Transcripts For RT News 20240713 : comparemela.com

Transcripts For RT News 20240713

China a report reveals the cia and its german counterpart used the Swiss Company for decades to spied on other governments. But i welcome the latest developments and look back at whats been happening to you over the last 7 days youre watching weekly here on r. T. International now a 3rd whistleblower has accused the worlds chemical weapons watchdog of creating an atmosphere of intimidation during. The alleged chlorine attack in the syrian city of duma in april of 2018 a redacted email given to investigative news website the grazing project highlights issues of integrity during the probe it followed revelations by 2 other watchdog employees stressing the same issue they also question to the findings of the final report which in effect pin the blame on the assad government. Reports. We like to imagine that these massive global organizations the un the i. M. F. The u. P. C. W. These juggernauts a good but knives that at the end of the day what they do is good for mankind but as with many things in life you take a closer look and youre left the supported one whistleblower saying the u. P. C. W. Was biased corrupt well he could be wrong just an opinion to whistleblowers saying the same thing makes you think could they be right u. B. C. W. Says no ignore them specter is a and b. A not whistle blowers they are individuals who could not accept that their views were not backed by evidence as could be expected their conclusions are uninformed and brohm sure one whistleblower could be wrong too well could be wrong but when its 3 when its 5 when its a dozen whistle blows you know somethings rotten. I share those behind the crimes that have been perpetrated in the name of humanity and democracy they will not hesitate to do harm to me and my family just what the hell is going on at the o. P. C. W. What could be so terrifying that its own employees are afraid for their lives and feel their employer could target them and their families it isnt just one individual its others too whose crimes were that they would just doing their jobs i submitted a requests to the team leader i asked i repeated this request a number of times all requests were declined or simply ignored just the guy doing his job what it said in the Job Description at what was a respectable organization according to testimony given at the un thats not what the u. P. C. W. The management wanted all requests were denied the responses i received included this is too big dont make yourself a martyr i deposited a dossier requesting an investigation months later i was informed that nothing would be done i requested a meeting with the director general as i thought the situation was serious enough to warrant him being made aware of it the request for a meeting was denied and i was informed by a senior manager that you will never get to the director general and if you try to go around me to get to him there will be consequences but dont you think the u. P. C. W. Hasnt learned that lesson it has it isnt the lesson you and me might think of you know being more honest the lesson they learned is everyone everyone working for them needs to learn to keep their mouths shut and additional bigotry Organization Wide confidentiality Training Program will be instituted for all personnel employed by the secretary and this training will be accompanied by annual are to stations and just in case anyone anyone gets any smart ideas in. Future the bosses over the u. P. C. W. Could always show them this letter and tell them this is what happens to you when you day speak out against the u p c w i dont want to expose myself or my family to their violence on revenge i dont want to live in fear of crossing the street. Or aghast if there was mention the a. B. C. Needed to go public and doubting the credibility of the 1st 2 whistleblowers we have asked the watchdog to to comment on all of the allegations and will let you know their response when we receive it. Now the British Government has warned that both the killer and the rapists could be released back onto the streets within days there among 25 violent criminals who avoided deportation to jamaica this week following a last minute legal challenge one of those 25 who managed to avoid deportation back to jamaica stabbed a man to death fitzroy daily is currently serving a 10 year sentence while 5 in henry is behind bars for raping 2 teenage girls theyll stay in britain pending the appeal by the government which is concerned that they might pose a threat to the public but for now they have been reprieved as the appeals judge ruled that there may have been an issue with their access to legal advice the u. K. Government said though it would continue to act to remove serious offenders who are not british defenses which these people responsible for include one month slaughter one firearms offense 7 violent offenses 2 which are in the category of rape or sexual offenses and 14 drugs offenses we make no apology whatsoever for seeking to remove serious Foreign National offenders but we put the issue of whether legal technicalities should keep violent offenders from being deported up for debate. This is not a race issue they supposedly protection issue and its also a rights issue people talk time and time again about your rights a family life your right to live in the United Kingdom you dont have a right to live in the United Kingdom or less your sits in the United Kingdom just like any other british nationalist as anyone else in the u. K. They committed a crime they said their punishment they were convicted sentence they serve their time now after that they should be allowed to come home to their family they have british spouses british parents british children british families it is not my responsibility to pay for a Foreign National to commit crime in my country any of these people they committed a single offense many years ago since then i mean obviously from the that just shows how little trust we have in our own criminal Justice System theyve been in prison theyve been of probation since then why have not been able to rehabilitate them why havent we not been able to reduce the chances of real offending that is the responsibility of the government i dont have a duty to deal with the worlds worst people i dont have a duty for my taxes to be paid on these sorts of people get a grip of yourself look if you wish to come to the United Kingdom in order to do a job it all to raise a family it ought to be a reasonable person i love you if you wish to come to this country it ought to sell drugs beat people up rape murder pillage abuse go how many of these people they were not given the right to make their legal claims is no legal aid for such cases anymore people who cant afford lawyers arent able to claim their legal rights and thats why there was an admission in the pointer is not just why are we deporting black people the point is why every deporting criminals who have committed relatively minor offenses and relatively short criminal sentences when they have children british families here and reception are separating them from them permanently we do not have a duty to law and support and trust and respect people who came to this country to abuse a strawberry if that sounds brutal i dont care anyone. Ever can be put in a situation where the you know in this part of the moment the they act in a certain way but out there that doesnt mean that we should separate them and essentially destroy their family lives whatever and thats the point we need in the in the he looking at other way and this is out of the moment in the spare the moments you commits an act of manslaughter or killing somebody in the spur of the moment go back. Now washingtons nato representative has claimed that russia and china have cyber attacked every Single Alliance member and theyve also said to the world must strengthen its files against moscow and beijing meanwhile a report has revealed the cia had his german counterpart did greek swiss made encryption machines back in the 1970 s. Allowing them to spy on embassies and government institutions in 120 countries for decades one quarter as more details the Washington Post is calling it the intelligence coup of the century the cia working with west German Secret Services pulling the strings of a swiss encrypt company and stealing government secrets from over 120 countries foreign governments were paying good money to the us and was germany for the privilege of having their most secret Communications Read by at least 2 Foreign Countries it was a foolproof operation 1st called the saurus and later renamed rubicon for over half a century of the Company Crypto eiji was a captain of the worlds encryption Industry Based in neutral switzerland most governments were quick to believe their secrets were in safe hands little did they know the cia and west germany b n d had coopted the companys founder to create a backdoor into the worlds best kept secrets in 1978 western spies had complete access to the egyptian president S Communications with cairo during the camp david peace talks with israel a year later washington was spying on a rainy and a. Fishbowls during the hostage crisis and as late as 1986 u. S. Intelligence was listening to libyan officials congratulate each other for the bombing of a berlin disco although the c. I. A and b. And d. Werent able to hook their main rivals russia and china had enough foresight to look elsewhere for their encryption needs nowadays though those 2 are the scapegoats for all of the wests cyber woes if you see throughout our alliance every one of our countries has had cyber and hybrid attacks from russia some from china for washington its become a routine to point the finger at russia and china but its not like u. S. Intelligence operations have wound down since then on the contrary theyve adapted. Edward snowden is the 29 year old intelligence contractor who leaked Top Secret National Security Agency Information revealing the incredible extent to which the u. S. Government is monitoring and keeping records of not just our phone calls the National Security agency has developed to build an infrastructure they could intercept almost everything. The National Security agency there in the United States allegedly spying on quite vast amounts of citizens data the group trying to find president obama who is reviewing the washington spying program because largely defended it although the program had not prevented a terrorist attack it was still vital to him and security. The Central Intelligence agency has walsh control of highly classified documents and computer code about the cias Technical Capability to carry out. Into. Electronic devices things like android phones only Julian Assange in london accusing the cia of devastating incompetence saying the agency has lost control of its Cyber Weapons it doesnt matter who you are friend or foe theyre coming for your secrets. I have since we started talking about them and see always made it clear to the u. S. President that spying among friends is not acceptable and if you take wiki leaks vault 7 documents into consideration it makes operation rubicon look like childs play the scope and direction of the cias Global Covert Hacking Program its malware arsenal and dozens of 0 day weaponized exploits against a wide range of u. S. And European Company products include apples i phone googles android and Microsofts Windows and even samsung t. V. s which are turned into covert microphones even their own citizens are unsafe now increasingly we see that its happening domestically and to do that. The n. S. A. Specifically targets the communications of everyone it ingests them by default it collects them in its system and it filters them and it analyzes the minute measures them and it stores them for periods of time simply because thats the easiest most efficient and most a valuable way to achieve these snowden took the revelations about crypto eiji even further comparing it with a formerly secret 10000000. 