Shift in the courts make up for issues central to americans lives . We will discuss that with ken starr and Laurence Tribe. And our panel on how the nomination battle could upend the election. All right now on Fox News Sunday. Brit and hello again from fox news in cleveland. We are live on the campus of Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Clinic. The site of the first debate between donald trump and joe biden, moderated by our very own Chris Wallace, who is preparing today. The Supreme Court vacancy number President Trumps third and to selection of Amy Coney Barrett as his nominee at a new twist. Mark meredith at the white house and Jacqui HeinrichJacqui Heinrich in wilmington, delaware. Lets start with the latest on the president s Supreme Court pick and what we know about the timeline for a confirmation process. Mark. President trump hopes to fire up his base with his new Supreme Court nominee but with election day fast approaching, the white house knows getting judge barrett confirmed by the senate will be contentious. Is a very proud moment indeed. Late saturday President Trump made it official, he is nominating seventh of her stomach Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court she is a woman of unparalleled achievement, towering intellect, sterling credentials and unyielding loyalty to the constitution. A favorite of the conservative establishment as a catholic, a graduate of dame and former clerk for the late justice antonin scalia. His judicial philosophy is mine too. A judge must apply the law as written. Democrats are outraged republicans are pushing her nomination forward just five weeks before the election after republicans locked president obamas nominee Merrick Garland for the same reason in 2016. Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer says democrats are concerned with her record on abortion and dilute religion. I will strongly, strongly, strongly oppose this nomination. Two g. O. P. Senator say they will not vote in the nominee before the election but the majority of republicans appear ready to hold a hearing at Senate JudiciaryCommittee ChairmanLindsey Graham says his committee will hold four days of confirmation hearings beginning the week of october 12th. The president told reporters last night he thinks her confirmation will move fairly fast and as he believes a confirmation vote will happen before election day. Brit. Brit Mark Meredith reporting for the white house, thank you, mark. Alex turned to Jacqui Heinrich, covering the Biden Campaign in wilmington, delaware. Hi, brit. Joe biden hopes pressuring vulnerable republican senators about health care amid the pandemic can stall the confirmation process. Joe biden is hedging his bets on coronavirus fears, warning of judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed and the Affordable Care act is overturned, complications from covid19 like lung scarring and heart damage could become the next deniable preexisting condition, writing barrett has a written track record of disagreeing with the u. S. Supreme courts decision upholding the affordable to Affordable Care act. She critiqued john roberts majority opinion upholding the law in 2012. Democrats hope the threat of retaliation from angry voters could persuade Senate Republicans in tight races to push the vote past election day and biden is offering the electionyear standard the g. O. P. Set four years ago as a way out, urging no action until after november 3rd. Biden is resisting talk about Nuclear Options like Court Packing if judge barrett is confirmed, instead turning the focus to President Trumps refusal to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses. What i am concerned about is whether he generates some kind of response in a way that unsettles the society or causes some kind of violence. The last thing we need is a [indiscernible] of a coup. He was slated for a light schedule as hes been heavy into debate prep, mock debates with an advisor playing the role of President Trump or early this morning he announced surprising marks on the vacancy coming up later this afternoon. Brit. Brit Jacqui Heinrich reporting from wilmington, delaware, thank you. Joining me now is our secretary of labor, eugene scalia. Mr. Secretary, thank you for joining us today. Thank you, its a pleasure. Brit let me start, i know you know judge barrett going back a number of years and i wanted you to just give us quickly how you would characterize her. What kind of person is she . Secretary scalia well, she is a beloved teacher, a very respected scholar. I think she shown herself to be a thoughtful jurist and shes just a wonderful, warm, admirable human being as well. Mother to seven, mother to schoolage children. She is a very impressive, delightful person. I think the American People as they come to know her are going to find her very admirable in so many ways. Brit lets get to the question of her record then buried him we are now its now becoming clear at least at the outset that the issue on which she will be challenged by democrats is health care and particularly the Affordable Care act, which is coming up for action by the Supreme Court at some point in the near future. The assertion is being made that she is likely to vote not to uphold the act and therefore