Transcripts For MSNBCW Ana 20240703

Happy friday, it is 10 00 eastern. Im Ana Cabrera Reporting from new york, and Donald Trumps Hush Money Trial just resuming this morning with a former Trump White House aide facing cross examination. Madeleine westerhout back on the stand, shes testified about trump signing checks and Michael Cohen visiting the white house. And speaking of cohen, we just learned that the prosecutions star witness will take the stand on monday. Nbcs Vaughn Hillyard is outside the courthouse for us. Also with us our legal panel for the hour White Collar Defense Attorney and former federal prosecutor sarah krisoff, and criminal defense attorney bernard via low na. Vaughn, catch us up. Whats happening inside that courtroom this morning . Reporter hey, good morning, ana. Madeleine westerhout who was the trump Executive Assistant inside of the white house for his first two and a half years there is currently testifying Under Cross Examination by Susan Necheles. Theyre currently looking at an email in which a former personnel aide, personal assistant to donald trump in the white house emailed with Madeleine Westerhout and rhona graff over the mailing of personal checks that donald trump would have sent to him from new york and the Trump Organization, and this individual, john mcentee requesting that they be sent to a personal address. This is part of Madeleine Westerhout here making it clear that in her role, in her capacity in which she was the one who was executing and bringing these actual checks to donald trump to be signed, essentially she is one of these individuals who is helping fill out the chain of custody that the prosecution needs to bring forward to the jury about how donald trump went about sending those reimbursement checks back to Michael Cohen. Of course you said it, though, the marquee witness that were waiting for, Michael Cohen expected to testify on monday, which would lead us to believe that several additional witnesses could very well be brought up to come testify before this jury here to round out the prosecutions list of witnesses before the defense following Michael Cohens several days of testimony brings forward their own witnesses in defense of donald trump, their defendant. So vaughn on that news about cohe taking the stand on monday, was that timing a surprise for anyone there at the courthouse . Reporter you know, the prosecution several days ago indicated that they had the expectation that they would need to have Questioning Take place for about two more weeks, which would have taken us to the end of next week or early the week thereafter. And so with Michael Cohen expected to take several days, we expect not only the prosecution asking questions but then cross examination, redirect, and more cross examination. We expect him to potentially take up the entire week. So of course the expectation when were asking the question how much longer does this trial go on, its outstanding. We dont know exactly how long the defense intends to bring forward witnesses. Of course the question is whether donald trump would testify himself. Stand by and keep us posted on whats happening inside the courtroom, of course. Lets start where we left off there, cohen taking the stand. He is expected to be perhaps the star witness. Hes the one who completes the story from start to finish. What does it tell you, if he takes the stand monday, does that mean were near the end . Very. What the prosecution was doing was building up the story, building up from the beginning to the end and also corroborating Michael Cohen as much as they could before calling Michael Cohen to the stand. I expected Michael Cohen to be called as one of the last witnesses. I dont think hes going to be the exactly last witness because you dont want to end with Michael Cohen because we all know hes very problematic, so theyll probably have a witness or two after Michael Cohen. Michael cohen, thats the person that weve been waiting for and thats going to give us crucial testimony, crucial evidence and connect that tie between the payments and donald trump and how that was actually arranged without having Allen Weisselberg coming to testify. All right, because weisselberg was sort of the middleman as far as weve been told based on Witness Testimony so far. Cohens going to be taking the stand after weve heard over and over again prosecution talking to witnesses and already kind of getting out in front on credibility issues. Then weve also heard the Defense Attorneys in their cross examination attacking cohen through, you know, the current testimony weve already had. How does that impact his own testimony . So Michael Cohens not going to know what happened in the courtroom, so his testimony is sort of independent from these witnesses, in his head, right . But the prosecution has done here is sort of laid this Foundation Brick by brick of corroborating Michael Cohens testimony even before he takes the stand. He has a lot of baggage. Theres no question about that. The defense team is going to have fun with this. There is a lot to do there on cross examination, and so the prosecution just really wants to buttress him as much as possible before he testifies. You said he wouldnt know whats already come out in testimony. Is that because they were instructed to make sure witnesses arent paying attention to the news . Yeah, thats right. Essentially its important really that each witness in a criminal trial such as this is independent and theyre not influenced by the testimony that happens before them. Theyre isolated. Theyre not supposed to learn anything about other witnesses at the trial. There are some oftentimes witnesses are allowed to be in the courtroom after they testify or learn about what happens after they testify, but even sometimes that is restricted as well. Lets go back in to whats happening right now inside this courtroom and i want to take a look at the testimony with Madeleine Westerhout, vaughn kind of laid the groundwork for her testimony so far. She began her testimony yesterday. Right now Donald Trumps attorney continues with cross examination asking westerhout, you would leave any items for President Trump on his desk . Westerhout, yes. And he would sign checks, and you said he signed a tremendous amount of items . Westerhout, yes. Necheles, proclamations . Yes, commands, proclamations, letters. Necheles, he felt if someone was getting his signature they believed his real signature, westerhout, yes, this was between other things he was doing and did you see him i signing things like checks without reviewing them . Westerhout, yes. Necheles sign checks like meeting with top foreign leaders or meeting with you. Yes. Other times he was meeting with you, westerhout, no yeah. He could multitask . Westerhout, yes. So im curious, first, ber nar da, what do you think theyre trying to get at here . Theyre trying to say donald trump hes so busy being the leader of this new world, he wasnt really paying attention to what he was signing. He wasnt focusing on those invoices and the checks that Trump Organization has sent over for him to sign. He was busy trying to run the country, so trying to distance him as as much as possible from these invoices and from these checks, but the big question that he cant run from is that those checks were from his personal account, and it had his signature. So this is the best the defense can do is try to create some confusion into when donald trump signed these checks. I want to bring in veteran Trial Attorney Paul Henderson joining the conversation as well. So, paul, as westerhout continues her testimony, she follows Stormy Daniels who was more confrontational on the stand with Donald Trumps attorneys and you could say vice versa, Donald Trumps attorney was more confrontational certainly with her than were seeing with Madeleine Westerhout. Madeleine westerhout is somebody whos been very friendly to trump. She comes on, has expressed affection for trump, called him a really good boss, talked about writing a book, and how she wanted to make sure his story was out there. She thought he had been treated unfairly in materials of the public eye. I think they wanted to make it clear for the audience and jury that she knew and liked him. That her testimony is more credible because of that, and the key i think in bringing her on the stand and having her give that testimony about how close she was to the president , how much she liked the president makes what she has to say more true. That he actually had a reaction about Stormy Daniels and having to write a check for her. And heres why thats important because thats the linchpin of what he knew or should have known personally about what was going on. Hes not going to be its not going to be as easy for him to say, listen, i signed a lot of checks. I signed a lot of documents. I do multitask, i did Pay Attention to that check. I was upset, visibly upset about the payments associated with Stormy Daniels. Thats why her testimony was so important. I think its very good for the prosecution and it completes the narrative of how much of an impact Stormy Daniels was on him and how much he was trying to pay her to not tell the story that we all heard in court this week. So that was a good prosecution witness and tells a narrative that i think is really important and ties donald trump to a personal understanding and reaction to having intentionality about what he was doing while he was signing his personal check. But does she also help the defense in sort of being a Character Witness for donald trump in a sense . I dont think in a strong way. You think her getting up there and saying that hes a good guy, that she liked the family, that she had made mistakes, that she really likes him, supports him and believes in his leadership, that has nothing to do with the case. I think its a throwaway. I dont think it gave the defense very much at all other than she is a credible witness and she may be open to saying nice things about him, but the reality of it is, the purpose of putting her on the stand in the first place is to show she had intimate familiarity with the president , specifically about this transaction, and she can testify specifically that he knew, understood, and reacted to what he was doing and that goes to his understanding about what he was doing and thats a point for the prosecution. Thats why they have her on immediately after Stormy Daniels and makes her a good witness for the prosecution. Vaughn, take us inside that courtroom, and maybe provide some of the color. What is her demeanor like on the stand . Are we getting any reporting on trumps demeanor or how the jurors are reacting to her testimony . Reporter our colleague Katherine Doyle is saying at this point and juncture Under Cross Examination from Susan Necheles Madeleine Westerhout appears to be more uncomfortable answering some of the procedural questions that are being presented to her about exactly how they would mail private correspondence to donald trump from within the white house, and why a p. O. Box was set up and then why did they use fedex . Was that common inside of previous white houses, and Madeleine Westerhout is sort of outlining that they were new to this and they were figuring out how to be responsive to private conversations that donald trump wanted to be engaged in and not only he had a lot of obligations inside the white house, but she is answering the questions also about the decisions, for instance, Picture Frames with framed photos of the family are being discussed, in which she was talking with rhona graff over email about approving the expense for the photo because donald trump was busy, and that they didnt feel like they needed to go directly to him for that approval, but also that she just testified that there are some situations in which he would sign things without looking at what he was exactly signing, which is counter to, of course, shes answering these questions Under Cross Examination but Donald Trumps own attorney. That runs counter to micromanaging the type of framing the prosecution has attempted to lay out for the jurors with other individuals who have previously testified in front of this jury. Okay. So lets go back into the testimony and im told redirect is just about to get underway just before redirect, this is how the defense left it with the cross examination. Necheles asks westerhout, you were in the white house when there was a story about Stormy Daniels and you were working with him. Westerhout says yes. Necheles, con voe with trump about Stormy Daniels, westerhout that he was very upset by it. My understanding is that he knew it would be hurtful to his family. The whole situation was very unpleasant. Necheles, that was based on what he said to you. Westerhout, i dont know if he specifically said that. Necheles, no further questions. So ending there, sarah, whats the strategy, and what she said, was that a big win for the defense that he was worried about his family . That was a good spot for the defense to end, right . They made a good point. She sat down and didnt ask further questions to try to, you know, get some further admissions out of the witness, but it was a strong place for her to end. I think that the defense has sort of done what they need to do here. I think there probably is a tension with the Defense Attorneys and trump here, trump wants some sort of big moments on cross examination, some big wins. He can you know, that will be talked about in the press. The defense is really trying to chip away