00 contract between the n. S. A. And a major u. S. Computer Security Firm it begs the question what info grabbing operations are still going on right now under our noses. So to come on the we play while the wave of fear coronavirus sweeps the world people of asian descent complaining if they getting increasingly isolated well have a look at how and why just our. So what weve got to do is identify the threats that we have its crazy. Let it be an arms race is on spearing Dramatic Development only closely im going to resist i dont see how that strategy will be successful very critical time to sit down and talk. Welcome back to the way facebook boss marks a school for talking to government regulation of online content saying it shouldnt be left to the private companies his comments kind during an address at this weeks meeting conference. I do think that we dont want private Companies Making so many decisions about how to balance social equity use without a more democratic process so i think that where where the law means is in my opinion should be drawn is there should be more guidance and regulation from the states. Were hearing a speech like a bird said his Company Already employed 35000 people to review content and security on the platform with more than 1000000 a 1000000 thank you cant bring taken down every day however in recent years facebook has come under fire for helping to spread fake news along with its policy on political advertising lets get these now Technical Technology expert will mean hes a man to come to an issue like this good evening bill thanks for coming back what are your thoughts here Mark Zuckerberg believes that bringing in the state or local government is the way to police the internet what would be the difficulties in doing that do you think was actually a good idea. I think facebook are very reluctant to bear the responsibility with coming up with the rules themselves because whichever rules that they come up with and then seek to employ somebody is going to just like that the problem is if you say well the state should define the rules which states are we talking about because the viewpoint in europe is going to be very different from the viewpoint of the u. S. Which will again be different from the viewpoint and else were there are different regulations in the country we g. D. P. Are here in the u. K. We have a new group of the regulation in california that possibly will be federal regulation the u. S. To come and then there are other countries developing their own regulations and when it comes to look at online holmes who defines what is our because if we were sitting in the middle east it would be hardly uncommon for there to be critical comments about judaism but they would take a great offense at any critical comments about islam or the koran whereas if we were in a different country say u. S. Phobic convents might be quite comet common but that they would take great offense or anything that they deemed to be somewhat anti semitic and therefore it is very much the viewpoint of the eye of the beholder and who gets to set these rules its going to be a very difficult question im ashamed that there would be people that would like to set those rules though as much as it might be difficult they would then turn to control what goes on and what comes off the internet from your perspective whos most likely to come forward and do this. I think because the companies are based in the u. S. And because europe is such a large market and leading the way to proceed with its g. D. P. Our regulations it is going to be a combination of u. S. Federal and g. D. P. Our regulation is going to lead the way and weve already seen some very large fines in the u. S. For the federal trade commission and weve also seen by the european union. But those fines are not to stop this kind of behavior and facebook to give them some credit during an enormous amount to try and remove the content it is going to complain about. Its a difficult one isnt it because people always talk about the freedom of the internet and its done so much good has brought so many views that people havent heard of before into the mainstream and people are able to bait them and see them and click on links etc but there is clearly a downside to it and its just striking that balance isnt it and i just wonder whether we will strike this balance or we will always be arguing about what should and shouldnt be on the internet. I dont think were ever going to please everybody the issue here is that facebook are actually caught in a very difficult position here then not the ones creating the abusive content and theyre doing their very best to remove it theyre not the ones creating fake news and fake it gets in the game theyre doing their best to remove these but this is going to continue because of the platform the place to create it and the same is true for a whole host of other so to me your but. The the difficulty comes where with different nuances and interpretation its a bit like left or right all of the people on the left feel that they have the rights the freedom of speech right to say what they want to say but they point at the other side and are horrified with what they deem to be fake news and misinformation but you look at the people of the right and theyre saying exactly the same things demanding their right to speak through freedom of speech and also pointing at the other side and complaining about their misinformation so its caught in a position its never going to keep everybody happy yet its very difficult isnt it for everybody i would say bill good to tell

© 2025 Vimarsana