off our power. was that meant to run? >> i think so. musk has offered twitter $41 billion in cash to take the company private. twitter's board is made at 1:00 p.m. eastern today to carefully review musk's latest takeover bid. twitter is one of the largest social media platforms claiming 330 million monthly active users around the world. musk, has criticized the country for not living up to free speech principles and says that it needs to be transformed. if elon musk requires this, we may just see him do that. okay. do you think he is serious? >> pete: i do. how crazy is it to be back on the couch. >> amen. >> harris: i thought i heard an amen. >> look at that. >> pete: it's great to see. i will say, i will give it in amen as well to elon musk. i think he is serious. i think this is a guy who has made a lot of money and has been very successful. loves this country and the freedoms it affords. looks at a space like twitter and says that it used to be a public forum now it's not. the business model also fundamentally broken. i'm going to buy into great leverage. now that i see from the inside a little bit more, i realize how broken it is. i wanted all. and i take it private. if they walk away from the deal, which they might, and he decides to get rid of his shares, that puts them in a really precarious situation as well. as far as the shareholders and stock price. no, i did not have on my bingo card one week ago, elon musk you know, tries to save free speech in america. but he's a freethinker and a bold guy. and i hope that he stares this down. i thought we were stuck to alternate ecosystems as conservatives or freethinkers, create your own. it would be amazing if you could take a brand and revitalize it and make it a true. >> harris: wow. that is so precise what he said. he gives that option and it's already established which is been part of a challenge for other platforms coming from the ground up. he starts at 330 million followers. >> pete: it's like if cnn could ever figure out. >> harris: yeah they got 10,000 years for that money. shannon, i saw you over there nodding in agreement paired what do you see about this? >> shannon: any time the establishment gets freaked out or silicon valley, they're like no elon musk can't touch twitter. then i start to think, why? like that's a little bit of the contrary in me that they are so freaked out about it. but remember, he calls himself a free speech absolutist. remember, he put the starling satellites up and try to help communication stay going in ukraine. and while people said that he should block russian media and propaganda. he said no. i will not do that. he said he is absolutely about free speech unfiltered in its purest form. i think that scares twitter. >> harris: wow. i want to get to this paired because there's another big voice in the business world. mark cuban tweeted today, "every major tech company google, facebook, is on the phone with their antitrust lawyers asking if they can buy twitter and get it approved. and twitters on the phone with their lawyers asking which can be either white night. good to be interesting." emily. >> emily: contrast to that, with elon musk tweets before, he said that the next board meeting is going to be lit. to talk about bingo, he's the only one apparently that saw the writing on the wall. i thought it was interesting. the language he used in his letter to the board, where he said, twitter has the potential to serve truly as a free speech marketplace in the global democracy. he says as of now, the way it is is becoming come as an investor, he realizes it will never serve in that capacity in a way to being run right now. it will not serve both as a free speech portal and also as a really fundamental aspect of a democracy. that is why i'm coming in as the white night, so that i can pivot. i think what is interesting to your point, remember he grew up in south africa. in the republic of south africa, the basic constitution on could hear someone who did not grow up under a.r.c. particular constitution but he values and appreciates what free speech means, what capitalism means, what anti-regulation means. all of that. if anyone can say that he can, but to mark cuban's point, if there are other big tech heads coming in here at trying to stand it down, i know who i'm rooting for and it is not them. >> harris: wow. i have never had that usage of lollipop had. before it popped my head. >> kayleigh: my take is this, brian seltzer said there's a lot of fear of elon musk taking over. i'm sure brian seltzer was wide awake and i think about this because guess what it means, if conservatives are given a free public square where they can say their opinion unbridled, uncensored, and shadowed. if they are given a place for the media is no longer leaning left, were social media cannot censor hunter biden, here's what happens. conservatives win nearly every time. when you look at the hunter biden story for example, media research center did a poll. they said 36% of biden voters did not know about the scandal. 13% said it would not change the vote meaning that president trump would have gotten 289 electoral votes. that is what happens when you censor an entire story to protect the candidate. that is exactly what is happening here. elon musk, we will see what he does. i'm excited because elon musk made the key point, you hit on it. because twitter was a public square and social media was a public square, they're going to section 2:30 protection meaning they are virtually immune from lawsuits. former president cannot take them on. you cannot sue them. they are no longer a public square when you're censoring half the country. we need to roll back on section 2:30 protection for that was the biggest regret for me with the trump administration. >> harris: it is interesting. because at first elon musk was asked about him, people wondered if he really was serious when he did not take that seat on the board. but why would you. they've invited you to sit at a party, when they are probably not going to listen to. even though you own 9.1, 9.2%. because he made a big guy already. >> pete: he beat biden himself to the party. and if he took a seat at the port he would be limited in what he could buy and what he could do. clearly he had grander plans from the beginning paired shannon come at your point, i love the fact that heads are exploding inside, twitter heads with these blue checkmarks, they've grown up in a cocoon where speech is violent. speech absolutist are dangerous. that's where the clashes. we have a lot of young people who believe in this idea that disinformation is dangerous. that you cannot tweet out the wrong gender pronoun for someone here that needs to be shut down. this is a total clash of worldviews. of whether or not we should have absolute free speech. that's why, elon musk has left a legacy on this country whether it's tessler spacex, this would be an even bigger one. >> harris: that's interesting what you just said. that word disinformation. because they got to decide what was disinformation. it was not an algorithm. we know that it's human beings at twitter. because when that racial epithet was trending against senator tim scott, remember when they called him. they left that trend. they actually made it floats to the topic they manipulated it. it was not an algorithm that was human base there. they did that. they want to control the disinformation, whatever it is. it's either something that they determined not to be true, or something that they wish was not true. emily. >> emily: that's exactly right. keep in mind we will get to this conversation later. but for example, the maniac that shot people in new york subway, he was allowed, racist rants were allowed to thrive on twitter and other platforms. and to your point, other gender pronouns missing. that's what gets you cancel. during to question the cdc commentary to question authorities. >> harris: i wear it like a badge. >> emily: because it was humans ascertaining what constitutes violence and free speech or not. they were absolutely condemning and censoring those voices needed to be heard. >> harris: all right. and we just mentioned, the subway shooting suspect now in custody. however, new york city mayor is going social media firms for allowing his vile anger fueled video on their platforms. remember, youtube said it had a watchful eye. google him. that's next. at xfinity, we live and work in the same neighborhood as you. we're always working to keep you connected to what you love. and now, we're working to bring you the next generation of wifi. it's ultra-fast. faster than a gig. supersonic wifi. only from xfinity. it can power hundreds of devices with three times the bandwidth. so your growing wifi needs will be met. supersonic wifi only from us... xfinity. let's do it. we already hit the bank, the museum, the jewelry store. where to next? next, we save hundreds with xfinity mobile. huh? -mmm. you know, unlimited data. oh. nationwide 5g at no extra cost. [ chuckles ] that's a steal. wait, wait, wait. are we stealing the safe? we're saving so much, it's like stealing. well, you're the tech expert webs. is it reliable? you tell me. wah ping. it's reliable and fast. wireless savings so good, even the bad guys love it. switch to xfinity mobile today. and see dreamworks "the bad guys." speak of the suspect in tuesday's terrifying subway shooting is expected to make his first court appearance any minute now. frank james faces a federal terrorism charge with which if convicted could send him to prison for life. nypd arrested and yesterday, after a citywide manhunt. the suspect had a history of posting disturbing rants on social media. including anger fueled tirades about race, politics, even new york city mayor, eric adams. the mayor now calling out big tech for failing to report james to law enforcement. watch. >> i cannot play a song on a social media channel that belongs to someone else without them identifying that. why aren't we identifying these dangerous threats. why aren't we being more proactive, instead of waiting for this to happen. there's some responsibility i think on social media companies, they must lean into while we are watching these postings and these threats. every day and no one is giving an early warning sign to law enforcement. >> kayleigh: shannon he is absolutely right. manufactured censorship emanating from these social media platforms were certain things that infringe copyright laws or any type of dip into their potential advertising revenue, they are on it immediately. but really violent truly potentially tragic circumstances that are so evident looking back in hindsight, those are ignored. before too busy shutting on "the new york post" of the hunter biden's are because they do not want to share certain information. for satire, that's the point of satire. but i also have questions about this guy because he was known to law enforcement. a number of different agencies but he has had run into before. it raises the question for me about potential charges he could have faced in the past. he was able to legally buy a gun because he did not have felony charges. that is charging decisions as well. was there anything in his past that rose to a felony level charge that did not get charged or played down. i don't know. there is so much more to know about him. he was not a stranger to law enforcement. >> emily: that's right. that begs the question on that very point. in the criminal justice reform, the very progressive left have been advocating. the dangerous kind not the kind that comes from actual justice seeking changes but actually that kind where they are reclassifying crimes, violent, former violent felonies that now all of a sudden or a misdemeanor or are now all of a sudden nonviolent, stripping judges of any type of discretion in order to designate that, let alone put someone behind bars. the suspect himself said that the mental health system failed me. >> pete: which it did. it all has that cascading effect, to the point where when you walk onto the subway new york city today, you expect to be harassed or surrounded by people who have serious mental complications and have not been addressed. and potentially accosted. that's like the expectation. and the person in there doing it knows that if they do that, nothing will come of it. that's not because the police do not want to do their job. but it's because the park behind pumps them back into the system. time and time again. every time you get on public transit or walk the streets of new york, your plane relent. with your own personal safety. in a town where the second amendment does not exist for law-abiding citizens. but criminals have no problem getting their hands on guns legally or illegally. that reclassification is very legitimate point. he was able to get it because the system said so. >> harris: we know what was on the blotter report in those cases. this case got dropped. included a criminal sex act. larceny, precession of burglary items. some of them were pretty bad parent from 1991 until 2007. this is a rap sheet that you need a very large dumpster to put everything in. so we don't know all that. but it's an excellent point. because if he says the system failed, because he even pleaded guilty to many of these charges. that's kind of what is interesting about this too. try to sit for second on the mayor though. i get his point. on social media. if you look at what this guy was posting, he needed something. especially when he talked about wanting to kill people. he needed intervention. he needed a lot. it is kind of like biden blaming put in for oil prices. >> kayleigh: good analogy. >> harris: he took this job as a cop for 22 years, eric adams. started in january of 2022. things were sliding over already in the subway. he wants to talk the politics of guns, what about the woman, the 57-year-old woman who got hit in the back of the head with a hammer. 13 times all on video. why weren't the three cameras that would have been key to catching it james even earlier, why were they inoperable. there are a lot of things that he could put some pressure on now. is ta responsible for that? absolutely. but two weeks ago he said he would fix it after they said they were having perception problems with crime in the subway. there's a lot to get to with the mayor. let's see if he can step up. i'm not saying that youtube should not take down her dress. i don't think they take it down. i think they address it. tell local authorities, whatever it takes. let's not let him use that as the reason why this guy was not on his radar. >> kayleigh: that is such a great point. there's a constellation of factors that exacerbates a tragedy like this. or enables a tragedy like this to happen. the failures at multiple levels. but chief among them, or equal among them, is the amplification of someone because it's hard to stomach as a regular citizen, that people who dare to question against the progressive left herd mentality on social media are automatically canceled. and then something like this, where if it had been amplified, someone could have if they saw something said something. now to extend wishes that opportunity or that possibility. the hypocrisy is really hard to stomach with the social media platforms. >> kayleigh: it is. this maniac posted a video on march 1st we said i wanted to kill having an centered i was planning to kill everything i saw. that was on march 1st. there is a trend in this country, and worldwide, when you look at these things. jama did a study in what they found was that they studied 170 perpetrators, nearly half of the time, 44% of the time these perpetrators communicated what they wanted to do before hand. "the new york times" did a study of a hundred shooting perpetrators and found that 60 specifically said that they are going to do xy xyz. she has time and time again for the michigan shooting was all last year. he literally drew a picture of what he wanted to do. aurora, colorado. there is a threat assessment out of that individual. virginia tech, the individual there name to danger. there is a trend. so rather than kathy hochul, literally minutes after people are shot or hours i should say, two hours, getting up and alluding to gun violence is the reason for this. and mayor adams talking about that. instead of doing that, let's get together, right and left and study what we can do when people communicate their intense before hand and then you want to do it. there's something here and it is not begun. >> harris: there is no way they did not have him and hit all of his videos. remember, 2007 was not that long ago. it's not like these