Michigan Court of Appeals Holds That Development Agreement O

Michigan Court of Appeals Holds That Development Agreement Obligations are Extinguished in Tax Foreclosure | Miller Canfield


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The Michigan Court of Appeals recently held that assessments on a property under a development agreement between a city and the property's former owner did not survive a tax foreclosure and therefore were not liens against the property in the hands of the party that purchased it at tax auction.
On April 22, 2021, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided P
etersen Financial, LLC v. City of Kentwood and Kent County Treasurer, docket no. 350208, 2021 WL 1582835 (unpublished). The former owner of a property had entered into a Voluntary Special Assessment Development Agreement (VSADA) with the City prior to its tax foreclosure by the County. The question was whether the lien granted by agreement between the City and prior owner survived the tax foreclosure.

Related Keywords

Kent County , Michigan , United States , City Of Kentwood , Miller Canfield , Petersen Financial , Michigan Court , Assessment Development Agreement , Kent County Treasurer , கேண்ட் கவுண்டி , மிச்சிகன் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , நகரம் ஆஃப் கென்டுவூட் , மில்லர் கேன்ஃபீல்ட் , மிச்சிகன் நீதிமன்றம் , கேண்ட் கவுண்டி பொருளாளர் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana