Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | com

Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus couldve come from a lab in wuhan. Theres no chance. Many people believe them. Almost no one asked, unfortunately, why peter sick particularly might be saying this. We dont know the answer. He was Funding Research on current of viruses in wuhan. He was doing that using american tax dollars fed to him by tony fauci. According to one approved, he was authorized to conduct Virus Infection Experience across a range of subcultures from different species and humanized mice. Why humanized mice . They mimic human beings. The collaborators wanted to make viruses more infectious. He didnt hide this. In december of 2019, he appeared on a podcast on youtube that was owned by google, by the way, to brag about how easy it is in the lab to manipulate coronavirus. Coronavirus is a pretty good you know all of this stuff, but you can mimic it in the lab pretty easily. It drives a lot of what happens. So you can get the sequence, build the protein, and insert into the backbone of another, do some work in the lab. Tucker in one of the great head hitting moments in recent history, we learned that the guy directing tied to experiments in wuhan was a very same guy telling the entire world this virus could have come from the wuhan lab. A Conflict Of Interest anyone . Its absurd. Its beyond belief. Whats amazing is google knew this. The evidence was right there on one of its own platforms. Youtube, which owns. Why did google continue to rely on peter sick of all people on earth to decide what the rest of the people would know about covid . Thats the answer. Tonight, we know why. It turns out that tony fauci was not the only one funding daszaks research. Google was funding that research, too. It sounds unlikely, but we know that. We know it from a new piece in the National Post which publish the evidence. Peter jessica admitted it in prints. If we dont need to speculate, its right there. It beginning in 2010, several Research Papers explicitly acknowledged that they were funded by google. One of those papers was observational and alyssa Analyzing Bats to humans. In this case, in bangladesh. It they may facilitate the transmission of viruses either through direct contact or food routes. They paid Peter Taussig to take his study of viruses to china, now famous bat cage. The perceptions associated with transmission and highly exposed Human Population at the animal human interface. Yes, daszak knows an awful lot about abhorrent pandemics. In fact, he is implicated in one, and google is likely implicated in it as well. Together, google sick work to keep critical, factual information from the public as nearly 4 Million People from around the world died from the virus. Its a horrible story, someday perhaps soon we will learn all of it. If in the meantime, as we await the indictments we are overcoming, the whole story what makes you wonder bigger things. How many other dangerous, potentially world altering experiments are going on right now in this and other countries. Funded by the Secretive Daisychain of Government Health agencies and ngos . Expense you never heard of. If they can enter your viruses to make them more infectious, what else are they doing . Youre not supposed to ask that question. Youve been commanded to trust these signs and get back to watching netflix, please. Only neanderthals as questions. Thats been the arrangement and science for quite a while. You pay for, we do it, its all good. Why does that continue . Why do we know that liars and moral pygmies, people like tony fauci and the soul is thought google hq are running global science. Maybe its worth being slightly more inquisitive about whats happening in labs around the world. Why not . It could affect us. Take a look at this. A conference featured a professor of philosophy at hes the most influential bioethicists in the world, and thats a fact that while macy once you see this tape. Here he is explaining that Climate Change can be solved by something called, human engineering. My view is that what we need is a really robust ethical framework. Within this ethical robust ethical framework, i think theres a way Going Forward where we can do this ethically. Because theres a lot of opportunities for this to some of the big World Problems. One thing is Climate Change. There, i just use Climate Change is a really big problem, we dont know how to solve it. It turns out we can use human engineering to help address Climate Change. Tucker heres a tip, anyone who uses the phrase, robust ethical framework wouldnt know ethics if they got in the shower with them. You know that perfect because he uses the phrase, human engineering. Human engineering . The name alone should make you pause and take a deep breath. People are not buttons. You cant just add it. Much less come in the human soul. People are living beings. They are alive. We outlined his proposal in a recent paper in ethics policy and environment. In that paper, he suggests a solution to the problem of people Eating Hamburgers. How do we get them to stop Eating Hamburgers . Not convincing them that hamburgers are bad, you tell people something, and if they believe you, they do come in if they didnt, they didnt. Thats too timeconsuming. At the new models, we use pharmaceuticals