The hour 12 noon having a right to see things that was certain has. Gone from president of the United States. Article one. Of use of power article to obstruction of congress. The gravity of these charges is self evident to anyone who is not self interest the houses power. Is over. The senate. Is. Also coming up tonight is the russian president preparing his country for a change which guarantees more of the same will it be a 3rd decade of putin power these many and so busy i doubt and i think will change with his own the silly boy you think you may be in more civilized countries or states when this kind of thing happens people expect change and for things to get back. To the noise here. To our viewers on p. B. S. In the United States and all around the world welcome we begin the day with the beginning of the impeachment trial of u. S. President donald trump and the u. S. Constitutions clauses for impeachment in a trial. Sitter and emergency brake if you will Congress Taking exist rematch and to stop a president whose actions are deemed possibly criminal and dangerous now that is one outcome the other a verdict that exonerates the executive well as the trial began today a bombshell announcement came from a u. S. Government watchdog the Government Accountability office saying that the Trump Administration broke the law when it withheld millions in aid earmarked for ukraine and that is precisely the claim which triggered impeachment proceedings against the president this could possibly add to the evidence against mr trump but tonight we still do not know if the senate will allow new evidence or witness tears testimony in this trial sir can there be a fair trial without witnesses yeah the same witnesses are saying they needed they were available in the house you know when you if you want to witness and witness was available to chose not to call them dont play name they dont want to see documents they dont want to hear from eyewitnesses they dont want they want to ignore anything new that comes out. What kind of trial it is going to be to talk about that im joined tonight by bret ruin he is president of the Consulting Firm the Global Situation room he joins me from new york city its good to have you on the day bret you know this report that we got today from the Government Office of accountability when you add that to these new accusations coming from an associate of giuliani the president s personal attorney about ukraine i mean all of this appears and sounds very damning for the president s kids but will it matter at all if this stuff is not admitted as evidence in this trial. Well i think it got pretty darn difficult now for Senate Majority leader Mitch McconnellLindsey Graham who you just heard from there and other republicans to stonewall i mean what you saw last night on American Television was someone who was very close both to Rudy Giuliani the president s personal attorney as well as to the president himself and he pointed the finger at both of them and rather direct and then on top of that this morning it only got worse because this independent u. S. Government bodies said pretty darn clearly the president broke the law because the president ordered this aide to be stopped in what does that mean this is this report by the g. A. O. Way saying that the president broke the law i mean its clear to me and the same we have no doubt the evidence is there the evidence that anyone can check and see and read shows is that the president the trumpet ministration the wall with ukraine when you have a report out like that then how is it not going to influence the outcome of this trial. So here is why it is so significant for the whole time when testimony and the proceedings in the house of representatives were taking place the republicans case was predicated on the notion that yes it was unseemly for the president to be asking for personal or political favors but it didnt break the law now you have what for foreign viewers i think is really important to understand the u. S. Government Accountability Office as the name suggests is a really important body here this is not a minor and to d. Or agency so for them to say that carries a lot of weight. The 100. 00 u. S. Senators today they took an oath of impartiality which demands that they act in this trial is jurors and not as lawmakers not as political animals which which they are if they werent they would even be sitting in congress is it almost a Superhero Task to ask of all makers to do that is it even possible do you think. Well i dont think theres anyone including the founders of our country who believed that this process was going to be devoid of politics it is ultimately a political decision but that being said the republicans run the risk here of trying to hold almost a king group court where they quickly move past evidence they quickly try to block witnesses and that could be damaging for them on a political basis because many of these republican senators are up for reelection and lets remember it only takes who are report least the rules to change and the question of removing a president here in the u. S. Will require that supermajority of the senate i dont know that we get there but nonetheless procedurally the votes could be there for witnesses and other evidence to be heard i mean lets talk about that what about if we dont get there the constitution for that for our for our viewers they see whats happening right now as an example of a constitution the worlds oldest that is functioning you have what the constitution says must be done when you have suspicions of high crimes and misdemeanors i mean its following the path that it should but what happens in a hyper polarized political environment when the senate is unable to fulfill its role as an impartial jury. Well there are several points that i would make for viewers in germany and around the world the 1st is that despite the appearance of difficulties and the damage our institutions have suffered of the last few years i do think were seeing evidence of this system functioning as intended the senate the house of representatives our legislative entities are conducting war oversight than they ever did before and there is an effect on the operation of the Administration Even if the president isnt removed these are life firing warning shots across the bow of the boat of additionally i think were seeing as the judicial institutions function both as a result of some of the evidence thats uncovered here and then lastly i would say i think the press and that 4th estate as we call it youre in the us is becoming much more robust much more vigorous in some of the reporting and investigations as a result of this process and we know that for our colleagues in the United States and in washington particularly its very difficult to do their job especially when there are no White House Press briefings being held any more lets look forward though lets assume the math is in favor for the president and he is acquitted here there is no conviction and then we move towards election day in the member what will a lack of a conviction in this trial do to the credibility of the election in november. Well i think 1st youre going to see that republican senators will have to not only vote but voice their support for what clearly were questionable acts by the president and that could have political consequences secondly theres a lot of evidence thats being laid out here which will provide fodder for both the president ial election i think whoever comes out as the nominee of the Democratic Party will certainly use of the material the statements the evidence here but also for the house of representatives elections or state and local elections in the u. S. You could really see of blue wave that comes as a result of americans just being fed up with this kind of governance yeah that is definitely a big risk with this trial joining us tonight with the Consulting Firm the Global Situation room but we appreciate your insights tonight thank you good to be with you. Yesterday russias government resigned in mass today president russian president putin began naming replacements what most people would expect to be a political crisis is being treated like business as usual in moscow almost today putin named a former tax technocrat to be the countrys new Prime Minister but insiders say that putins decisions mean more than meets the eye they say hes grooming political moscow to make room for another decade of putin power. Hes little known even within russia now. Formally the head of the countrys tax service has become russias Prime Minister so lawmakers overwhelmingly backed russian president Vladimir Putins candidate for the job to no ones surprise addressing the duma misused and promised change. Because the president has stressed several times people should already now be feeling real changes for the better so far this is happening far from everywhere. Its a rapid rise for the career bureaucrat elevated to the countrys number 2 position less than 24 hours after russias government resigned that paves the way for putting his newly announced sweeping constitutional changes there are mixed reactions over whether the political shake up will make any difference because theres a look at this day after the political system was stagnant people want something new now new decision some kind of renewal i think president putins make the right decision when he shook everything up. You know yup i dont know but i trust putin to make the right decisions good on him but at the shop theres many doubts and i think will change. Maybe in more civilized countries or states when this kind of thing happens people expect change and for things to get back. To the noise here. Are sort of moses. Critics say misused in is merely a placeholder for putin who they believe has no intention of relinquishing power when his president ial term ends in 2024 but russias political elites are still pondering what role putin has in mind for himself. What is going to marry putin up to talk about that im joined now by d. W. Russia analyst constantine fund and he joins us tonight because Scott Constantine its good to see you again is so when you look at the actions of the russian president right now what is he doing is he will putting a new foundation down for 10 more years of putin power. Well 1st of all you mentioned that people expected a political crisis but that combi any political process in a place where there is no politics where politics is conducted by one man so yes there is no crisis and mr putin has chosen this unknown technocrats for one simple reason as he approaches 2024. When he supposed to step down as president im told is what hes going to do next and how he did it what he needs he needs a deflection of attention from growing economic and social problems in the country to give you just one figure a real disposable income is officially have been pulling full 5 years in a row so putin is the sighted to get rid of this over centralized system in which he is responsible for everything and make the government and the duma much more lets say responsible for the at least notional responsible essentially to make them a punching bag so weeping boys for the growling for the uneasy Public Opinion that we have in russia and. To liberate mr putin from this dependence said to let him do other things he likes and enjoys like Foreign Policy and you know playing power Politics Around the globe and lecturing people on history thats what he wants to do he doesnt want to be seen as someone whos responsible for what really touches peoples lives when youre talking about a politician who is thinking about his legacy ive heard some commentators say that mr putin cant afford to live long enough to see that legacy that he has to find a way to stay in power connected to power because once he leaves the forces that are against him will become so dangerous that his his wife will be threatened when hes no longer in politics do you agree with that. Well predictions are there and grateful business but let me put it like that i generally agree i think that the put in the system is very much based on one man and when put in. The system will challenge for as long as possible and all that will see this constitutional reform which is a number 2 item of the most good gentle today i think its although its called most usual reform in fact its going to be a very thorough rewriting of the current rules all the time a process of political game in moscow you know that to secure or that puts a little control person that changes this socalled seal of the key i. E. The army the f a z and the Police Forces until the very very end until you really decide to with the political scene and what it is also supposed to ensure is that people remain sheep coordinate and chief all that up inside the russian elite whether he will succeed. In this that remains to be seen because what weve seen recently according to independent Public Opinion polls in moscow sorry in russia is that people just start getting weary of this will settle and this essentially costs make the change which is designed to prolong the power of one man over russia may well where thin much sooner then we can imagine well yeah you speak to a important point here i mean when will people become fed up with Vladimir Putin that he has been their leader for almost all of this century and were talking about him being connected to power a baby up until the year 2030 he likes to is talk about democracy and give lip service to that but someone being in power 30 years in a democracy that that cant be healthy any way you look at. Well if i had such powers of prediction i would have been winning bets and a 10000 bucks every day i dont but definitely youre right i think that the. This problem geisha of the same thing as the french say you know if you socialist to sell and then it shows. Something that usually undermines such systems and basically id like to suggest that we compare it to what happened to 2 regimes authoritarian regimes and the didnt in the last century some of us are in portugal didnt think about change didnt think about succession didnt think about basically what happens in the future and his system collapsed in a military coup Francisco Franklin spains not a thinking about succession and change set to yes before he died and look most of the franco is people remains pretty cool and although this is them did change this was a much better and much smoother result so got to make a pick yeah let me putin as russians frank of when we will see the w. Russia analyst constantine from they are joining us tonight to talk about a president who apparently is not going anywhere constantly thank you thank you. Oh when the world needs to get the ear of the russian president usually calls this woman here the german chancellor Angela Merkel after almost 2 decades in power the image of maricopa is just as much that of a diplomat and a stateswoman as it is of a politician but it will not be that way forever miracle plans to step down next year when her current term ends her policy decisions now theyre being watched and weighed just as much as theyve always been in an interview with the Financial Times she speaks candidly about relations with the u. S. And china and she says that washingtons warnings about china should not be a warning for germanys dealings with china now merkel is quoted as saying i would advise against regarding china as a threat simply because it is economically successful and then she goes on to say thats bull that right there do we in germany and europe want to dismantle all interconnected Global Supply chains because of this economic competition in my opinion complete isolation from china cannot be the answer all right so what is the answer lets bring in now our Political Correspondent simon young hes here in berlin good evening to you simon the u. S. We know considers china particularly the chinese tech giant who way to be a National Security threat and so do many people in the Coalition Government right here in germany yet the german chancellor Angela Merkel she refuses to say no to allowing who way to come in do business here in germany what is her reasoning for that. Well i think angle medical. To be suspicious of the motives of some of those who raise concerns about why way and of a successful Chinese Companies you hear that in this interview when she says that china is not a threat simply because its successful and shell say interestingly drew a comparison between the economic rise of china and that of gemini she said that the chinese you know economic success is largely based on khalid work and technical skill and creativity so i think she is inclined to suspect that there is isolationism and protectionism behind behind that sort of challenge in the case of huawei for instance another point in this case i think hes also the concerns of germanys telecoms providers all the german telecoms operator is all custom is of huawei and theyve been warning that if you ban that Chinese Company you know thats going to add billions of euros to the cost and many years to the time that itll take to roll out the 5 g. Network for instance you know i mean this is a case where we are seeing Economic Policy colliding with National Security policy and so i m