A u. S. Warship in the persian gulf accompanied by a bomber plan since washingtons abandonment of the nuclear deal with iran in may 2018 the situation in one of the most volatile regions in the world has been escalating and iran consequently resumed enrichment of uranium in the process itself violating the multinational treaty. Some fear this could put the country on the threshold to becoming a nuclear arms state. Meanwhile the i. N. F. Treaty between the us and russia banning land based intermediate range Nuclear Missiles has effectively collapsed the Nuclear Powers in adversaries of old are now developing new weapons and new strategies. Are we seeing a return to the times of the cold war is the world at risk of a new global arms race 30 years since the last one ended or has it already begun. A Nuclear Bunker under the center of nuremberg built decades ago during the cold war there used to be around 2000 bunkers like this across germany their purpose to provide shelter for at least a section of the population in the event of a nuclear holocaust. Thats on the list of months by 2000 people who were supposed to survive a surface to to nation down here on chairs and bunk beds. 8 hours a day lying down 16 hours sitting down. A brief reprieve from the inevitable 10 meters below ground. Nothing to do but after 14 days the diesel generators would no longer be able to pump in fresh air or fresh water and then it would be worth surviving another 14 days for them to go so why bother. But that was the situation. So. Our guide around this eerie relic of the cold war is philip holtz hes an ambassador for the International Campaign to abolish Nuclear Weapons winner of the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize the bunker symbolizes an era that should be by now history but it seems a new Nuclear Arms Race is on the horizon and this as the world appeared to be looking safer with a range of treaties on disarmament and arms controls. But Nuclear Weapons have never disappeared completely. Also this is a good illustration i think of it still has 1600 warheads ready for deployment in the us 1715 according to these figures. I think of and so theoretically we would see a continuing downward trend in the years to come in terms of absolute numbers. But that could be deceptive in quantitative terms the trend is declining but the warheads are an increasingly higher state of the plant so todays situation is not a relaxed one in fact we have a similar situation to the cold war russia as violated the agreement theyve been violated here for many years and i dont know why president obama didnt negotiate or pull out. That were not going to let them violate the Nuclear Agreement they go out of your weapons and were not allowed to wear that one should have stayed in the agreement and we bonded the agreement but russia is not one fortunately under the agreement so were going to terminate the agreement were going to pull out. In august 2019 the u. S. Withdrew from the i. N. F. Treaty banning intermediate range Nuclear Missiles in 2018 President Trump announced his country would be pulling out of the nuclear deal with iran despite opposition from its european allies. I trump and his advisors and the military in the white house prefer to return to hardline policy to rearmament and deterrence. Every few years the us reexamined said strategy on the deployment of Nuclear Weapons the Nuclear Posture review defines potential adversaries and scenarios 2800. 00 sought trump embark on a radical change of direction. Does practice to be a bit like its the bible of american proto turns of tickets trump wants new weapons the new deployment scenarios and thats exactly what the arms my. Fractures want of on. The u. S. Capitol washington d. C. Weve come here to find the people whose ideas later become policy. Among the many think tanks based in washington are those that provide the theory behind nuclear rearmament and consider a nuclear war to have become feasible again they started working years ago on a new Nuclear Strategy. One of their most prominent figures is political scientist matthew critic in addition to being a professor at the Renowned Georgetown University hes a leading strategist at the Atlantic Council one of the most influential think tanks in the western hemisphere. Im proud to say that at the Atlantic Council where i have an affiliation ive been writing about this issue for several years i think starting in 2014 or 2015 started writing about the threat of russian deescalation strikes and i started writing and doing congressional testimony on the need for the United States to develop low yield Nuclear Options to respond to that Matthew Koenig is also the author of an influential book called the logic of American Nuclear strategy it provides scientific arguments for the concept of Nuclear Deterrence arguments that enjoyed powerful backing at the Atlantic Council. I got some. John rogers chairman of the board of directors used to work in the state department and in the white house and is today executive Vice President at the Goldman Sachs investment bank. President and c. E. O. Of the Atlantic Council as frederick camp formerly a high profile journalist with the wall street journal. Brant scowcroft served as National Security adviser to u. S. President s gerald ford and george bush sr today hes the Councils Chairman emeritus and is also a member of the Advisory Board serving the secretaries of state defense and energy. I would like to thank that my work had some role in informing u. S. Officials about the possible responses and may have had some role and flown in saying the final Nuclear Posture review. Washington has and dozens of think tanks vying for money and influence many of them operate on a global scale. And their staff juggle positions in government ministries and political circles with their jobs in the think tanks among them is elbridge called. Mr colby with with you. In january 2019 right colby was summoned to appear before the u. S. Senate Armed Services committee he had been in charge of the National Defense strategy at the pentagon under then secretary of defense john madis also making him one of the chief architects of the new Nuclear Strategy strategy entails a fundamental shift in the orientation of our Nations Armed forces toward preparing for war against china or russia precisely in order to deter this ship is urgently needed as our military advantages against both have substantially eroded in recent decades. Today called the works for the center for a new American Security one of the many conservative think tanks in washington. I think if you look at the Nuclear Posture review theres some theres some theres some strong rhetoric and but actually its fundamentals its a very an evolutionary document its very consistent with the past history of u. S. And nato policy its basically saying were going to you know rebuild our Nuclear Forces which are getting old and then were going to do a couple of things to make it clear to the russians that they dont have a good strategy to selectively escalate. Hardline rhetoric consolidating washingtons existing Nuclear Strategy and sending a signal to moscow what might initially sound unspectacular in effect means breaking with the disarmament policy of previous decades. Our next stop is the center for strategic and International Studies the director of the centers Missile Defense program ian williams shares the view that the new strategy chosen by the u. S. Constitutes a fundamental change of course. The number one goal of the 28 team review is is Nuclear Deterrence it doesnt even have arms control and Nuclear Reductions on the list of priorities it it has a full throated endorsement of the value of Nuclear Weapons in defending us interests and defending the core interests of the United States which is something that is quite a shift from from the tone of the 2010 policy review. But what exactly are the interests of the u. S. Washingtons deterrence concept is based on the Nuclear Triad a 3 sided military force structure consisting of land launched intercontinental Nuclear MissilesNuclear Armed submarines at sea and strategic aircraft with Nuclear Bombs and missiles. The objective to deter an adversary from launching an attack and deploying Nuclear Weapons due to the threat of being destroyed with an overwhelming nuclear counterstrike the american strategists however believe that the threat situation has now changed primarily as a result of moscows change in stance. Because what the russian strategy attempted to do was to force the United States and nato into this suicide or surrender problem that if we get into a war in Eastern Europe that russia could use one or 2 or 3 small Nuclear Weapons early in the conflict. And then that would place a dilemma on the west. At the 2018 annual meeting of the valdai forum in Sochi Russian president Vladimir Putin openly threaten to use Nuclear Weapons in response to an attack on his country i believe you saw on that show was in which there was a museum used. To make sure. You know and we. Can look at which egypt but youre right. Any of those distortions. It was when you look at most of the i mean theres a casings. And so what the Nuclear Posture review was to try to provide options between suicide and surrender to say that if russia conducts a limited Nuclear Strike that the United States and nato can respond with a limited Nuclear Strike of our own. Hans kristensen is an expert on Nuclear Weapons at the federation of american scientists he too sees a fundamental change in american strategy. And. Theres the other element which is that it seemed to and the idea that its a priority of the United States to work to reduce the Nuclear Arsenals and reduce the role of Nuclear Weapons. That was a primary objective of the one ministration this one seems to you know go in the other direction and say you know not only do we need more of them we also are now officially in bracing a great power competition. Washington sees itself at the heart of the confrontation for power and influence in a globalized world the renewed competition between the major powers also promises new Business Opportunities new strategies require the development and manufacture of new weapons. And the arms manufacturers are already in a state of readiness they begin investing before decisions of the political level have even been made and some of the funding for think tanks comes from corporations involved in the arms trade. They include the likes of airbus and boeing as well as European Companies including Italys Leonardo and france based saffron. They donate hundreds of thousands of dollars every year to think tanks like the Atlantic Council and the center for a new American Security. If you look at these companies donations its clear what interests the views are represented in these think tanks. The arms manufacturers want to sell their Nuclear Weapons and present their ideas to politicians. You could also say that you basically think tanks serve as advertising agencies for the government and the Arms Companies and think things you need there are going to in. Amsterdam spring 2019. The city is hosting the annual general meeting of the airbus one of the biggest arms manufacturers in europe. And members of the pax activist group have come to talk to shareholders. To take. Pressure. They are outraged at the gate valve much of the airbus and other companies and Nuclear Weapons programs such as that of the french state well the most thing is that they. Work on all kinds of weapons and thereby you make