comparemela.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For RT News 20240713 : comparemela.com
Transcripts For RT News 20240713 : comparemela.com
Transcripts For RT News 20240713
That utilize their our you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and bad you need to take that into your own hands. Are you watching out
International Wednesday
the 4th of december live from our world new centrist with a half hour up the company so a story about dont start the trump impeachment saga steps up a gear in washington where the u. S. House
Intelligence Committee
has delivered a damning report detailing how trump allegedly abused his office for personal gain mopin examines the documents in more detail. Well the report from the house
Intelligence Committee
democrats essentially alleges 2 things about donald trump 1st it alleges that he conditioned military aid to ukraine on an announcement that would have been beneficial to his
Reelection Campaign
and secondly it alleges that he obstructed the house of representatives impeachment inquiry investigation now adam schiff representing democrats came forward and painted a pretty grim pricks here donald trump and his activities this is adam schiff this report chronicles a scheme by the president id states to coerce an ally ukraine that is at war with an adversary russia into doing the pleasure of the president s political dirty work and he was willing to sacrifice the
National Security
of the
United States
by withholding military aid and diplomatic recognition in the form of that white house meeting in order to get what he wanted now before departing the country on monday donald trump dismissed the allegations that were expected to be leveled in this report this is what donald trump said prior to leaving the country before the report was released by the radical. Democrats decide what im going to set up a year ago that what im doing that was. One of the most important. Thing. For them to be doing saying putting it at the end of the table which. I grew up with in a recent interview the ukrainian leaders the lenski also dismissed these allegations about
President Trump
behavior and interactions with him look i never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo thats not my thing i dont want us to look like bagus now many witnesses testified during the impeachment inquiry hearings but observers wondered if they really. You made a strong case that donald trump had been inappropriate in his dealings with ukraine this is some of the testimony that was heard there was no mention of withholding aid on the call correct thats correct and there was no quid pro quo correct correct was there any reference to withholding aid you know there was not any reference to bribery no there was not any reference to quid pro quo no there was not you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the
United States
has been involved with paddle. Now before this report was released on monday we had a report from the republicans that was released it was 123 pages long and it defended the actions of u. S. President donald trump saying that his dealings with ukraine had not been inappropriate and had not violated the law fact that donald trump is out of the country celebrating the 70th anniversary of nato the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
that many have pointed to the timing of the report as being somewhat suspicious however while some are looking at the report and saying it shows very very damning evidence against donald trump others are looking at the report and saying its simply a rehash of long discredited allegations different views from different sides of the political spectrum here in the
United States
if new york city kellam open this so last thoughts about this somewhat concerned about the papers veracity others taken it for granted taken either side next we have from
Florida Democratic
party chair mitch sees that hes convinced by the report media on this line lou thinks is going to the leaning. What we have here is unprecedented and no one knows what it means because it
Means Nothing
why do we call it an impeachment inquiry because if it was an impeachment hearing or an impeachment proceeding the president would have been allowed to invite and to subpoena witnesses but since they didnt do that and didnt want him to do that they call that an impeachment inquiry and they have not changed one i ota from what they said when they began the inquiry that and i will paraphrase it the president used to his position. His authority under article 2 of the constitution for personal and or political benefits and the last time i checked every president since
George Washington
as done this this is not impeachable i do believe that the democratic report was factual and obviously the republican response was perhaps a fairy tale that people do want to repeal have to support some went to bed specifically you have very different responses be on the lookout for this what we have to look at is different articles that are going to come out that will be pretty straightforward theres going to be an abuse of power because as you say in the quote he took his interest above the
National Interest
theres also going to be obstruction some is obstruction of congress not letting people cooperate. The u. K. Government is facing a massive backlash after the release of a heavily redacted report on the fracking industry british authorities never intended to see that day but it did greenpeace won a lengthy legal battle with the government under the freedom of information act but end of the day out of 48. 00 pages 37. 00 were totally blacked out what remains of the one secret document does though show a concerted plan to develop a positive image for the controversial gas
Extraction Method
amongst the general public the conservatives have taken money from
Oil Executives
dress the rights of communities and enabled
Franken Companies
