Mark Hello America i am mark levin this is life, Liberty Levin saturday to Gre Two Greas this evening john, you former Deputy Assistant attorney general and law professor, exquisite law professor, Douglas A Human Rights advocates and National InstituteSenior Fellow but will have him on as well to talk about the hitler youth that are taking over our colleges and universities. We forget said that lets talk about president ial immunity. Many of you watched or heard what was at the Supreme Court i know i did. And i got to thinking to myself, they are discussing the wrong thing. What am i talking about . Well, what is an official act of what is a personal act, judge cody barrett was that person was that private wasnt personal . Sotomayor talking about possible insurrection. About whats going on here want to read something about 1876. He did about a year ago when this first popped up all makes sense its very, very important. Brutal election in 1876. As pointed out by the university of Virginia CenterSheila Blackford in the president ial election of 1876 Democrats Milton Tilden Ran against republican rutherford b hayes. At the end of the election date no clear winner emerged the outcomes in South Carolina, florida, louisiana or unclear. Both parties claim a victory in those states. Republicancontrolled returning boards would determine the official electoral votes. Try to influence accounting of the votes they spoke to whom ever they could. They were doing whatever they had to do, they needed our votes they determine which votes to count could throw out votes if they deemed them fraudulent. Returning boards and all three states argued fraud, intimidation and violence in certain districts invalidated votes. They threw out enough democratic votes for hayes to win the presidency. Sounds criminal, sounds illegal. Sounds like election interference. Meanwhile i an Organist Range Development added that to the uncertain mix. Hayes won the state but want the republican Electors Jon W Watts was also postmaster of the u. S. Constitution for bids of federal officeholders from being elected. Watts plan to resign from his position in order to be a republican elector the governor of oregon was a democrat disqualified watts instead certified electors cast their ballots on december 6, 1876 generally the process went smoothly. But in four cuppercaseletter salem, oregon, tallahassee, florida, new orleans, louisiana two sets of conflicting electors of mets and voted so that u. S. Congress received two sets of conflicting electoral votes. Fake electors. Why did they do that . Because theyre going to challenge the election on the floor of the house were both chambers meet at the senate and the house to count the Electoral College votes. If you do not send a separate set of electors in, the other side automatically wins. Theres nothing to accoun count. Theyre not fake electors. They are a second set of electors sent by the other party. That must be a crime. 184 electoral votes while hayes had 165 with 20 votes still disputed. Tilden was in the lead substantially so. The Constitution Syphilis electoral votes be directed to the president and the senate who was a republican, thomas a w in the republicans argued he had the right to decide which votes to count. While, almost sounds like advice even by jon eastman the former Vice President. Democrats disagreed argued the democratic majority in the congress should decide. While a compromise was reached in 1877, Electoral Commission act commissioned five senators, three republicans, to democrats five representatives, three democrats, to republicans five Supreme Court justices believe it or not one independent to decide which votes to count and resolve the dispute. The independent Supreme Court justice look to serve on the and was replaced by republican justice. Had five Supreme Court justices three of whom republican appointees. Hayes is not initially support the commission he and his mind because it would enhance the legitimacy of the eventual winner. Unless the republicans control the vote for the Commission Voted eight seven toward the electoral votes from South Carolina, florida, and louisiana and one from oregon to hayes. He was 20 behind. Now, Democrat Members of congress threatened to prevent the count of the electoral votes and delay the resolution of the election. Frequent adjournments and filibusters. They hope to win some concessions from republicans. Blackmail . Obstruction . Two issues restoring their control of government thus White Supremacy in the south. Always an for slavery and segregation. Removing the last of the federal troops for railroads. Reach any sort of deal beyond what hayes promised to do in this letter of acceptance. Samuel j at randall democratic speaker of the house realizing created chaos of akbar on the democrats finally ruled filibusters out of order forcing completion of the account in the early hours march 2, 1877. 