platforms did not exist. >> emily: absolutely. that's why classification and discretion is so important. legally, in some states to be considered an actual threat, you need to have it. with an action. an actual action. threats do matter. that's the whole point. threats lead to things like this. all of that matters. >> pete: there's a difference between these segments. it's wanting to have a political opinion that you at least don't like, it's one thing to say you going to shoot somebody. that's a totally different free-speech issue. >> emily: there you go. we should take everything a one fiercely. coming up, with crime and inflation soaring and the president's approval number sink into new lows, democrats are now bracing for nightmare scenarios come november. one strategist is calling" a biblical disaster. stay with us. "♪ ♪ >> emily: new and devastating poll numbers putting the president's job approval rating at an all-time low. a new poll shows that biden's job approval is barely over 30%. with more than half of the respondents disapproving of the current state of affairs. with just over six months until the 2022 midterm election, democrats are fearing the worst. one strategist not holding back, saying that november will be a biblical disaster. the last 48 hours and certainly not helping their cause, with the release of devastating reports on inflation and the economy. adding to other concerns like rising crime rates and the surge of the southern border which is only going to get worse. all of which are sure to be at the forefront of voters minds. this is like a sinking titanic peace and nothing can help this administration recover, not an ill-fated speech in iowa where a bird intervenes. not a supreme court nominee, not the perception of being a wartime president, not even they are not president trump vote for me. nothing can help them. what perplexes me, about 13 voters say they still like them. about 10 out of 10 people i talk to say they don't. i don't know who they poll with liberal media. i don't think it's 30% paired >> pete: i agree. but sometimes you just have to stop and say 33? that low this fast? alarm bells have to be going after the question is not whether or not it will be biblical, it's which one. is it a flood, drought, plague, locus? i don't know which calamity is going to be. we can take down the items. we do often. inflation, border, crime, illegal immigration. whenever you want to focus on. ukraine, afghanistan. we can go down the list. but it's also the cultural issues that they have allowed her to bubble to the top. whether it's gender or critical race theory or even the way covid is politicized. i think you can manage if your democrat, the fact that you're getting hit a little bit and you have to rationalize that away. but if you feel like your party has lost sanity, that's where the independent numbers even lower. 26%. the adults aren't in charge over there. you cannot undo that with a press release or a hashtag. their backs are against the wall for all the right reasons. they've got in bed with a crazy left and now they are associated with them. >> kayleigh: when you look at the breakdown here, look at these are four key cohorts to win an election. 26% approve. 37% of women, just 21% of those 18 to 34. democrats need these people. >> harris: you say young people. do they vote that sort of thing. but the performative value that biden has tried to show is mainly to young people. about the woke issues. he needs them to at least not be an enemy. she needs to have friends that can say to the base, i'm the real deal. he's got to perform for that younger group, even though they may not normally go to the poll in the same number of people who are above the age of 60. if you look statistically, that's true. so you talk about what gives you the reset for biden. i asked a democrat guest this last hour and she immediately toggled to something else. i don't think they know. you know what triggers voters? in party confusion. in party fighting. so what voters, democrat voters are seeing right now is the president that cannot figure out which way to flex. to i flex toward the woke and then every time he does something, jen psaki at the white house lectern has a say in a press briefing, that's not what our policy is. well do i flex the more moderate? she comes back out again pair that's not our policy. they cannot figure out what to do. so what that does as you get guys like who live along the border who are democrats going, title 42 are you going to wipe that away? knife got a real problem inside the party. because it's tied to national security. which again, is a leaders number one job. >> emily: is very simple. but shannon can only look at the president and vice president, the president has done one interview and the vice president has done six. this seems to be an inverse correlation for the more he put kemal out there, the slower the presidency seems to go. i don't answer, but i think having more than one interview would probably help. >> shannon: auto. i think after the performance and critiques of some of these issues, they probably like let's scale this back bring it in. when you look at overall numbers, of course they think about the economy. that is really the thing that drives people in their voting. can i put food on the table and take care of my kids and gas in the car. when you look a clear policy and how the country moves in the right a wrong direction, it is upside down by more than 37 points. that coupled with the fact that historically, the party of the