Good to be with you. Good to see you. When did Voter Suppression become a thing . I mean, i know that over time theres been efforts to restrict the votes of some people, laws have changed, we hope that were in a society where everybody is allowed to vote. But it seems like overnight it went from being a thing here and a thing there to being an epidemic. Yeah, i mean, this latest iteration, obviously throughout our history, as you mentioned, theres been different times, but this latest iteration, its interesting because after 2000, after what happened in the election of 2000, you had the help america vote act. You really had us sort of going as a country in the direction in the right direction. Right, in the right direction of making sure that everybody got a chance to vote. And then, what happened was, and just to be real about it, is that the Republican Party decided, wait a minute, that doesnt really work for us. So, they decided that they were gonna basically target folks who were really unlikely to vote republican and make it harder for them to vote. Lets be specific about who youre talking about. When you say folks, you mean . Im talking about minorities, im talking about lowincome americans, im talking about the elderly, im talking about, increasingly, young people, students. And the assumption is these people would all vote democrat. Right. And so, what happened was is thats when you saw photo id laws, that sorta thing come around, because what didnt happen, what they claim is that it has to do with voter fraud. You are statistically more likely as an american to be struck by lightning than you are to commit voter impersonation fraud. So, this is a political strategy is what it is. They pretend that its a policy disagreement between the parties; its not. Its a political strategy no different than when they decide where to send mailers, whose doors to knock on or what to say in tv ads. So, lets talk about specifically the kinds of suppression efforts youre talking about. Voter id, youve alluded to; i wanna come back to that in a second. Purging of voter rolls is another big thing. Voter intimidation. Putting onerous requirements on just the Voter Registration process to begin with. All of these fall into the bucket of the things that youre trying to do. And there are others too that people may not necessarily think of. So, for instance, weve seen, in special elections where, in urban parts of a district, if the folks running the election are, if its the Republican Party, they will do things like consolidate polling places so that all of a sudden, lets say you voted in one place in november, the special election comes along and now youre voting in a different place. You might in fact go show up at that first place to vote frequently. Be turned away and not go back to the other place. Right, and theyll consolidate em and so youll have this really long drive to make, that kind of thing. Unfortunately theyre getting really creative about it. This question of voter id specifically, let me ask you about that. So the countercase to the case that you make that voter id is bad, and youve heard this, is you have to produce a photo id to cash a check. Does anybody cash checks anymore . I guess probably some people do. You have to put a picture id in front of somebody to get on an airplane. Why would you not have to put it, why is it so bad if you have to do it for other things, why is it so bad to vote . Well, ill just talk about my state for instance. I was the chief election official in missouri for four years secretary of state. Right, and there were over 200,000 eligible registered voters in my state who didnt have the kind of id that they wanted to require in order to vote. As to why its different than the other things, well the other things arent a constitutional right, period. Thats the reason. I went to afghanistan not for your right to check into a hotel. Thats one reason, but the other reason is that it would be one thing if there were a purpose in doing this other than trying to keep those people from voting. As far as youre concerned, there is no other purpose. No theres not. No matter what anybody says. Right, they are trying to create the idea that theres this widespread epidemic of voter fraud. Theres just not. Its just an outandout lie. And again, the things youre talking about are things that are put into law. This is not like Donald Segretti in watergate dirty tricks. This is not sending people a note telling them when the date of the election is, but its the wrong date deliberately to keep them from voting. This is actually stuff that legislators are going into session approving, governors are signing, this is actually put into law. This is them deciding that theyre going to create the appearance of a problem when the real problem were trying to solve is black folks, hispanic folks, lowincome folks, the disabled, they tend not to vote republican. Thats a problem for the Republican Party, so if they cant vote, problem solved. Youve been dismissive of the suggestion that this is about Voter Protection as opposed to Voter Suppression, because thats the way that this is couched. The branding of this on the side of the people who support these measures is that its Voter Protection. We have a voter fraud problem. You totally yeah, its a lie. You dismiss that, okay. But of course, theyll produce data. Theyll say, there are x number of cases. Theyll point to particular cases and theyll say, well heres an example of somebody who did exactly the thing were talking about, we do have a problem to solve. Well okay, a few days ago, i refer to the president s Election Integrity commission as the Voter Suppression committee to reelect the president , cuz thats what it is. Tell us what you actually think. Thats what it is. So the Voter Suppression committee had its second meeting the other day. They had it in New Hampshire so that they could lie and claim that there were all these people who voted who shouldnt have been