about diversity over that round of words. that is a basketful of words. >> trey: save you the trouble of looking that word up, it is a superficial cover. it is her way of calling senator scott a token. what she has done that too in the past. >> your appointment is seen by some as a member of progress. others have called you a mere token, elevated only to show that the g.o.p. has gotten the diversity. i do hope that as a senator, you will prove those who called you a token wrong. >> trey: for a party and a media, a client who loves civility and public discourse and ruling out the hot political rhetoric and finding some unity, she has a really weird way of showing it, like ignoring policy debates and engaging in personal attacks. if she knew anything about tim scott, she would understand full well why he would be participating in a press conference on the minimum wage. if she knew anything about tim scott, she would understand why he is frequently front and center in major policy debates in washington. tim scott was 1 of 3 u.s. senators chosen to work on the tax reform legislation because he made himself an expert on the issue, not because he is black. he is a business owner. he started a business. he had to make payroll. he had to access credit. tim scott was at the forefront on tax reform because he is on the senate finance committee. because he was on the house committee. because he dedicated himself to becoming an expert. and yet, at a press conference about tax reform, yet another woke liberal referred to him as a prop. i cannot tell you the number of times tim scott excused himself from the dinner table in washington to take a call from a colleague while the senate was negotiating and drafting legislation. they were not calling tim scott because he is black. they were calling him because he is an expert in tax legislation. he was at the forefront of police reform legislation because he knows what it's like to be stopped while driving, stopped while someone else's driving, and he was even stopped from entering the united states capital. he also knows the power of a justice system that is respected and worthy of respect. he knows the anguish of officer shootings and he knows the pain and the grief's thousands of police officers feel, because he is the first one to call a surviving spouse of a dead police officer. he was at the forefront of this debate because he has lived this debate in a way that very few other united states senators ever have or ever will. you know, kamala harris and cory booker were part of that national debate as well. but neither one of them was called a token by liberal senator. but tim scott was. tim scott is at the forefront of issues in washington because he has earned the right to be there through hard work, through learning the issues, through experiencing issues, through respect. earning the respect of his peers on both sides of the aisle. you know, he is welcome to have whatever political leash she wants. i don't think she has ever run for office before and my guess is that she wouldn't win if she did. that is policy. but when she calls a united states senator who is a subject matter expert a prop, a token, or a superficial covering, that is personal and that's wrong. and she should be held to account. now, i'm having to say this now because when tim scott joins us in just a moment, he won't say any of this. he is humble. he is driven by policy, not personal attacks. he doesn't make personal attacks. he rarely responds to those made against him by others. he is driven by faith, which is the cornerstone of his life. not the faith where god tells you to do the easy things. the kind of faith where you actually forgive people when it's hard. in short, tim scott is too good of a person to respond to the likes of joy reid, but i am not. tim scott is a united states senator who worked his tail off to be part of nearly every significant policy conversation this country has. he can stand wherever the -- he wants to stand and any group he wants to stand with because he has earned the right to be there. the fact that you see a black man as a prop, joy reid, says a lot more about you than it does about tim scott. i see a united states senator and if you really were interested in unity or fair treatment and respect and civil discourse, that's what you would see. so now, the senator from the great state of south carolina, tim scott. thank you for joining us, senator. >> tim: what's up, buddy? how are you? >> trey: i have to get something on to off my chest. thank you for joining us. i want to talk to you about what is in the covid relief bill that the senate just passed. >> tim: well, thank you. let me just say this on what you just said. woke supremacy is as bad as white supremacy. we need to take that seriously. for all of the folks who oppose common sense, matthew five, verse 34 is still relevant. it is not a covid relief package. it is more of a progressive plan. it pays everybody. it pays prisoners. think about this. california, that is predicted to have a $19 billion surplus gets 40000000000 out of $350 billion set aside for states who need help. if you don't need help, you shouldn't get it. and why is the taxpayer, or why are all taxpayers funding and subsidizing blue states that have surpluses? 1% of this bill, trey, 1% goes to vaccines. less than 10% goes to covid relief. in other words, as bernie sanders said, this is the most progressive piece of legislation passed since he has been a senator. that says a lot when you make bernie sanders blush over progressive policy. >> trey: well, i hate to be cynical and i hate to be slow, but if i hear you right, the covid relief bill doesn't have much to do with covid. it is kind of a christmas list for progressives. >> tim: absolutely, trey. if you think about the fact that unemployment is going to be extended through september even though just this week we added 379,000 jobs and our unemployment rate went down. if you think about the fact that they are literally going to cut a check to new parts of the american economy because they can, it's hard to stand $2 trillion. by the way, this is the only relief bill that was purely partisan. not a single republican in the senate voted for it. the 5 previous relief bills under the senate republican majority, 90 plus senators voted for all of them. for a senate that is 50/50, it sure doesn't feel like it. that is bad for the american taxpayer. >> trey: you know senator, you are right. it is 50/50. it hardly seems the time