president is in power, at first midterm after his election is not a good one. they are facing all kinds of problems. the president is upside down for the economy, inflation, the border come as you mention, hairs. it will get exponentially worse. in about a month. with the democrats controlling the white house, the house, and the senate, they cannot point to anybody else for these border problems. the cultural stuff, i don't know what they have two rally around at this point. take is just about every indicator is a super for them. >> emily: including california paired this would be like a republican president not having wyoming and oklahoma. red red red states. but in california, the vice president said i think it's 35%, 37% right around there. home state. speedily i wanted to say about someone which is 37% of residents where you are from and where you spent the majority of your public service career, which is the bay area, have a favorably your view. let alone the rest of california. two-thirds of registered voters believe that the countries on the wrong track. in california. get this, 65% of voters not affiliated with the political party, think that it is headed in the wrong trajectory. she is absolutely failed the people who know her best. and they are saying. you brought up the young voters earlier. interestingly in california, they have the worst marks of inflation against the president and vice president. it is not lost on them. >> harris: they don't make a lot anyway. right, because they are young and starting out in their careers. so yes, it is easier to get a job right now because we have so many of them. but if they good job and get a second job in a third job and still can't afford anything, what does that tell them about the policies of this administration? >> emily: that's right. the line that stuck out to me so much from that poll is that it said that the number captures deeply pessimistic about the future. we will see the decisions as a result in november. >> harris: it should be better coming out of the pandemic. >> emily: it's not. you've got 35% of lipton california supporting the vp. coming up, president biden doubling down and extending the math on the planes and trains. my goodness paired but guess he does not have to wear a mask? that's next. ♪ ♪ >> emily: the way to to finally take off your mask on public transit just got longer. 15 days to be exact. the cdc extending the federal mask mandate on planes, trains, and other forms of public transportation through may 3rd. this is despite ceos at the major airlines asking president biden to end the mandate. the evident hypocrisy here is the fact that title 42's covert restrictions prohibit a lot of the illegal immigration, they are just find it really those away but not the mask mandate. the cdc is basically a political arm of the democrat party at this point with the teachers union dictating guidelines. so maybe the dnc should start writing the talking points. >> harris: i think they already are. >> emily: what i don't understand is that argument that has surfaced lately that the cdc in fact is political and that we should wanted to be paired that we should reduce the politicized nation to a small p that we should accept the variables that include these recognitions because the next inevitable pandemic will mean that it will be sort of data for the panelists. i totally reject that argument. the cdc and the scientists in those positions that are part of that esteemed organization should remain just that. science-based, database, medicine base. and leave it to the elected officials and leaders to make those decisions. because that's what i elect my governor and my mayor and those that we have entrusted public health decisions to hold. that's why we do it paired so they can take into consideration economic factors and social factors and every thing else that goes into the decision of locking down and mask requirements. the cdc as a hammer, will always see having as a nail. what is the electorate that should choose to make the decisions that affect our economy and our livelihood on a daily basis. that is not the cdc. >> kayleigh: take a look at this. these are the rules for citizen to grow. this is a 2-year-old nonputting on a mask on an airplane. it's very hard to get them to do so. being dragged off the plane. u.s. citizen to roll. let's flip. here is an illegal immigrant coming to the united states of america. they are boston to washington, d.c., where they get to get off a bus. the u.s. citizen 2-year-old, very different than this we get a free ticket essentially to anywhere. >> pete: it's amazing. it has nothing to do with science. at this point, dismiss that completely. the same people who were telling you wait 15 days of the same people telling you it's 15 days to spread. so i think what america needs right now, is a first. i will say this in the military context. at the end of a long week of work at 5:00 p.m. you're standing in formation. you want to be released for the weekend. the whole country is ready to be released for the weekend. but somewhere the first sergeant is talking to the commander and they are not quite out in front of the formation. we need someone to come out in front of the formation and say, dismiss. this is over. if you want to wear a mask, you can wear a mask. it is your choice. sleep with it. i don't care. do whatever. but for the rest of us, the science has shown us and who is affected and who is in. make it a personal decision, especially on airplanes. someone take a leadership role. the white