him. The conventional wisdom is that oh this wont affect anyone. Voting habits because those who hate trump will vote against those like trump will vote for trump i think do think that this does damage trump because trump hyun bold no one forced him to do it and when he hired him there were many people you know what the hell is he doing you think youre doing all 3 of us operative. If anyone opposes the agenda that trump ran on in 2016 is john bolton and of course as soon as bolton arrived in the white house he needless other pursuing his agenda regime change war against everyone. You know it israel 1st everything that would extend no peace on the Korean Peninsula you know thats right exactly so this really does raise questions of very serious questions about trumps judgment and that goes extends to all of his appointments he never ever when hes going to have it walks away from him full of hatred for him well of course they were because they full of hate that his agenda hes the one who opposed them he never opposed it he never appointed anyone who would actually believe in his agenda and would try to implement his agenda so he does it is down to trump and his judgment yet you know and thats one of the things i find interesting that the boltons behavior you know earth surrounding his book and. Doing it to the public its very much his style of breaking the rules flaunting the laws when he did it as a Foreign Policy adviser during his long and checkered career hes doing in his own personal life the rules dont apply to me thats when it gets down to you and thats you and thats when you can disarm him so him that way his Foreign Policy is that we do what we want to do and everyone else must be follow International Law because we dont have to he is truly an exceptional person out the is a man with and one of the people who doesnt like him is the judge of the case made it very clear that he disapproves strongly of mr boltons and precisely that reason but that is needed consistent perhaps an old sense to react hes an extraordinarily good tool bureaucratic in fights at ease sats many will in many places in International Institutions at the head of the International AtomicEnergy Commission the head of the el organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons all sorts of all the many places of polands fall of john bolton a few. Years ago it was rate on the north Korean Embassy and i think spain portugal and bolton was widely tipped on that egypt cultural sea just wasnt only to secure our viewers know that that was when trump was going to meet with king. Just to sabotage that we dont have the evidence but its a very interesting coincidence that i think we would all agree here you know you george whats really interesting is how bolton is playing his cards because now hes the darling of the resistance and it just shows how the the political political thinking is to short circuit short circuited itself because bolton is one of them is one of the most agreed. Neocons out there and now you have the left in racing him only because hes taking a swipe at the big bad orange man in the white house i mean that it shows an enormous amount of a lack of. Intellectual and moral integrity i would say go ahead. Well because theres a lack of integrity of it but it is ironic that leave liberal democrat media complex is actually now has embraced the bolt on the agenda. They have had though they hatred for putin and russia that bolton espouse us thats right actually the democrats media consensus hatred towards china thats also pretty much the i mean this biden is attacking trump for being too soft on china for cow traveling to china so again bolton is not outside the consensus there. A korea he trump has been repeatedly attacked for what has been actually a sensible policy at the end it into a secret process known with north korea and denuclearization of the korean bill is your trump has been repeatedly attacked by the democrats on that so you know he brought the bolton agenda is actually the socalled liberal media agenda it is a really surprising that they say yeah it is right that you know that. There is there is trump you know cow towing to the dictators. You know its interesting going back to the title and politico alex everyone in washington hates john bolton but everybody in wisconsin except for on boltons world view him as a really quite amazing if hes it is extraordinary and we just just its its i mean the breaking point of parent leap between something bold the final straw was the trial didnt start a war was in front the general gratz a supposedly fought rats rossmore with iran is they mean kid sealed up a great. Frat and yes they are now supporting john bolton. In this quarrel its very very strange every vote ultimately in the just decision in. Washingtons always seems to be if the choice between war and peace used to hold all over the piece which is of course well bolton once you said it because multan doesnt believe in International Agreements he doesnt believe helms control even least the word of the United States should be decisive in every set starts and he considers that the United States has the rights to enforce its news by full set that has an agenda for wool which everybody in washington ultimately accepts its very strange and frankly very very dangerous you know georgia i delayed a sea of bolton is that is what we heard during the impeachment process is injury policy consensus ok that is his ultimate legacy and we and its really quite interesting if you look at bolton is any hes long been associated with the g. O. P. He was bastards the united youve never confirmed by the senate again you know kind of breaking the rules going around but it whats interesting is that. He has left this behind this interagency policy consensus and it is just a failure from beginning to end and what its done also is to destroy any kind of state crowd in terms of diplomacy there is no need for a secretary of state anymore for example who had. No there isnt there the bolton worldview if which is that there should be no diplomacy no negotiations the United States should just simply issue diktats