a lot of profit off it and that changed the inquiry. In their treaty. While they are working towards a new Nuclear Weapons in europe so its for our safety well. Important to stand up against them to become police that make profit over break weapons that could murder the entire world if they want. My kidneys conducts analysis for pax another lands based organization that scrutinises Companies Involved in the Global Nuclear arms business. Is a Global Company but their headquarters in the netherlands and the netherlands itself of course is not allowed to have or produce Nuclear Weapons so i think its its a bit strange that they allow a company thats headquartered in that country to have to be involved. But the activists are unable to confront airbus shareholders at the a. G. M. Most of them arrived via the underground car park does your yes im an errand vanderveen are committed to challenging the arms related operations of the. Of the worlds Biggest Aerospace and Defense Companies they want the shareholders and investors to see the growing sensitivity of the issue and to put the spotlight on the corporations activities well the most the most important thing for me is to to let people see who makes the profit go into big shareholders with big money to make big profits of these weapons i think the main one in europe is of course our boss but you also have for example layer nardo an italian company. And actually layer nardo and airbus together with the u. K. Company be an east instance theyre in a joint venture m. P. T. A joint venture that together produces missiles for their French Nuclear arsenal so france has an estimated arsenal of 300 Nuclear Warheads the airbus group is co owned by the french spanish and German Governments and is as such indirectly involved in frances Nuclear Weapons program. Yet some must be about the same to see launched m 511 missile developed in the joint venture of airbus and suffering together with the area group because this is another french project the a s m p a this time involving a number of european countries. Airbus defense and space is based in munich be a e systems in britain the mia nardo in italy. From tyrion so we have a tremendous amount of money to play with the raw military 700000000000. 00 plus 716000000000. 00 we are going to develop the weapons. The us has new Nuclear Strategy promises to generate trillions of dollars for Defense Companies in the decades to come they stand to profit from both the maintenance and modernization of existing carrier systems and the development of new Nuclear Weapons and cruise missiles. And while the Nuclear Arsenals are overhauled and restart it seems to always be the same companies turning a tidy profit out of the business as i can embassador feel the pulse shows that. Weve selected for examples of Nuclear Weapons that are currently in use are currently being graded. As you can see its always the same names theres boeing 3 times systems 2 and the b. 6112. 00 nuclear bomb is the one that will replace the american bombs in germany and throughout europe so its an issue that is not only in america but its also a european one and especially germany will. Be 6112. 00 is an enhanced weapon with a lower yield that can reportedly be modified according to its target in contrast to strategic Nuclear Weapons which can destroy entire cities in the enemys heartland with their immense destructive capability and range the 6112. 00 is a tactical weapon designed to attack individual enemy buildings. That means it can be deployed earlier on in a conflict. These are not new things were not building additional. Numbers and we are not developing really fundamentally new kinds or new capabilities we are replacing for it so the 6112 the bomb. For your for instance that replaces existing systems. So its not a very black and white situation i think the issue is more when they begin to introduce weapons that are officially tactical Nuclear Weapons that are supposed to be used before strategic weapons thats when you begin to get into trouble about earlier use of Nuclear Weapons. The German Authorities refused to confirm the storage of nuclear. Happens in germany on the grounds of secrecy what is known is that in the event of a war german pilots would also have to deliver them to their targets in accordance with the nuclear sharing concept. Has even more america here you can see where the us stores Nuclear Bombs of its own bases so much that 10 or 20 on google in germany for example. German soldiers have regular drills for the deployment of weapons of mass destruction that in weapons designed to kill hundreds of thousands of civilians. The collapse of the i. N. F. Treaty is a source of major concern in berlin it had a stent simply banished intermediate range missiles from europe. Party political defense experts in germany fear the implications of a call for a new Nuclear Arms Race in europe. This rig. A few ago we are also calling for the firme land based intermediate range weapons to be upheld. Within the Coalition Government for example we have called for no new intermediate range weapons to be stationed in germany and shots from europe or. This is the subject of russias alleged violation of the i. N. F. Treaty the presentation of a missile container said to show the new s s c x 8 missile an intermediate range missile that it is claimed could reach any city in europe. Silage emergency room so the russians have been cheating on their intermediate range Nuclear Forces treaty theyve already deployed 4 battalions of these weapons so these weapons are threatening us bases in europe threatening our allies in europe right now as we sit here speaking in the tog it does im now speaking to darfur those are indications that russia may also have breached the provisions of the