house is going out on c. someone make a call. i think everyone is just waiting for that moment. no one will stand up and do it. >> kayleigh: harris let's put the science. we have pictures of kids and masks. your thoughts? >> harris: will first of all, i don't think that really people get the point of how bad this really is. we are not able to test all these people. so if they are coming over with delta, or omicron, or what i like to call the og variant. the original variant that killed so many people. or the sub variant of omicron. whatever it is. we likely will not know until they become symptomatic and then they lean on our health care system to fix that. so we aren't able after may 23rd. if they want to extend that the way they have these mask mandates, maybe we could get that so they can come up with an actual plan. that's a bipartisan group that is growing is pushing them to do on title 42. there really, what this is saying is that it's not really that urgent of the matter. any more. because if you're willing to let it flow in droves by literally millions potentially. because you cannot test them all. millions come across. again for second year in a row. north of 2 million projected. if you're willing to let that happen, and how serious are you about covid. what they are doing comes from narcissism. that's what they want politicization with a small p. the bigger word's popularity. if they want that. they want to be popular. they want to show people that they are honest. the president promised he was going to shut down covert. while he has not been able to do that. so what can we make it look like that code is still worse than it ever was. let's do that part. but continue to stick with this policy on the border. because of the policy. so really it puts us in a position of them, where's the policy meant for mishandling what's going on or not. i really need it. but you know i don't need come i don't need for them to say they're sorry and not change their behavior. because that's manipulation. >> emily: you mentioned narcissism which is a perfect segue for my next segment with shannon. no, no, no. you will see where i'm going up real quick. you'll see where i'm going. we can't end this segment without a word from dr. anthony fauci. roll the tape. >> why only 15 days? >> it's a moving target and we want to sue the pattern is here in the united states. it's not like things are static. things are moving. were seen an increase throughout the country. were seeing it more so in certain cities and in certain regions than others. until we get a really good handle on it, i think it's prudent. >> emily: the problem is angela mitchell saying why only 15 days, problem number two, filed she says we are seeing an increase throughout the country. so why andrea, follow-up with why roback title 42. >> shannon: there so much to say by the spirit first fought in on the cdc bad list for a long time. they have a page on the website that says say no to raw cookie dough. you cannot eat your steak less than medium. medium rare is not okay for the cdc. i take evan with a grain of salt. the fact that when speaker pelosi kissed the president on the cheek a couple of weeks ago that was not considered close contact. i think so much of what the cdc has said coming to the normal everyday person, does not jive with common sense. plus, i would like to say that if you've followed joe scarborough who to doubt it's time to get rid of that mandate. you've lost them as people are over it. a lot of people. we were told in a space of travel keep these airlines and flow throughout the pandemic. it's safer than being in an operating room we were told at some point. but now, the only place. i wear masks on a plane. so i'm not sure that any of this lines up with what we want to think makes sense. i think that they've done such a deserted, with conflicting information makes messaging the people don't know what to trust. speak to you on everyone's lists shannon. i do know that cdc said that. so take it for what it's worth. make your own informed decision. >> harris: i'm a bad parent now. we eat on inordinate amount of cookie dough. >> emily: i love it. from foxy to cook it out. just ahead, the man who attempt to assassinate president ronald reagan 40 years ago. get this, is now a musician and has a sold-out concert. who is buying these tickets? ♪ ♪ >> harris: and john hinckley jr. who assisted and thankfully failed to assassinate president ronald reagan in 1981, is now a musician. he is now set to perform a sold-out show in brooklyn, new york, this summer. he had been in psychiatric care until 2016 and officially launched its music career in 2020. here's a peek ♪ ♪ >> harris: so he is doing covers obviously. he's pushing back on criticism with his now deleted tweet. you know tweets don't go away. here's the tweet. it states that hinckley did not mess up nearly as many lives as reagan did. and that time was served for his action. wow. pete. >> pete: yeah. leave it to brooklyn. these are the same hipsters who would wear t-shirts of shaker far and think he's a hero. there is no willingness to hold up people hooted sick and twisted things and then validate them. i wish i had more original commentary that it is discussing trade but if you are willing to attend that, you're effectively willing to support somebody who tried to assassinate an american president. >> harris: and not all of brooklyn obviously. hipsters are everywhere. they are in jersey too. >> emily: i went down a bit of a rabbit hole in the spirit he also does original