to threaten their local environment the fact they have tried to counter the sob by rejecting pages of critical information for the illustrates this governments contempt for the public this is the conservatives idea being open about the franken experiment forced to release their report and heavily censored it. This heavily redacted government report shows reference to secret plans to run a processional complain used by the weight of
Scientific Evidence
and strength of
Public Opinion
against bracken i dread to think what we havent been allowed to see so is more the long running controversial fight against fracking in the u. K. Israeli patrol connects. They high tech god knows what sticking out of the ground that earns some people cash and literally shakes other peoples homes those other people for years have been teaming up with green activists to win a war against fracking in britain. Its the areas from believable if you can believe. In finally last month came the victory at least for the timing the controversial method of shale gas extraction was banned in the u. K. Under the
Prime Minister
who once called it glorious news for humanity and now that it seems there is no more need to come out and protest the
Cabinet Office
has at last released a secret report on the fracking industry despite these lines on the paper no parts of this report shows appendices is to be released under the freedom of information act so you want to rate something that the activists were trying to get a glance at for almost 2 years theres a little problem heres what it looks like from the 48 pages seen by the guardian 37 are entirely blacked out and only one the very front is left uncensored so if youre still keen to get to know about the skeletons in the industrys closet good luck why would so much stuff remain hidden looking at this black wall of redacted pages people will be wondering why theres so little the government is willing to reveal about fracking and so much it wants to hide if ministers have really dropped their support for this polluting industry why not publish this report in full and come clean about whats been going on behind closed doors. For years still though theres enough to scratch your heads over after reading the uncensored bits in there heres the gist of a few ideas there are issues with the fracking industries progress the main one is public opposition to fracking it needs to be dealt with the government should develop a pro shale narrative and spread the word the department for energy and
Climate Change
is already undertaken crucial work on communications to increase public acceptability of shale for example creation of objective information
Material Development
approach
Show National
and regional narrative show champions and among other useful moves that whitehall needs to take is finding ways to speed up planning in response to operators concerns which is also sometimes an obstacle planning times need to be shortened and process needs to be predictable which all makes you wonder why would the guys in charge ban fracking at all in such a document there are always going to be sensitive parts that are embarrassing to the government that are sensitive that could harm you know the industry potentially in the future or that could show the government being too cooperative with industry that might show motives. That are the public would not see in a good light its to protect their their image and to protect their ability to move forward and continue to do what they think they need to do for the nation which is different from what they tell the public of course because they tell the public whatever narrative suits them in terms of getting elected and so on but typically its for domestic political reasons that you would ban it theres no other reason that i can think of depending on how things develop geopolitically there might be a big impetus to develop u. K. Shale and in which case theyll want to do. As quickly as possible. Backstory for today popular free dating up such as tender and others owned by the company much group not protecting their users from sex offenders on their platforms says an investigation the investigators took a look at more than one 150. 00 incidents of
Sexual Assault
over the last decade they found that the majority of victims were women whod met their attackers through match ups in fact in 10 percent of cases they say they had much with the med who had already been accused or convicted of sex crimes much group which owns over 40 of the most popular up says they do conduct background checks but only on the members with paid accounts crucially further the
Company Claims
they do not agree with the investigations results the implication that we norberg such offenders on our side and dont fight to keep them off is as outrageous as it is falls as
Technology Evolves
we will continue to aggressively deploy new tools to eradicate bad actors including users of our
Free Products
where we are not able to obtain sufficient and reliable information to make meaningful bank ground checks possible or of course it got the conversation going chadwick more suspect a journalist resurfaces of womens rights advocate here they are. The magic group is a 1000000000. 00 company theres no reason why they couldnt allocate just a small portion of their revenue to screen the people on their ab just so that theres just a smaller since of increased safety its a precaution its a measure but its deserved if they appear if theyre suddenly saying that we want in order to join the service we want to perform background checks on everyone who joins 1st of all that would kill the business and they know it theres a moral responsibility on these companies that are making billions of dollars 1700000000 dollars from women looking for love to say oh you know what its too expensive for us to do a little bit to protect you nobodys going to want to join these apps with these kind of if theyre doing that theyre being this invasive of background checks with that said people maybe shouldnt be on them especially women and not only are these dangerous for women but its destroying women so just give up the dating apps if you dont perform your own background checks in your own time with your own money get off were not going to restrict women from using the internet because there are predators we do desire for these companies to at least take the step into the right direction why do you want to put that kind of power on these monolithic