i. M. F. Treaty. For ta goes for. This probably most about here the problem is that this is not a one sided dispute. Then the worse off russia is in turn saying that in stationing Missile Defense facilities in europe the americans are also introducing systems that are violating the treaty. Both washington and moscow have refused to mutual weapons inspections trading mutual accusations of noncompliance u. S. Intelligence has seemingly convinced its nato partners at least that russia violated its treaty commitments. We meet Alexander Golts in moscow hes a journalist and a long term observer of the Russian Military apparatus and the kremlins defense policy he is among those who believe russia breached the treaty and that washington can substantiate its claims wiring is that america was. March for more details to prove that russia. What. A reason. To keep their forces secret they did not give this information. Pro russian fighters in Eastern Ukraine the nightmare scenario for nato is something similar happening in the baltics for example some experts fear that russia could use the ethnic russian population as a pretext to send in troops presenting nato with a fait accompli after the russian invasion of ukraine we had to update our assessments because what russia did in ukraine it could easily do something similar in a stone in latvia or lithuania but this time it would be with a nato ally so the United States would be compelled to come to that Nations Defense in fact the Nuclear Posture review talks about enhanced in the role of Nuclear Weapons against nuclear strategic attacks those missions would be 1st you would be 1st use as a Nuclear Weapons against a known Nuclear Attack so it can incorporate anything it can involve significant conventional attacks biological attacks possibly even Cyber Attacks theyre not very specific about identifying. Nato has conducted a series of military exercises rehearsing for war in the baltic region article 5 of the alliances treaty specifies that an attack on any member is to be considered an attack on all members who will then take action to assist their ally the hardliners in washington are convinced that the west also has to be prepared militarily for a Nuclear Conflict if the russians think that they can attack and they can go to a low level of nuclear of use and when while thats a very powerful incentive for them we have to be willing to push back but when you push back there is a risk of Nuclear Conflict. But what is moscows strategy and goal. Maneuvers like that seen here outside the russian exclave of kaliningrad to raise the question of whether moscow is rehearsing for a hot war. In the case of a conflict in the baltics would it potentially resort to deploy Nuclear Weapons in order to ensure a swift and successful resolution. In the cold war the russians had a no 1st use doctrine under president putin russia change this policy and for the 1st time said that they would be willing to use Nuclear Weapons 1st on the battlefield ive given some debates with some russians about whether this escalate to deescalate strategy actually exists we dont know we cannot possibly know what we know is that the russians absolutely happen ability to selectively escalate with low yield tactical Nuclear Weapons and of course then happy shadow the very very Large Nuclear war hovering over everything we do the face off between trump and putin is one between 2 men who believe in boosting military strength as a means of politics its a problem of leadership i think mr porter as well as mr rob are very inspired by a deal with the pows their overwhelming. Force through overwhelming Nuclear Might have this i can do everything i want its not the kids. In here the famous interview about crimea. Putin said that. He thought. A lot. Russians threw a rock at 4th. Both sides accuse the other of pursuing an aggressive policy that would in the end game not preclude the deployment of tactical Nuclear Weapons. A new spiral of arms proliferation has been set in motion. d in the us an entire network of ministries Laboratories Research facilities and private Sector Companies are already doing the groundwork to implement the requirements of the new us Nuclear Strategy the individual facilities have different assignments in areas ranging from research and development to production and testing the responsibility lies with the energy and defense departments the job of running them is in the hands of the corporations. And must be a knave out and thats delivered a National Security side for example is in fact run by furnace like honeywell that and they in the crops up a number of times are the mammoth after the individual companies we see here obviously have an interest in these 1000000. 00 and 1000000000. 00 government contracts that are another permanent arms race and thats why they also provide funding for lobby groups and they dont know what. Some of these companies are so big that they are like small countries in terms of their financial power there are so many jobs interest involves theres theres so much political money flowing into the political decision process that oh yeah quite often you have problems with the democratic process. Now while a. Warrant for Livermore National laboratory along with los alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National laboratories is a more tight disciplinary National Security laboratory we have a rich history in delivery and engineered solutions to meet nationalistic you. And this dedication to the safety and security of our country continues today the center of the last hours. Is that we are back in turkey and that knowledge and theres the countrys National Laboratories and production sites from california to South Carolina conduct state of the art research and in a radius