allows us to do. but congress, once again, needs to speak on this issue. it needs to assure that there's continuity of legal authorities as we repeal and replace the 2001 aumf and we also need to make sure it has a mechanism so that when there is a commitment in a new geography to say, fight isis or aqap, another terrorist group, then congress will be able to speak to that issue. so, yes. yes. >> how would you include, how would you tackle cyber in a revised version of that. nonstate actors right now it seems like some of the most dangerous ones to our infrastructure. the cyber terrorists. they're nonstate actors. maybe they're not. we can get to russia in a moment. but how would you deal with them in a revised aumf? >> well, right now they're, of course, very principled, legal