He says though his views will take another context. Good morning life martin snowshoes made you sent here moscow is kevin with you for this 30 minute world news update just 10 10 in the morning here now 1st and the u. K. Government has challenged the court of appeal decision to hold ourselves to saudi arabia after it was ruled that the military exports were unlawful last month the court also acknowledged that british arms might be used in the bloody conflict in yemen devastated by that saudi led war there london is now we get to get its weapons trade with riyadh back up to speed in fact its licensed if you look back nearly 5000000000 pounds worth of sales to the saudis since the start of riyadh Bombing Campaign in yemen in 2015 that makes the u. K. The 2nd biggest exported to the gulf after the United States has Kate Partridge has more on pretty. Israel in the conflict the u. K. s government is fighting the court of appeal ruling that arms sales to saudi arabia are norful in the latest challenge in the long running legal battle over weapons used in the yemen war ministers are trying to stay the judgment which means they could carry on licensing arms sales to the saudis until the outcome of its appeal last month the court said the u. K. Export licensing process was wrong in law in one significant respect the government made no concluded assessments of whether the Saudi Led Coalition had committed violations of International Community area law in the past during the yemen conflict and may not tempt to do so trade secretary liam fox was forced to hold an immediate review of almost 5000000000. 00 pounds worth of weapons deals while this latest appeal seems to contradict foxs assurances to m. P. s that saudi arms sales would be halted pending a review as i said earlier we disagree with the judgment and will seek permission to appeal alongside this work carefully considering the implications of the judgment for Decision Making why we do this and partners which might be used in the conflict in yemen Opposition LeaderJeremy Corbyn says the latest efforts to halt the ruling ridicule the governments position that human rights take priority over profit despite clear legal warnings that the sale of arms to saudi arabia has contributed to the worst humanitarian catastrophe in the world the conservatives are determined to allow sales to carry on regardless this makes a mockery of their own commitment to hold all new sales while the review takes place into civilian casualties Human Rights Watch has documented the use of u. K. Made weapons in apparently are lawful airstrikes foreign secretary jeremy hunt says suspending british exports would diminish the u. K. s influence over the course of the conflict but the campaign against arms trade argues the sales have meant british bombs have been used to kill civilians what the government has applied for is. Estie which would mean that if it is granted that the arms exports can continue under the present under the present process this is the same process which the court of appeal has phoned was illegal and if that happens and that means that there will be more arms sales and that means for all did what atrocities committed because for 4 years no u. K. Made fater jets u. K. Made bombs and u. K. Made missiles have played a devastating role in creating the worst humanitarian crisis in the world and yemen is no surprise the government is appealing this paradox because it will do everything it can to maximize arm sales to the saudi regime because for decades and decades to say dictatorship has been the largest buyer in the wilds of u. K. Weapons the Saudi Led Coalition says it wasnt deliberately targeting civilians but thousands have been killed the United Nations says 3300000 yemenis are displaced and at least 2 thirds of the population need help in the long running lethal battle is no end in sight Kate Partridge r. T. London. It seems the issue of segregation in the us is still on the agenda a Music Festival in detroit is being forced to change policy because of a backlash after it charged white people double for tickets organizers said it reflected the White Communities wealth and privilege would help disadvantaged people in the black Community Despite the afro future fest slogan saying equality means treating everyone the same 1st of all charging different prices bees dont race well darn intersectional radicals youve become the very racist you claim to stand against so walk so very walk us through future 1st equality means treating everyone the same also for a future 1st were going to charge people different prices based on their race i wonder how our future Music Festival will charge asians do it be 15. 00 because were non white but privileged. Well the latest is the festivals no cancel the pricing policy following widespread complaints and even threats against the organizers instead theres no suggested donation option for quote normal people of color it said half the proceeds will go to a program that supports young people in detroit the organizers explained the reasons behind the initial ticketing terms. Artist structure was built to ensure that the most marginalized communities people of color are provided with an equitable chance at enjoying events in their own community black detroit affording joint pleasure is unfortunately still a privilege in our society for people of color and we believe everyone should have access to receiving such one of the artists on the bill even pulled out of violent protest of the ticketing policy i was immediately enraged just because i am bi racial i have family members that would have under those circumstances been subjected to something that i would not ever want them to be in its nonprogressive and its not solution focused in my eyes. Well attorney and