scientific fields but Nuclear Weapons technology is one of the key areas of focus. At the kansas city National Security campus our work is more than a job its a mission a mission to deter our adversaries and ensure our allies they call it the Nuclear Enterprise and it involves a lot of different moving parts with different interests different constituencies they friend. Business interests political interests military interests that all compete and try to influence where decisions are made and decisions of of course are made in the white house and in congress and so theyre appealing you know from these various groups to the white house and to congress to give them more money to fund systems and sustain factory nice introduced Delivery Systems and what have you the Savannah River site processes Nuclear Material in support of our National Defense treaty at the Savannah River so i visit during mission it is the nations only facility for extracting recycling purifying and reloading this hydrogen isotope a key component of modern Nuclear Weapons. Try to as a radioactive hydrogen isotope used the Nuclear Weapons to boost the Chain Reaction process. Its an end dispense. Substance for the u. S. Nuclear arsenal as it allows the weapons to be constructed on such a small scale that they can be delivered to their target by a missile. In. The Savannah River site. Go back to make the world safe for. The try to run for u. S. Nuclear bomb production is made at the watts bar reactor a power plant that belongs to the Tennessee Valley authority. As the u. S. No longer has uranium enrichment facilities of its own the material for the fuel rods in which the try to him is produced has to be acquired abroad. Our next stop is the german town of cornell close to the dutch border. Operates the only uranium enrichment facility in germany and is the 2nd biggest producer of enrich to uranium in the world. The us is the worlds biggest producer of Nuclear Power and your anchors number one customer but obo called says a spokesman for citizens Environmental Action group for years they have been challenging your own coast Global Operations in commercial uranium enrichment. Concert dates during cooperates a total of 4 facilities one is a growing germany across the border in the netherlands theres also a mellow in britain theres a site in cape interest and the 4th in richmond facility runs by youre in co in the us. A guy comes along between. Your ankle is a Multinational Enterprise its one 3rd owned by german Nuclear Power plant operators are. The other 2 thirds are owned by the netherlands and britain in 1007. The 3 countries signed the treaty of. Combining their research and Centrifuge Technology for commercial use but exclusively for civilian purposes. Critics and politicians from the German Parliament screen and left parties have made repeated demands for information from the government on the business dealings of your income. Hubertus stable as one of the left Party Representatives on the parliaments Environmental Committee he fears that especially in the u. S. The boundaries between civilian and military use of Nuclear Technology and material have become blurred. In the grounds of come online as often as not strict seeing as this in my opinion there is no clear line. Of Course Technology makes it possible to enrich uranium for use in Nuclear Power plants as is but with a few more revolutions per minute its equally possible to produce essentially highly enriched uranium for use in Nuclear Bombs. So what. Does hard for me does for me that means that this Enrichment Technology has a kind of generous face. This is where it becomes obvious that the demarcation between civil and military use is dissolved on the wall so there is a sizeable grey area and as far as i can see this great areas growing continuously domestically and internationally and with a huge threat potential. The treaty of almelo explicitly and categorically excludes the supply of uranium for military purposes a try National Government commission monitors compliance with the treaty but isnt reached uranium from cornell in germany also used for trading in production in the us your uncle gave us a categorical denial. Pavement. Material produced by your uncle has never been and will never be used to feed reactors that also produce try to. The companys future plans certainly do have critics sounding the alert your ankle intends to increase the uranium enrichment level at its u. S. Plant from 5 to almost 20 percent the company insists the material would be used exclusively for civilian purposes but 20 percent is the threshold beyond which the material is classified as weapons grade uranium. In the tods these are noisy busy reports or some chance came as a shock to us. Before who well you know had been mislead you know what in the German Government to do we try to ensure that we see confirmation for these assumptions and then also try to exert influence. Influence sunni minus oftens which are long blocking law this sort of set the alarm bells ringing off the German Government can exercise a veto with the scope of the treaties joint committee which essentially monitors the activities of your rango moved and germany did have that option because it considered your rank whose decision a dangerous one that appears to serve military purposes and could as such be prohibited. And charged but that did not happen. Does this new policy ought to Frankfurt GermanyFinancial Center here too nuclear critics are alarmed at the investment behavior of the banks dont bank on the bomb is the title of a study conducted by the pacs and i can organizations that examined who the investors are behind the Nuclear Weapons corporations. And the list includes states at bank the Central Institution of sap. 100 cooperative banks