185 votes the tildens two days before he was inaugurated. Africanamericans right to vote by the time he took office in the federal troops in the south protecting republican governments limited to small area surrounding state houses the capitals of new orleans and columbia. Hayes insisted democrats in South Carolina and louisiana pledged to uphold civil and Voting Rights at a Black And White republicans, once the democrats agreed of the remaining troops of the south white southerners quickly turned their backs on their pledges systematically disenfranchising black voters through poll taxes, literary tests and intimidation. Democrats in the south grade segregated society using terror and violence to press africanamericans. Hayes had little power to control the democratic governments in the south. Anyway, 1876. Wow, what a year. Let me talk to about the allegations against trump and others. Brought by an unconstitutionally appointed rogue jack smiths appointment violates the constitution. Numerous prosecutorial powers never had to present himself to the set of Judicia Judiciary Coe or the senate for a vote. Basically this attempting to influence State Officials ladies and gentlemen. Canids are free to try to influence State Legislatures governors and whomever is involved to see if theres any way they make win or may have one or if theres something the other side did. It is not a crime it. It is not subverted but legitimate reject elections results. The election is not over until the house and the senate, the members of Congress Meeting and jointly say it is over. That is a whole point to. Organizing fraudulent slates of electors you mean like it 1876 . It is a second slate of electors to challenge the election on the floor of the house where this senate and house members are needed. They say goodbye who the president of the United States and the Vice President of the United States are going to be under our system. Using the Department Of Justice to conduct Sham Election criminal investigations. Sham, says who . Will criminal investigations been done by the Department Of Justice on Election Fraud, all the time. How the Radical Left WingCivil Rights Division that is constant accusing states and counties of criminal violations and election codes. Theres nothing d new with that. Knowingly and fraudulently attempting to the electoral votes. When you have a lawyer like jon eastman or others, trying to convince the president of the senate that is the president of the United States make the Vice President of the night states, Pennsbury Of The Park At X versus y at maybe pence may be uncomfortable. Maybe people may not like it, that is not a crime. It has never been a crime. Utilizing the events of january 6, 2021 to levy false claims of Election Fraud and convince Members Of Congress to delay the certification, free speech trying to influence the outcome of the election but not subverted and election part you are challenging the election. It has been down since the beginning of elections an in the nine states of america. Now, what does any of this have to do with the Immunity Hearing that took place in front of the Supreme Court . Why is that case in the court . Why is there, for the first time in American History a dispute over whether a president s immunity carries over to his post president ial life . When he conducted himself a certain way as president. Why is this front and center . Why is is never been an issue before . Because of trump . That is ridiculous but obama could be charge provided will be charged for this is ridiculous. Do you know why its in front of the Supreme Court . Because the Biden Administration that rogue unconstitutional prosecutor with their deaf, dumb, blind attorneys general have criminalized politics. They have criminalized the editorial process. Everything they claim that trump did is not a crime. Now how else do we know that . Currently through our own history they have criminalized elections in a political process what is trump charged with sedition . No. 1871 Clute Plucks A Klan Act and the reiteration for i just told you about an election that took place in 1876. After 1871 clute clocks and act was a mask. No one even thought about bringing a case against hayes comiccon State Legislatures, against anybody. The enron obstruction act, what is that all about . They use that at the u. S. Attorneys office in washington have the judges in washington d. C. Against the january 6 letters. The problem is that does not fit they had to rewrite the statute. The Circuit Court the threejudge panel with Biden Appointees. Applied to the purchase Supreme Courts having to hear that case as well. And decide on it. Then a law thats used against potentially corrupt federal contractors . That is what they are bringing against trump. The Supreme Court is sitting there at the debating society. It did not look like theyre debating a law they were debating philosophy. Whats private . What is official . What if Seal Team Six is sent to overthrow a president sends out the military. But the president s and alien . It was embarrassing it was humiliating is working for an unconstitutional prosecutor other assets of the constitutional system. The justice that should be familiar with jack smith pretty went there before he brought a preposterous case he rewrote the statute. And so the governor was convicted only to have eight justices who ruled on the case rule unanimously, over turn it and