voting. Well in fact, that was the precipitating event for the creation of that commission, was it not. The president s claim some months ago that the number was three million, am i remembering . Three to five million. Conveniently, a very similar number to the margin of loss. The popular vote of victory of hillary clinton. But that there was some bus involved, that they were busing them into New Hampshire to somehow vote illegally. Yeah, the president s been making a lot of stuff up. I mean, thats not news to anybody probably. We interrupt this broadcast, right. laughter this, i argue, is the biggest lie that a sitting president has ever told. The commission was created to justify the lie. Thats what it was created for. Then that morphed into another way to undermine faith in american democracy so that you can then suppress the vote. That by the way, is how this works. Its a threepart playbook. Part one is you undermine faith in american democracy. Part two, you put up obstacles to voting. Part three, you put up obstacles to the obstacles. Youre mentioning, they mentioned cases of this. I was there when they were having this a couple weeks ago, this meeting in New Hampshire. We had 200 people there protesting, which was exponentially more people than secretary kris kobach from kansas whos the real leader of this commission, has actually convicted of voter fraud, despite the fact that he spent an enormous amount of taxpayer dollars trying to do it. Investigating it, looking for people, looking for the real killer as it were, right. Kovach is, as you say, the secretary of state of the state of kansas. He is your bestie, right. You guys are like americas fun couple. You could not be more opposite hes the bizarro of me. In your perspective. He is the bizarro. Hes vicechair of this commission, but hes really effectively, hes running it. Hes running the deal. Youre not a big fan of his or of the rvf. Yeah, i dont have any of his records. laughter i keep wondering why the conversation is about voter fraud of the sort youre talking about and not like people hacking into the election. Why is that not the Voter Fraud Commission . Well i think thats kind of obvious, i guess, but unfortunately, right. But its a reasonable question. I mean, if you step back from politics. The answer to your question is, the reason that the questions that are being asked are being asked by the Trump Administration is because theyre trying to get certain answers. They dont like the answers to those. Or maybe theyre diverting attention and distracting attention from trump. Of course, its the same reason that President Trump is running a Misinformation Campaign against both the American Intelligence Community and the media. He doesnt like the answers theyre coming up with, so hes gotta make sure that theyre not believable to the american people. So there are a couple aspects of this. Theres the Voter Suppression part, but then theres also this more general problem of people dont vote, and maybe the reason that they dont vote is not because of voter id. Maybe its not because of onerous registration requirements. Its just that we havent put in place measures that actually give people a motivation to vote or an incentive to do it. I looked up two things that are of particular interest to me, motor voter and online Voter Registration, as we were getting ready to talk today. Motor voter is now in 10 states. This is where you get signed up automatically to its also known as automatic Voter Registration. Register when you get a drivers license and i think there was some, more than 30 states currently have some legislation on the books now to either create motor voter or to expand. 35 states have online Voter Registration, making it easy. People in office, republicans, democrats, talk about we want more people to participate in this democracy, but then we dont necessarily in every place, create the means to do that. Were sitting today in a state, texas, that does not have motor voter and does not have online Voter Registration. People in charge here dont want folks to vote. Well, ill let you say that. Its okay, im just what i will observe as a data point, we have the worst voter turnout over the last four election cycles of any state in the country. You do the data, ill tell people what its about. Playbyplay, color commentary, thats it. You be my troy aikman, thats fine. The point is, there are measures that could be put in place proactively, if you really want people to vote. Thats how you let america vote, right, is you give people the means to do it. Its 2017. And i can tell my phone to tell my tv at home. Im from kansas city, im a huge royals fan. I can tell it to record the royals game so i can watch it when i get home. But i got to wait in line for two and a half hours to vote sometimes. What about the question of the tech is not sufficient, from a security standpoint, to allow people to do that . Right, im not saying you should be able to vote on your phone. What i am saying is that the world we live in, naturally, there is a certain level of customer expectation. If you see a product and youre like, i want to get that, you go to your phone and youve got it a couple of days later. If you want to pay a little more, you got it the next day. What that means is, is that this conversation has got to be about the fact that at least when it comes to elections, thats one of the few areas where everybody in the country is a potential customer and should be treated that way. What that means, if you look at states like oregon, where you have mailin voting, you have automatic Voter Registration. You have the whole smorgasbord, its basically the Gold Standard of how to do an election. That should be our goal. And voter turnout in oregon is actually pretty good. Its really, really high because of it. Thats the first part of folks not voting. We should actually strive to make it convenient. We should treat them like customers. But then the second part is, sometimes i think