to be pursuing this transformative generational change but it seems like that is what the democrats are bent on trying to do, even in an evenly divided senate. we've got about a minute. what else is coming up that the american people can be fearful of from this 50 senators overplaying their hand? >> tim: you should look for another round of the minimum wage that also look for the greatest transformation of voting we have ever seen in this country. what the democrats want to do is allow a 16-year-old to vote. not an 18-year-old, but a 16-year-old. they are looking for ways to transform the way we vote in this nation. voter i.d. eliminating or reducing the amount of mail -- the only thing that is not his equal. it is not fair. it discriminates. that is what they are going to do for the next several weeks. >> trey: well, you are an old college football player. i've got all the confidence in the world. it is great to see you. thank you for joining us. we will see you soon. >> thank you, trey. >> trey: yes, sir. through the years, we have seen powerful figures on both sides of the aisle accused of inappropriate sexual behavior. but what is it seemed that they are always being held to different standards? that's next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ (quiet piano music) ♪ ♪ comfort in the extreme. the lincoln family of luxury suvs. we made usaa insurance for members like martin. an air force veteran made of doing what's right, not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. ♪ usaa ♪ [ sigh ] not gonna happen. that's it. i'm calling kohler about their walk-in bath. my name is ken. how may i help you? hi, i'm calling about kohler's walk-in bath. excellent! happy to help. huh? hold one moment please... [ finger snaps ] hmm. ♪ ♪ the kohler walk-in bath features an extra-wide opening and a low step-in at three inches, which is 25 to 60% lower than some leading competitors. the bath fills and drains quickly, while the heated seat soothes your back, neck and shoulders. kohler is an expert in bathing, so you can count on a deep soaking experience. are you seeing this? the kohler walk-in bath comes with fully adjustable hydrotherapy jets and our exclusive bubblemassage. everything is installed in as little as a day by a kohler-certified installer. and it's made by kohler- america's leading plumbing brand. we need this bath. yes. yes you do. a kohler walk-in bath provides independence with peace of mind. call... to receive one-thousand dollars off your kohler walk-in bath. and right now we're offering no payments for eighteen months. ♪ ♪ >> trey: max because since i've been following politics, there have been republicans and democrats accused of sexual impropriety, unlawful touching, inappropriate comments, and creating a hostile work environments, and it's not just politicians. media executives have been enclosed, entertainers, pastors. the allegations are individual, of course. each victim or complaining witness has her own specific allegations. but the allegations have similarities. this has me wondering, can't we have just one standard for judging misconduct or criminality? can't we have just one standard that doesn't depend on the political ideologies of the accused were the person making accusations? can't we have just one single process for accepting, evaluating, and determining these allegations? one single system for how we have for due process and seek to find the truth of the matter at hand. hillary clinton once said this: i want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault. don't let anyone silence your voice. you have the right to be heard. you have the right to be believed. and we are with you. "the right to be believed," she said. i wonder if that's true, secretary clinton, of the women who accused andrew cuomo. i wonder if that's true of the woman who accused president biden. i wonder if that's true of the women who accused president clinton, or is the standard different when you are accusing republicans versus accusing democrats? vice president, harris, senator gillibrand, they all had a simple mantra. they said women should be believed. what made it especially interesting is that some of the senators said they believed the witness even before the witness said a word. how could you possibly believe someone who hasn't said anything yet? i mean, think about that for a second. how can you believe the witness when the witness hasn't spoken? doesn't it sort of depend on what the witness says? i mean, don't you want to hear the allegation first? and the same is true on the other side of the political spectrum. when a former staffer accused joe biden of what would legally constitute rape, there were those that were quicker to believe her. and even as allegation swirl around andrew cuomo, there are also allegations against republican members of congress. do we have the same process for evaluating both, or is the process different based on who is being accused? what if we had just one standard, just one standard for accepting, evaluating, and then determining credibility no matter whether the accuser is a republican or a democrat, no matter whether the accused is a republican or a democrat. one standard, one set of rules, equally applied. what if we are great victims complaining witnesses or those who believe they were wrong or victimized have the right to present the facts without fear, retribution, or intimidation? what if we agreed we would apply the same standard of criminology regardless -- that we would judge motive, bias, opportunity to observe, access to information, consistency, inconsistency. the timing of the disclosure process any recent disclosure maybe it wasn't possible or practical. in other words, what if we applied the same credibility standard to these allegations as we do allegations in every other facet of life, including the courtroom? what if we had just one single standard by which we judged everyone, and what if we rebuked politicians who tell us dumb things like, they can tell whether a witness is telling the truth or not before the witness actually says a word, or politicians and the media who have different standards based on the political ideation of the person being accused. one standard, one form of due process, one justice, equal justice, not good for everyone, even in a divided country. what if we could unite around a single standard of fairness for both friend and foe? equal justice for all. equal justice under the law. that is the phrase carved in stone on top our