work and it is also subpar. i think that's a nice way to say it. it's not really good. the melodies or the leaders. he does talk about going to the dark night and how is been to the other side. in june of this year, all of his conditions were released and dump it disguised totally free. he's also started a record label and is looking to put together a band. so if any of these hipsters really want to get involved, why not join his band. he looked for a bass player, a drummer and a lead guitarist. i'm telling you, i'm fascinated and it can't turn away from a train wreck kind of situation. but he says he wants serious inquiries and he's doing this all through a po box so i can provide that for you if you want me to. >> harris: that's a lot of detail. next time i lose my keys and come in you. emily. >> emily: i spoke to secret service agents that were hinckley's case agents for a year. he said that he always has marvels at the fandom and attention this guy gets. he got more attention from women then he did when he was single. it goes into that same bucket as manson and scott peterson and all of these people who for some reason, because of their criminal behavior, have attracted a swath of the population that is absolutely disgusting. their obsession and the revering of these criminals keep in mind, remember my nation show that talked about the crimes that result in laws that are passing in the united states. you have to understand new york, it resulted in the first law that makes it illegal for these criminals to profit off of their behavior. i argue, that any fame he has is from his criminal behavior. it's not that he's writing a book on the crime itself. that's how we can get around it. the only reason we know is discussing name is because he injured four people, tempered to assassinate the president, including a d.c. officer, press secretary, who eventually died of his injury. this is a horrible human. everyone who purchases a ticket and supports this, in my opinion is pretty horrible too. i believe in redemption but i do not believe in supporting a criminal. >> harris: it's so interesting. we know where the money will come through. he is setting up his own venue to attract other artists. it could be the very people at that venue who support him so much. >> emily: it's amazing to me. that's the worst sound of ever heard when i listen to his music. i wanted to plug my ears. why are these tickets selling out? only because of his criminal background. no one would go to see a joe schmo who sounded anything like that. he has 26,000 youtube subscribers. excuse me, one? who are these 26,000 people who want to follow this guy. i simply do not get it. unless james brady, who the press briefing room is named after, paralyze and harm to secret service officer. a police officer. we are going to glorify the sky? i don't get it. it reminds me of people glorifying the cop killer we talked about earlier who's been given a platform. why are we lifting up people who bought for their criminal activity, would not be known to the world. >> pete: you heard it in the tweet. it's because of ronald reagan. >> kayleigh: one of the greatest presidents ever. >> pete: hate to say but it feels like he's part of it. >> harris: so you think politics come into it? >> emily: i remember this. i remember my mom and two years and just this harsh over the school where she was a teacher and i went to school and i remember the complete freak out about this. i don't know if it's a younger hipster kind of generation that does not remember what it's like to have a president shot and to walk through that and remember how horrific that was. and maybe they just don't get that. >> harris: i'm glad a new church they are focused on identity, gender identity in second grade instead of this. when you say that. i mean seriously. they are doing our job as parents, not to bring too much into this. but we have those conversations with our children. i really want them to get this historical part right. if what you're saying is true, shannon. >> shannon: you think about hinckley. at that moment on, if you would've said to me, even it's a little kid, not understanding the justice system having else. the man that did this and shot the president today will one day walk free and sell out concerts. i don't think anybody would have believed that in 1981. >> harris: all right. we have a very special guest right after the break. more outnumbered. ♪ ♪ >> tears erupt >> cheers erupting as an nypd detective was released in january. he was shot on duty while serving a search warrant staten island. he saved his entire team from a hail of gunfire using his ballistic shield after he was shot. he joins us now. detective, thank you for your service, thank you for your heroism, such an honor to have you with us today. >> thank you for the invite, we had a great time today, my team, appreciate everything. >> harris: the commissioner has recognized you as a hero here at nypd, it's been a tough year for all of us here watching you under pressure as officers. we love you, and we support you. >> thank you for your service. >> god bless you. >> thank you so much, we support all of nypd, everyone in blue, grateful every day. >> harris: and you have your crew here. >> thank you for watching, and now "america reports." >> john: emily, thank you. fox news alert to start us off, the word's richest man says he wants to transform twitter by taking it private. elon musk's $43 billion offer to buy twitter sending shock waves through silicon valley. could it be a win for free