when folks dont vote, thats a vote. I think that politicians have a tendency, and im a politicians, but i tell my fellow politicians all the time, i say, whenever we talk about it like why dont these people vote, and we put it on the voter. Thats like a lawyer blaming the jury when they dont get the verdict they want. You didnt make the case. The reason i say it is a vote is because at some level, people have said this is not worth my time. Youre not going to deliver on what you say. Some of that is solved by us just being more genuine and getting more done, frankly. Right, let me layer one more bit into this conversation before we turn it over to sort of the jason kander story, and that is redistricting. A lot of people in this country have decided on in red states and blue states that elections are rigged. The reality is, when you gerrymander to the point that the major party not in power doesnt even bother to field a candidate, or you know that based on the way that district has been drawn, theres no chance in hell that your partys going to win. Are they wrong to think that the election is rigged . Thats why some people stay home. Yeah, that is exactly why some people stay home. Unfortunately theyre not wrong. How do you fix that because people in power who control those levers, they want to stay in power. They control those levers to remain in power. Absolutely, well first of all, you take it out of their hands. I mean, the idea that we have politicians drawing their own district lines is like having inmates serve on their own juries. It doesnt make any sense. If you look at what california has done, its really interesting. Theyve done a couple of things. One, theyve brought citizens into the redistricting process. Theyve had actual citizenoriented redistricting. I would go further, this whole thing where everybody tries to bring in a certain amount of democrats, a certain amount of republicans. I think you just bring folks in, just regular citizens, and you can have a judge instruct them, right. Its not unlike a jury situation. You trust the public to do this . Absolutely, if youve ever watched a jury, if you ever watched a judge instruct a jury, the jurors come out of there and they take it very seriously as a civic duty. They also arent elected officials or tied to elected officials. They have no stake in the outcome except for democracy. They dont care that representative jones and representative smith live two blocks from each other. No, the district belongs to the people who live in it, not to the people who are elected to represent it. The other thing that they do that i think is very interesting, is they have the true open primary system where everybody runs in the same ballot regardless of party, so if you have a district that, and itll happen regardless of redistricting. Some districts where its overwhelmingly r, or overwhelmingly d, the general election Still Matters because if your district youre talking about top two finishers, what they call top two finishers. Long story short, you gotta make the general election real competitive again. What that does is, it forces you to represent your entire district. Now does that mean you necessarily move to the middle. No, thats not the point of it. The point of it is, you gotta listen to everybody, you gotta court everybody. Its not just a base election, a subset of a subset. You gotta come back with results. It goes back to, remember when people used to brag about being bipartisan . Youre talking about Customer Service, right, if you dont produce Customer Service they go, they find another company. Exactly. Okay, so lets do your story. You were raised outside of kansas city, in the suburbs right. Parents were both juvenile probation officers. Go to american university, then you go to georgetown law school. You joined the rotc when you were in law school. Yeah, it was right after 9 11. Right after 9 11. So you were a reservist for awhile, and then you voluntarily deployed to afghanistan. Thats right. You served for four months, come back, at 27 you run for state legislator. At 31, you run for secretary of state. At that point, youre the youngest statewide elected official in the whole country. You got this down, this is good. Then at 33, you run, i have a tv show. laughter well, they should let you keep it. And then at 33, you run for the senate. Thats right. Whats your hurry junior . I mean, there is like i was just trying to get here. Let some old people have jobs. Oh, is that right, this is the goal. Let some old people have some of the action here. After this, im done. Im going to go take a nap. Why didnt you screw around . Why didnt you go to europe with a toothbrush in your backpack . Explain. I went to afghanistan instead, i guess. Well, i guess you kinda did go overseas, just not the same way. So look, for me, anytime that ive run for office, its been because theres been a change in the world that i wanted to see, and there just happened to be an office between me and that change. I ran for state representative because i was really upset that there had been really deep medicaid cuts in my state. I had just come back from an experience where, you know, look, i grew up comfortably. There was no politician making a decision that was taking food off my familys table, so the first time i ever had that experience. A lot of people, thats their first memories, is feeling let down in that way. I was in my mid20s in afghanistan in a vehicle with no armor before i really understood the consequences of these decisions. Then i come home, and id already been thinking about running. I see the deep medicaid cuts and i wanted to do something about that and some other issues, so i ran. Secretary of state, just like now, i wanted to stand up against Voter Suppression, stand up for voting rights. And then u. S. Senate, i wanted to protect obamacare, i wanted to look out for my fellow vets, i wanted to make college more affordable. The answer to your question is, when i see som