at these witnesses, really undermine the prosecutions case bit by bit so they can stand up at the end and say theres reasonable doubt. Bernarda, speaking of family, we know that trump perked up in the courtroom yesterday when westerhout was testifying about his relationship with his wife melania, and she talked about how trump would say, honey, come to the window so that i can wave at you, im paraphrasing this when he was beat at the oval office. Up until now we were just coming off the testimony are from Stormy Daniels who was talking about an extramarital sexual encounter and hadnt heard much about his relationship with his wife, right . What impact do you see that testimony having in this trial . So its twofold. So in terms of what the defense was trying to do is that theyre trying to combat all the storm that Stormy Daniels brought in with her testimony, damaging to his credibility, to his persona, to how he treats women. So with this woman testifying, mr. Westerhout who actually worked with donald trump for at least two years try to bring some friendly face to the courtroom, a friendly face that donald trump knows to calm him down, but also to try to portray him as hes a nice man. Hes a nice leader. Hes a great manager. So to contradict what Stormy Daniels was saying. Also, to go to say that, look, in terms of what donald trump was concerned of during this hush money stage, he was concerned for his family Ab Melania Finding Out and theyre trying to drive that as maybe that was the focus in trying to maybe pay Stormy Daniels off, and it one that it was the focus, the payment for the Campaign Itself to affect the campaign. Again, when it comes to the charges, if you cant tie this payment to concealing a crime of affecting the Campaign Itself, you cant get a conviction. Putting those seeds to the jury. It just takes one juror to believe it was more for his family. Let me take you into the redirect that were seeing unfold right now inside this courtroom, so now the prosecutor who is questioning her is rebecca man gold, the defense asked you about the method of sending checks to the white house,westerhout, yes. It just made it faster. It was just mangolds way of getting him to things faster. I think theres a typo in our document here again. Bear with me folks at home since this is a Working Document coming from the courtroom. You didnt meet trump until after the election . Westerhout, yes, in november 2016. Didnt spend a significant amount of time with him until january of 2017, so after he was already in the white house. Mangold asked were you on a different floor than mr. Trump in trump tower . Westerhout, yes. Ms. Necheles didnt ask you if youd spoken to her before, westerhout, i have, once, i spoke with her two nights ago wednesday night. Mangold asking about access Hollywood Tape came out in 2016. You did not meet mr. Trump until november . Westerhout, yes, and she didnt spend a significant amount of time she says. Westerhout saying no firsthand knowledge of trump reacting to the access Hollywood Tape fallout. Paul, youre hearing this redirect, what is the strategy with this redirect, and by the way, ill note westerhout just stepped off the Witness Stand, so well wait to see who is the next person called. I think it was a fantastic strategy. See how they planted the seed that because she is so friendly with trump, they also show to the jury that she has been in communication with the defense, and one of the strategies and this goes back to your earlier question about what it means that she likes the president , that she testified that she supports him and wishes well for him and his family, that strategy prevents the defense from really attacking her to undermine the credibility of the story and the narrative that she says when she talks about how the president operated, how he everybody though hes a billionaire was paying attention to this specific payment that he knew about it, understood the Transactions Associated with his personal money in reaction to Stormy Daniels trying not to have the story told that we just heard because shes friendly with trump, that really prevented the Defense Attorneys from coming in and really attacking her as someone that was less credible that had an agenda because her agenda was not to destroy the president , and that makes her testimony more credible. I thought this was a great cross, recross exam from the prosecution not to open up too many more issues but to leave an issue with a question and answer from the jury to indicate that the defense had actually had access to her. That makes her testimony more credible rather than less, and i think it was a job well done. Vaughn, do we know anything more about her communication with trumps Defense Attorneys. Reporter right, it was just revealed under questioning by the prosecution the extent to which she had engaged before today with the Defense Attorneys for donald trump, and she acknowledged here from the Witness Stand that she had a onehour zoom with Susan Necheles on wednesday night. Now, this is sort of the oddity, you could say of some of these witnesses that were chosen to be brought forward by the prosecution because the d. A. s office also met for three hours with Madeleine Westerhout. These are opportunities for both sides to meet with these witnesses at their will to have a better understanding of exactly how they may answer some specific questions in the line of questioning that they would want to present directly to westerhout once shes in that chair in front of the jury here. And so you could call her a friendly witness to trump. She is currently working for robert obrien, the former National Security adviser, his consulting firm. At the same time, it was the decision of the prosecution to bring her on the Witness Stand, so somebody like a Madeleine Westerhout is sort of a perfect profile of an individual that both sides feel that they were able to get some string of to build their case and ultimately towards the culmination of this trial. Okay, and the next witness they just called is daniel dixon, were learning hes from broward county, florida, he works as an Appliance Analyst for a Telecom Company and hes there to apparently authenticate Phone Records. Well keep an eye on his testimony. I want to bring in political White House Reporter eli stokols who covered the white house during the Trump Administration as well as his 2016 campaign. I want to ask you about the person who was just on the stand, Madeleine Westerhout who sat right outside the oval office, controlled a lot of the communications for then President Trump, talked about the checks that he would sign, his micromanagement style, his ability to multitask, she said, and all the rules that he had for everything from Oxford Commas in