author resurface and supports the organizers but on this side of this conservative social commentator brian logan says it simply racist. Well i cant really tell was going on here it seems like a one hand they dont want white people to come but on the other hand they want to text him they want to charge do more money they let people for this is a so you dont want to be here but you want your money i dont really understand what you have are people who are local to the Detroit Community who may have been under server economic minorities and theyre seeing an influx of money and wealth into their community that theyre not necessarily always able to participate in and so when you have this organizer seeking to put together and a vent to benefit these underserved communities what shes saying is this is for the native people of this community what if it were in hispanic event lets say it was an hispanic Music Festival and they say hey anybody to c. Span and youre able to pay x. Amount of dollars if youre not hispanic including black folks you got to pay more so to make you use a black person pay more to go to their viewing with the races yes or no so if they say that you cant come ratings are going to ability to exclude people if they say it is a it is you cant come at all because you blake wouldnt be racist is that he is i mean im trying to figure out yes or no i would iraqis definition. So you say yes ok that would be raised that way. Now if a black person did it to a white person how would it be would at the races well if it were white people and the shoe was on the other foot then it doesnt really make sense because we know in our day how about if you spend your understanding as to when black people actually have that type of control again its discriminatory its a its a practice where you are setting a bear a boundary a barrier but is it preventing someone from receiving an economic benefit now but if it were the other way around if it were a white it was a curse Music Festival in any way why you go to pay double to secure brace what would the reaction be your races you neo nazi k. K. K. Obvious and maybe what were looking at right now is a young lady looking through the lens of history and deciding that its important for us as a people to began to fix the issue from the lens of equity versus equality. A different story next become a tide a leading Us Democratic president ial candidate joe biden is defending himself after coming under a barrage of friendly fire from his own party they claim hes been too sympathetic towards racial segregation in the past the issue was raised late last month during the 1st Democratic Party debate ahead of the 2020 president ial election biden went on to hail the good old days he was able to reach a compromise even with his strongest rivals like pro segregation congressman during the debate party diehards criticized him for even having dialogue with such people in the 1st place now for apologizing for his remarks biden then mentioned the words were taken out of context. Did you see the questions about your past positions from the perspective of race being as relevant as they are no no i think theyre relevant because the taken out of context and so easy to go back and go back 304050 years and take a context and take it completely out of context nonetheless throw to merican history the democrat was proven to be pro integration is kellam open explains. Joe biden the current front runner in the democratic president ial race has come forward to apologize about statements he made about working with advocates of racial segregation i regret it. And im sorry for any of the pain or misconception i may have caused him but earlier joe biden made statements about his previous work with segregationists he was almost saying he got things done with some civility now his apology comes as his rivals have been taking him to task over his record i dont think you have to be holding a personal relationship with people who will very brutal oh a segregationist it was hurtful. To hear you talk about the reputations of 2 United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country now joe biden is still in the lead despite the scandal however it seems to have unearthed a strange reality in american politics the Democratic Party the party that brought us the 1st africanamerican president has a rather strange record when it comes to the issue of racism when senator robert byrd of West Virginia died barack obama gave him a stirring eulogy he was sent and i come he was a party leader he was an elder statesman and he was my friend. Thats all remember him prior to becoming a u. S. Senator robert byrd had been a high Ranking Member of the ku klux klan afterwards he repudiation the views of the hate group but prior to that he had some strong views when it came to the issue of race of a fight in the armed forces with a negro bomb i saw id rather i should die a 1000 times and see old glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again than to see this beloved london vase become degraded by race mongrels a throwback to the blocky specimen from the wilds bill clinton who was wildly popular among africanamericans gave a eulogy when he was president for j. William fulbright another democrat we come to celebrated. For the remarkable life of j. William fulbright. A life that changed our country. And our world for ever and for the better well the glowing words left out the fact that fulbright was a big advocate of keeping black and white children in separate schools back in the 1960 s. When john f. Kennedy and the northern Democratic Party organizations located in urban areas were pushing for racial integration the biggest pushback didnt come from republicans it came from the dix occur. As a Splinter Group within their