Tech Companies
and up saying you know ban women from dating apps im simply saying you shouldnt rely on this and you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and whos bad you need to take that into your own hands so if you meet someone do a background check before you did for you go out on a date if they work in tandem with the courts to get the names at least of the 1st and last names in the location of where these people are and perhaps create some type of monitor of their internet thats a step in the right direction its going to be a mess i think no matter what and theres always going to be people who perhaps squeak through or dont get picked up who then commit assaults and crimes get a gun ladies. Protect yourselves and we dont and by the way these incidences are obviously extremely rare and you know by and large the vast majority of men are not sexual predators one woman is enough we need the companies to take a moral stance or at least have some sort of responsibility to protect the women that utilize their app and and then what happens you know its its never going to be a perfect system about 16 past the high the things of watching hope you stick around because coming up after the break well the big nato both a plus for an event that was supposed to inspire unity it see the allies fall out of protests on the streets of london just one of the stories about one of the when but by. Financial survival. Ill fill out im a. Fraud thank you for. Destroying 6 thats right. Slavery. Join me every. Time im sure. Politics. Im show business. Up until recently politics were about policy preferences and ways to implement them that is not the case today your political views are now what define you as a person and there is a moral dimension bias against those who are not politically correct is the last acceptable form of discrimination this is the end of. Nato continues to market 70th anniversary with the heads of the
Member States
convening in london for a 2nd day for the military alliances summit so of course many big names say the cameras are not actually worrying to here are some of the highlights from day one of the. Pretty bizarre exchanges between the lead. Our. Doctors are practicing medicine probably. Also as well as a good breakfast. We have all that. Hours old. As well as paid by god to say to yourself. Thank. You. For his words. Were here she was. At the. Car but nato is still doing what hes been doing for the years desperately trying to find a role for itself and its clear that europes security interests cannot be served by a military alliance that just keeps expanding and expanding and thereby threatening the security of the very
Member States
that nato is supposed to be defending doesnt matter oh im sounding rather trompe and i mean he was saying look i mean we all have to pull our own countries for us we have to see whats in our interest its clearly in the europeans interest to think of a
European Security
identity and you would have thought draw the you know the make america great. The america 1st guy he sees on this is say yeah youre right you know we should. All look after our interest but instead he sounded like a stick in the mud later person you know how dare you call anything is the question america is going to be committed to later when we save you. All sorts of terrible things well as a split screen there nonetheless all could outside to the big birthday bash already marred by protests the british capital with more expected later today demonstrators been venting their anger over nato forcing its members to raise the defense spending to the detriment of the countrys economy. We are here because we want to protest a nato summit because for example the nato is forcing its
Member States
to increase their difference budget for my country for example belgium it means doubling
Defense Budgets
while we are asked to have an austerity policy in the same time they are trying to using this money to transform armies into intervention on these we have seen what this means in libya or in afghanistan destabilizing countries and sold another important issue is the confrontation policy to towards russia which is exactly creating this kind of prompts race so there are many many issues why we have to oppose nato thats why we are here if hypothetically tomorrow nato ceased to exist would not create perhaps a security vacuum a security problem in europe that would lead to war instability this is an old argument done by the conservatives are a little worse i dont think so what we need is a new
Security Architecture
what i say to the security quality of. Your stock this is what hopes to do secure. More a story we touched on yesterday for yourself back here may be joining the trend of restoring
National Gold
reserves in a bid to try to avoid a
Global Economic
crisis that comes as countries across
Eastern Europe
are trying to shake off more and more the dependency on the u. S. Dollar by rupert trading said yellow metal dont cotton reports. Its a 21st century gold rush countries around the world are looking to the precious metal to cure their dollar dependence the main switches are china and russia but
Eastern Europe
is now joining in for its own reasons like many slovakia has its gold reserves in the u. K. And now former
International Wednesday<\/a> the 4th of december live from our world new centrist with a half hour up the company so a story about dont start the trump impeachment saga steps up a gear in washington where the u. S. House
Intelligence Committee<\/a> has delivered a damning report detailing how trump allegedly abused his office for personal gain mopin examines the documents in more detail. Well the report from the house
Intelligence Committee<\/a> democrats essentially alleges 2 things about donald trump 1st it alleges that he conditioned military aid to ukraine on an announcement that would have been beneficial to his