put an end to it. What do you make of that claim . Secretary scalia its a red herring, brit. I think it reflects a bit of frustration on the part of the democrats on how they might attack her nomination. She made a comment about the Affordable Care act decision a number of years ago before she was a judge. It was a comment that a number of people made at the time. Its not a question that will be before the court in the case thats coming up and theres absolutely zero reason to believe that judge barrett is somebody who does not have the views about the importance of health care. As i said, shes a working mother to schoolage children. She is the mother to a child with disability. The suggestion that she is brit let my drill down a little bit farther on the question about the comments she made. What did she say about the Affordable Care act and i guess it was about john roberts decision in the case to treat the Affordable Care act penalties as a tax. What did she say exactly that you think is not likely to lead to a decision one way or the other . I believe that she made the observation that it appeared the chief justice had bent over backwards to twist the language of that statute, to save its constitutionality. That was a criticism that a number of people made at the time. By the way, it was something that other people praised the chief justice bar. A number of people said the justice to the right thing it was a very common view at the time. I think the most important thing to know about judge barretts jurisprudence is that she will go with the law takes her. Her view of judging is that many personal views she may have on health care or any other matter you can name is not relevant to determining what congress wrote and whats in our constitution. Her authority derives from those documents. She understands that and she will follow the lead of the constitution and its original meaning and the text of what congress wrote. Brit i understand that the issue that will come before the court is whether the Affordable Care act, with its tax or penalty now were zeroed out, so theres actually no actual monetary penalty for not having insurance. With that out, then how can it stand as a tax, correct . Secretary scalia i believe thats the question, but again brit let me just interrupt you a great record of achievement. Theres no single case by which you should judge her qualification for the court. She will be addressing cases for years, probably decades. Brit understood, but let me just push or just a little farther on this, if you dont mind, sir. If she believes that the idea that it was a tax as articulated by the chief justice was kind of farfetched, why would we not then believe that when the issue became the court with the tax zeroed out that she wouldnt then say that the constitutional basis for demanding or ordering people to have health care, mandating Health Care Health insurance, i should say is unconstitutional . Secretary scalia because by the very fact that the tax no longer is there, the question whether its a tax or not is moot, its gone. Its a totally different case and again, the fact that this is being raised shows that the democrats are casting about for anything by which they might seek to oppose an exceptional nominee. The other thing i expect we may hear about is her faith, which as you know was something she was attacked for last time. The democrats embarrassed themselves when they did it. We had a nominee of the president to the court a little more than a year ago who was attacked for being a member of the knights of columbus, which is a Catholic Organization that has existed for more than a century and a senator of hawaii and senator, harris attacked this man for being a member of the knights of columbus, which is just a Catholic Organization that accepts catholic faith. If i think we will see all manner of criticisms, but it cant change the fact a wonderful person and exceptional nominee. Brit very quickly then, speaking of organizations, she has said to be a member of a group called people of praise, which is a kind of Christian Group exists in many countries and has a number of members in this country, what you know about people of praise and do you have any idea of why people seem so afraid of that . Secretary scalia well, it is, as you said, a Christian Group that has spread about the world. Its one of any number of groups that catholics associate themselves with to deepen their faith, deepen their spirituality, serve others. Its been suggested that because shes a member of this group she may have a submissive view of womens role in society, which is ridiculous. This is an incredibly accomplished scholar. A teacher who won the best teacher award three times at notre dame law school. Shes done amazing things. Its actually quite insulting to suggest that she has a submissive view of womens role in society. Quite sexist, and by the way, thats not what her critics are worried about. Theyre worried not that shes meek and mild, but that shes a very thoughtful, articulate, learned judge who will be i think a wonderful addition to the court. Brit mr. Secretary, thank you for joining us today. Up next, we will speak with two members of the senate about the upcoming confirmation process of judge Amy Coney Barrett. Fox