Andrew follow will be here with you next hour to take you through all the latest news from around the world and stay with us for crosstalk next here on our international. Hello and welcome to cross talk were all things are considered im Peter Lavelle 30 years ago the berlin wall fell the cold war had essentially come to an end the fall of the cold war symbol was heralded as a new spring of nations and the end of communism decades on what is the legacy of this historic event the promises of 1989 been fulfilled. Crosstalk in the fall of the berlin wall im joined by my guest John Laughlin in paris he is a political scientist and historian in washington we have harold james hes a professor of history and International Affairs at Princeton University as well as author and editor of a number of books including when the wall came down reactions to german unification and in cork we cross to Geoffrey Roberts he is emeritus professor of history at University College cork and a member of the Royal Irish Academy all right gentlemen crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it let me go to john and paris for 30 its been 30 years now believe it or not because i remember it so vividly when it happened a few months before i had been living in poland for a number of years and an avid student of Eastern European communist affairs at the time john 30 years on what is its meaning because i look at cursory reviews of you know that in commenting on it it is the peoples power the rise of the spring of nations in Eastern Europe but thats a kind of a narrative that is very western i suppose but i lived there it was i dont have that same kind of feel for it ok though having said that im very glad those communist regimes are gone and the wall go ahead john. You know well like you peter i lived through those events very directly like you i was studying Eastern European studies at oxford at that point i spent that summer in 1909 in romania and in hungary and indeed in september 89 i was in west berlin and was there when the 1st east berlin is arrived in west berlin having driven through czechoslovakia hungry austria and and the whole of germany so i have a very strong memory of it as well i would make 2 points the 1st is that none of it would have happened without gorbachev decision to pull the rug on the Eastern European communist regimes that was decision he took in june and which he announced to the german chancellor helmut kohl at the time and all the events that we remember now the jangling of keys in the square in prague the the torch is the candlelight the songs and so on all that was nothing but operetta it was political operetta it was froth on the tidal wave of history but it was not the cause of the tidal wave of history the cause im afraid was much more basic and much more realistic it was the decision as i say of the soviet union no longer to support. Those regimes and once the support of moscow had been withdrawn they collapsed so it was not the triumph of people in the streets of berlin or whatever it was instead it is jus political decision taken by moscow which had the inevitable consequences that we know about ok now you only lighted the human is and fell ok i mean i did as i say it is not is that harold was disagreeing with you go ahead errol in washington you know i really do think it has much deeper roots it has roots that go back into the 1950 s. And 1960 s. But for me that really transformational story was good papacy of john paul the 2nd. Mobilization you saw the demonstration of millions of poll. People really united against against the regime and from that moment on. The regime lacked any legitimacy in addition to that theres a systematic economic failure and its not but gorbachev is dealing with stuff that gorbachev has to respond to threats the basic sentiment is there in the streets of force or its a bear in the streets of prague and its very very clear i think im ok i think its completely wrong i think of it as well. Ok but harold i agree i spent a lot of time in poland and one thing on jang on jeff hang on one thing is that i would tend to agree that maybe kind of split the difference with john here is that i think i know that there was a lot of people were disgruntled with the political and Economic System they had in poland many were that is true ok but the pappas the of john paul the 2nd United People and what they didnt like it wasnt where they wanted to go that was very unclear that there wasnt even a glimmer in anyones eye of where they should go they just didnt know what they did they didnt know what they didnt like jeff uncorked jumpin a lot a lot of Different Things he did and again i think we got to we had a time delay go ahead jack i liked might be ok maybe yes go ahead well i agree i agree to a certain extent with both john and with highroad yes i agree i agree with joe on that goal which i hope was a factor in 1000 when the globe which of theres no theres no peoples revolution in 1009 in the senate i dont agree with you on that goal which will pull the rug from under the east coast European Congress route regimes or at least that was the intention go to chelsea intention was to save the comic book to save communities and to revitalize it and what he was trying to do was to encourage east European Congress leaders to actually to do the necessary reforms on the other hand its not just about gold which of the dead was a kind of masculine Popular Uprising in various countries in Eastern Europe and that mass uprising that peoples revolution was critical in pushing events in the. Direction such as like said i agree. With high road yes i was to the fact is is to go but youll fuck the revolution from above is led by cold which of and is the revolution from below that comes from the street ok and you. Had. Thanks i mean obviously its difficult to discuss such a big issues in the short term its needed for television the reason why i said what i said is that on the 13th of june 1909 gorbachev effectively toyed helmut kohl that he the soviet union would not oppose german reunification that the communication of that information to call in the gardens of the federal chancellery says it all because once the soviet union let it be known to west germany that it would not oppose east german reunification then the entire house of cards could only collapse of course they were popular discontent i would never dream of suggesting otherwise and i certainly didnt suggest otherwise what i would say though to harold james is that those previous expressions of popular discontent including in poland were suppressed by force they were suppressed by force in berlin in 153. 