own party in 1968 George Wallace the democratic governor of alabama was so outraged to see anti racism become the dominant view within his own party that he ran as a 3rd Party Candidate then you ought to come on down to alabama we did you some low down there oh you know you are. Right now it would seem that a democrat having such an agenda would be almost unbelievable in fact m s n b c mislabeled George Wallace as a republican check it out governor George Wallace stood outside the university of alabama personally blocking 2 black students from unrolling their. Sure joe biden has come forward and apologized for his statements on racial matters but it seems like the country has forgotten that not so long ago his entire party had the same issue after the civil war was the Democratic Party that was the races it was the Republican Party that was different the republicans ran the slavery lincoln was republican the slavery it she changed the dixiecrats after segregation after the civil war they were the races everything was a mess weve had president S Supreme Court justices who were members of the klan some of them had to do that to join the ku klux klan for political reasons i dont understand why this now with biden this is an inside baseball inside the bubble issue. After receiving Death Threats to movie theaters in canada have canceled showing the antiabortion movie unplanned. Management personal information has been spread through social media and theyre getting threats to watch sandbags we feel any movie is not worth feeling unsafe on the streets in canada to cinemas have fled showing unplanned for fear of lives we will still be shown in numerous other locations nearby and are grateful to canadian enforcement for investigating the terrorist threats unplanned is the story of antiabortion activist abby johnson for 8 years she was the director of the planned parenthood clinic but then she switched to a prolife position after seeing a doctor perform an abortion. You know is the thing that is twisting it. Became in the souls of these hundreds of children. The film was made in the u. S. And jude was controversial content experience problems getting screened in canada initially but after more than 5000 people signed a petition movie theaters eventually agreed while some are still convinced it shouldnt be show. The american film and planned soon to be screened in a few canadian theaters is a dangerous piece of antiabortion propaganda it preaches an absolutist an extreme case against abortion that has nothing to do with reality t. V. And radio host karen turk thinks the canadian government has to treat the activists the same way as any other extremist group. I feel like the cinema really and have a choice but to pull the movie and i think its really unfortunate that they had to give in to these far left protestors and that you know their general manager with the right and i dont really understand why weve allowed this to get so out of control stead of in the past they would call themselves prochoice the new narrative of these far left is to call themselves pro abortion and i dont know why we would ever say we are for abortion i think that the critique and government really has to take a proactive approach with this i think its very easy when there is problems on the far right its very easy we label neo nazis and we go after them really really really village it lay but when it comes to far left groups in the past they really have not been handled the same way and it seems that now they are spiraling out of control with the same amount of violence and some civil and most of time high the things said watching in the stories ahead an alumna case because facebook and austrian privacy activists stands up to the social media giant to try to safeguard the data previously of european citizens reach the borders one monkey was ahead of me given oh in good morning. And you try and be professional you try and leave it outside the door you try and put it in the coming compartment and as its new bright and so you can forget about it but little by little these. These different whispers come and for me it was actually putting some only 6 into my wifes johnson june and to play the song on the sound of an ice cream to the grass reminded me of how we can go to school in bali which was with banks of supermarkets our ice. But you should. Put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. So when you want to be president and you. Want to be thats. What you going to be this is what the 3 of them will be good. Interested in the why. Should. Facebook goes head to head with an austrian previously activist tuesday in europes top court marks rems claims the social media platform does not sufficiently protect the danger of a huge citizens when it shipped across the atlantic the last case but at stake the legality of socalled standard contractual clauses complex legal mechanisms that allow companies to move data freely from europe all over the world firms use these to transfer Digital Information between their various hubs worldwide ceramicist to argue it runs against you previously rules as it allows Us National Security agencies for example extensive access to europeans digital data susan Australian Law Student previously brought a data sharing deal worth billions between europe and the United States crushing debt you may recall back in 2050 he successfully fought against european privacy rules called safe dont court has got the latest a legal struggle over whats known as the e. U. U. S. Privacy shield is being considered in europes top Justice Court its looking into complaints that data transfers may not be compatible with the wall due to mass surveillance programs in the United States it was an issue picked up by whistleblower Edward Snowden now a