Reelection Campaign<\/a> and secondly it alleges that he obstructed the house of representatives impeachment inquiry investigation now adam schiff representing democrats came forward and painted a pretty grim pricks here donald trump and his activities this is adam schiff this report chronicles a scheme by the president id states to coerce an ally ukraine that is at war with an adversary russia into doing the pleasure of the president s political dirty work and he was willing to sacrifice the
National Security<\/a> of the
United States<\/a> by withholding military aid and diplomatic recognition in the form of that white house meeting in order to get what he wanted now before departing the country on monday donald trump dismissed the allegations that were expected to be leveled in this report this is what donald trump said prior to leaving the country before the report was released by the radical. Democrats decide what im going to set up a year ago that what im doing that was. One of the most important. Thing. For them to be doing saying putting it at the end of the table which. I grew up with in a recent interview the ukrainian leaders the lenski also dismissed these allegations about
President Trump<\/a> behavior and interactions with him look i never talked to the president from the position of a quid pro quo thats not my thing i dont want us to look like bagus now many witnesses testified during the impeachment inquiry hearings but observers wondered if they really. You made a strong case that donald trump had been inappropriate in his dealings with ukraine this is some of the testimony that was heard there was no mention of withholding aid on the call correct thats correct and there was no quid pro quo correct correct was there any reference to withholding aid you know there was not any reference to bribery no there was not any reference to quid pro quo no there was not you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the president of the
United States<\/a> has been involved with paddle. Now before this report was released on monday we had a report from the republicans that was released it was 123 pages long and it defended the actions of u. S. President donald trump saying that his dealings with ukraine had not been inappropriate and had not violated the law fact that donald trump is out of the country celebrating the 70th anniversary of nato the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization<\/a> that many have pointed to the timing of the report as being somewhat suspicious however while some are looking at the report and saying it shows very very damning evidence against donald trump others are looking at the report and saying its simply a rehash of long discredited allegations different views from different sides of the political spectrum here in the
United States<\/a> if new york city kellam open this so last thoughts about this somewhat concerned about the papers veracity others taken it for granted taken either side next we have from
Florida Democratic<\/a> party chair mitch sees that hes convinced by the report media on this line lou thinks is going to the leaning. What we have here is unprecedented and no one knows what it means because it
Means Nothing<\/a> why do we call it an impeachment inquiry because if it was an impeachment hearing or an impeachment proceeding the president would have been allowed to invite and to subpoena witnesses but since they didnt do that and didnt want him to do that they call that an impeachment inquiry and they have not changed one i ota from what they said when they began the inquiry that and i will paraphrase it the president used to his position. His authority under article 2 of the constitution for personal and or political benefits and the last time i checked every president since
George Washington<\/a> as done this this is not impeachable i do believe that the democratic report was factual and obviously the republican response was perhaps a fairy tale that people do want to repeal have to support some went to bed specifically you have very different responses be on the lookout for this what we have to look at is different articles that are going to come out that will be pretty straightforward theres going to be an abuse of power because as you say in the quote he took his interest above the
National Interest<\/a> theres also going to be obstruction some is obstruction of congress not letting people cooperate. The u. K. Government is facing a massive backlash after the release of a heavily redacted report on the fracking industry british authorities never intended to see that day but it did greenpeace won a lengthy legal battle with the government under the freedom of information act but end of the day out of 48. 00 pages 37. 00 were totally blacked out what remains of the one secret document does though show a concerted plan to develop a positive image for the controversial gas
Extraction Method<\/a> amongst the general public the conservatives have taken money from
Oil Executives<\/a> dress the rights of communities and enabled
Franken Companies<\/a> to threaten their local environment the fact they have tried to counter the sob by rejecting pages of critical information for the illustrates this governments contempt for the public this is the conservatives idea being open about the franken experiment forced to release their report and heavily censored it. This heavily redacted government report shows reference to secret plans to run a processional complain used by the weight of
Scientific Evidence<\/a> and strength of
Public Opinion<\/a> against bracken i dread to think what we havent been allowed to see so is more the long running controversial fight against fracking in the u. K. Israeli patrol connects. They high tech god knows what sticking out of the ground that earns some people cash and literally shakes other peoples homes those other people for years have been teaming up with green activists to win a war against fracking in britain. Its the areas from believable if you can believe. In finally last month came the victory at least for the timing the controversial method of shale gas extraction was banned in the u. K. Under the
