comparemela.com
Home
Live Updates
[EPF ACT] S.14 B Does Not Mandate Imposition Of 100 % Damage
[EPF ACT] S.14 B Does Not Mandate Imposition Of 100 % Damage
[EPF ACT] S.14 B Does Not Mandate Imposition Of 100 % Damages On Employer As Penalty: Kerala High Court Upholds Order Reducing Penalty To 50%
The Kerala High Court has upheld the order of a Central Government Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court (Tribunal) which reduced the amount of damages from 100% to 50% stating that Section 14-B of the...
Related Keywords
India ,
Jalpaiguri ,
West Bengal ,
Athul Babu ,
Pranoyk Kottaram ,
Justice Gopinath ,
Shriram Mutual Fund ,
Regional Provident Fund ,
Union Of India ,
Employee State Insurance Corporation ,
Supreme Court ,
High Court ,
Apex Court ,
Mcleod Russel India ,
Central Board ,
Employees Provident Fund ,
Mcleod Russel India Limited ,
Provident Fund Commissioner ,
Mutual Fund ,
Textile Processors ,
Advocates Athul Babu ,
Kerala High Court ,
Erala Hc ,
Ection 14 B ,
Provident Fund ,
Justice Gopinath P ,