say the statute did not say what mr. Smith said it did put mr. Smith goes back to the Supreme Court with all of this stuff because he was criminalized in the electoral process. A political process that could be ugly bird that involves talking to one another. That involves separate electors he has criminalized every piece of it. Not under the insurrection or in Sedition Statutes but a dust up these ridiculous statues and throws in the donald trump. The courts caught up in all of the static the courts caught up in mr. Smiths world. The courts caught up in some think that is something quite dangerous. Now there going to decide what is official and private conduct on facts brought to the court in a case that never should have been brought against donald trump. Not by this prosecutor or any prosecutor. I will be righ a lot of new dry eye patients in my office tell me about their frequent dry eyes, which may point to dry eye disease. Millions of americans were estimated to have it. Theyve tried artificial tears again and again, but the relief is temporary. Xiidra can provide lasting relief. Xiidra treats the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. Dont use if youre allergic to xiidra. Common side effects include eye irritation, discomfort or blurred vision when applied to the eye, and unusual taste sensation. Doctor why wait . Ask your eye doctor about a 90day prescription for xiidra today. Mark welcome back america. Thats the u when the uc barklet a Deputy Assistant attorney general, Hoover InstitutionVisiting Fellow very busy but not too busy to not be able to come here but thank you. What do you make of my points question of the reason we are in the Supreme Court is because the Department Of Justice and this a prosecutor or doing things normal administrations will not do. They are pushing the edge of the envelope in every respect. Mark, i think you nailed it in your monologue. Im so glad you brought that out. Everyone its about the Supreme Court one of the going to be doing about immunity the Supreme Court is never here a case like this because no president and the history of the republic has tried to prosecute one of his predecessors. That is crossing a rubicon and it creates a terrible incentive for future president s. Because they have to always be worried. Thehave to be looking over their shoulder a future president s going to go after them. What you have is the absence of statesmanship, leadership, common sense there are no doubt president s in the past you mightve done things other people mightve thought would be criminal. Future president s always i was a best interest of our country to pardon a nixon. To get past controversies and look to the future and do its best for the american people. Unfortunately it is joe biden has triggered this crisis by continuing to press the Special Counsel investigation. That is where the fault lies on this. Listing to some of these injustices and they have been sucked into this world. Im listening is that private conduct is that official conduct . Do they actually think these nine justices are going to sit there and come up with a meaningful definition to apply and all circumstances when a president is sitting there under god knows what conditions making decisions. Having to make decisions and wonder. I heard judge jackson said that all of the lawyers for the Criminal Defense Lawyers sitting around them determining at the going at this place with that place or make these decisions . They are buying into this whole thing it is donald trump. What is the potential, truly for doing permanent damage to the separation of powers the power of the presidency and empowering future administrations to go after past administrations like they do in the Fascism Marxist regimes. If donald trump wins this case is because of that exact points. Lets just stop and talk about the future bird that is what is important in the question is what is this going to do to president s when they have to make the hardest decisions for the country . Do we want them to think about is my successor or my political opponent and the next election who was already going to get the nomination from his party . Are they going to turn the power of the government against me . What will end up doing a have presidency will not want to exercise any leadership. They will not take any risk. They will not make the tough calls they will be worried some successors going to want to throw them in jail. Isnt that what is happening right now to donald trump . Mark isnt this evidence of the problem is in this example number one the clan asked the enron act and some federal contractor act they are bringing against donald trump after the fact . They have to dig and dust off these laws. They have to try to force their arguments into the arcane statutes which is what jack smith did before and what he is known for but we have justices sink what if he orders the military to do this . Have we lost our minds here . Works even if trump were to lose this Immunity Question it will go back. Weve got to test, as you say exactly those kinds of charges. Must a shock you to is the flimsiness The Rush To Nature Against Trump but he will still be