his tweets to the sharpies he preferred for signing documents, and she found that he always knew where things were. He paid close attention to spending. Made calls late into the night. How does all of her testimony square with your reporting on how trump ran the white house . And anything in particular that stands out to you . Ana, thanks for having me. I think the picture she paint ed is probably a pretty accurate one. I saw in some of the courtroom sketches, the poster board of the oval office. She was right outside, and the west wing proximity to the oval is power. She spent so much time around the president being summoned by the president whenever he needed something, and obviously the reason shes porn here is because she was the Connection Point when things were happening on the outside and they needed to get to donald trump to sign a check or he needed to be aware of something, or they were setting things up surreptitiously on the outside she was the intermediary, she was the one connecting him with Michael Cohen or other people on the outside, setting up meetings. Shes obviously critical to the prosecutions case in that sense, and i think that, you know, donald trump is a fairly particular boss, right . He likes things a certain way. When he wants a diet coke, aides know they better get him that diet coke right away. They are familiar with how he would bounce from one activity to the next. How he would get upset about something he would see on the television in the Executive Dining Room on the other side of the oval and would want his phone or want to tweet about it or want to send out a statement. When he wanted to see someone in his office, they needed to be in there quickly. It would be people like Madeleine Westerhout who would be out there trying to summon those people and get them into the oval. She was very close to the president and had a really clear understanding of the way that the Trump White House operated. There were a lot of people coming in and out of that oval at certain points. There was a lot of chaos. There were a lot of controversies swirling around the president at that time. He was struggling to find a new chief of staff. There was consternation on the hill, the Mueller Investigation was going. There were a lot of stress point and she was sort of his first person first person he would go to when he needed something, wanted something, so she was right in the middle of all of it. You had some fascinating reporting in 2018 about how trump responded to the reporting of the Hush Money Payments at that time. You wrote for the l. A. Times, Trump Is Loathe to admit any fault when forced to confront his previously false statements. Instead, he responds like a retreating army that refuses to surrender forced out of one fox hole, hes fallen back to another to reposition again and again. And i wonder, you know, fast forward six years or so, almost six years, here we are, and this story coming full circle. What do you think is his next move if hes like that army refusing to surrender . You know, when i would talk to white collar crime, criminologists, people who study this stuff. Its common to see the invincibility among White Collar Criminals. Donald trumps illusion of invisibility, this idea that he can adapt to circumstances, change his own circumstances, and that nothing will ever really get to him is nothing like anything from any White Collar Criminal they have ever seen. Donald trump faces a lot of different counts in a lot of Different Cases here, and he is still, you see it every day,ing talking to the cameras, responding in the moment. He is living in this constant present. Not worrying about what he said ten seconds ago or ten days ago or three years ago. Worrying about right now, always communicating and changing his story, and hes not going to be shamed by the fact that that story doesnt line up with what he said before. I have been thought about some of this stuff in a while, looking through that at first when he was asked about the payments when Michael Cohen was pleading guilty, at first he denied knowing anything about any payments to Michael Cohen. Sort of dismissed this on Air Force One when he was questioned about it. Then more facts came out, trump changed his story he said, well, those were just legal payments. It had nothing to do with any of this. Ultimately he said we dont anything illegal. You could see him kind of reacting in realtime because his strategy is always a political or Public Relations strategy more than a legal strategy. It has always been the case with donald trump that thats how he sees things. I think its still the way hes operating in this trial. A lot of his defense and the reason hes violating this gag order is because he feels the need to communicate with the public to make sure that they its his hope that they see this trial as politically motivated and that they are dismissive of what they are hearing about taking place in the courtroom. I really appreciate your insights. Thanks so much for joining us. And everyone stay with me, up next were breaking down new updates from that manhattan courthouse, the witness on the stand now there to authenticate Phone Records. Were back with our panel after a very short break. My name is david. Ive been a pharmacist for 44 years. When i have customers come in and ask for something for memory, i recommend prevagen. Number one, because its effective. Does not require a prescription. And ive been taking it quite a while myself and i know it works. And i love it when the customers come back in and tell me, david, that really works so good for me. Makes my day. Prevagen. At stores everywhere without a prescription. When migraine strikes youre faced with a choice. Ride it out with the tradeoffs of treating . Or push through the pain and symptoms . With ubrelvy, theres another option. One dose works fast to eliminate Migraine Pain treat it anytime, anywhere. Without worrying where you are or if its too late. Do not take with strong cyp3a4 inhibitors. Allergic reactions to ubrelvy can happen. Most common side effects were nausea and sleepiness. Migraine pain relief starts with u. Ask about ubrelvy. Learn how abbvie could help you save. Today, at americas beverage companies,. Our bottles might still look the same. But they can be remade in a whole new way. Thanks to you. Were getting bottles back. And weve developed a way to make new ones from 100 recycled plastic. New bottles made using no new plastic. Youll be seeing more of these bottles in more places. And when we get more of them back. We can use less new plastic. See how our bottles are made to be remade. healthiers not something that happens all alone it takes greg and lydia, and josie on the phone. Its grammy getting checked on in her favorite chair. Or dolling herself up to go handle all of her care. With doctors to nurses and all the people in between healthier happens in more ways than rays ever seen. Healthier happens together. A slow network is no network for business. Thats why more choose Comcast Business. And now, were introducing ultimate speed for business our fastest plans yet. Were up to 12 times faster than verizon, at t, and tmobile. And existing customers could even get up to triple the speeds. At no additional cost. Its ultimate speed for ultimate business. Dont miss out on our fastest speed plans yet switch to Comcast Business and get started for 49. 