in germany visitors to deeds at annual general meeting plead ignorance for apathy just yet for getting this who wants to invest in Arms Companies it could mean helping to exasperate the problems we already have in the world. Before you would think would you really dont like to see it that from a president i think as a shareholder no. I cant comment on that. Were you aware of it. In my opinion thats not the case. We werent allowed to film at the a. G. M. Itself as it is not the bank tells us a public event we asked did said about its financial stake in u. S. Nuclear weapons maker Northrop Grumman but were told it had no such stake and no business relations at all with the company. I can beg to differ. But theres a bank is involved of a Union Investment in a subsidiary that manages an equity fund called uni global. Ball thats about fun for example invests in Northrop Grumman which is also an arm supplier. Northrop grumman its another of these cloned lumber its. Im one of the manufacturers and services Nuclear Weapons. Head and stands. So the bank has an indirect investment by its subsidiary and the researchers from i can have the proof. If you look at uni global its half yearly report you can see in page 8 that theres a bank invests not only in Northrop Grumman but also in the other big nuclear arms manufacturers and service or. Honeywell international incorporated. Today Philip Schultz and his fellow competitors are protesting outside georgia back in for lent. They want to raise Awareness Among customers in the hope the companies will eventually stop banking on the bomb they are convinced that only public pressure can prompt the big investors to reconsider. Its magnify much yet handing out fliers on the streets of berlin i find that most people shrug you off or act as if they dont have much to do with it although everyone has a bank account and hardly anyone is with alternative banks. And whether its deutsche a bank or some Partner Institution the german banks are all ultimately involved in this deadly 1000000000. 00 business. To me i was at. Abu dhabi as host i taxed the biggest arms fair in the middle east itself one of the most dangerous regions in the world. To go out to the silver that you believe why am. I. Up on the past it showcase of military hardware hosted by a country with a population of less than half of berlin. The middle east is currently the leading region in the world by the volume of arms purchased. Their us nations here are enemies of iran and have a permanent eye on its ongoing conflict with the us. Since washington withdrew from the Iran Nuclear Deal some fear there is a growing danger of iran itself becoming a Nuclear Power in the not too distant future it could take just one spark to detonate the most dangerous political power on the planet iran currently has no Nuclear Weapons but its Missile Technology could pose a serious threat to American Warships and military bases in the region. If iran can start striking. These targets with accuracy you could see a kind of almost like a pearl harbor type situation where iran sees an opportunity that it can disable and throw into disarray u. S. Forces in the area u. S. Would then have to face a choice of whether to launch a massive effort to kind of reinserted itself into the area and it its difficult to say how the United States would deal with that situation. Errant Missile Defense and integrated command and control systems are the stars of this years arms fair. In view of the growing threat of war with iran the focus for many customers here is on responding to surprise attacks by the conventional or nuclear. The world is an increasingly dangerous place with escalation and war looming over a range of hotspots around the globe. And in a World WithoutNuclear Arms Control and disarmament treaties where the major powers are entering a new phase of confrontation the use of Nuclear Weapons is no longer inconceivable. What were saying is we are we dont know how a nuclear war would go and god forbid it would be the most dangerous thing anyone had ever done but we are going to have the ability to escalate and we will we are prepared to do it because we recognize that a Nuclear World thats what you need to do with her. Thoughts about as normal a specter of Nuclear Proliferation and the possible deployment of these devastating left as seem to have disappeared after the end of the quarter war. But now a new global Nuclear Arms Race appears to be already well underway. The 1st. Euro. What unites. What divides. Cooking the books the driving force. What binds the continent together. The answers and stories a plenty good. Spotlight on people. Hunting minutes on w. The now going to be affectionate leisure but as affectionately as you can. Laddie mere putin in the middle of his Election Campaign in the year 2000 a documentary was filmed for Russian Television but director Vitali Munson captured much more publicity to turn the camera back on the young of course. Of the film secretly chronic old a power grab actually everything was precisely the structure. Featuring tom supporting roles to the freedom of russia. And the featuring a lead role like youve never seen before let me be clear with you. But i mean theres plenty of edge to the ends justify the means. To tunes witnesses starts december 13th on d w. Last. Laugh. This is the w. News laiva from the most anticipated witness in the trump impeachment hearings delivers his testimony u. S. Ambassador gordon song and says that the president to monitor pressure on ukraine to investigate trumps political rival joe biden and he claims everyone close to the president knew about. Me while u. S. Democrats spar over their ability to defeat donald trump in 2028 during the last places the debates of president ial contenders damaged