00 in prague in 168 in budapest in 156 and in poland in 1901 we all know that the decision was taken by gorbachev to stop that policy to abandon the doctrine and once he did that the whole thing unraveled and that seems to me to be the cause of everything you hear all the want to respond to there go ahead. Yes i mean i do think that is right there was a moment we know now when the east german regime was considering using force and they had after all the example of Tiananmen Square behind them and they were explicitly prohibited from doing that by the by the soviet union by major gorbachev and so that is indeed important but i do think you really have to think that by that stage its really too late there is an enormous amount thats just going on on the street and actually i wanted to disagree a little bit peter with what you said before that there wasnt a plan for what to do in the middle of the 1980 s. And 1905 Solidarity Office in brussels the summit on the show office in brussels wrote to the International Monetary fund that they wanted a plan for the reconstruction of poland along the lines proposed by leisure boats or ovitz and so the discussion of the reform has now been well documented after 990 it was already being discussed well ok well when we very important given harold with all due respect i mean solidarity wasnt a monolithic thing even in the 1980 s. There were a lot of different solidarity is for sure ok absolutely ok absolutely of course i mean any Political Party any Political Movement is a coalition of Different Things and you know there was a catholic element to it a very very strong effort and absolutely as a liberal and im into that ok with this kind of easily dovetail so my question for jeff uncork i mean if given the go to child mind set in 1909 i think all of us probably at the time thought there would be some kind of reform communism because thats what got a bunch up was talking about for the soviet union itself and i think thats what really caught all of us every single one of us off guard because you cant have a little bit of this of a little bit of bad and its either one or the other jeff. That was very much that was the intention was recent comments and also. It was the intention that a lot of the activists who were leading these mr must demonstrations in the g. D. R. In prague and other places thats the way they saw the future as well and its were a lot of outside observers saw the future now we know what happened that there was no reform comes and communism collapsed but because that happened to me to say that it was inevitable at the time there were lots of all kinds of different possible political futures and so on and i dont accept you know that once you once resolve the same motion and once gorbachev did what he did it the only outcome was the outcome of that happened which is a complete collapse and the introduction of this little girl i dont believe that all of it or all kinds of possibilities there what happened was amount of political choices lots of different political choices including choices were made by gorbachev by western leaders by you know the people on the ground in Central East Europe as well ok well johnny made my bed again the actual existing socialism our going back to graduate school here i mean it was very totalistic its either one thing or another its not like how do we you know its like the further perfecting of communism a model that kind of. Language which has a really make any sense ok and i didnt believe in breaking it through a reform reforming actual existing socialism was possible if you cant you cant reform it it has to go down. Yes i think thats right i think you can be any more half communist than you can be half pregnant and the subsequent history of the soviet union itself of course showed this because as we know the forces which gorbachev unleashed ended up destroying the soviet the communist party of the soviet union in the soviet union itself so i agree with that i also think that today just as in a comment about russia in the today common to present day russia western commentators focus only on the liberal opposition they never focus on the nationalist opposition or of the communist opposition. So they have a totally liberal interpretation of the coming down of the berlin wall the coming down of the berlin wall was of course the physical barrier which divided the german capital and therefore the german nation and so it did have an Important National content and the same applied to some extent for the other countries of Eastern Europe although of course as we know the un curtain itself came in june john mccain really john crush hold on to call john d. Tony in his hold that thought were going to go to a short break and after that short break well continue our discussion on the fall of the berlin wall stay with me. Nobody wants to look at the wildfires and say the obvious number one the taxes are being misused and theyre not being adequately distributed to where they are needed on the infrastructure side because theres a government failure number 2 Climate Change regardless of whether you believe its happening or not the damage that is going to be applied to your pocketbook that you will pay for Climate Change whether you believe it or not you know its still the price is still there. Today there are good tennis and bad debt its the bad news in yemen the United States deems to be a threat the good those who work in syria the cia and the u. S. Military were engaged in covert actions really throughout the world. Where they were assassinating populist leaders they were backing up the right way military funding an army just was theres no. More because theres always a small. Really good. Profit. Welcome back to crossfire where our things are considered im Peter Lavelle to remind you were discussing the fall of the berlin wall 30 years ago. Ok john i had to go to a hard break there are you more back and would you like to finish your point go ahead so what i was saying was that the fall of the berlin wall obviously physically symbolized the reunification of germany in the liberation of the nations of Central Europe but what it really was if you like even more so than the collapse of a physical barrier was the collapse of communism itself as a governing ideology and as i said earlier we know that the collapse of that ideology ended up in golf in the soviet union itself what this collapse allowed western liberals to do is to do what trotsky originally did back in the in 1920 s. Which was to prevent soviet communism as purely an expression of russian imperialism and nothing else and to make an obstruction if you like of the whole communist ideology the whole marxist ideology which they the todays liberals the intellectuals who in the in the cold war in western europe and the United States had supported lets never forget that marxism was extremely alive and well in western universities throughout the entire period of the cold war still were now with a sort of revisionist leisure demo its now presented it still is its now print the berlin wall of the collapse of the berlin wall is now presented as nothing but the collapse of a russian empire when in fact it was the collapse of a marxist ideological empire and that to me is the is the most important thing that we must remember i think the critical years later errol do our reflect upon that thats very interesting. Id like to. Go ahead and i agree. I agree that the. It was the collapse of the communist idea and thats absolutely right i remember these discussions in east berlin in 199991 people discuss the 3rd way and whether the world of of there were formal tentative and then there was a very powerful mind that the 3rd way is just a way into the 3rd world its a way to backwardness and you had a model of yugoslavia that which was obviously not soviet style communism and in some ways it was held up as an example of how you can do reform but yugoslavia fame of this miserable it is the soviet experiment failed but then it also was i think you have to think of that also historically that this is the result of 145. 00 and so if you think of what happens in poland what happens in hungary what happens in czechoslovakia its the result of soviet power and the story of communism in in poland or hungary is not simply a nature of movement this is taken over. Because of the military presence of the soviet union jeff we have a time delay im sorry for that let me lets go to jeff now we go to jeff. Yeah. Peter im a bit surprised the extent to which you buy into the western liberal triumph of this narrative is im not im a plotline not you still there is no no no theres actually a well let me finish my but thats actually existing socialism is either one thing or the other then you actually cant explain what happened in 1909 because the reform the impetus which i each kind from weave in common dismissals. And from from from something. You know you talk about you know the end of the communist idea well people said that in relation to china i mean what they will society in 1990 was that china will be next chinese commies in the full was not the case we still have a communist regime in china dont we and we have a situation where the people are talking about china becoming the most powerful actor in the little so how does that fit in with this kind of like triumphalist you know to try out the place where they listen and you have to write a letter you come and i think ok i would i would like i would love a answer that i have to tell you heidi on hang on here id love to answer that but i want to hear my guess 1st because i have a bone to pick with you jeff but im going to go to harold 1st go ahead. So i mean i think if you think of what to what happened in china of course its its a communist party in china but whats happened is a completely different kind of evolution than the evolution of the soviet union and an adoption since the early 1980 s. Of market principles. And so the really the creation of a tremendous find dynamism that comes from the. Liberation of people in the economic sphere so theres a lot of Economic Freedom obviously on the political side theres a one party state but in in terms of economic dynamism thats where it comes from it doesnt come from old style Central Planning and in the soviet model ok well let me go to john here and i kind of want to address what jeff had to say here because i hate to. I could just get very quick just get here very quickly can i just get in very quickly peter one quick point one quick point yes what im trying to get away from here is just kind of what i can essentially is kind of view of history what happened was a matter of historical contingency what only so all kinds of different outcomes are possible and we can see that now because of the time everyones saying no to transfer of the west front of liberalism democracy would we say thats the case now that i do not i am not i said just now is that we democrats now we want what are you with us are you saying history into the year ok let me go to john here and i think it will an