Prime Minister<\/a> who once called it glorious news for humanity and now that it seems there is no more need to come out and protest the
Cabinet Office<\/a> has at last released a secret report on the fracking industry despite these lines on the paper no parts of this report shows appendices is to be released under the freedom of information act so you want to rate something that the activists were trying to get a glance at for almost 2 years theres a little problem heres what it looks like from the 48 pages seen by the guardian 37 are entirely blacked out and only one the very front is left uncensored so if youre still keen to get to know about the skeletons in the industrys closet good luck why would so much stuff remain hidden looking at this black wall of redacted pages people will be wondering why theres so little the government is willing to reveal about fracking and so much it wants to hide if ministers have really dropped their support for this polluting industry why not publish this report in full and come clean about whats been going on behind closed doors. For years still though theres enough to scratch your heads over after reading the uncensored bits in there heres the gist of a few ideas there are issues with the fracking industries progress the main one is public opposition to fracking it needs to be dealt with the government should develop a pro shale narrative and spread the word the department for energy and
Climate Change<\/a> is already undertaken crucial work on communications to increase public acceptability of shale for example creation of objective information
Material Development<\/a> approach
Show National<\/a> and regional narrative show champions and among other useful moves that whitehall needs to take is finding ways to speed up planning in response to operators concerns which is also sometimes an obstacle planning times need to be shortened and process needs to be predictable which all makes you wonder why would the guys in charge ban fracking at all in such a document there are always going to be sensitive parts that are embarrassing to the government that are sensitive that could harm you know the industry potentially in the future or that could show the government being too cooperative with industry that might show motives. That are the public would not see in a good light its to protect their their image and to protect their ability to move forward and continue to do what they think they need to do for the nation which is different from what they tell the public of course because they tell the public whatever narrative suits them in terms of getting elected and so on but typically its for domestic political reasons that you would ban it theres no other reason that i can think of depending on how things develop geopolitically there might be a big impetus to develop u. K. Shale and in which case theyll want to do. As quickly as possible. Backstory for today popular free dating up such as tender and others owned by the company much group not protecting their users from sex offenders on their platforms says an investigation the investigators took a look at more than one 150. 00 incidents of
Sexual Assault<\/a> over the last decade they found that the majority of victims were women whod met their attackers through match ups in fact in 10 percent of cases they say they had much with the med who had already been accused or convicted of sex crimes much group which owns over 40 of the most popular up says they do conduct background checks but only on the members with paid accounts crucially further the
Company Claims<\/a> they do not agree with the investigations results the implication that we norberg such offenders on our side and dont fight to keep them off is as outrageous as it is falls as
Technology Evolves<\/a> we will continue to aggressively deploy new tools to eradicate bad actors including users of our
Free Products<\/a> where we are not able to obtain sufficient and reliable information to make meaningful bank ground checks possible or of course it got the conversation going chadwick more suspect a journalist resurfaces of womens rights advocate here they are. The magic group is a 1000000000. 00 company theres no reason why they couldnt allocate just a small portion of their revenue to screen the people on their ab just so that theres just a smaller since of increased safety its a precaution its a measure but its deserved if they appear if theyre suddenly saying that we want in order to join the service we want to perform background checks on everyone who joins 1st of all that would kill the business and they know it theres a moral responsibility on these companies that are making billions of dollars 1700000000 dollars from women looking for love to say oh you know what its too expensive for us to do a little bit to protect you nobodys going to want to join these apps with these kind of if theyre doing that theyre being this invasive of background checks with that said people maybe shouldnt be on them especially women and not only are these dangerous for women but its destroying women so just give up the dating apps if you dont perform your own background checks in your own time with your own money get off were not going to restrict women from using the internet because there are predators we do desire for these companies to at least take the step into the right direction why do you want to put that kind of power on these monolithic
