Gen AI Shows Promise — And Peril — For Pro Se

Research on the capabilities of generative AI tools to help self-represented people has shown potential, but there is broad disagreement about how and when pro se litigants should be using them alone.

Related Keywords

Ohio , United States , California , New York , American Bar , Berkeley , Memorial Church , Arizona , Missouri , Stanford , San Francisco , Alaska , Fordham University , New York University , Utah , San Francisco Bay , American , Lisa Larrimore Ouellette , Robert Mahari , Colleenv Chien , Richard Lewis , Miriam Kim , Nikki Endsley , Stephen Gillers , Karin Roberts , Christophera Boyko , Stuart Levi , York University School Of Law , Vanderbilt Law School , University Of California , Lexisnexis , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher Flom , Suffolk University Law School Legal Innovation , Yale Law Journal Forum , Vanderbilt Ai Law Lab , American Bar Association , Massachusetts Institute Of Technology , School Of Law , York State Advisory Committee On Artificial Intelligence , Technology Lab , Berkeley Center , Task Force On Artificial Intelligence , Stanford Law School , Munger Tolles Olson , Stanford Law School Legal Design Lab , Missouri Court , Fordham University School Of Law , York State Bar Association , Glide Memorial Church , Digital First , East Bay Times , Getty Images , Glide Unconditional Legal Clinic , Lawyer Committee , Civil Rights , San Francisco Bay Area , New York University School , Help Bridge , Suffolk University Law School , Legal Innovation , Legal Design Lab , New Way , Hindering Access , Eastern District , Judicial Orders , Judge Christopher , Northern District , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher , New York State Advisory Committee , Artificial Intelligence , Massachusetts Institute , New York City Bar Association , Task Force , Digital Technologies , South Bronx , New York State Bar Association , Fordham University School , Larrimore Ouellette ,