Mark Hello America i am mark levin and this is life, Liberty Levin saturday pretty think youre going to be very pleased that you are here. With three tremendous s Robert Costello you may have heard of him, newt gingrich, it may have heard of him and ben shapiro. Were going to do this program differently than ive done this network. I interviewed mr. Costello on thursday afternoon. I interviewed him on thursday afternoon. I also did the Sean Hannity Show on thursday evening. The reason why is this, you have a fastmoving trial in manhattan. You have all kinds of analysis, all quite good. Respecting mr. Costellos public statements his testimony before congress. The fantastic interview with Bilbill Hemmer and so forth. I feel theres an Essential Element missing. Essential element that is missing. I want to get this out as soon as i can because its irrelevant to the trial. Its relevant to you and the rest of the American People. With all of that in mind lets been at the interview from thursday with mr. Costello. Robert casillas welcoming former deputy chief of the Saw A Shabby Position i remember that the big position as Chief Of Staff at the Attorney General. I want to get right down to it, sir. You gave an interview earlier this morning. I have the text here with the bibillhemmer. I have gone through it and detail. I want to hone in on a few issues for a reason. You represented Michael Cohen during the period in which the fbi swat went into his properties to gather information and evidence, is that correct . We represent him after that. Right after that he came to you . That is correct. See if what you got into Privilege Conversations with him i will get to that in a minute. The subject of donald trump came up and so forth and so on. Can you concisely tell me what he told you about the Nondisclosure Agreement with Stormy Daniels and who is responsible for what . Michael cohen set in reference to the nda the Nondisclosure Agreements which i pointed out to him were perfectly legal that it was his idea to take care of this. Not Donald Trumps idea. Solely his idea. That Stormy Daniels attorney, davidson, contacted him and said Stormy Daniels was going to claim there was a sexual relationship between stormy and donald trump. Cohen said he did not believe the allegations but he knew they would be embarrassing. He specifically mentioned they would be embarrassing to millennia. So cohen said he decided on his own and i repeat that on his own because that is what he said and i kept on nailing him down on that. You did this on your own . Yes. Donald trump have knowledge of it . No did you have anything to do with it . No. Whered you get the 130,000 dollars . He took out a loan i said what would you do that . You said i did that because i did not want melania and to know anything about this and i did not want my wife to know he said if i took money out of our accounts he said my wife would know right away because she controls the Family Finances she would ask me 100 questions that i did not want to answer. That is exactly how Michael Cohen summarize that. Donald trump knew nothing about it. Did not encourage it. Did not do anything this was solely Michael Cohen. Why would he do Something Like this . He was trying to ingratiate himself back into the inner circle because when trump got elected and went to washington d. C. , took his inner circle with them except for Michael Cohen who was left behind. This guy was angry about that. He actually had told me he thought if he went to washington d. C. He would be considered for Attorney General of the United States. Or at least Chief Of Staff to the president. Ludicrous. But because he did not get that he was looking for a way to get back in. Mark can you think of any reason at all, you are his attorney why he would lie to you is there any benefit to him lying to you about it . Absently not. Especially because he told us he was suicidal at that point. He had been up on the roof of the Regency Hotel seriously considering jumping off because he saw a mountain of legal problems coming his way he did not have to deal that he kept on saying to us that they bob, i need you to explain what is my escape route . How do i get out of this i cannot handle the pressure. And so of course i went to the steps and i told him that clearly he was not the target of what the Southern District of new york was doing. The target was really donald trump and i said if you have any truthful information and i emphasize that time and time again i said michael, these are very smart people down the Southern District of new york. If you think you can win there and tell them a half a truth or three quarter truth you are crazy they will find out you will burn your bridges on both ends. The only way you can do this is with truthful information. So now is the time if you have truthful information you can cooperate i will get rid of all of your legal problems by the end of the week i swear to god i do not have anything on donald trump he mustve said that 10 20 times. I have lost count because in between then he would also say guys i want you to know i was there