Tech Companies<\/a> and up saying you know ban women from dating apps im simply saying you shouldnt rely on this and you cant trust these companies to tell you whos good and whos bad you need to take that into your own hands so if you meet someone do a background check before you did for you go out on a date if they work in tandem with the courts to get the names at least of the 1st and last names in the location of where these people are and perhaps create some type of monitor of their internet thats a step in the right direction its going to be a mess i think no matter what and theres always going to be people who perhaps squeak through or dont get picked up who then commit assaults and crimes get a gun ladies. Protect yourselves and we dont and by the way these incidences are obviously extremely rare and you know by and large the vast majority of men are not sexual predators one woman is enough we need the companies to take a moral stance or at least have some sort of responsibility to protect the women that utilize their app and and then what happens you know its its never going to be a perfect system about 16 past the high the things of watching hope you stick around because coming up after the break well the big nato both a plus for an event that was supposed to inspire unity it see the allies fall out of protests on the streets of london just one of the stories about one of the when but by. Financial survival. Ill fill out im a. Fraud thank you for. Destroying 6 thats right. Slavery. Join me every. Time im sure. Politics. Im show business. Up until recently politics were about policy preferences and ways to implement them that is not the case today your political views are now what define you as a person and there is a moral dimension bias against those who are not politically correct is the last acceptable form of discrimination this is the end of. Nato continues to market 70th anniversary with the heads of the
Member States<\/a> convening in london for a 2nd day for the military alliances summit so of course many big names say the cameras are not actually worrying to here are some of the highlights from day one of the. Pretty bizarre exchanges between the lead. Our. Doctors are practicing medicine probably. Also as well as a good breakfast. We have all that. Hours old. As well as paid by god to say to yourself. Thank. You. For his words. Were here she was. At the. Car but nato is still doing what hes been doing for the years desperately trying to find a role for itself and its clear that europes security interests cannot be served by a military alliance that just keeps expanding and expanding and thereby threatening the security of the very
Member States<\/a> that nato is supposed to be defending doesnt matter oh im sounding rather trompe and i mean he was saying look i mean we all have to pull our own countries for us we have to see whats in our interest its clearly in the europeans interest to think of a
European Security<\/a> identity and you would have thought draw the you know the make america great. The america 1st guy he sees on this is say yeah youre right you know we should. All look after our interest but instead he sounded like a stick in the mud later person you know how dare you call anything is the question america is going to be committed to later when we save you. All sorts of terrible things well as a split screen there nonetheless all could outside to the big birthday bash already marred by protests the british capital with more expected later today demonstrators been venting their anger over nato forcing its members to raise the defense spending to the detriment of the countrys economy. We are here because we want to protest a nato summit because for example the nato is forcing its
Member States<\/a> to increase their difference budget for my country for example belgium it means doubling
Defense Budgets<\/a> while we are asked to have an austerity policy in the same time they are trying to using this money to transform armies into intervention on these we have seen what this means in libya or in afghanistan destabilizing countries and sold another important issue is the confrontation policy to towards russia which is exactly creating this kind of prompts race so there are many many issues why we have to oppose nato thats why we are here if hypothetically tomorrow nato ceased to exist would not create perhaps a security vacuum a security problem in europe that would lead to war instability this is an old argument done by the conservatives are a little worse i dont think so what we need is a new
Security Architecture<\/a> what i say to the security quality of. Your stock this is what hopes to do secure. More a story we touched on yesterday for yourself back here may be joining the trend of restoring
National Gold<\/a> reserves in a bid to try to avoid a
Global Economic<\/a> crisis that comes as countries across
Eastern Europe<\/a> are trying to shake off more and more the dependency on the u. S. Dollar by rupert trading said yellow metal dont cotton reports. Its a 21st century gold rush countries around the world are looking to the precious metal to cure their dollar dependence the main switches are china and russia but
Eastern Europe<\/a> is now joining in for its own reasons like many slovakia has its gold reserves in the u. K. And now former
Prime Minister<\/a> robert feet so is trying to get it back i guarantee that if something happens we wont see a single gram of this gold lets do it as quickly as possible feets i was at the helm of slovakias
Biggest Political Party<\/a> and he says its safer to keep the 31 tons of gold in his own country why it could have something to do with when venezuela tried to recall its own gold from the u. K. In early 2019 the u. S. Began actively supporting venezuelas selfproclaimed president. Against president
Nicolas Maduro<\/a> as a legitimate government when the dural sought relief from crippling sanctions by tapping into the overseas gold reserves the bank of england outright refused after washington pulled some strings of course even then experts could see the writing on the wall one of the few things left for britain is to be the
Financial Center<\/a> that london has been for so long and one of the ways you stay a
Financial Center<\/a> is if you dont play games with other peoples money it is not for the bank of england to pick who its going to give money to that comes from another society and you can be sure that every government in the world is going to rethink what do you any money in london as they used to do when theyre watching this political manipulation with the money they had trust to the british that prediction panned out feet so it was far from the 1st to demand a recall of gold days earlier poland recalled 100. 00 tons of its gold reserves from the bank of england and the polish