99 a month. Plus, ask how to get up to an 800 prepaid card. Call today welcome back. As we continue our breaking News Coverage of Donald Trumps Hush Money Trial where right now an at t employee is on the stand to authenticate Phone Records. And back with us is nbcs Vaughn Hillyard at the courthouse. Vaughn, take us inside that courtroom. What are the questions prosecutors are asking to this witness . Reporter right, its that at t employee daniel dixons lucky day. He gets to go in front of donald trump and testify to Phone Records and bring them in as evidence in front of this jury. They are looking currently at six at t customers phones, but also theyre able to enter into evidence 11 other phony information because of the use of at t Cellular Towers here. One of those phones was Michael Cohens primary phone. We are going to be seeing those Text Messages, some that have already been brought forward. The Text Messages between the likes of Keith Davidson and dylan howard of the National Enquirer and Michael Cohen. So some of these messages were we should wholly expect to be brought forward before this jury when Michael Cohen himself takes the stand this upcoming monday. Stay close, please, and lets bring back our legal panel, sarah krissoff, Bernarda Villalona and Paul Henderson. Whats the point of this line of questioning . It might be a little dry for the jury, but frankly the trial has been pretty entertaining so far so a few bits of dry evidence arent going to be a problem. But its really, again, to corroborate the testimony of the other witnesses. Michael cohens going to talk about communications he had, calls he had, Text Messages he had, and then the prosecution is going to stand up at the end of this and say, you know why you can believe Michael Cohen . Because its right here in the Text Messages. You were surprised they didnt save this guy for after Michael Cohen, why . This would be a good witness to put after Michael Cohen. It would corroborate him, and theres not a lot of cross examination to do with this guy. Its dry. Its simple. Theres some cross examination you would do, information about sort of you dont know what was said on the calls, the records dont show the content or anything like that, but it would have been sort of i think a nice sort of simple place to end or probably not your last witness but close to the end. And bernarda, of course with it being cohens Phone Records and Text Messages and emails that are being looked at here, right . Weve got emails and communications with david pecker, with dylan howard, the other guy from the American Media company as well as Keith Davidson who is Stormy Daniels attorney at the time of this Hush Money Deal that went on, obviously this is stuff theyre going to be picking apart with Michael Cohen, no . Absolutely. So in terms of daniel dixon testifying, hes going to bring in the Phone Records. But remember that theres already been testimony about the calls that is Michael Cohen made before and after he set up this Shell Compan Ask Made Payments to Stormy Daniels attorney. All of that is corroboration for what we expect them to testify and what you already heard before. In terms of this witness himself, hes not going to testify as to the contents themselves or the Text Messages, but merely that these calls were made and putting all the records into evidence and so then the prosecution at the end at Closing Arguments can pick and choose what they want to take out of those records. Thats the great part of putting an entire Business Record into evidence is that you dont have to bother the witness in terms of testifying about every phone call, every text message that was made. Instead you can highlight the ones that are most important and then save some so you can ask other witnesses like Michael Cohen, oh, in your Phone Records, where in your Phone Records did you call donald trump or you made that call, made that meeting. Before you set up the shell company, after you set up the shell company, once you made payment. All of this corroboration, corroboration, corroboration, because we know ichael cohen is a troubled witness. This is moving quickly, its already on to cross examination with this particular witness. Its just about entering these Phone Records and authenticating them. We have seen the defense with other witnesses who had to authenticate or discuss some of the other communications that they handled, the defense tried to call into question their authenticity. Tried to suggest that they could have been manipulated. Yeah, and they have to. They cant let a witness like this go that the prosecution puts on that they just wave away and dont say anything. That validate it is to the jury. They have to say something. They have to do something. What i think is really interesting about putting this witness on the stand right now, i think its a trial strategy move. I think they put him on to be innocuous to lay this foundation because Michael Cohen is going to be so controversial, and because they didnt want to bring him up and put him on as their last witness to open the door for issues that gives the defense the entire weekend to prepare more for what hes going to say. Thats part of the strategy. Thats part of the reason why they chose to put him on to do these phone record validation, which seems pretty innocuous in the context of the big Explosive Testimony weve heard this week, just to not give defense a preview of what Michael Cohen is going to say and to allow them to prepare to have this witness on on friday. Thats what im paying attention to in the courtroom. We know, paul, that cohens already had significant time with prosecutors undergoing witness prep, do you expect hed undergo more of that this weekend . I think most of its been done by now. They pretty much know what Michael Cohen is going to say, and this testimony before he testifies is going to be the validation that we were alluing to earlier where hes going to say specifically and the jurys going to be able to say specifically, oh, yeah, we saw those records. Oh, yeah, we saw how many times they were in communication. I understand his testimony