to make people comply. He proposes a nationwide system like that, a pill that would make people nauseous at the sight of red meat. Given that Climate Change is an existential threat thats limiting our time on earth do 20, 12 years, six months pick your exaggeration. Its hard to believe a pill like that would be optional. It would be mandatory pretty soon. Does that sound like a dystopian fantasy . He is deadly serious. Watch him explain. Heres a thought. It turns out we know a lot about we have this intolerance to for example, i have milk intolerance. There are some people who are intolerant to crayfish. Possibly, we can use human engineering to make it a case that we are intolerant to certain kinds of meat, certain kinds of bovine proteins. If thats something we can do through family and engineering. We could address a really big World Problems to human engineering. Tucker human engineering. Why do we laugh at alex jones again . Again, says the bioethicist, human engineering is the answer. Wait a second, you ask, human engineering . Thats kind of creepy. It dimly try this kind of thing in europe 80 years ago, didnt we agree were not going to do that ever again . True. Bioethicists have short memories. In any case, Climate Change is suppressing emergency, we dont have time to consider the consequences of a response to this existential crisis. Heres an idea, lets fiddle with the human genome to see if we can make Human Children smaller than they are now. A race of dwarves, they would eat less and they would be cheaper to transport. That would reduce Greenhouse Gases. If think of the lifetime Greenhouse Gas emissions required the energy thats required to transport argie people rather than smaller people. If we are smaller just by 15 centimeters, thats a i did the math, its a mass reduction of 25 , which is huge. 100 years ago, we were smaller. Exactly about 15 centimeters smaller. Think of just the dash you know, lifetime Greenhouse Gas emissions if we had smaller children. At that something that we could do. Tucker imagine if we had smaller children . Little tiny children. Think of how little it would admit to. Think how easy it would be to pick them up, juggle them around, control them . All we need to do is experiment on Human Children, and we can solve Climate Change. I was at a public conference five years ago, nobody said anything. Surprised . You shouldnt be what you heard is less ghoulish than things happening in labs right now. This is what science looks like when its completely decoupled from wisdom and from decency and christianity. Its a Science Fiction novel come to life, except its real. Mike gallagher is a wisconsin Member Of Congress. Thank you so much for coming. When can we we are getting piecemeal the story about how these experiments took place, who funded them, and what they may have read too. When are we going to get the whole story do you think . Luckily, the damage freaking scientist that signed the letter are starting to admit we need to investigate the hypothesis. Theres still a lot more we need to do. We need to immediately declassify all or relevant intelligence and release all of the Grant Information related to any u. S. Taxpayer dollars that went to wuhan. What were seeing is the troubling pattern, whereby the scientist and social media companies, the useful idiots in the American Media trying to get so many inconvenient facts down the memory hole, that it finally got clocks. Even still if not for the work of a few reporters integrity, a few commentators like yourself, right now the Democratic Party would be trying to nominate algae and daszak for a nobel prize. At Companies Like google, they look at the control that the Chinese Communist party has over censorship of what people think, what they share, what they write. If they dont look at it as a dystopian future to be avoided, they look at it as an aspirational model, a goal to be attained, a tool with which to crush dissent and enforce orthodoxy. If thats the road we go down, science no longer exists. Science is all about dissent. His agreement, questioning hypotheses. Our time, crazy ideas. Helio centricity was a crazy idea when it was first talked about. We cant let google to do our thinking for us. We might as well accept her Chinese Communist overlord and get a head start on our credit score. Tucker it was so nicely put and deep. I think, completely true. I think the leadership of the Republican Party waits around to be called racist and thinks of ways to juneteenth, maybe they will stop criticizing us . Why not use this issue on which you are right, you have the facts on your side, and be more weight on your side to put the other side on the defensive . Why are we classifying these documents . As we pointed out, we have a special committee to investigate coronavirus, the response to it, and yet the committee has refused to investigate the origin of the disease itself, which is absolutely absurd. If you have two declassifying intelligence is a start to a much broader process of initiating selective financial and technological decoupling from china. Its time to choose which team are you on. Are you on team america or with the communists right now . Tucker i think you are exactly right on that. I appreciate you coming on tonight. Thank you, from wisconsin. Bulls are about to close and the mayors race for the democratic primary, Trace Gallagher has the very latest. Latest. Shooting in new york city, up 70 after mayoral candidate thinks the solution is to trim the budget by a billion dollars. She claims its not really cut, just cutting the fat with no effect on safety. While hes awful open to the idea of Disarming Police and enforcing corp. Uses a waste of money. It than theirs are pushed toward diversity. During her time in builder policy owes administration, she was in charge of contracts for businesses owned by women and minorities. Only 5. 