National Bank<\/a> was certainly happy about it we managed to increase the
Strategic Reserves<\/a> of gold and take steps through a patch ready to launch by. The gold by implementing a constitutional statute or in simple patriotic commitment would not only deal the economic strength of the post state but also great reserves that will save god its
Financial Security<\/a> this is the global trend but also the expectation of poes society other
Eastern Europe<\/a>an countries like hungary in serbia began recalling their gold as early as last year now the
Mainstream Media<\/a> has covered this new gold rush but what theyd probably like to avoid is admitting that its getting pretty close to home take germany it just increased its own gold reserves for the 1st time in 21 years even us economists are admitting the role of this precious metal is quite literally as good as gold the question is what else thats the environment i think will be in and theres a saying that gold is the only ass you can have thats not somebody elses liability the d. Dollar ization of eurasia would support mr down israel view so would the shifter nondollar reserve assets such as gold such a change would force the us to sell dollars in order to settle its balance of payments in the new neutral reserve asset the greenback has been very powerful for a very long time but if countries continue to look for other reserve standards it could mean the end for the dollars golden age its part of the attempt to break away from the dollar as. You know the trading currency in the reserve currency which gives the
United States<\/a> immense economic and political power over other countries and it uses it whenever it can to get its way we see all kinds of moves in that direction we see attempt to use other currencies to use gold turn of
Payment System<\/a> these are all trends just beginning the dollar is still dominant but they portend a list of the u. S. Global economic agenda and the over the next decade will continue to cover the long running story as it develops for us around. I can tell you it is her and often ill call him brave later today that she wednesday great lineup of anchors the next various programs for you and your part of the world coming up after the break and if you want to follow the news check it out on the social media to me kevin o. And i will say goodbye for now maybe see the same times tomorrow whatever you do if you want she won the world thank you for choosing
Us International<\/a> and have a great day. You know world of big. Law and conspiracy its time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door on the back and shouting past each other its time for
Critical Thinking<\/a> its time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now for watching closely watching the hawks. My feeling with this world its right now as were so confused. Here folks and this is a certain generation thats controlling all the
Politics Around<\/a> the world when that generation dies off and children are brought off of this new reality our nest materialistic dont really care about these things dont even more automobiles want to live right beside job want to ride a bicycle this movement is global and its going the world is going to go with this direction and its going to change. In this community there are people who believe that its ok eat this up or accept food on my table its really hard there are no jobs and you see the kids that ask and as a parent. I can come up with lots of arguments. Theres a lot of conflict within the game between the teams close to the conflict i would say. Close one on the childrens clothes each other is
Good Business<\/a> the state of california alone makes 6000000000. 00 a year of prison complex just to get some 25. 00 where. You dont care. Hello and welcome to cross talk where all things are considered im
Peter Lavelle<\/a> up until recently politics were about policy preferences and ways to implement them that is not the case today your political views are now what define you as a person and there is a moral dimension bias against those who are not politically correct is the last acceptable form of discrimination this is the end of politics. Crosslinking political intolerance im joined by my guest kevin chavez in washington hes managing partner of the chavez group as well as former president of d. C. Young democrats also in washington we have christopher and i we mean hes a political analyst and iraq war veteran also in raleigh we cross to ryan he is the national cochair and founder of students for trump all right gentlemen crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate ok kevin im going to go to you 1st because youre of the odd man out i want to make that clear im going to make sure that you get equal time on this program because i always welcome different opinions have any and in my introduction here i said that you know the last bias that is politically that is acceptable is discrimination against people because of their political views i mean that is on steroids right now and i think that is very its terrible for our political discourse im sure i would disagree with you on many many points but im welcoming you on this. I am and im i actually im very interested in what you have to say because i dont see that in the
National Media<\/a> much anymore go ahead kevin why is this the case well i think you know what youre referring to is is the fact that people are so used to consuming the media that they want to consume or theyre sort of validates their personal beliefs that theyre not really open to hearing other sides but i think when we call it discrimination i think that is probably not the right word because in what way is a stopping you from from living a certain quality of life its not like
Racial Discrimination<\/a> or gender based discrimination or
Something Like<\/a> that so i would use that","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia803108.us.archive.org\/13\/items\/RT_20191204_100000_News\/RT_20191204_100000_News.thumbs\/RT_20191204_100000_News_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240716T12:35:10+00:00"}