with my work partner who knew Michael Cohen i want you to know i will do whatever i have to do. I will never spend a day in jail and he slammed his hand on the Conference Room table. That is the kind of guy i was dealing with that day but there is theres no way hes going to lie. Mark went to hone in on Something Else delayed the predicate. These are the facts. We had no reason to lie to gave him every opportunity really to protect himself. That would even meet if necessary implicating donald trump and he didnt but i want to move on. You testified instead of an front of the Bragg A Grand Jury is that correct . That is correct. Michael cohen had waived in writing youve presented that a shirt to the whole world, correct . Looks i have that is correct. Mark the last witness to testify in front of the bragging grand jury to the best of your knowledge, correct . Whats the best of my knowledge that is correct. Mark you testified were you free to testify or you as you said come out of the testimony were repeatedly interrupted. Repeatedly trying to shut you down is that correct to question. That is correct. There are eight assistant District Attorneys in the room. Eight. Ive never seen that before. But she indicated i saw early reports in a few years ago up to 300 or so emails which is basically contemporary communications with Michael Cohen that would certainly collectively demonstrate he was lying about Material Information mr. Bragg was looking into. They would not introduce ulcerated emails is that correct . They put six in, i objected. I said arent you going to put the remaining emails end . Right of the grand jury and they said we cant and i said why not and they said theres a legal problem i said really . What is that . He said hearsay. First of all hearsay is admissible in grand jurys and i said you just put six out of that package and went about the rest in these people mean the grand jury are entitled to hear everything. They are entitled to hear everything in my own pack in the same materials. They said we cannot put them in because they are hearsay. If you think they are hearsay to listlisten carefully to my nexto sentences. These documents were made in the regular course of business it was the regular course of business to make and maintain document such as these at or about the dates indicated on the documents. I said now you know, and i know but the grand jurors do not know that makes these documents Business Records. You know and i know but the grand jury does not know Business Records are an exception to the hearsay rule if it was ineffective. I said what is your next excuse . You think you should give these to grand jury . I held up the packet to the grand jurors you should demand is in the District Attorney and ask yourself where they keeping these from you . Say had the packet apart from of the grand jury are hearing the District Attorney office had all the emails, correct . Correct it. Mark they could read over threaded emails, correct question. Of course. As a courtesy to show i was being fair to them, as a courtesy the friday before i testified i gave them an hour and a half Zoom Conference in which i was going to explain the exculpatory materials that i had and why they should not proceed with this case. When the Zoom Conference started they told me they had all the evidence i gave them. Assume we have Read Everything and understood everything. What do you want to say . That is how they began i said thats hardly a warm greeting to somebody try to help you out. Mark very, very important for some thisomething people are not focusing on including the legal analysts. And it is this. Mr. Bragg and his prosecutors have every reason to know that when they put cohen on the stand there is serious material issues in which you and perhaps others have presented evidence contrary to what he was going to say. That is they put them on the stand hes lying in every respect to you and according to many other people what took place. They have your emails that cut off your testimony when you are in the grand jury but where i come from i us at old Chief Of Staff to Attorney General of the United States, this is a classic case of Suborning Perjury i am saying to you mr. Costello they put this man on the stand. They did not seek a hearing before the put them on the same with the judge to go through your emails or any evidence that they had. Whether they gave it to the grand jury or not. They had your emails. They knew what you said. You are a credible witness. You are the former mucky muck of the Criminal Division over that the Southern District of new york. Your testimony to them persuaded them not to pursue the case, as i understand it, against mr. Cohen. But bragg the eight District Attorneys did not want you to say what she wanted to say in front of the grand jury but did not want to hear anything about the other emails that might harm their witness. They knew he would get on the stand and that he would commit perjury. Where i come from, sir, you given the elements of perjury they did not bother to tell the judge we have this guy costello. We do have this