in the context of how frequently they were talking, when they were talking, its going to ta the narrative together because thats what the prosecution is doing. Theyre telling a story, and the jury was leaning in this week listening to the story understanding how salacious it was, understanding how the president responded. Understanding how donald trump was reacting to all of this. Thats exactly what theyre trying to do thats leading us up to next week where were going to Start Connecting dots of how he understood things, what he was trying to do, how he knew and understood about the false narrative that he was trying to present to protect his campaign by paying off this hush money so the story wouldnt come out. Those are the dots that youre going to start see connected by Michael Cohen, which is what makes him so important, thats exactly why they want a fresh week to start, thats why i believe they put on the testimony today friday afternoon with this witness that they have on the stand right now. And right now my understanding is bove, the attorney for donald trump whos doing the cross examination of this Phone Records witness is suggesting that there might have been some pocket dials in the Phone Records mix here. Bernarda, when we think about cohen testifying early next week, as soon as monday is our understanding, what do you see as the potential pitfalls for prosecutors with Michael Cohen . So in terms of having Michael Cohen testify on monday and then a strategic move for him to start off the week, that way youll have him testifying monday, tuesday, unfortunately youll have that wednesday off which im sure prosecutors dont want that because the defense is going to try to have it continued until thursday and have wednesday to prep. When Michael Cohen what the prosecutors have to do, theyre going to have to show this jury the good, the bad and the ugly because they dont want to lose credibility with this jury, so theyre going to try to sell to this jury, look, Michael Cohen is who he is. Theyre not trying to clean him up. Theyre going to bring out his criminal activity that he pled guilty, that he was in jail but also why he was in jail, what he pled guilty and some of the underlying facts to that, subject to judge merchans order as to what they can take out. Remember, Michael Cohen pled guilty having to deal with donald trump. So the jurys not going to be allowed to use that plea and infer guilt on donald trump. In terms also of Michael Cohen, theyre going to set out the complete timeline from the beginning to the end. Theyre going to set up the close relationship Michael Cohen with the campaign and how active he was and how close and trusted he was to donald trump because they have to develop that trust because if you dont develop that trust, then the argument would be to the jury by the defense is that why would he trust why would he trust Michael Cohen to do this . Instead, Michael Cohen was rogue. He acted on his own, not at the direction of donald trump. Donald trump didnt tell him to do that. He just wanted to be in Donald Trumps light and donald trump wasnt aware of that. Also important that theyre going to have to bring out that recorded phone call, the recorded not phone call, Audio Tape Inside where he talks to donald trump about the payment to karen mcdougal. While thats key evidence in this case, theyre going to have to explain, Michael Cohen, why would you record your own client a conversation that you had. Isnt it unethical for you to make this recording . What led you to make this recording . What led you to have that conversation. All of that is going to come out. Michael cohens going to be on that stand for hours, for hours. Possibly days i have a feeling. Definitely days. I hope he can keep his cool, though. You have to keep your cool because you have to be intentional with the answers that you give, and you have to listen to the question. Because in the end, Michael Cohen was an attorney too so he knows how this goes. Thats a good point. Well come back to that, i giggle because i think Michael Cohen is very much a colorful character, and its hard to contain him as weve seen. Hes been out there during this trial saying a lot of things that other legal analysts have said. I would not like that if i were a prosecutor and my witness was doing that. Paul henderson, thank you so much. Sarah and bernarda stay close. Well bring you updates as we get them. From the courtroom to the Campaign Trail, donald trump is going to hold a rally in new jersey tomorrow. Stay with us. Jersey tomorrow. Stay with us so i didnt think i needed swiffer, until, i saw how easily it picked up my hair every time i dried it only takes a minute. Look at that the heavy duty cloths are extra thick, for amazing trap lock. Even for his hair. Wow. And for dust, i love my heavy duty duster. The Fluffy Fibers trap dust on contact, up high and all around without having to lift a thing. Im so hooked. Youll love swiffer. Or your money back nothing dims my light like a migraine. With nurtec odt, i found relief. The only Migraine Medication that helps treat and prevent, all in one. To those with migraine, i see you. For the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura and the preventive treatment of Episodic Migraine in adults. Dont take if allergic to nurtec odt. Allergic reactions can occur, even days after using. Most common side effects were nausea, indigestion, and stomach pain. Its time we all shine. Talk to a Healthcare Provider about nurtec odt from pfizer. Remember when i said we need to screen for colon cancer . Was that after i texted the age to screen was now 45 . [both] because i said cologuard® hey there where did he come from . Yup, with me you can screen at home. Just talk to your provider. [both] well screen with cologuard and do it my way. Cologuard is a oneofakind way to screen for colon cancer thats effective and noninvasive. Its for people 45 at average risk, not high risk. False positive and negative results may occur. Ask your provider for me, cologuard. With the freestyle libre 3 system know your glucose levels. No fingersticks needed. All with the worlds smallest and thinnest sensor. Manage your diabetes with more confidence and lower your a1c. Try it for free at freestylelibre. Us [sfx] water lapping. [sfx] water splashing. [sfx] ambient laughing. Welcome back, testimony in day 15 of Donald Trumps Hush Money Trial continues right now where prosecutors just called a new witness to the stand, another Phone Records person appears, an employee for verizon. So we went from at t to verizon now. But a look at who is sitting in the gallery in court can say almost as much about Donald Trumps State Of Affairs as who is sitting on the Witness Stand, and today we are seeing some Campaign