news sunday reports from the campus of [indiscernible] and the Cleveland Clinic head of the first president ial debate. stasha vo i really dont remember not being able to braid. [laughs. ] stasha vo i used to braid my brothers hair, my sisters hair, neighbors hair. stasha vo when everything shut down, i thought, you know what . People have been asking for online classes for the longest. It was amazing. Business kept growing and growing and growing. stasha vo i feel blessed that i can still connect with others. Support others. And i am still going. And geico loves helping riders get to where theyre going, so to help even more, geico is giving new and current customers a fifteen percent credit on their motorcycle policies with the geico giveback. And because were committed for the long haul, the credit lasts your full policy term. The geico giveback. Helping riders focus on the road ahead. Im a delivery Operations Manager in san diego, california. Weve had a ton of obstacles in finding ways to be more sustainable for a big company. We were one of the first stations to pilot a fleet of zero emissions electric vehicles. The amazon vans have a decal that says, shipment zero. Were striving to deliver a package with zero emissions in to the air. I feel really proud of the impact that has on the environment. But were always striving to be better. I love being outdoors, running in nature. We have two daughters. I want to do everything i can to protect the environment to make sure they see the same beauty ive seen in nature. My goal is to lead projects that affect the world. I know that to be great requires hard work. My goal is to lead projects that affect the world. Spam one Senate Republicans have laid out a speedy confirmation process the president s Supreme CourtPick Senate Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnell has not said whether a final vote will become come before or after the november 3rd election, so joining us now is democratic senator Debbie Stabenow of michigan, a chance to vote in this nomination. Senator, very nice to see you, maam. Is there any chance you might any chance you might vote for this nominee . Senator stabenow well, first let me say, congratulations to Amy Coney Barrett. This is always in honor of course to be nominated to the highest court in the land so i want to congratulate her for that. For me, this is all about in the middle of a Health Pandemic, onceinalifetime Health Pandemic and its very clear from her writings, multiple writings that she will be the vote that takes away health care for millions of americans, including people 130 Million People and counting with preexisting conditions and of course those are going up every day because of the Health Pandemic so im deeply concern concerned. Brit let me ask you what specific writings you are citing that would mean she would definitely be a vote not to uphold the Affordable Care act . Senator stabenow i think your questioning of former guest, secretary scalia makes it clear when she was laying out her criticisms for not essentially repealing it sooner. And you know, whats most important here we know that President Trump and republicans have been trying to repeal the Affordable Care act since they took office. This is the last chance you put someone on the Supreme Court that will do it and that even though people in michigan didnt want the law to be repealed, they want their health care, and i would say that the response has got to be to put a president in whos going to protect and strengthen their health care. Brit i hear you, senator. Let me just follow up on that a little bit further if i can. The remark that i mentioned to secretary scalia was one in which he had commented in passing im a john roberts determination that the penalties afforded under the Affordable Care act for not carrying insurance amounted to a tax and not just a penalty. That viewpoint, by the way has been widely criticized and now that the tax penalty has been eliminated, theres no tax at all, what makes you think that that remark would lead to her naturally and automatically, inevitably voting not to uphold the Affordable Care act . Senator stabenow its called common sense. The number one priority of the president of the United States, donald trump, has been to take away Peoples Health care and theyve been trying actually for ten years, even before President Trump by the way with no replacement. They want to take it away and he certainly has given every indication that he wants the Supreme Court to act in the favor of the case that he has supported. He has helped to bring this case to the United StatesSupreme Court. Does anybody really think common sense will tell you, hes going to put somebody on the court who has given all kinds of clues and writings about this issue and i tell the people of michigan are really worried. Brit i can understand, but you say all kinds of clues. What other clues other than this remark that was cited in my interview with secretary scalia . What other clues . Senator stabenow well, we will lay all of this out in judiciary hearings. I dont want to debate all the legalese back and forth with a u today because i think theres a Bigger Picture and i do have to say from a michigan perspective, we have people right now just holding