comparemela.com
Home
Live Updates
Non-Obstante Clause In S. 109A(3) Of Companies Act 1956 Doesnt Exclude Legal Heir From Claiming Securities Against Nominee: Supreme Court : comparemela.com
Non-Obstante Clause In S. 109A(3) Of Companies Act 1956 Doesn't Exclude Legal Heir From Claiming Securities Against Nominee: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that the non-obstante clause in both Section 109A(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 & Bye-law 9.11.7 of the Depositories Act, 1996, does not exclude the legal heirs from their...
Related Keywords
Bombay ,
Maharashtra ,
India ,
Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar ,
Justice Hrishikesh Roy ,
Abhimanyu Bhandari ,
Shakti Yezdani Anr ,
Harsha Nitin Kokate ,
Aniruddhaa Joshi ,
Justice Pankaj Mithal ,
Jayant Shivram Salgaonkar ,
High Court ,
Division Bench Of High Court ,
Supreme Court ,
Companies Amendment ,
Saraswat Bank Ltd ,
Bombay High Court ,
Companies Act ,
Depositories Act ,
Saraswat Co Operative Bank Ltd ,
Single Judge ,
Division Bench ,
Single Bench ,
Shakti Yezdani ,
Rohit Anil Rathi ,
Egal Heirs Rights Over Securities ,
On Obstante Clause Interpretation ,
Ecurities Ownership And Nominee Dispute ,
Upreme Court Ruling On Nominee And Legal Heirs ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.