Aides like susie wiles and boris epshteyn. Weve this week seen florida senator rick scott who showed up yesterday, had the former president s back sitting behind trump in the Courtroom Lobbying for him, saying things in tv news interviews that trump cant because of a gag order, and this weekend the president will hit the Campaign Trail with no bailiff, no attorneys, no Judge Standing over him. I want to bring in former gop Communications Director tara setmayer, resident scholar at the university of Virginia Center for politics. Thanks so much for joining us. This week its rick scott. Last week it was Texas Attorney general ken paxton, a couple of republicans who have had their own trouble with the law who stood by trump there in the courtroom, and they came out, called this trial a sham. Does their Loyalty Help Trump sell the narrative that his indictment was a political hit job . Well, for his base, sure, but im not quite sure people who have had their own runins with the law are credible to moderate voters that donald trump needs to convince to vote for him in the seven swing states that will decide this election. So its clear that rick scott is vying for the vp slot like many others. This is his way of trying to demonstrate that hes loyal enough, so thats his motivation right there, and its also obvious that donald trump has sent word out that if people want to be in his good graces, they need to show up in the courtroom and support him because his own family isnt. Is it reasonable to wonder if showing up for trump in court could serve as a litmus test of sorts for anyone who wants to be his running mate or potential future Cabinet Member . Of course. You know, its like The Apprentice meets the bachelor, so thats how donald trump operates. Hes a reality show guy. Its all about the pomp and circumstance, and proving loyalty, and what better way to do that than to sit in a courtroom while hes on trial for a hush money, you know, case with a porn star. Pretty obvious to me whats going on here with that. Do you see other republicans then lining up for the opportunity . Possibly. I mean, why wouldnt they . Theyve stooped theres no low they havent stooped to yet to prove their loyalty. We saw what happened at maralago when he trotted out a bunch of republicans to parade them on stage to see who could be more loyal for the vp slot. And these were people who said horrible things about trump when they were running against him in 2016, until they werent because they have a certain amount of desire to be relevant and political expediency, which i think is pretty hypocritical and craven. Donald trump is going to be in your home state of new jersey tomorrow holding a rally near wildwood. With the limited time to Campaign Around his trial schedule, mind you he wasnt campaigning on wednesday. He was in maralago, but why wouldnt he be hitting all the swing states with all hes got at this point . Well, which the irony of that is that he whines and complains that he cant campaign properly because of this trial and how unfair it is, and yet, at every opportunity almost when he can campaign he chooses to do events like this, which is more about adulation. Thats his fuel. He needs to be in front of his sycophants in order to recharge. We all know this, and so while wild wood unfortunately in my home state of new jersey and south jersey is a very trumpfriendly area. The congressman there van drew, he was a democrat and switched over to republican and became very maga, so wildwood is a friendly place. Theyre going to do it on the beach, can hold up to 40,000 people. Ill be curious to see how many show up for this, but this is what donald trump does. Hed much rather be speaking to the same people in the same echo chamber than expanding his base. Hes got to expand his voter base if he thinks hes going to win. New jersey isnt the place to do that. Thats what he needs to survive, and we all know that. Good to have you here, thank you so much for joining us. Thank you. Now back to the courtroom where our team just spotted the manhattan district attorney, alvin bragg for the first time in several days. Nbcs Yasmin Vossoughian is joining us from outside the courthouse. How significant is it to see bragg in court . Reporter its truly significant, ana, he hasnt been in much throughout this trial so far. I think i can count maybe two, this might be the second or third time in which hes actually sitting in court, but fairly significant to say the least. Were seeing kind of a buildup as you all have been talking about all morning towards the testimony of Michael Cohen. If you remember the evidence that Michael Cohen has turned over and was subsequently seized on a raid in his office, many of which was Phone Records, Text Messages, recordings in which Michael Cohen made of him, conversations he was having of him, Allen Weisselberg, the former president of the United States as well. This is kind of part of the documents piece that i have been talking about over the last couple of days, which is really key to the prosecutions case here, right . It is the documents, what has been seized from many of these phone calls as you listen to the testimony from the individual who works for at t, they were going over six different at t customers, now an individual who works for verizon going over Phone Records of 12 different customers from verizon. In the cross examination, it was important to note that bove kind of went at this individual testifying for at t more about how there could be inconsistencies when it comes to some of those Phone Records and or someone could kind of switch a sim card to another phone, for instance, possibly it wasnt being taken from the actual phone itself. Maybe the sim card could have been changed putting questions in the jurors minds. This is what its all about, the evidence that will be submitted and shown when Michael Yasmin U for that update. And theyre now looking at Allen Weisselbergs Phone Records as the testimony continues again with this new witness from verizon. I want to bring back our legal panel, sarah chris and bernardia vialona. I want to talk about what happens when it goes to the defense. Were talking about Michael Cohen being a big witness next week. Shortly after him we anticipate things will start to wrap up on the prosecutions side, and there have been a lot of discussion around whether trump will take the stand in his own defense. Hes been very outspoken about his desire to take the stand, went from absolutely to softening to if it is necessary. After Stormy Daniels testimony, bernardia, when he was really fired up, do you think hes more or less likely to take the stand . I think that i can tell you this, he definitely had that conversation after Stormy Daniels testified. I want to