3 of Government Spending went toward those businesses, when she left, the spending has dropped to 4. 9 , even al sharpton took a swipe at wiley saying the goal is to get minority contracts up not down. If its unclear of alexandria are causing a was aware of wileys fail at city hall when she endorsed her, but the Progressive Push has lifted wiley into the top three of the democratic primary. Thats important, the first time in new york is using ranked choice voting, where voters list your top five choices, the can to get mores than 50 , he is the winner. With 13 candidates, somebody getting 50 is highly unlikely, and that begins the Process Of Elimination where each ballot that last place candidate is out, and then goes to the next person in line. The fact that Absentee Ballots arent doing for another week, we should have a winner in this race sometime midtolate july. Tucker [laughs] one out does have an election . Trace gallagher, that was the clearest explanation ive ever heard of ranked choice voting. I appreciate it. Thank you. Youve heard for years that the most racist thing you can do is ask someone to show i. D. Before voting, the new jim crow. With that in mind, you will never guess who is just change their mind on voter i. D. Laws . Its an amazing story, we will be right back. [narrator] imagine a shirt that actually makes you feel better, introducing tommie coppers shoulder centric support shirt, their biggest breakthrough yet. Advanced engineering promotes Healthy Posture and relief for achy shoulders and back. Visit tommiecopper. Com to see the entire line of wearable wellness compression. They have you covered from head to toe. Tommie supports my back and my life. [narrator] go to tommiecopper. Com right now and save 25 . Life hurts, feel better. Tucker today, joe biden demanded, demanded passage of something called hr one, very first piece of Legislation Democrat sponsored comments before the people act, that ought to make you nervous. That would allow democratic operatives to go doortodoor collecting mail in, democrats have said for months that if you oppose this, then you are a racist. You support jim crow. Making it harder for younger, poorer, nonwhite and typically democratic voters to access the ballot. Shame, shame, shame. This is my they signed to the Voter Suppression as laws, steal your brooch laws. Its try to deny people of color, young people, poor people, the right to vote people with disabilities. If you and the right to vote, like you cant go to the polls like people have for 250 years . Are you joking . People will literally say anything to increase their own power. The weak sisters in the senate didnt get it on the republican side. Now, and the complex dance that is the legislative process, that something open to a compromise offered by joe manchin of west virginia. That compromise would include voter i. D. Laws that virtually every person in america, including the majority of black people support. Yet, it was just a few weeks ago that stacey abrams, the Oracle Of Georgia was telling us, thats racism. Now, shes telling us, thats a good idea. No one has ever objected to having to prove who you are to vote. Its part of our nations history since the inception of voting. Voters without it fighters license must surrender their personal information and risk Identity Theft just to receive an absentee ballot, and then Georgia Voters who dont have either i. D. , and its not free when you factor in the cost of transportation and underlying documents. Tucker it makes your head spin. A brit hume, by virtue of his wisdom not age, he joins us tonight. I think im going crazy, i sat on the steps last five years. Ive been called a racist for saying that people ought to show i. D. Before they vote. Now, they are telling us they were always for that . Have i gone insane . What is this . Hes one of those saying that nobody weve known has rarely ever been opposed to this, it proves people work, she was one of them. The problem they are having now is that voter i. D. Is wildly popular. Its on the order of 80 according to a current poll. At that reflects all of the polling on issues going back a number of years. The bill, hr one or s1 as you are considering in the senate, would loosen voter i. D. Provisions all across the country, which a number of states already have. They already have voter i. D. Requirements. You could swear at a statement saying you are who you say you are, which wouldnt be terribly effective, but thats what the bill was saying. Thats one of the reasons why was oppose, and why republicans felt quite safe in opposing it. Tucker if you wanted to restore the public safe and clean elections, if you wanted to have clean elections, why wouldnt you have the elections weve had for hundreds of years, where