Administration acted improperly by terminating the program in 2017. That is the last clearcut statement from the majority opinion. The courts reasoning, tortured throughout, and these five justices appear confused as they often do when roberts, the chief justice, is the swing vote. For example, this ruling does not touch the merits of the program, meaning daca remains in place but it could end at the hand rather the pin of this or any other administration. President trump reacting on twitter. He said, quote, these horrible and politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people who are proud to call themselves republicans or conservatives. We need more of justices or well lose our Second Amendment and everything else. Vote trump, 2020. Siding with the four liberal justices today was chief Justice John Robert as i said and this is the second time this week that he has sided in a ruling against the Trump Administration. In the majority opinion today, the chief justice wrote, quote, the dispute before the court is not whether dhs may rescind daca. Get ready for this. All parties agree that it may. The dispute is instead primarily about the procedure, the procedure that the agency followed in doing so. Well, the procedure chief Justice Roberts is referring to came in the form of a 2017 memorandum, written by former dhs acting deputy secretary elaine duke. Her memo called the Program Illegal because it allows Daca Recipients to have benefits like Social Security and medicare. And allows them to legally work in the United States despite their status. Chief Justice Roberts in his opinion says the duke memo doesnt get into the heart of daca. His words. The Legal Protections against deport is a. And in his majority opinion, roberts concluded that dhs must somehow offer a better explanation if it is to reconsider rescinding daca, which everyone agrees that the department of Homeland Security has the power to do. The court, however, chose not to evaluate the merits of a subsequent memo from former dhs secretary kristin nielsen. In 2018 she elaborated on dukes reasoning to rescind the program and said in part, quote, if a policy concerning the ability of this class of aliens to remain in the United States is to be adopted it should be enacted legislatively. Trump appointed Justice Brett kavanaugh who wrote his own dissent to the courts ruling today. He explained the nielsen memo provided a reasonable explanation to end daca, saying this. The nielsen memorandum shows that the department back in 2018 considered the policy issues that the court or at least the majority of it today says the department did not consider. Adding, quote, the only practical consequence of the courts decision to remand appears to be some delay. That delay cheered on by the globalist business groups like the Business Roundtable, the u. S. Chamber of commerce, wall street, the radical dems an rhinos who have long fought to flood the american job market with low wage immigrant workers and the Business Roundtable said this today. We applaud todays Supreme Court decision to protect the hundreds of thousands of Daca Recipients who play a vital role in our economy and our communities. The chamber of commerce, they had something to say and this what is they said. It is long past time for congress to provide permanent relief for dreamers. Now, while the globalists and big Business Today made it very clear if there was any doubt in any ones mind just who owns the chief justice minority leader Chuck Schumer suffered something of an emotional meltdown over the ruling. I cried tears of joy a few minutes ago when i heard the decision of the Supreme Court on daca. These wonderful daca kids and their families have a huge burden lifted off their shoulders. They dont have to worry about being deported. Lou . Wow, the decisions amazin. I am so happy. Lou were all relieved for schumer who looked on the verge of a breakdown there. There appeared to have never been any intention by President Trump, however, to deport any one of the socalled dreamers. The Trump Administration not looking particularly good today, nor on the first day of oral arguments in the Supreme Court, when President Trump tweeted this. President obama said he had no legal right to sign order but would anyway. If Supreme Court remedies would overturn a deal would be made with dems for them to stay. Wow, thats encouraging, isnt it . The law in driveby form. The white house move was to win some sort of leverage in order in order to force the radical dems in the house to make a move on immigration. How did that work out . Not well at all. Former attorney general Jeff Sessions in 2017 called it an orderly, lawful winddown of daca that left time for congress to act. But as is customary, congress has done nothing. Republicans and even members of the president s cabinet have yet to fully support his immigration position and agenda, not that they should, but one would think they would. The dems have called to abolish immigration and Customs Enforcement and they push an open borders agenda, so really everybody would be welcome if the left have their way and the Business Roundtable and of course the chamber of commerce. Congress, it appears, is content to use immigration as a political issue as opposed to actually coming up with a solution. But maybe we should be thankful that that is their position. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the main dissent to todays ruling. He said the courts decision allows any administration to use executive action to essentially bind the following administration to the laws that result from that executive action. Thomas writes this. Quote, even if the agency lacked authority to effectuate the changes, the changes cannot be undone by the same agency in a successor administration unless the successor provides sufficient policy justif just justifications to the satisfaction of the court, to the satisfaction of this court. In other words, he wrote, the majority erroneously holds that the agency is not only permitted but required to continue add medicinadministering unlawful ps that it inherited from a previous administration. Justice thomas saying it straightforwardly and succinctly and clearly. The court is confused. It is contradictory. It is quickly becoming a laughing stock under Justice Roberts. The executive branch in the view of those justices, at least the majority, can legislate by executive order. So long as the majority of the high court and the administration to a lesser degree in this case the Obama Administration are ideologically aligned. What they basically said today was to hell with the law and to hell with the constitution, we know better. Also taking to twitter to clear up what robert ligh lighthizer t yesterday. I dont think its a reasonable policy option at this point. I think you will see supply chains come back as a result of u. S. Policy including the kinds of things that you all did in the tax bill but also with the regulatory space that the president has done, as well as the tariffs that we put in place. Lou the president clarifying on twitter. He said this. Quote, it was not ambassador lighthizers fault yesterday in committee and perhaps i didnt make myself clear. But the u. S. Certainly does maintain a policy option under various conditions of a complete decoupling from china. Well, now weve got that straightened out. Up next, john bolton continues to carry out acts of betrayal against his former boss, saying house dems should have done more during their sham impeachment investigation. Jason chaffetz has a few thoughts about the former National Security advisor and his betrayals. Jason chaffetz joins me when we come back. Please stay with us. Save hundreds on your wireless bill without even leaving your house. Just keep your phone and switch to xfinity mobile. You can get it by ordering a free sim card online. Once you activate, youll only have to pay for the data you need starting at just 15 a month. There are no term contracts, no activation fees, and no credit check on the first two lines. Get a 50 prepaid card when you switch. Its the most reliable wireless network. And it could save you hundreds. Xfinity mobile. Lou former National Security advisor john boltons betrayal of the president he served goes on. Today, the New York Times reported in his new book, bolton claims the radical dems should have looked into the president s dealings with turkey and china during their sham impeachment inquiries. Bolton alleged President Trump tried to curry favor with turkish president erdogan and chinese president xi by intervening in several investigations. Its only in paragraph 20 of a 21page story that the times does report bolton doesnt know exactly what happened at those times, in those episodes, nor was he sure they were even well, offenses. But they still, he says, should have been investigated by house democrats. Thats the level you could expect from this little literary masterpiece of john boltons. Heres White House Press secretary kayleigh mcenany, her response today. What i would note is this book is full of classified information which is inexcusable. Former National Security advisor john bolton should know all too well that its unacceptable to have highly classified information from the government of the United States in a book that will be published. Its unacceptable. Lou unacceptable but its ongoing. Joining us now, former congressman, former chairman of the House Oversight committee, jason chaffetz. Also a fox news contributor. What do you make of john bolton and his encouragement of the sham impeachment inquiry to look into things that he doesnt even know about . Jason im terribly disappointed in john bolton. He was supposed to be the career professional who could come in there as an adult and be the National Security adviser. I have to tell you, the antics and ranting and raving that hes doing in trying to publish this book to line his own pockets at the expense of National Security, thats just not acceptable. And you know one thing i want them to go back and look at, lou . Its amazing how john bolton leaves and now we have the very competent Robert Obrien as the National Security advisor and guess what we dont have the same type of leaking that we did when john bolton was the National Security advisor. Remember the calls going out the door, the information was flowing out to media sources, the New York Times now has more bolton information. Maybe were looking at the source of those. Its at least something they should look at in terms of the leaking. Lou well, its an excellent point. And bolton has a lot to answer for and the list gets longer every day. He is an extraordinary, extraordinarily disappointing, petty and vindictive person. Its just its sad to see what perhaps he always was, but certainly what he has become. Lets turn to the pompeo meeting. Why are we being kept in the dark about what the chinese and the secretary of state are meeting about . This is annoying as hell as you might guess to someone who works in media. Jason well, i dont know exactly what theyre going to be talking about. I have a great deal of trust in secretary pompeo. There are a lot of high level talks that need to be happening. Ive got to tell you, i dont like what was happening on capitol hill today. That did disturb me. But i think we need to see what the result of these pompeo meetings are. I think dialogue is good in general. I want there to be good, strong dialogue back and forth and well see what comes of it. Lou well, lets take a look at what was happening and part of it happening with the u. S. Trade representative, robert lighthizer, who has been the lead in these negotiations. He and secretary mnuchin, with the chinese. He said that decoupling with the chinese is not a policy option for the Trump Administration. Your reaction to that statement . Well, thats not what the president campaigned on. Its not what he did for the three andahalf years. The president took the very reasonable stance and said whats fair with china is going to be fair with us. Its got to be fair. Its got to be reciprocal. And if theyre not going to play fair, were not going to allow you access to our of markets. I think that is a reasonable approach and something that hes taken a pretty good hard line and stance on to back off of that in some obscure hearing on of capitol hill sends the wrong message to the chinese, to the u. S. Personnel and people like mr. Pompeo. I dont know if this is planted or planned for by the president but it seems like mark meadows, maybe the chief of staff needs to have a discussion with mr. Lighthizer and what happened on capitol hill. Lou well, it looks like, if he lighthizer has had a record of saying exactly what he means, the extension of what he said is the United States is no longer a sovereign nation. Were incapable of making a decision who we do business with. We will not be holding anyone accountable for the death of 100,00100,000 americans, the inn of 2 million more. We might as well surrender to the chinese. And i am not i hope you understand, indulging in hyperbole here. This is devastating to the base, what was said by lighthizer on capitol hill today. It was. It was totally foreign to the policy and the position and part of the reason a lot of people voted for donald trump in the first place. So well see where it goes from here. I mean, i was reading stories today about some illicit cash, some forged one dollar bills that were flooding into our markets. Again, the source being the chinese. Well see if that plays out and if that is true. The secret service is working on that as well. So add that to the ongoing and long, long list of things and issues and problems and challenges we have with the chinese. We should take a tougher stance and negotiate our right position, not just lay down and die in front of the United States congress and say oh, well. Lou it seems to be exactly that, jason. Lets hope that you and i are both wrong about that. Were going to have to believe our lying eyes and ears to this point. Jason, thanks so much. Good to have you with us. Up next, the American People arent buying into the radical leftist plans to Defund Police departments. Bob woodson is the former head of the National UrbanLeagues Department of criminal justice, he joins us here next. You dont want to miss a word this man says. Im a performer. Always have been. And always will be. Never letting anything get in my way. Not the doubts, distractions, or voice in my head. And certainly not arthritis. New voltaren provides powerful arthritis pain relief to help me keep moving. And it can help you too. Feel the joy of movement with voltaren. Lou if ever there were a time to worry about this nation and our direction, it appears that this is one of those times. Seattle mayor jenny durkin says the Seattle Police department will not enter the zone styled as capitol hill organized protests or chop, except in the event of a, quote, significant life safety issue, whatever that is. The police define a life safety issue as an active shooter, an assault, structure fire or significant medical emergency like a heart attack, or stroke. End quote. Since the radical left has taken over the city blocks, Police Response time has more than tripled in the precinct, including the socalled chop. So not much of what she is saying has much relevance. The radical left has been leading the charge for weeks to defund the police department. The message not catching on with the American People, for some reason. According to a Politico Morning Consult poll by a 21 margin, American Voters oppose defunding of the police department. 57 to 29 . 43 say theyre strongly opposed to that socalled movement. Not much of a of movement. Joining us now is bob woodson, former civil rights activist, the founder of the Woodson Center which helps residents of low income neighborhoods and, bob, were delighted to have you with us to talk about all thats going on. First, your reaction if we may to this organized protest as theyre now styling it in seattle, the left wing activist groups. Your thoughts about the way the citys handling it, the governor handling it as well. Bob well, its really organized aorganized anarchy. This is part of a long struggle that goes back 60 years where low income blacks are americas silent vic