testify. I want to testify. My people need to know the truth. They need to hear my side. But then that the attorneys had to calm him down. We need to talk about who are you catering your talks to, are you catering to the jurors who are ultimately going to make the decision as to your guilt or not or catering for the court of Public Opinion on the outside. The focus is inside of this courtroom. And there is no need for donald trump to testify. Number one, he cant be controlled. Number two, hell be confronted as already in evidence, the jury has heard from him without testifying with the recording from Michael Cohen, with his social media posts, with his books and what hes written in books, so the jury has heard from him. Also, you have to keep in mind, if donald trump were to testify, judge merchan has already made a ruling that he can be crossexamined on the e. Jean carroll lawsuit, both of them, he can be crossexamined that he was fined a 5,000 one time by judge engoron and 10,000 another time by judge engoron because he couldnt follow the court rules. These are things he will be subject to in cross examination. But he cant be controlled. He cant be controlled during direct examination and when it comes to cross examination, come on, keep him off the stand. It does more harm than good. Stormy daniels tweeted yesterday, real men respond to testimony being sworn in and taking the stand in court. Oh, wait, never mind. Your reaction to that and, did she maybe open the door for judge merchan to modify the gag order because right now, she can put that out there, but trump, as hes complained about, cant say anything back to her at least specifically. Yeah, she certainly seemed to be egging him on to testify there. I think i dont see any change to this gag order, judge merchan is working hard to keep the former president as quiet as he can during the course of the trial to prevent any sort of influence over the witnesses or the jury, i think the gag order will stay in place as is. But trump has a big decision to make, and ultimately this decision is his. And his lawyers are going to counsel him and spend a lot of time talking with him about this and what the testimony would look like if he chooses to take the stand. But he gets to make that decision, it is not his lawyers decision at the end of the day and he might, you know, he might make a decision that may not be in his best interest in connection with this case, but is something he wants to do for himself, he wants to do for his family, wants to do politically, regardless of the outcome of this particular criminal case. One of the reasons i bring it up today is this also came up in court after Stormy Daniels testimony where Donald Trumps lawyer todd blanche was upset and complaining, calling for a mistrial about how prejudicial Stormy Daniels testimony had been, particularly around the details of this alleged sexual encounter in the hotel, and the prosecution ultimately said, you know, we needed to include those details because it was about her own credibility, it is about the strength of the case, how damaging this story would be if it got out before the election in 2016 and they said, you know, trump could defend himself. Steinglass, the prosecutor saying if they want to offer testimony that the sex never happened, thats their prerogative. What do you make of that argument, bernardia . So, the prosecution is definitely baiting donald trump, just like Stormy Daniels is baiting donald trump, to testify, like, i dare you go to testify. It is true, in terms of what happened with Stormy Daniels testifying, the only person that can conflict or counter that a sexual encounter didnt take place is donald trump. The person that was in the room. So, with Josh Steinglass saying that, hes a great attorney, i actually interned for him in law school in 2003, 2002, he knows what to expect and donald trump is not going to be able to hold up. I think his demeanor, his attitude, is just going to overwhelm this jury and is just not in his best interest. Thank you, ladies, so much. Sarah, bernarda, great to have you with us, we appreciate it. Thanks to Yasmin Vossoughian for her reporting. Vaughn hillyard at the courthouse. Thats going to do it for us this hour. Ill see you back here at noon eastern. For Andrea Mitchell today, for more coverage of Donald Trumps Hush Money Trial. For now, im Ana Cabrera Reporting in new york. Jose diazbalart picks up our coverage next. G in new york. Jose diazbalart picks up our coverage next. ella fashion moves fast. Setting trends is our business. We need to scale with customer demand. In real time. jen so we partner with verizon. Their solution for us . A private 5g network. ella we now get more control of production, efficiencies, and greater agility. marquis with a custom private 5g network. Our customers get what they want, when they want it. jen now were even smarter and ready for whats next. vo achieve enterprise intelligence. Its your vision, its your verizon. vo if you have graves disease. And blurry vision, you need clear answers. People with graves could also get thyroid eye disease, or ted, which may need a different doctor. Find a ted Eye Specialist at isitted. Com. [tense music] one aleve works all day so i can keep working my magic. Just one aleve. 12 hours of uninterrupted pain relief. Aleve. Who do you take it for . And for fast topical pain relief,try alevex. If you have wet amd, you never want to lose sight of the things you love. Some things should stand the test of time. Long lasting eylea hd could significantly improve your vision and can help you go up to 4 months between treatments. If you have an eye infection, eye pain or redness, or allergies to eylea hd, dont use. Eye injections like eyla hd may cause eye infection, separation of the retina, or rare but severe swelling of Blood Vessels in the eye. An increase in eye pressure has been seen. Theres an uncommon risk of heart attack or stroke associated with blood clots. The most common side effects were blurred vision, cataract, corneal injury, and eye floaters. And theres still so much to see. If you are on eylea or a similar type of treatment, ask your Retina Specialist about eylea hd today, for the potential for fewer injections. Honestly, i was scared when i was told age ask your Retina Specialist about eylea hd related Macular Degeneration could jeopardize my vision. Great. One more thing to worry about. It was all too hard to deal with in the beginning, but making a plan with my doctor to Add Precision was easy. Preservision areds2 contains the exact nei recommended, clinically proven Nutrient Formula to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. Thanks to preservision, i feel better that im doing something about it like millions of others