supreme court. if only we could carve it into our minds as well. that would be a good and different kind of america. joining me now, mollie hemingway, senior editor at "the federalist," and kim klacik, president of red renaissance. molly, mollie, i can't think of anyone who knows more about what now have an justice kavanaugh went through than you. have you seen the same response to kavanaugh is what you are seeing with the meeting with cuomo, or are there two different standards? >> there are two different standards, not just about whether republicans believe accusations against democrats or democrats believe accusations against republicans, although there is a bit of human nature to that. you're actually seeing an attack on the rule of law itself. you saw it during the cabin a confirmation where senators were saying they didn't believe that brett kavanaugh had a right to due process and he was accused without evidence of all sorts of completely unsubstantiated and ridiculous things. you also see it today when joe biden issues an executive order about his plan to get rid of due process when college students are accused of impropriety. this is something that the left has really pushed, this idea that you do not have the right to have a defense or to see your accuser if you are a college student accused of misconduct. it's not just politics but natural disagreement about whether rule of law exists or whether due process is important, and this is something that really threatens the entire republic. >> trey: you know, kim, i used to say we don't use procedures and policies in the courtroom because they're not right, because we use them in the courtroom, we decided to use them in the courtroom because we first found them to be right. what about this notion that we have one standard? to mollie's point, how do we get to applying to process no matter the circumstance? >> unfortunately, congressman, if it wasn't for double standards, there were many in the media that would have no standards at all. these allegations, not against governor cuomo should be taken very seriously, talking but even the fact that the nursing home deaths, to me, that should be investigated thoroughly. so there are some stories coming forward that should have him under a microscope. again, we have this bias in the media where it's not. i recall the congresswoman trying to push forward with what is sitting down right now, hiding a lot of those on capitol hill that paid out $17 million to individuals that kept quiet about sexual harassment allegations and charges, and so for her, she was trained push that forward and say, look, democrat or republican, we want to know who these individuals are. and i agree. that is what i would to do if i were to go to the house in 2022. for all the women that have come forward so far, that is an act of bravery, it is not easy, but i think the women that might come forward in the future against anyone, i hope that the site doesn't made a decision whether or not to come forward, as a great congressman once said, there is no statute of limitations on the truth. and, trey, i agree with you on that. >> trey: that was a washed up congressman that said that. the media had cuomo as a possible potential candidate, then an award, i mean, is the fact that they have so much egg on their face, is that why they've been slow to cover cuomo and his administration or am i missing something? i'll give you each 20 seconds. >> i do think that that is why they are focused so much on these allegations from women who say the passes andrew cuomo made it them it made them uncomfortable, far more important of the 15,000 people who died because of his policies and his attempt to cover it up. >> absolutely. i have to agree with mollie. unfortunately, they have put him up on this pedestal, made it seem like he was a guy that combated trump and what he was doing, meanwhile, governor cuomo had those numbers on the nursing homes, now he does have this going for it. yes, egg on their face. >> trey: be really hard to imagine him being confirmed for attorney general while he is also under investigation by the department of justice. but that's what the media wanted about two months ago. thank you both for joining us. >> thank you. >> trey: from uncontrolled immigration, it seems that every day the democrats' agenda strays further and further to the left, begging the question, who really is in charge? jim jordan is here next on that. renae is not an influencer. she's more of a groundbreaker. just look at the way she's reshaping, and reimagining, her 4 acre slice of heaven. it's not hard to tell she's the real deal. renae runs with us on a john deere 1 series tractor, because out here, you can't fake a job well done. nothing runs like a deere. get a 1 series tractor starting at $99 per month. bipolar depression. it's a dark, lonely place. this is art inspired by real stories of people living with bipolar depression. emptiness. a hopeless struggle. the lows of bipolar depression can disrupt your life and be hard to manage. latuda could make a real difference in your symptoms. latuda was proven to significantly reduce bipolar depression symptoms, and in clinical studies, had no substantial impact on weight. now i'm feeling connected. empowered. latuda is not for everyone. call your doctor about unusual mood changes, behaviors or suicidal thoughts. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. elderly dementia patients on latuda have an increased risk of death or stroke. call your doctor about fever, stiff muscles, and confusion, as these may be life-threatening, or uncontrollable muscle movements as these may be permanent. these are not all the serious side effects. this is where i want to be. talk to your doctor and ask if latuda could make the difference you've been looking for in your bipolar depression symptoms. (deborah vo) i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair, but nobody even sees them. you've been looking for (vo) discover the exclusive, new miracle-earmini- a nearly invisible hearing aid from the brand leader in hearing aids with over 70 years of experience. (deborah) when i finally had miracle-ear and i could hear for the first time, i started crying. i could hear everything. new miracle-earmini. so small and comfortable that no one will see them, but you'll notice the difference. call today to start your 30-day risk-free trial at your local miracle-ear. if you're 55 and up, t-mobile has plans built just for you. get 2 unlimited lines for