>> yep. >> drawn. then he says he disagrees with parts of it. so it's hard to analyze that without the specificity. >> what do you make of it? when you read that -- i guess the bottom line is, again, we didn't for a long time get to read that report. we only had barr's interpretation of it. and he definitely had the home-court advantage on being able to put out an interpretation that many americans have now taken to believe didn't find anything, any wrongdoing on the president's part. then some people read the report. not all legislators have read it. not all people have read it. when you read that report, you do find that there are two stories going on here. so what's congress supposed to do? >> yeah. when i read the report, whether you agree with it or not, the special counsel's report makes it clear the reason why he was not drawing a conclusion or stating a conclusion because he says it would be unfair if we were just to allege or draw a conclusion that a crime was committed then not give the