Domain Name Infringement, S.34 Restrains Judicial Interferen

The Delhi High Court on December 13 held that the ambit of Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 strictly restrained the Court from interfering in issues of interpretation of...

Related Keywords

Hawaii , United States , Hindustan , India General , India , Sudhir Makkar , Justicec Hari Shankar , Quanutum Univerisity , Jayant Mehta , Satyam Infoway , Satyam Infoway Ltd , Delhi High Court On , Hindustan Construction Company Ltd , High Court , Siffynet Solutions Ltd , Apex Court , Honble Supreme Court , Supreme Court , Authority Of India , Uttrakhand Legislature , Court Under Section , Quantum University , Delhi High Court , Conciliation Act , Hon Ble Supreme Court , Name Dispute Resolution Policy , Learned Arbitrator , Senior Advocate Mr Jayant Mehta , Quantum University Act , Senior Advocate , Judicial Interference , Arbitral Interpretation , Contractual Conventions , Hindustan Construction Company , Highways Authority , Arbitrator Tribunal , Fact Finding , Solutions Ltd , Rights Flowing , Domain Name , Quantum Univerity , Arbitral Award , Domain Name Infringement Case , Section 34 Of Arbitration Act ,