but we still think we should bring him on. They committed suborned perjury which is a felony against the court. What you think about that, sir . I think that should be pursued. I agree. I think at the very least its a motion to dismiss the indictment they did not present all of the exculpatory evidence that they had. They very good reason Michael Cohen was not telling the truth. I told them the Southern District of new york had obviously concluded Michael Cohen was not telling the truth. I suggested to them if all the Southern District lead and drop the case they had no interest in hearing my opinion of what they had to say. I told them and us in the Zoom Conference on the friday before my Grand Jury Testimony Et Cetera you people aware Michael Cohen is coming out with a second book . I know youre probably aware of his first book. I got blank looks from everybody. I will save the effort of toes coming out they book quite coincidentally its coming out next week which is the week that you intend to indict donald trump. Do you think thats a coincidence . Dont you see he is using you people to monetize the situation . He is using you to make money. You are going along with that. You havyouve not been your Due Diligence paid they had no interest in hearing that. Think its important for the American People to understand is that a prosecutor is not free to put someone on the stand who they either know is a Liar Testimony under oath. Or make well and has propensity to lie under oath. It destroys the whole idea of getting to the truth. It is an attack of due process. And prosecutor at a thousand reasons to know mr. Cohen would go on the stand and commit acts of perjury. You handed him the evidence with your emails. He handed him the evidence it is not hearsay. He spoke to you, his lawyer. Is not you speaking to someone else. He spoke to you dissing out hearsay is . Even if it did apply and it didnt heal it out of the way to cut you off during her testimony would they withheld evidence of the grand jury they still indict donald trump on they knew he was a liar. Not just because a federal judge that he is a liar. Its not just because he confessed to being a liar but is not because he was convicted of being a liar. Because he lied to them. That every reason to know it. They still put him on the stand. That Suborning Perch at the could have gotten around his go to the judge and say we have all this information about him. If they did that they knew he could not be the star witness. Final words, sir . I think thats absolutely correct. This case never should have been brought there is no theory under which this is a crime. I told Michael Cohen and our initial meeting their use theres nothing illegal with that. Since he said trump had nothing to do with his taking care of the storming Daniel Situation we did not follow it up any further. Under thank you usually the left wing kooks are out there attacking you trying to attack your credibility. It takes t guts to come forward. The only crime committed was committed in the courthouse with the testimony of Michael Cohens and crimes committed by the d. A. Office and Suborning Perjury. God bless you my friend. Take care of yourself. Thank you. Have a good day. Mark we will be right back. Shell renewable race fuel. Reducing emissions by 60 . Were moving forward with indycar. Because were moving forward with everybody. Shell. Powering progress. Mark Welcome Back America but we havwith different former sper newt gingrich. The other day the president of the United States assert Executive Privilege. Not for the presidency, not for the separation of power issue really. Joe biden wants to get reelected issue. He asserts Executive Privilege which congress is about to release the house to hold Merrick Garland in contempt because he refuses to release the videotape of joe bidens interview with former Special Counsel her. Which is absolutely apparently damning. Jamming of joe biden. Damning of us and cognition. Damning of it his handling of classified information. And on and on and on. They are exerting Executive Privilege. This is not the purpose of Executive Privilege and i want to give this to you, too. At eight separate occasions when the socalled generate six soviet commission and nancy pelosi demanding president ial papers of any kind he weighed Executive Privilege eight times. So Tens Of Thousands of documents that were supposed to be protected in the office of the presidency were turned over too nancy pelosi and alyssa cheneys committee. But here when they want to know exactly what joe biden said, not as president but said under this investigation they are asserting Executive Privilege. When you make of that . Whats the guys a crook and a liar so he behaves like a cork in a liar. As long as he is president you have to assume the constitution is very limited application for the rule of law has almost no application. Hes going to do whatever he can get away with it. I think any effort to try to define either biden or his appointees within a traditional american system of total contempt for the constitution. Total contempt for the